Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:30 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
Hawknballs wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:

Logic: The practice squad is where you put players who will be good in a year. When they are in better shape. And more prepared. Pete didn't do that.



yes. Players that have also been playing football for the past several years.

Not sitting in a prison cell.

Great logic.


Ours is the FO who just signed a basketball player with no college experience to a real contract, so he can play tight end, maybe. If they thought Banks had potential, they would have signed him.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:33 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3092
Scottemojo wrote:
Hawknballs wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:

Logic: The practice squad is where you put players who will be good in a year. When they are in better shape. And more prepared. Pete didn't do that.



yes. Players that have also been playing football for the past several years.

Not sitting in a prison cell.

Great logic.


Ours is the FO who just signed a basketball player with no college experience to a real contract, so he can play tight end, maybe. If they thought Banks had potential, they would have signed him.


Not really fair. Fells has maintained conditioning as a professional athlete (albeit a different sport). His speed, endurance, strength, etc. has likely been unaffected by not playing football.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:44 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am
Posts: 2216
Fells, A conditioned athlete with insane measurables with a minimal 1.5m/3 year "real" contract basically to make sure he is in camp without visiting any other teams is quite a bit different than the banks situation.

FYI Fells is the minimum per year, and nothing is guaranteed. So basically he can be cut at any time.

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seah ... ren-fells/

0 risk high reward for a 6'7" 280 LB tight end.

He was signed so he wouldn't get snatched up by other teams. That obviously wasn't the case for Banks for obvious reasons.

Not sure what is relevant about that or what your point is.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:47 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
DavidSeven wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
Hawknballs wrote:


yes. Players that have also been playing football for the past several years.

Not sitting in a prison cell.

Great logic.


Ours is the FO who just signed a basketball player with no college experience to a real contract, so he can play tight end, maybe. If they thought Banks had potential, they would have signed him.


Not really fair. Fells has maintained conditioning as a professional athlete (albeit a different sport). His speed, endurance, strength, etc. has likely been unaffected by not playing football.

And Brian Banks was training with a trainer that gets players ready for the draft for quite a while before his Hawks tryout. Point is, neither has played football at all for a long time. Banks was not signed to the expanded 90 man roster, 10 more players than normal. Instead, Seattle signed a 220 pound LB, Kyle Knox, to the spot Banks was trying to get.

Yeah, I know, I didn't remember Knox either.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:51 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am
Posts: 2216
I still don't see your point, you're talking about a year removed from whatever condition Banks is in now. I'm not sure what that has to do with last year's 90 man roster or whatever you're going on about.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:58 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
Hawknballs wrote:
I still don't see your point, you're talking about a year removed from whatever condition Banks is in now. I'm not sure what that has to do with last year's 90 man roster or whatever you're going on about.



Image

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 11:43 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:18 pm
Posts: 280
Because its been a year, hes had a few attempts with teams now, and is 27. Other people need to stop being illogical. This was a feel good story last year... ESPN is just trying to rehash the same damn story for some ratings.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:05 pm 
* Dirty Harry *
* Dirty Harry *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
Posts: 5424
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Scottemojo wrote:
Hawknballs wrote:
I still don't see your point, you're talking about a year removed from whatever condition Banks is in now. I'm not sure what that has to do with last year's 90 man roster or whatever you're going on about.



Image


Dude! That's Giorgio the Ancient Aliens guy!

_________________
"God bless America, and God bless the Seattle Seahawks" - Cortez Kennedy


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What was the reason the Seahawks didn't sign Brian Banks?
 Post Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am
Posts: 2216
Ah the ancient aliens concession.

I accept.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], hawknation2014, jasehawk, Largefarva, NoChops, SmokinHawk, Sprfunk, UK_Seahawk and 70 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.