Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 1:56 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8853
Location: Covington, Washington
Saw this article and decided to pass it along. A blogger uses All-22 to rate how Sherman's coverage skills hold up.

http://presnapreads.com/2013/05/16/richard-sherman-the-numbers-the-tape-the-verdict/

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Sidney Rice 2011-2013 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 2:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3092
Nice find.

Some good data on the Sherman vs. Revis debate:

Quote:
Richard Sherman
2012 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 380
Failed coverages: 70
Shutdowns: 86
In Position: 224
Sherman’s success rate for the season: 81%

In Comparison to Darrelle Revis
2011 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 332
Failed coverages: 130
Shutdowns: 46
In Position: 156
Revis’ success rate for the season: 60.2%

It must be noted that Revis trailed the opposition’s best receiver on a weekly basis and was put in single coverage with no help at all much more often than Sherman was. He also moved into the slot or swapped to the other side of the field when necessary, something Sherman only did when Browner was suspended.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 2:19 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am
Posts: 2216
pete carroll is a college coach.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 2:21 pm 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
Awesome article. Sherm is really going to make some noise this year...

_________________
I <3 Nunchucks


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 2:44 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8853
Location: Covington, Washington
Here is Sando's take on the same article.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/99958/beyond-richard-shermans-grandstanding

Quote:
It is Sherman's combativeness, outspokenness and good humor that make him one of the more compelling figures in the NFC West. But as Fahey concludes, Sherman's brain might be his most underrated asset.

A Stanford graduate's smarts should not be underrated, but Sherman makes focusing on style over substance so easy. He has, in his brief NFL career, dismissed receiver A.J. Green as overrated, warned quarterback Peyton Manning, mocked receiver Michael Floyd, confronted Tom Brady, incited Steve Smith, played Optimus Prime to Calvin Johnson's Megatron, baited cornerback Darrelle Revis, put down receiver Roddy White, dressed down Skip Bayless, watched practice from a jetski and, perhaps most hilariously, claimed to have hired as a charity softball umpire one of the replacement officials notorious for his role in Seattle's controversial victory over Green Bay last season.

Sherman feeds off the attention, obviously. He has positioned himself prominently in any debate over which cornerback is best in the NFL, overshadowing a far more highly-drafted cornerback from his own division, Patrick Peterson, who goes about his business with only occasional references to his own prowess.

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Sidney Rice 2011-2013 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 3:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:30 am
Posts: 736
Location: Van Buren, AR from Kent-Covington, WA
Sherman=Beast


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 4:15 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:11 pm
Posts: 1242
Location: Spokane
I find it hilarious Roddy White was talking all that crap. When faced with Sherm in coverage one on one, Roddy caught one ball out of 11, and only because Sherm slipped on turf. What a joke.

_________________
For custom Seahawk backgrounds and signatures, click HERE!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:43 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 3181
Yup, that was my favorite part of the article, where you could see where all the guys lined up against Sherm and what they did.

Roddy White: 1/11
Julio Jones: 1/5

Funny thing: it really sinks home what a combination of a team effort, and individual matchups these games really are. For example, Stevie Johnson not only did very well against Sherman, he also tore up Revis as well. Very few people, even educated football ones, would call Stevie Johnson an elite WR, but he excells at matching up with the 2 best QBs in the league. Buffalo's OL was below average and their QB position stinks, so it covers up individual brilliance.

I think Kearly said it, but the more I learn about the NFL, the more I realize I don't know. I can't wait to see how much Sherman progresses this year.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:35 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Ft. Meade, MD
Quote:
In today’s NFL, quarterbacks routinely look to leave the pocket. This typically stresses the defense because it forces the secondary to cover for longer, but it is often forgotten that once a quarterback leaves the pocket defensive backs can become as physical as they like with the receivers they are covering. As soon as the opposing quarterback leaves the pocket against the Seahawks, Sherman is always looking to knock his assignment to the ground.

This may seem like a cheap move to the uninformed, but it is the smartest way to stop receivers from making big plays against you. The quickness of thought to recognize the scenario and his understanding of the rules is something that not every player possesses, even at this level.


I know this isn't what the article and thread was about, but this quote at the end got me thinking about Chris Harper. Since Russell Wilson is so adept at buying time outside the pocket, could this be one of the reasons we wanted a physical WR?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:05 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:11 pm
Posts: 1242
Location: Spokane
Erebus wrote:
Quote:
In today’s NFL, quarterbacks routinely look to leave the pocket. This typically stresses the defense because it forces the secondary to cover for longer, but it is often forgotten that once a quarterback leaves the pocket defensive backs can become as physical as they like with the receivers they are covering. As soon as the opposing quarterback leaves the pocket against the Seahawks, Sherman is always looking to knock his assignment to the ground.

This may seem like a cheap move to the uninformed, but it is the smartest way to stop receivers from making big plays against you. The quickness of thought to recognize the scenario and his understanding of the rules is something that not every player possesses, even at this level.


I know this isn't what the article and thread was about, but this quote at the end got me thinking about Chris Harper. Since Russell Wilson is so adept at buying time outside the pocket, could this be one of the reasons we wanted a physical WR?


Certainly doesn't hurt.

_________________
For custom Seahawk backgrounds and signatures, click HERE!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:24 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Ventura, CA
Erebus wrote:
Quote:
In today’s NFL, quarterbacks routinely look to leave the pocket. This typically stresses the defense because it forces the secondary to cover for longer, but it is often forgotten that once a quarterback leaves the pocket defensive backs can become as physical as they like with the receivers they are covering. As soon as the opposing quarterback leaves the pocket against the Seahawks, Sherman is always looking to knock his assignment to the ground.

This may seem like a cheap move to the uninformed, but it is the smartest way to stop receivers from making big plays against you. The quickness of thought to recognize the scenario and his understanding of the rules is something that not every player possesses, even at this level.


I know this isn't what the article and thread was about, but this quote at the end got me thinking about Chris Harper. Since Russell Wilson is so adept at buying time outside the pocket, could this be one of the reasons we wanted a physical WR?


I don't know if they thought of it specifically, but they didn't have to. Seattle wants to play physical on both sides of the ball. They want to intimidate. They give a lot of weight to a SPARQ type formula that calculates an athlete's athleticism from their weight and speed. They're trying to put as many players on the field at once who have the most weight plus speed they can find. Players with weight and speed can do a lot of things better, e.g., receivers with weight and speed are hard to push to the ground. They're also good at sealing off the defensive back. Also good at catching balls while being hit. Good at breaking tackles. Good at not fumbling. Good at blocking.

At some point, when you have enough weight and speed on the field, it's just too much. You reach a tipping point where big plays happen left and right, technical imperfections are masked by physicality, and everyone's making up for everyone else's mistakes with sheer athleticism. The margin of error for the opposition becomes small. And it's scary to opposing teams. And they just get overwhelmed the way SF was last season.

St. Louis is trying to counter on offense with mostly just speed. Fisher knows he can't compete with us on physicality. It's a smart play. It's one weakness that can be exploited if you round up the right personnel. We have trouble with speedy slot guys. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. Unfortunately for them, they don't only play the Seahawks, so designing your team to exploit us won't get you all the glory. Besides, in the end, I think we'll beat them anyway. Weight and speed is too deadly a combo.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 10:42 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am
Posts: 573
Good thing SPARQ or whatever didn't figure that prominently in the QB decisions, and we got the "midget", as some other teams fans labeled Wilson. (Can you briefly explain this SPARQ formula?) Though Wilson is fast, 4.55 or so I think. He better watch his back with Jerrod Johnson and Brady Quinn out to take his job. My money is on Jerrod Johnson to wind up as the #2.

Our receiving corps is the one place it seems we lack physicality. So yeah, maybe Harper gives us something new there.

I know Pete likes physical players. I was under the impression that SPEED was a slightly higher priority with PC, especially on defense, but he wants both.
Converting college DL to OL... yeah, those seem to be about athleticism.
But then the TE from Rice, Willson, seems to be more speed than bulldozer TE physicality. I suppose he is a nice blend of size and speed.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:25 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 3179
SE174 wrote:
I find it hilarious Roddy White was talking all that crap. When faced with Sherm in coverage one on one, Roddy caught one ball out of 11, and only because Sherm slipped on turf. What a joke.

Yet with a lot of people saying crap about Sherman and his big mouth, he gives props to Julio Jones for being one of the best.
R.White is a J.Jones wannabe, but ain't.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Article: Richard Sherman: The numbers, the tape, the verdict
 Post Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:26 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:05 am
Posts: 278
olyfan63 - check out this article:

SPARQ a Fire: Measuring the type of athlete the Seahawks hunt for

It's a link to FieldGulls, but it is a super good article on the "SPARQ" rating.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ak3000, drdiags, Google [Bot], halfrack, SeahawksRawk, smerfy01, Sprfunk, Yahoo [Bot] and 118 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.