Winfield Visiting Seattle UPDATE:Who knows anything amirite?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:17 am
  • The perfect veteran addition to our defense. I'd prefer him to Woodson, Urlacher, Freeney, or Abraham as it stands right now. He would be an immediate upgrade at one of our teams biggest weaknesses. This would be an instant impact move and I see no downside here, he'd keep the young DB's in line, make plays and give us more flexability in the draft.

    I am for drafting a nickel CB but to get a potential starting nickle CB we'd have to spend a 2nd or 3rd. Wouldn't you rather use that somewhere else?

    Could it be that Lane and Maxwell are not meant for the slot? WT3 is soo injury prone that unless he absolutly dominates when he gets on the field his roster spot needs to be considered available.

    Let's get Winfield and when we play in the SB against Denver or NE he will match up perfect against Welker or Amendola
    Last edited by Wenhawk on Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Image
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2139
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:42 am
  • For a nickel back, this would be an incredible steal.
    February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized
    User avatar
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 4786
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:55 am
  • Sports Hernia wrote:Thurmond is a duck, J is a duck. FWIW I like III, dude just can't stay on the field though.

    I'm a husky and I think Thurmond is an incredible talent, what's your point?

    If Thurmond could stay healthy, wow our secondary would be that much more incredible. Thurmond could play either starting CB spot and I believe there wouldn't be a huge drop off in our CB play. The problem is we can't count on him, but that shouldn't take away from his talent. And yes, I'm basing MY OPINION off the small size of Thurmond on the field.
    SUPERBOWL!!
    User avatar
    Hawkfan77
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1670
    Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:29 am
  • BlueTalon wrote:
    Nateruw wrote:He's so physical against the run that I wonder if they are considering playing him at SS. Maybe Kam is getting cold feet?

    That is probably the weirdest first post I have seen on this board.

    Welcome to the .NET community, but damn.


    Thanks. Just trying to think outside the box. Obviously he is more nickel material and most likely insurance for Thurman. But Kam's contract situation reminds me a little of Clem's last year. Signing Winfield could also add some insurance for a Kam holdout if we are willing to move him around for run support. After all we are trying to extend Kam and with the freed up cap space from Flynn's trade, it seems a little wierd to be bringing in another vet when JS is on record saying we are working on our own guys. Especially when we can front load Kam's deal right now, no?
    Nateruw
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 17
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:41 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:43 am
  • Hope something comes of this visit, I would love to get him on the cheap!
    User avatar
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2645
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
    Location: Battle Ground, Wa


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:48 am
  • I'm sold. Get it done son.
    Image
    User avatar
    Largent80
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 22789
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
    Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:05 am
  • Coug_Hawk08 wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:
    NorthDallas40oz wrote:You might want to do a little homework before posting things like this, because saying that you prefer two wholly unproven options (incl. one with a major injury history) to the premier nickel/slot corner in the entire NFL is patently absurd. Also, Winfield isn't signing "for the minimum" somewhere "to compete" like he's some form of camp fodder. He's an elite player at what he does, he has a healthy offer on the table from the Redskins to be a starter, the Vikings are trying to get him back, and anyone who wants him is going to have to pony up.


    Thank you for the advice. I will be sure and do a minimum of 15 minutes research before sharing my meaningless opinion in each post from this point forward.

    I understand he's very good at what he does. I also know that he's 35 and that his coverage skills have already begun to decline rather dramatically although he's still very good against the run. Thurmond is the 2nd best cover corner on the team when healthy and Lane showed me a lot last year as well. I'd much rather have a decade of each of those guys then 1 year of Winfield. (although i'd gladly take all 3 and lose Trufant and Maxwell).

    Doesnt surprise me that the REdskins would offer to pay him a lot of money, their owner is one of the biggest idiots in the NFL. If Winfield is their starter on the outside WR's are going to be licking their chops, and fighting to line up across from him.


    Dude, Thurmond has proved absolutely nothing. I just dont undersrand the love fest there. He has been serviceable at best when he is actually on the field. 1 year of elite play at one of our primary weak points is a huge gain. If Thurmond and lane are so great have them try and beat out Winfield. Good luck.

    Who were the other DBS on he Vikings? Crickets. Now imagine other elite players around Winfield. Good stuff. Lets win now and develop guys like lane. We don't have to push him into a starting role just because. Signing a great player for one year is not going to hinde anyone development.


    The nature of Jseahawks' opinion becomes a little clearer when you understand that he's an Oregon U homer, and Walter Thurmond III is an Oregon U alumnus. For the record, I agree with you in that he's yet to truly prove himself for any reasonable length of time. Any player can look awesome when their sample size is about 5 minutes of film.
    Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

    He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
    User avatar
    SmokinHawk
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 5651
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
    Location: Back in Seattle


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:35 am
  • From the descriptions he sounds like a nice addition. I am from Oregon. I think Thurmond has had his chance and Marcus is not a option anymore as a rotational player. If this guy is good vs the run it means he has physical presence but I think Tru was good vs run too. As a fan I want a corner that isn't burned like Toast every third.
    Image
    Cassius Marsh is my 2014 Adopt a Pro Bowl Rookie
    User avatar
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
    Location: South of Heaven


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:40 am
  • Largent80 wrote:I'm sold. Get it done son.


    I'll give you 16 to 1 odds that Winfield is a Seahawk by next week. Book it, literally.

    Seriously though, I would be all about this move. When it comes to Minnesota Vikings joining the Seahawks, I trust bestfightstory's knowledge on the matter. If bfs thinks Winfield is the man then HE'S MANN!!! I honestly can't believe Winfield is still as effective as he is. Most corners hit the wall fast when they get old (Madison, Tru, Surtain, the list goes on and on), not this dude. And he hits like a mofo, IMO the perfect fit at Nickel CB and not only that but with Winfield/Lane/the idea of Walter Thurmond III/Maxwell/possible draftee you're almost guaranteed to improve upon Tru's performance in the position last season.

    Do work Johnny S!
    Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/
    User avatar
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1394
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:40 am
  • I like it. If he's available at a reasonable price, it just adds depth to one of our areas of strength. I'm comfortable with WTIII and Gay, but Winfield is a more proven commodity, and adds experience as well. It's a no lose proposition IMO.
    RyPants
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 11
    Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:27 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:43 am
  • SmokinHawk wrote:The nature of Jseahawks' opinion becomes a little clearer when you understand that he's an Oregon U homer, and Walter Thurmond III is an Oregon U alumnus. For the record, I agree with you in that he's yet to truly prove himself for any reasonable length of time. Any player can look awesome when their sample size is about 5 minutes of film.


    Ah, I forgot that Jseahawks was all about the O.

    I bet the Raiders watched those 5 minutes closely, and are strongly considering sending us 2 future draft picks for him.
    User avatar
    Coug_Hawk08
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2957
    Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:26 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:45 am
  • SmokinHawk wrote:The nature of Jseahawks' opinion becomes a little clearer when you understand that he's an Oregon U homer, and Walter Thurmond III is an Oregon U alumnus. For the record, I agree with you in that he's yet to truly prove himself for any reasonable length of time. Any player can look awesome when their sample size is about 5 minutes of film.


    That's fine, and I understand taking what I say about Ducks with a grain of salt, but also please understand that I love the Seahawks 10 x's more then i love my Ducks. I'd be perfectly fine with Seattle never having another Oregon player on their roster as long as they have somebody better. And when I share my opinion on former Duck players its based on how they could help Seattle or not, not based on the fact that they were once Ducks. (For example, I thought Max Unger was never going to be a very good center. I would have been perfectly fine with the Seahawks getting rid of him after his first couple of year. I'm glad to have been wrong on that one.)

    For the recorrd, i've been pro signing Winfield from the start. I'm just saying I think Thurmond can beat him out in camp making Winfield our 4th corner, rather than our 3rd.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18527
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:06 am
  • To borrow a line from my boy Patrice, RIP...

    Walter Thurmond Tres is a legend around these parts. And when I say legend I mean a myth... Like the Lochness Monster or Big Foot. We all believe they exist, but who ever really saw it?
    Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/
    User avatar
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1394
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:15 am
  • I would love this signing. It would also allow us to keep Thurmond, who can play when he's on the field, and maybe let him heal/give him a timeshare at that slot corner position.

    I like Lane quite a bit, but he's much better on the outside than the inside.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3625
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:32 am
  • I wanted Winfield in '99 coming out of Ohio State, but no, Holmgren in his fledgling years of playing GM went for "need" and drafted Lamar King, from Nawgunna Playlong St. We selected King with the 22nd pick, the Vikings took Winfield with the 23rd. 14 years later and we have an opportunity to right that wrong.

    ____________________________________________________________________________
    "When I became a man I put away childish things. Including the desire to be very grown up."
    ~C.S. Lewis
    User avatar
    HagFaithful
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 169
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:10 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:36 am
  • HagFaithful wrote:I wanted Winfield in '99 coming out of Ohio State, but no, Holmgren in his fledgling years of playing GM went for "need" and drafted Lamar King, from Nawgunna Playlong St. We selected King with the 22nd pick, the Vikings took Winfield with the 23rd. 14 years later and we have an opportunity to right that wrong.


    Great post dude. Way to bring the knowledge! I hadn't even thought about this! What a truly awful decision.

    One day I hope to start a 10 page thread on Lamar King. I wonder what he's up to at this very moment?
    Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/
    User avatar
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1394
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:52 am
  • Oh man, I hope Winfield flies in to Seattle and doesn't want to leave. He would be a great addition. We would go from having a nickel defense that was more of a liability (slot corner, specifically) and all of the sudden it becomes a strength. As has been mentioned, Winfield has arguably been the best slot corner in the league for the past while, and although he is getting up there in age, he would be a solid addition.

    Veteran leader that can pack a solid hit, and fits in nicely with the Legion of Boom. I wonder how the acquisition of Percy Harvin will effect Winfield's decision to come to Seattle, if at all.
    Image
    nategreat
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1334
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:54 am
  • Figures it rains its butt off when he visits
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2231
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:57 am
  • The Outfield wrote:Figures it rains its butt off when he visits


    According to the reports above he's visiting on Wednesday. Supposed to be fairly nice with just a few showers.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18527
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:11 am
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    SmokinHawk wrote:The nature of Jseahawks' opinion becomes a little clearer when you understand that he's an Oregon U homer, and Walter Thurmond III is an Oregon U alumnus. For the record, I agree with you in that he's yet to truly prove himself for any reasonable length of time. Any player can look awesome when their sample size is about 5 minutes of film.


    That's fine, and I understand taking what I say about Ducks with a grain of salt, but also please understand that I love the Seahawks 10 x's more then i love my Ducks. I'd be perfectly fine with Seattle never having another Oregon player on their roster as long as they have somebody better. And when I share my opinion on former Duck players its based on how they could help Seattle or not, not based on the fact that they were once Ducks. (For example, I thought Max Unger was never going to be a very good center. I would have been perfectly fine with the Seahawks getting rid of him after his first couple of year. I'm glad to have been wrong on that one.)

    For the recorrd, i've been pro signing Winfield from the start. I'm just saying I think Thurmond can beat him out in camp making Winfield our 4th corner, rather than our 3rd.


    I don't disagree that Thurmond has the ability to beat Winfield in camp, but given he's been in the league for three years and can't stay healthy, is it even worth the risk of giving him priority on the snaps in practice?
    Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

    He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
    User avatar
    SmokinHawk
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 5651
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
    Location: Back in Seattle


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:13 am
  • Pete's all about having a strong secondary. You know he won't add a player that would weaken that. It sounds like the guy could still compete and produce.

    Perfect guy for JS&PC.
    Talent can get you to the playoffs.
    It takes character to win when you get there.

    SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS
    User avatar
    sutz
    USMC 1970-77
     
    Posts: 10046
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
    Location: Monroe, WA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:16 am
  • JSeahawks wrote:Alright. Since calling him our 2nd best cover cb is so asinine then there must be an obvious answer who is better. If not Thurmond who is our 2nd best cover man? Don't tell me Browner. Browner's a very good CB, much better all around then Thurmond. But its due to his physicality and beastlyness. Not due to his coverage ability.


    J, you really think Thurmond is better in coverage than Browner? Was it Thurmond's zero career INT's that made you feel this way, or his two passes defensed in the last 16 games he's played in? :P

    Stats source:http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13473/walter-thurmond

    I'm happy Thurmond is on the team, I still think he has a lot of potential. But Winfield could really help us.
    camdawg
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 101
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:22 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:20 am
  • camdawg wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:Alright. Since calling him our 2nd best cover cb is so asinine then there must be an obvious answer who is better. If not Thurmond who is our 2nd best cover man? Don't tell me Browner. Browner's a very good CB, much better all around then Thurmond. But its due to his physicality and beastlyness. Not due to his coverage ability.


    J, you really think Thurmond is better in coverage than Browner? Was it Thurmond's zero career INT's that made you feel this way, or his two passes defensed in the last 16 games he's played in? :P

    Stats source:http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13473/walter-thurmond

    I'm happy Thurmond is on the team, I still think he has a lot of potential. But Winfield could really help us.


    If you're covering your opponent so well that the QB is not likely to throw his way then you're not likely to get many passes defensed or interceptions.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18527
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:21 am
  • IIRC, Browner was behind Thurmond on the depth chart before TIII got hurt.
    Talent can get you to the playoffs.
    It takes character to win when you get there.

    SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS
    User avatar
    sutz
    USMC 1970-77
     
    Posts: 10046
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
    Location: Monroe, WA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:21 am
  • I hope this is more than a rumor. Winfield would be a great addition if he works out.
    Image

    “There’s no reason, with Mr. Allen and the fan base here and the stadium, that this can’t be a stable, long-term winning organization.” - John Schneider
    User avatar
    Bakergirl
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3302
    Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:13 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:25 am
  • In a passing league, got to have a great secondary.

    I would be on board with Winfield back there, could be a move like when the Saints got Sharper for their Superbowl season. Slot corner, can play outside in an emergency, maybe even allow earl to move around more in some packages or Kam to play pass-rusher more.
    NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
    User avatar
    12th_Bob
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1754
    Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:28 am
  • With strong run support from both Bam Bam and Winfield, I see a lot of nickle packages in our base defense.

    Now just draft a big body DT with our 2nd round pick
    Last edited by warden on Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
    warden
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1926
    Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:44 am
  • Winfield would be an instant upgrade and the best possibly option IMO. the dude makes 100 tackles a year and didnt give a touchdown during the 2012 season .

    For those wondering why Walter Thurmond , should just stop there because he just got hurt again.
    EastCoastHawksFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 874
    Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:12 pm
  • Our 2 biggest killers last year were the slot corner's inability to cover and tackle (Winfield would be a plus here as he is one of the best tacklers there is), and our late season struggles against the run, something else Antoine is good at stopping.

    Put him in Trufant's spot and limit his playing time throughout the season so that he can be a run-stopping monster late in the season when our defense struggles (if it does).

    Antoine Winfield can be our Lawyer Milloy, elderly statesman that can still play at a high level but whose technique can rub off on the younger guys that are slated to replace him in 2014.
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 8110
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:18 pm
  • We also have to remember the further pusification of our game. New rules make it harder for the RB to lower his head and gain the couple of extra yards. This is becoming a pass only league.
    warden
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1926
    Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle?
Sun Apr 07, 2013 1:14 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    camdawg wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:Alright. Since calling him our 2nd best cover cb is so asinine then there must be an obvious answer who is better. If not Thurmond who is our 2nd best cover man? Don't tell me Browner. Browner's a very good CB, much better all around then Thurmond. But its due to his physicality and beastlyness. Not due to his coverage ability.


    J, you really think Thurmond is better in coverage than Browner? Was it Thurmond's zero career INT's that made you feel this way, or his two passes defensed in the last 16 games he's played in? :P

    Stats source:http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13473/walter-thurmond

    I'm happy Thurmond is on the team, I still think he has a lot of potential. But Winfield could really help us.


    If you're covering your opponent so well that the QB is not likely to throw his way then you're not likely to get many passes defensed or interceptions.



    Now you are grasping at straws J :P You're telling me, that Thurmond is so good, they would rather throw to Shermans or ETS coverage instead?
    Teqneek
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 280
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:18 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 1:35 pm
  • sutz wrote:IIRC, Browner was behind Thurmond on the depth chart before TIII got hurt.


    Nope, Browner and Trufant were the starters until Trufant got hurt, Thurmond came in and got hurt, Sherman came in and the rest is history
    themunn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2380
    Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:17 pm
  • Adrian Peterson would you please pick the white courtesy phone for a conference call from Seattle?
    The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.
    RichNhansom
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2990
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 3:15 pm
  • themunn wrote:
    sutz wrote:IIRC, Browner was behind Thurmond on the depth chart before TIII got hurt.


    Nope, Browner and Trufant were the starters until Trufant got hurt, Thurmond came in and got hurt, Sherman came in and the rest is history


    Can easily explain that by pointing out PC sometimes playing veterans while prepping rookies. It doesn't mean that Browner's coverage skills are superior to Thurmond's, because they're just not. Browner has his role, but he got burned all the time in ways that Thurmond, even in limited playing time, showed strength against.
    GO HAWKS!!!

    Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

    Follow me on Twitter at @17power
    User avatar
    MontanaHawk05
    * 17Power Blogger *
     
    Posts: 11248
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 3:56 pm
  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:
    themunn wrote:
    sutz wrote:IIRC, Browner was behind Thurmond on the depth chart before TIII got hurt.


    Nope, Browner and Trufant were the starters until Trufant got hurt, Thurmond came in and got hurt, Sherman came in and the rest is history


    Can easily explain that by pointing out PC sometimes playing veterans while prepping rookies. It doesn't mean that Browner's coverage skills are superior to Thurmond's, because they're just not. Browner has his role, but he got burned all the time in ways that Thurmond, even in limited playing time, showed strength against.



    Can't compare the two. Browner played waaay more snaps. Better comp. Etc. I take Browner every day of the week and twice on Sundays.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9189
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:43 pm
  • RolandDeschain wrote:Him replacing Trufant's role would make our defense retardedly hard to go against.


    Agreed... but be CAREFUL.
    "We walked our (pedestrian) ass to the Super Bowl"
    Angry Doug
    "We're looking for grit"
    Pete Carroll
    "We got grit. That's it."
    Earl Thomas.
    User avatar
    Rocket
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1216
    Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:12 pm
    Location: The Rain Forest


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:20 pm
  • camdawg wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:Alright. Since calling him our 2nd best cover cb is so asinine then there must be an obvious answer who is better. If not Thurmond who is our 2nd best cover man? Don't tell me Browner. Browner's a very good CB, much better all around then Thurmond. But its due to his physicality and beastlyness. Not due to his coverage ability.


    J, you really think Thurmond is better in coverage than Browner? Was it Thurmond's zero career INT's that made you feel this way, or his two passes defensed in the last 16 games he's played in? :P

    Stats source:http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/13473/walter-thurmond

    I'm happy Thurmond is on the team, I still think he has a lot of potential. But Winfield could really help us.

    Thurmond is clearly better than Browner in coverage. Of course stats aren't going to show it, but when he's on the field his skills definitely show.
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6958
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:28 pm
  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:
    themunn wrote:
    sutz wrote:IIRC, Browner was behind Thurmond on the depth chart before TIII got hurt.


    Nope, Browner and Trufant were the starters until Trufant got hurt, Thurmond came in and got hurt, Sherman came in and the rest is history


    Can easily explain that by pointing out PC sometimes playing veterans while prepping rookies. It doesn't mean that Browner's coverage skills are superior to Thurmond's, because they're just not. Browner has his role, but he got burned all the time in ways that Thurmond, even in limited playing time, showed strength against.


    Yes... but that still means Browner was ahead on the depth chart. Maybe they anticipated Thurmond beating him out eventually, but Carroll would never play a veteran over a rookie (or 2nd year player) he thought was better.
    And it's not like he had Browner splitting time - he played every snap.
    themunn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2380
    Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 6:12 pm
  • SalishHawkFan wrote:Between him and Sherman I think the Seahawks could be something epic. I'd pay the guy what he's worth, which is more, IMO, than people on here seem to think.


    Yep, You get what you pay for.
    I was so sick of our breakdowns against the run plays, the second half of last Season.
    Maybe, just maybe our returning DC has asked for a flier-look-see on Winfield, and maybe feels that his kind of instincts can't be taught.
    I see no reason why we shouldn't try him for a 1 year, or maybe even 2, and don't try'n cheap him away to the 9rs, Rams, or Cards.
    scutterhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3530
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 6:46 pm
  • MontanaHawk05 wrote:
    themunn wrote:
    sutz wrote:IIRC, Browner was behind Thurmond on the depth chart before TIII got hurt.


    Nope, Browner and Trufant were the starters until Trufant got hurt, Thurmond came in and got hurt, Sherman came in and the rest is history


    Can easily explain that by pointing out PC sometimes playing veterans while prepping rookies. It doesn't mean that Browner's coverage skills are superior to Thurmond's, because they're just not. Browner has his role, but he got burned all the time in ways that Thurmond, even in limited playing time, showed strength against.


    You have to admit, Browner's role is pretty unique in the NFL. It amazes me that the officials largely turn a blind eye to his physical play. The fact that you can say a guy his size even possesses above average coverage skills is pretty amazing by itself, but the guy straight up demoralizes whoever is unfortunate enough to line up across from him. Even if Thurmond is the better "on paper" cornerback, Browner's size has proven to be to his benefit in terms of health. His playstyle is more fun to watch, too. I generally find him even more entertaining to watch than Richard Sherman, to be honest, and I love me some Sherm.

    I sorta liken Browner to the enforcers of the old NHL, except he is an above average player at his given position. For me, the fact he strikes terror in his opponents is still the main attraction.
    Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

    He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
    User avatar
    SmokinHawk
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 5651
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
    Location: Back in Seattle


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:13 pm
  • themunn wrote:And it's not like he had Browner splitting time - he played every snap.

    And even when he was done with serving his suspension, PC put him right back in there to continue with his intimidating features, speaks volumes as to his value at CB, (coverage be damned)
    Those that were foolish enough to retaliate against BB's thug-ery ways, were quickly schooled, and decided to skip his classes, rather than be humiliated again.
    Smith got away with retaliation against Sherman (until he finally got flagged for it), I'd bet $$ that Smith would have only retaliated > ONCE < before Browner would have shown him what " contact" really means in the phrase, "contact sports". :16:
    scutterhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3530
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:03 pm
  • Adding Winfield would be an A+ move, on our part. And I'm up with giving him a decent contract, too. At this point Winfield > Woodson.

    Winfield will improve this team in 4 criteria.

    1) Give this young secondary as someone said a Lawyer Milloy veteran presence. Trufant is good, but he's not legendary and has a more quiet demeanor.

    Guys like Lane, Thurmond, Maxwell, and Snead all can learn from this guy.

    2) Gives the Seahawks, a quality backup at either starting CB spot if one of our guys go down.

    3) Gives the Seahawk, a player in speculation that could be a top notch nickel corner or....

    4) Gives the Seahawks, a player in speculation can also convert to FS in place of Thomas allowing the Earl of Boom to kick down as an elite slot defender.

    Winfield is deserving for whatever contract the Seahawks give him and I won't question it or disapprove.
    If I seem too passionate, it’s because I care. And if I come on too strong, it’s because I feel strongly. And if I push too hard, it’s because things aren’t moving fast enough. This is my home, you are my family, and I promise you, I’m not going anywhere.” - L.K.
    Pandion Haliaetus
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1812
    Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:07 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:41 pm
  • He'd fit in well with the LOB no doubt. Still has some left in the tank, big hitter, leader in the locker room etc. Hopefully they'll sign him.
    60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2724
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:09 pm
  • After reading Vikings' forums about Winfield, I really hope we sign him now. He sounds like a very good player still.

    I also noticed how much animosity a lot of their fans have against the Seahawks. You can tell they are still actually butthurt over the Harvin deal(whether they admit it or not).
    User avatar
    cacksman
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 569
    Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:17 am


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:21 pm
  • Signing Winfield would continue the talent drain from Minnesota to Seattle. Great player. A little more revenge for Hutch's poison pill.
    User avatar
    godawg
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 468
    Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:35 pm
  • We had excellant "team chemistry" last year. With the addition of each new player, a new "team" has to be formed. Pete needs to be careful on who he invites to camp......just sayin'
    Bigpumpkin
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 4789
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
    Location: Puyallup, WA USA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:48 pm
  • I've wanted Winfield since he got released. I'm excited that the Seahawks are giving him a look.

    Skittles - The candy of champions.
    User avatar
    Seahawksfan425
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1267
    Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:32 pm
    Location: Kenmore, WA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:08 pm
  • Antoine Winfield in 2012



    2012 Minnesota Vikings Games 16 - Total Tackles 101 - Assisted Tackles 72 - Solo Tackles 29 - Sackes 0.5 Passes Defensed 12 - INTs 3

    Link: http://www.nfl.com/player/antoinewinfield/2503765/profile
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 8110
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:24 pm
  • Can't argue with those numbers.
    60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2724
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Winfield Visiting Seattle
Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:53 am
  • Honestly one of the best highlight video's I've seen in a while. The music makes it even more epic, but the play is just amazing. Just dominating like it's high school football all over again. I really hope he ends up a Hawk.

    How funny would it be to see all these ex-Vikings win a ring with the Hawks this season? The ULTIMATE revenge for the Hutch "Poison Pill" fiasco. Karma.

    Edit: Forgot my whole point of this post. The Bernie. We need this guy so that he can do The Bernie before every game. That's the only thing this team is missing. Oh, and a kicker, but The Bernie is definitely more important.
    Last edited by NYCoug on Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/
    User avatar
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1394
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


Next


It is currently Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:27 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information