At 87 Seattle selects Jordan Hill, DT, Penn St.

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • Don't know much about him. But like the position.

    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18499
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • It's strange that they picked a Running Back before a DT. I think a OLB is next.
    User avatar
    Axx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm


  • Seems to get into the backfield well. I like the athleticism.
    NorthwestSportsFan
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 192
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:35 am
    Location: Pasco, WA


  • MikeRob just real double high fived himself.
    User avatar
    Shock2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1115
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm


  • Don't agree with this choice. Especially with Kaseem Greene, Sean Porter, and Brandon Williams still available. I don't see Hill as the BPA available at that point (not even at his position - DT).
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3404
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • hawkfan68 wrote:Don't agree with this choice. Especially with Kaseem Greene, Sean Porter, and Brandon Williams still available. I don't see Hill as the BPA available at that point (not even at his position - DT).


    First, tell me what you don't like about this kid, then tell me who would do it better.
    dumbrabbit
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 71
    Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 3:52 pm


  • Watching his tape looks a little Rocky Bernardish.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18499
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • hawkfan68 wrote:Don't agree with this choice. Especially with Kaseem Greene, Sean Porter, and Brandon Williams still available. I don't see Hill as the BPA available at that point (not even at his position - DT).


    This has consistently been the case each year, where the FO picks someone that was lower on boards than anyone else, and they have a pretty good track record doing that. :)
    Image
    Les - "Mark, you're my favorite player"
    Mark - "Mine too!"
    User avatar
    RockHawk
    * NET Landlord *
     
    Posts: 4006
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:23 am
    Location: Owner's Box


  • dumbrabbit wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:Don't agree with this choice. Especially with Kaseem Greene, Sean Porter, and Brandon Williams still available. I don't see Hill as the BPA available at that point (not even at his position - DT).


    First, tell me what you don't like about this kid, then tell me who would do it better.


    I just named 3 guys who would be better choices in my earlier post. Jordan Hill was given a 3rd day grade (rounds 4 or later) in about every mock draft online that I have seen. Not that it means much but IMO OLB is a greater need than a backup DT. Hill's not bad but he could have been picked in the later rounds.
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3404
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • RockHawk wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:Don't agree with this choice. Especially with Kaseem Greene, Sean Porter, and Brandon Williams still available. I don't see Hill as the BPA available at that point (not even at his position - DT).


    This has consistently been the case each year, where the FO picks someone that was lower on boards than anyone else, and they have a pretty good track record doing that. :)


    Very true, RockHawk. Great point. I was looking at it from a depth side. I believe that the Seahawks are better off at DT depth wise than they are at LB. I saw Brandon Williams' name in most rankings as a top DT, Hill was much lower. Hopefully they continue their track record of finding gems and he pans out.
    Last edited by hawkfan68 on Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3404
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • Opposing fan here, Falcons myself...as you might've guessed, I'm a gigantic fan of Hill's, so I thought I'd give you guys something to be happy about in regards to him. Actually compares pretty well to Mebane in a lot of ways, but he's quicker, and his skillset is really special for the position he's playing. As to getting him in the fourth or fifth - that was a pipe dream. Some teams gave him second round grades, according to Hill, and he doesn't strike me as someone who would lie about that.



    That first guy he beats is Chance Warmack. He beats several other top 10 OL prospects throughout the video, so you know he's faced NFL caliber talent - heck, his best games have come against bigger guys because he gets under their pads better than with an agile player.

    Highlights don't tell the whole story, but more often than not they do with Hill. Penn State have fielded a great run defense ever since he's been there, and the way he continued to produce (even more) without Still shows he can do it by himself. Often double teamed, even at his size. Leverage is some of the best of any DT in the draft, as is his hand usage, and he's very quick and strong, all things considered. He isn't going to be the type of guy who collapses a pocket, but if you're looking for a great pass rushing one gap NT, he's perfect for that role.

    An interesting quote that sums up just how good he is in terms of underused statistics:

    While big names like Sharif Floyd and Star Lotulelei dominate the discussion about defensive tackles, Jordan Hill deserves to be discussed based on his stats alone. As a pass rushing DT, Hill grades out with a Snaps Per Pressure (SPP) of 13.3, which makes him the most efficient pass rusher of the DTs (slightly ahead of Sheldon Richardson) and more efficient than some pass rushing DEs like Datone Jones. Hill also had the most combined tackles in the backfield and 1-2 yards from the LOS (25 tackles), more than any defensive tackle. Based on these metrics alone, Hill should be considered solid all-around DT to be picked earlier than the 4th-5th round he’s projected in.


    He'd visited Atlanta so I was hoping we could get him...congrats guys, you got a steal. You'll see a couple years from now, maybe even this year. Fantastic player.

    Looking forward to meeting you again this year.
    Falcan Moore
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 92
    Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:25 pm


  • Falcan Moore, thanks for the insight. I think most Hawks fans will be pumped and jacked about this pick soon enough.
    NorthwestSportsFan
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 192
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 8:35 am
    Location: Pasco, WA


  • Thanks, Falcon Moore. Made me feel better!
    User avatar
    bigdaddydave
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 121
    Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:26 am


  • Hill isn't a "backup DT," he's the Hawks' 3-tech of the future, and could easily start as a rookie. He was one of the most complete DT's in this draft. In the last game that he played, vs. Wisconsin, he completely abused Travis Frederick (1st round; Cowboys) for 4 quarters, to the tune of 12 tackles and 2 sacks. Had Hill not played out of position at 1-tech (NT) for the Nittany Lions out of necessity last season, his stats (TFL's, sacks, etc.) likely would have been eye-popping, never mind the fact that he played with a slightly bum knee in 2012, which he had scoped after the season, and is now back to 100%. Highly underrated, scheme-versatile, 3-down player who could be a star in the Seahawks system with how they mix, match and rotate their DL's based on situations.
    User avatar
    NorthDallas40oz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 584
    Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:04 pm


  • NorthDallas40oz wrote:Hill isn't a "backup DT," he's the Hawks' 3-tech of the future, and could easily start as a rookie. He was one of the most complete DT's in this draft. In the last game that he played, vs. Wisconsin, he completely abused Travis Frederick (1st round; Cowboys) for 4 quarters, to the tune of 12 tackles and 2 sacks. Had Hill not played out of position at 1-tech (NT) for the Nittany Lions out of necessity last season, his stats (TFL's, sacks, etc.) likely would have been eye-popping, never mind the fact that he played with a slightly bum knee in 2012, which he had scoped after the season, and is now back to 100%. Highly underrated, scheme-versatile, 3-down player who could be a star in the Seahawks system with how they mix, match and rotate their DL's based on situations.


    Very insightful post. Thanks.
    User avatar
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5012
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0


  • In Quinn I trust. Hill does two things I like very well, he's a very good interior pass rusher which we really missed in the playoffs. He is a very good lateral run support defender. This is a guy who can play three downs for you. Deep DL draft and we get one who fits the bill. Can't complain. We still have 10 picks tomorrow. Four of the next 64 picks. Go, Hawks!
    I'm In!


    What attracted you to the Seahawks?
    “It’s a combination of what I believe the coaches are doing here, the atmosphere and what I think we’re going to do here in the future. I think we’re going to win and win a lot and be a championship team.” – Zac Miller, August 4, 2011
    User avatar
    Seafan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3337
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:30 pm
    Location: Helotes, TX


  • Jordan Hill was a player I really liked a ton early in the process, but drifted away from once I noticed that he's more of an "effort" DT than a physically imposing one. Back in January I liked him more than most and for a brief time I thought he deserved to be in the conversation with the draft's top defensive tackles (Floyd, Sly Williams, Short, etc). In fact, when I wrote my DT article back in Late February I included Jordan Hill in my analysis of the top DTs even though most sites had him listed as a late rounder. I eventually cooled on Hill and stopped talking about him once I realized that he's essentially a poor man's Sharrif Floyd, and I was NOT a fan of Floyd's, essentially considering him the Aaron Curry of defensive tackles. (Or perhaps a more accurate comparison would be him as a Floyd/Short hybrid: He has Sharrif Floyd's two-gapping ability and lack of pass rush combined with Kawann Short's quickness and gap slipperiness but also Short's poor run anchor and lack of strength).

    Here is what I wrote about Hill two months ago:

    Jordan Hill:

    Hill isn’t very big nor does he anchor well, but he is probably good enough against drive blocks to be a non-specialist defensive tackle. He partially makes up for this by being consistently very fast off the snap, and keeps a good pad level.

    Hill’s uses his arms a lot like a 3-4 defensive end would, excelling at disengaging via extension, not unlike Greg Scruggs but with shorter, weaker arms. He has excellent backfield vision and tracks the ball well. If I had to highlight Hill for being the best at anything out of this group, I think he might have the best short area quickness. He can cover two yards side to side very fast, and despite being weak to interior drive blocks he’s actually an asset against slower developing stretch runs because he can disengage and cover short areas of grass very quickly. Not only is he very quick, but he’s exceptionally instinctive and knows where to move to keep a runner in front of him while keeping his shoulders square.

    Unfortunately, Hill can’t seem to use his shed ability to actually swim past defenders, which I theorize is from a lack of functional upper body strength. If he had it, I think he’d be using it. He also lacks lower body strength and is impotent as a bull rusher.

    Hill is a bit like Kawann-Short-lite as a 3-tech. He can sometimes slip through exploitable mistakes but he doesn’t force guards back. He could be a serviceable 3-tech, but not a star. I like him more as a 3-4 defensive end, where he can use his quickness around the edge more and will get more mileage out of his talent for two-gapping and reading the football. Then again, Hill stands just 6’1″ and doesn’t appear to have the longest arms, so he’d be a bit of a gamble in such a role. Those factors might explain why he’s expected to be drafted in the mid to late rounds despite having some talent.


    Bottom line, I think Hill is a high floor, low ceilling option at defensive tackle that might make a nice option for the Red Bryant role in the future. He's good for a few nifty plays a game in the backfield, but he's not a dominant force. In terms of upside, there were many other DTs who are better that Seattle passed on for Hill. In fairness, Stefan Charles may have the highest upside of them all and he could last into the late rounds, and it's not inconceivable that Seattle could draft a second defensive lineman with a late pick.

    I don't think John Schneider is immune to reach picks. I don't think Irvin was a reach, and I don't think Carpenter was a reach and I absolutely didn't think that Wagner was a reach. That said, I felt EJ Wilson was a big reach in 2010 as was Kris Durham in 2011. I wasn't wild on the value of the Jaye Howard pick either. Though I like Hill, I think I'd feel safe calling this pick a reach. I feel pretty good about Hill reaching the 5th or 6th round, and even if he didn't, there were better options available when Seattle picked him.

    Not a horrible pick, but I think in four years time every Seahawks fan (if not every NFL fan) will know Christine Michael's name, but only the dedicated among the Seahawks faithful will know who Jordan Hill is, because I think he's pretty likely to be an NFL average player.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 10306
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • We finally get the DT talent we've been hungry for as fans and we can't see the forest for the trees.

    Great post Falcan Moore please don't be a stranger around here.
    User avatar
    Beeker
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 145
    Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:36 pm


  • kearly wrote:Jordan Hill was a player I really liked a ton early in the process, but drifted away from once I noticed that he's more of an "effort" DT than a physically imposing one. Back in January I liked him more than most and for a brief time I thought he deserved to be in the conversation with the draft's top defensive tackles (Floyd, Sly Williams, Short, etc). In fact, when I wrote my DT article back in Late February I included Jordan Hill in my analysis of the top DTs even though most sites had him listed as a late rounder. I eventually cooled on Hill and stopped talking about him once I realized that he's essentially a poor man's Sharrif Floyd, and I was NOT a fan of Floyd's, essentially considering him the Aaron Curry of defensive tackles. (Or perhaps a more accurate comparison would be him as a Floyd/Short hybrid: He has Sharrif Floyd's two-gapping ability and lack of pass rush combined with Kawann Short's quickness and gap slipperiness but also Short's poor run anchor and lack of strength).

    Here is what I wrote about Hill two months ago:

    Jordan Hill:

    Hill isn’t very big nor does he anchor well, but he is probably good enough against drive blocks to be a non-specialist defensive tackle. He partially makes up for this by being consistently very fast off the snap, and keeps a good pad level.

    Hill’s uses his arms a lot like a 3-4 defensive end would, excelling at disengaging via extension, not unlike Greg Scruggs but with shorter, weaker arms. He has excellent backfield vision and tracks the ball well. If I had to highlight Hill for being the best at anything out of this group, I think he might have the best short area quickness. He can cover two yards side to side very fast, and despite being weak to interior drive blocks he’s actually an asset against slower developing stretch runs because he can disengage and cover short areas of grass very quickly. Not only is he very quick, but he’s exceptionally instinctive and knows where to move to keep a runner in front of him while keeping his shoulders square.

    Unfortunately, Hill can’t seem to use his shed ability to actually swim past defenders, which I theorize is from a lack of functional upper body strength. If he had it, I think he’d be using it. He also lacks lower body strength and is impotent as a bull rusher.

    Hill is a bit like Kawann-Short-lite as a 3-tech. He can sometimes slip through exploitable mistakes but he doesn’t force guards back. He could be a serviceable 3-tech, but not a star. I like him more as a 3-4 defensive end, where he can use his quickness around the edge more and will get more mileage out of his talent for two-gapping and reading the football. Then again, Hill stands just 6’1″ and doesn’t appear to have the longest arms, so he’d be a bit of a gamble in such a role. Those factors might explain why he’s expected to be drafted in the mid to late rounds despite having some talent.


    Bottom line, I think Hill is a high floor, low ceilling option at defensive tackle that might make a nice option for the Red Bryant role in the future. He's good for a few nifty plays a game in the backfield, but he's not a dominant force. In terms of upside, there were many other DTs who are better that Seattle passed on for Hill. In fairness, Stefan Charles may have the highest upside of them all and he could last into the late rounds, and it's not inconceivable that Seattle could draft a second defensive lineman with a late pick.

    I don't think John Schneider is immune to reach picks. I don't think Irvin was a reach, and I don't think Carpenter was a reach and I absolutely didn't think that Wagner was a reach. That said, I felt EJ Wilson was a big reach in 2010 as was Kris Durham in 2011. I wasn't wild on the value of the Jaye Howard pick either. Though I like Hill, I think I'd feel safe calling this pick a reach. I feel pretty good about Hill reaching the 5th or 6th round, and even if he didn't, there were better options available when Seattle picked him.

    Not a horrible pick, but I think in four years time every Seahawks fan (if not every NFL fan) will know Christine Michael's name, but only the dedicated among the Seahawks faithful will know who Jordan Hill is, because I think he's pretty likely to be an NFL average player.


    I agree with ya here kearly, really thought there were better options available when we took Hill. Hopefully I am wrong. I really want to love what the hawks have done so far, but unfortunately I am not really a fan of either pick.
    Image
    User avatar
    Blitzer88
    * NET Eeyore *
     
    Posts: 10831
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Pasco, WA



  • kearly - your way smarter than me when it comes to this, but I look at his arms in the pictures and videos out there. To me, I see a Defensive tackle that is highly underdeveloped with ALOT of room to grow where it will matter most for him - in his core. With proper nutrition and a real full time strength and conditioning program, think about whaty he will grow into. He has a huge bubble, but underdeveloped upper body (his bench press actually reflects this, there is room to grow there). His hand technique is already highly developed and a considered a plus. He shows he knows how to play Low in those videos, but his lack of strength hurts him.

    To help him grow, we are puting him under the tutilidge of what may be considered the premiere DL coach. Quinn wanted him for a reason. This guy is going to fit in in a major way. Look at late tape - I'm totally jazzed about this pick - I fully expect that they pack at least another 10 to 15 pounds of muscle on his frame.
    Last edited by Uberman on Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Image
    User avatar
    Uberman
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 34
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:37 am


  • 12 tackles and 2 sacks in a game vs an Wisconsion O-Line is not to shabby.

    Not sure what he projects to in the future on our line, but could see big role for him this season being coming in for Mebane in Nickel packages and obvious passing downs.
    User avatar
    GCrow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 678
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:05 am
    Location: Canada


  • I actually don't get what Kearly's talking about with the arms...he actually has pretty strangely long arms for a DT his size, 33 1/2 inches.

    To compare, that's as long as a guy like Sly Williams, while longer than Hankins, Brandon Williams, or Montori Hughes. Only a tenth of an inch smaller than Lotulelei and a half inch smaller than John Jenkins. Not to mention, he has the longest arms of any DT this year of his height (though there aren't many with his height so it's not saying a ton).

    He can get stronger in his upper body, that's my biggest thing with him. That and learning to anchor more consistently, though if you want him as a 3-tech that's less of a big deal. If he does learn those things...well, I don't know a ton of scouts, so I'm not going to pretend to be "in the know," but I take a big interest in DTs, so I ask about them a lot. Of the few I've talked to, when I asked which late round DT they thought had the most Geno Atkins-like upside, two said Hill without question. I don't think he's on that level, but I definitely look forward to seeing what he does.
    Falcan Moore
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 92
    Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:25 pm


  • I see a guy who stunts well and has great mobility. He has great hands to disengage. He was everywhere. I like
    this pic. Wow! I am sure because of his build he will draw comparisons to Darby. In my opinion this guy is more agile and energetic.
    Last edited by Atradees on Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Image
    Cassius Marsh is my 2014 Adopt a Pro Bowl Rookie
    User avatar
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2532
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
    Location: South of Heaven


  • Might just be the Kool-Aid, but I trust PC and JS. Excited to see Hill in action
    February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized
    User avatar
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 4650
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm


  • I agree with kearly, i like all the reaches that have worked out for the seahakws in the past 3 years. Im also against all the reaches that havent worked out, that sounds good right. I dont like ahtletic defensive tackles with all the physical tools neccasary to play in the nfl.I dont like drafting defensive tackles that dominated nfl caliber talent in college. I dont like drafting players in the 3rd round with 1st round production, what was our gm thinking.
    cockeyhawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 295
    Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:41 pm


  • We'll see how it goes, I think it's great we have analyst here who study film and have opinions, I think JS has reached on some guys in the past and while a lot have panned out, some have not. I think he's earned the right to let these guys compete -- I'm not so worried about "Who we could have had" I'm more concerned with how well is the guy we took going to produce.
    WestcoastSteve
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1141
    Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm


  • I echo Falcon Moore on what others are saying about Hill. Danny Kelly re-tweeted an opinion one of the Bengals bloggers had to say about Hill

    Danny Kelly ‏@FieldGulls 1h
    Whoa RT@JoeGoodberry: Everyone always comparing mid round DTs to Geno Atkins, but Hill is the first DT that actually warranted it from me.


    Knowing what I do about our FO over the past few years, I give them the benefit of the doubt. They are not infallible but if they come close to what others are saying, I won't complain.
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9091
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington


  • He has some of the most unique highlights I've seen from the DTs. He moves like a LB, very natural in space, and is very hard to cut. I definitely think Hill fits in with Pete's motto of 'tell me what you can do, not what you can't.' He's a slasher and gets up-field. I'm going to have a lot of fun seeing how the Hawks use him. Like Pete and John said today in their presser, he's very different than their other interior d-lineman.
    Tall men come down to my height when I hit 'em in the body.

    Jack Dempsey
    User avatar
    Fuzzman55
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1566
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:10 pm


  • Falcan Moore, thanks for your post! Great insight.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2226
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am



  • Falcan Moore wrote:Opposing fan here, Falcons myself...as you might've guessed, I'm a gigantic fan of Hill's, so I thought I'd give you guys something to be happy about in regards to him. Actually compares pretty well to Mebane in a lot of ways, but he's quicker, and his skillset is really special for the position he's playing. As to getting him in the fourth or fifth - that was a pipe dream. Some teams gave him second round grades, according to Hill, and he doesn't strike me as someone who would lie about that.



    That first guy he beats is Chance Warmack. He beats several other top 10 OL prospects throughout the video, so you know he's faced NFL caliber talent - heck, his best games have come against bigger guys because he gets under their pads better than with an agile player.

    Highlights don't tell the whole story, but more often than not they do with Hill. Penn State have fielded a great run defense ever since he's been there, and the way he continued to produce (even more) without Still shows he can do it by himself. Often double teamed, even at his size. Leverage is some of the best of any DT in the draft, as is his hand usage, and he's very quick and strong, all things considered. He isn't going to be the type of guy who collapses a pocket, but if you're looking for a great pass rushing one gap NT, he's perfect for that role.

    An interesting quote that sums up just how good he is in terms of underused statistics:

    While big names like Sharif Floyd and Star Lotulelei dominate the discussion about defensive tackles, Jordan Hill deserves to be discussed based on his stats alone. As a pass rushing DT, Hill grades out with a Snaps Per Pressure (SPP) of 13.3, which makes him the most efficient pass rusher of the DTs (slightly ahead of Sheldon Richardson) and more efficient than some pass rushing DEs like Datone Jones. Hill also had the most combined tackles in the backfield and 1-2 yards from the LOS (25 tackles), more than any defensive tackle. Based on these metrics alone, Hill should be considered solid all-around DT to be picked earlier than the 4th-5th round he’s projected in.


    He'd visited Atlanta so I was hoping we could get him...congrats guys, you got a steal. You'll see a couple years from now, maybe even this year. Fantastic player.

    Looking forward to meeting you again this year.


    Wonderful post.
    User avatar
    DavidSeven
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3456
    Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am


  • Huge Penn st fan Jordan Hill is good real good very happy with this pick. He was a beast at state hope he keeps it up. I love this pick.
    The office of Thomas and Chancellor specializing in Defense.
    thegreeninyoureye
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 356
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:47 pm


  • Falcan Moore wrote:I actually don't get what Kearly's talking about with the arms...he actually has pretty strangely long arms for a DT his size, 33 1/2 inches.

    To compare, that's as long as a guy like Sly Williams, while longer than Hankins, Brandon Williams, or Montori Hughes. Only a tenth of an inch smaller than Lotulelei and a half inch smaller than John Jenkins. Not to mention, he has the longest arms of any DT this year of his height (though there aren't many with his height so it's not saying a ton).

    He can get stronger in his upper body, that's my biggest thing with him. That and learning to anchor more consistently, though if you want him as a 3-tech that's less of a big deal. If he does learn those things...well, I don't know a ton of scouts, so I'm not going to pretend to be "in the know," but I take a big interest in DTs, so I ask about them a lot. Of the few I've talked to, when I asked which late round DT they thought had the most Geno Atkins-like upside, two said Hill without question. I don't think he's on that level, but I definitely look forward to seeing what he does.


    Well, I wrote that before the arm measurements were out, and didn't exactly say he had short arms, just said he didn't have visibly long arms. I never thought arm length was a problem for him, my issue came with how he only controls gaps and struggles to get past blockers. He lacks strength of all 3 varieties (upper, lower, core), and that makes him more of a finesse controller with high effort and quickness than a beast type.

    I like Jordan Hill, and I think in a normal year I'd call it a great pick. But in the 2013 draft which is insanely deep, I'm pretty sure we could have had him much later in the draft, and there were several other DTs with much higher upside, IMO. He was a solid pick in a draft where I'll expect solid picks in the 6th and 7th rounds.

    Side note- I don't think there is a Geno Atkins this year. Atkins ran a 4.75 forty at the combine. Datone Jones was the only true DT this year who came close, with a 4.80 (Hill was a 5.17 at the combine, and a 5.03 at his pro-day). Atkins was a special athlete with monster upside but was overlooked because he lacked production. I think Hill is more comparable to someone like Stephen Paea with less strength and run defense.

    Again, I'm not a Hill hater. Hell, I was touting him as a hidden gem in the draft for a couple months. Back in January I was railing hard against the "DT or Bust" crowd with our 1st round pick, pointing to Jordan Hill specifically and saying "we can get this guy later and he's 90% as good." My opinion of Hill has cooled slightly since then, but I get the enthusiasm. Believe me, I do.

    I'm just giving the fairest evaluation I possibly can. He's not a bad prospect, but I would have waited at least two rounds later before taking him, personally.
    Last edited by kearly on Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 10306
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • I'm sure we'll get the down low on this guy in the next RRR. Although, the opinion might be a bit biased! But, it will also be worth hearing what Mike Rob has to say about this kid, Rob is generally a really honest guy.
    Image

    Go Hawks.
    User avatar
    SouthSoundHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2108
    Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am


  • Pete Carroll wants to get after the QB.

    Hill looks like he will be overpowered by double teams in the run game, but his use of his hands to disengage and his closing speed appear top notch.

    This guy is an interior pass rusher. He will be a niche player that will come in on packages dictated by down and distance.

    Think of how the Colts built their defense around Manning. They could get beat by the running game, but most of the time they were playing with a lead and consistently put the pressure on.

    Carroll is adding players for that scenario. Seattle mitigates the late comebacks by Atlanta, Miami, and Detroit with interior rushers like Hill.
    His closing speed is what got their attention.

    The bottom line is that when Russell Wilson gets you that late game lead, you need guys like Hill pressuring from the inside to seal the deal. The opponents ability to overpower him with the run game is of little concern under such circumstances.

    I really like the pick and I think Hill contributes well within his niche. The Niner's O-line/Gore will wallop him with the run game in the first half, but if Seattle has a two score lead, Hill will be a pain in their backside in the second half. I expect that Carroll will put him in a position to succeed.
    Last edited by Mick063 on Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:23 pm, edited 3 times in total.
    Mick063
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 225
    Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:11 pm


  • The Seahawks had Hill (supposedly, **wink-wink**) as a player they were considering to pick in the 2nd round, along with Michael. So whether we personally agree with picking Hill in the 3rd or 5th round, they spent a few months thinking about this player and had assigned him a much higher value to the organization.

    If we are to believe that Dan Quinn knows his stuff, then to me just like the Irvin pick, I am going to wait to see what they saw in the player.

    EDIT: Nice post Mick063
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9091
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington


  • kearly wrote:I would have waited at least two rounds later before taking him, personally.


    If JS made a pick that someone didn't feel was a reach, I would start to worry.

    He's making his name off of guys that everyone feels "meh" about. Williams was supposed to be better than Okung. Lynch was a thug only worth a 4th round pick. Sherman was a converted WR and Browner was too big to player corner.

    I had a pretty good laugh today with Sando's blog about how predictable the Niner's draft is. He said it is because the FO has been around a few years and we can see their trends. I don't know if there is a person on this planet that can predict what our FO is gonna do next and I love that about them.

    As for Hill himself, I think you have to look at him in a bubble. Where does he really fit in the d line? He's unlikely to start and he's more of a pass rusher more than a run stuffer. So he's likely going to be in a crazy pass rush package that we come up with. If his game is all about effort, than our secondary should allow him to put that to good use to create pressure.

    As for the elite skills versus effort thing, some of our best players are effort/intangible guys. You don't have to look any further than our starting RB. He does not have elite speed or cutting ability. He just has heart and determination.
    User avatar
    amill87
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1331
    Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:35 pm


  • :sarcasm_on: He doesnt have a grill or rock dreads so I don't like the pick. :sarcasm_off:
    User avatar
    morgulon1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3486
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:07 am
    Location: Spokane, Wa


  • Mick063 wrote:Hill looks like he will be overpowered by double teams in the run game, but his use of his hands to disengage and his closing speed appear top notch.


    Most guys get overpowered by double teams. It takes a strange freak of nature to battle two NFL-caliber guys and come out on top. If he's a great interior pass rusher with great closing speed, then he's the right pick for this organization.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18160
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:
    Mick063 wrote:Hill looks like he will be overpowered by double teams in the run game, but his use of his hands to disengage and his closing speed appear top notch.


    Most guys get overpowered by double teams. It takes a strange freak of nature to battle two NFL-caliber guys and come out on top. If he's a great interior pass rusher with great closing speed, then he's the right pick for this organization.


    I'm not going to disagree with you, but some players hold up better than others. Sometimes an interior lineman just needs to anchor a 3 foot area for an extra half second so the mike linebacker can make a play. A guy like the Raven's nose tackle can anchor a spot long enough to be effective. Perhaps they all get beat by double teams. Some get beat a little worse.

    I don't expect Carroll will put Hill in that position. Carroll will put Hill in a position to succeed.
    Mick063
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 225
    Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:11 pm


  • amill87 wrote:
    kearly wrote:I would have waited at least two rounds later before taking him, personally.




    I had a pretty good laugh today with Sando's blog about how predictable the Niner's draft is. He said it is because the FO has been around a few years and we can see their trends. I don't know if there is a person on this planet that can predict what our FO is gonna do next and I love that about them.

    .


    Just for the record and for fun, Kearly did hit on the Michael pick, and I myself has advocated Jordan Hill selection throughout the draft process mocking him to the Seahawks between the 2nd - 4th rounds. But Hill was the guy that I wanted, my one constant, I wanted him in Seahawk blue, much like I wanted Mebane, as well as, Bryant in Seahawks blue in their respective draft classes.
    If I seem too passionate, it’s because I care. And if I come on too strong, it’s because I feel strongly. And if I push too hard, it’s because things aren’t moving fast enough. This is my home, you are my family, and I promise you, I’m not going anywhere.” - L.K.
    Pandion Haliaetus
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1647
    Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:07 pm


  • I dunno...I like the pick and don't feel it's a reach. I love how nimble and slippery this guys is. He won't physically dominate in the sense of bull rushing or collapsing the pocket, but the dude is quick and slippery, and he gets behind the LOS quite regularly regardless of OL size. That could be Kryptonite for big, corn-fed OLs like the Whiners. The guy has some unique skills that are hard to grade in traditional fashion when looking at DL players. Yeah, he won't totally dominate, but I think he's gonna be a head scratcher to protect against. If anyone can maximize his unique skillset, it's Quinn and PC.
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2528
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm


  • Looks like our Justin Smith equivalent I like it!
    43-8...it's all about that action boss....
    next man up.
    User avatar
    MizzouHawkGal
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6352
    Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:46 pm
    Location: Kansas City, MO


  • He's underated i think he'll be a good player for us. Pete and John have a track record of identifying players that are better than there draft grade .
    User avatar
    General Manager
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2192
    Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm


  • He fits as a back-up for Red Bryant and Mebane and can rotate anywhere.
    Driver of the PC/JS Super Bowl wagon since 2010
    Image
    Sherman looks like a ballet master in grand jeté –
    a trash-talking, dreadlocked Baryshnikov suspended
    impossibly above the turf – pro football's paean to
    wanton human destruction slips into the sublime.
    User avatar
    TDOTSEAHAWK
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2931
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:16 pm
    Location: Hamilton


  • Kearly knows his stuff and I respect his opinion. There's a contradiction here though. The guy kicked butt on Wisconsin. He kicked butt on some very good olinemen. I always say actions speak louder than words. And Quinn wanted him. I just don't think this guy's a reach. But hey, that's the fun of preseason, seeing who pans out and who doesn't. It's a crap shoot and the Hawks have shown they're better than most at crap shooting.
    Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

    R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
    User avatar
    SalishHawkFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4488
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm


  • KCHawkGirl wrote:Looks like our Justin Smith equivalent I like it!


    LOL, no, Justin is a pocket collapser and run plugger who can occupy double teams. He doesn't rely on slipping by people, but instead dominates with power and brute strength. Very stout at the point of attack. Entirely different athlete.
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2528
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm


  • KCHawkGirl wrote:Looks like our Justin Smith equivalent I like it!


    Might be a stretch to compare him to the best all around DE in the game.
    <A>
    <IMG></A>
    User avatar
    McGruff
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 1548
    Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:14 am
    Location: Blaine, WA


  • My favourite pick of the draft. Anyone who's compared to Geno Atkins excites me - he's almost the exact same height and weight as Geno and he looks like he can easily add more bulk up top. I don't know a whole lot about him but if he was nursing an injury at combine then his measurables can be even better when fully healthy.

    Looking at those game highlights, he seems to have a knack for sliding around and making plays. Wasn't Geno Atkins's crutch that he didn't produce as much as he should in college? I think Hill could be the same sort of steal. If he is, then we've just found the last piece of a championship defense.
    User avatar
    WorcesterHawks
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 89
    Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:46 am
    Location: Worcester


Next


It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:17 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information