Jags, Bills, and Raiders interested in Flynn

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • So it's been a few hours now, I'm just going to assume the Rapoport report was either premature or misinterpreted.

    And if I just jinxed the universe into announcing the Flynn trade 5 minutes from now, you're welcome everyone.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11559
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • T-Sizzle wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games.


    16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know. If he was any good at all those numbers would be different. How do you know he isn't awful? Pretty clear the guy isn't starting material. Believing anything is is just that......blind faith. If he was any good he would have more than 16 starts in 9 years.


    Right, because getting sat on the bench behind Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson, who are both CLEARLY overrated absolutely means that Flynn is crap. Gotcha.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10768
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • Bottom half the league's teams have no one who can play qb and you want to guys want a lousy late round pick for Flynn?

    If the Bills, Raidas, Jags, and Jets had Flynn they just might go 9 and 7. Even with a weak cast. Now i want a second now and a third next year.
    Image
    Cassius Marsh is my 2014 Adopt a Pro Bowl Rookie
    User avatar
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2585
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
    Location: South of Heaven


  • Yeah, the guy couldn't even beat out Rodgers or Wilson? What a horrible QB. And he's the "worst?"
    We are talking about the Seahawks here, there have been some BRUTAL quarterbacks here, not just bad.
    Mirer, Gelbaugh, Kemp, TJoke, McGuire, Salisbury, David Green, just to name a few. Of course, all of them must be better than Flynn.

    Thanks for the laugh, I needed it.
    60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3218
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:
    T-Sizzle wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games.


    16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know. If he was any good at all those numbers would be different. How do you know he isn't awful? Pretty clear the guy isn't starting material. Believing anything is is just that......blind faith. If he was any good he would have more than 16 starts in 9 years.


    Right, because getting sat on the bench behind Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson, who are both CLEARLY overrated absolutely means that Flynn is crap. Gotcha.


    You are right.....he must be awesome and all the people evaluating him are wrong and have been since college.
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2635
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am


  • Man, we really need a sarcasm font on this site.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    Les Norton - gone but never forgotten. Rest in blue and green peace, my friend.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 19029
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:
    T-Sizzle wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games.


    16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know. If he was any good at all those numbers would be different. How do you know he isn't awful? Pretty clear the guy isn't starting material. Believing anything is is just that......blind faith. If he was any good he would have more than 16 starts in 9 years.


    Right, because getting sat on the bench behind Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson, who are both CLEARLY overrated absolutely means that Flynn is crap. Gotcha.


    The poster you direct this at clearly must have a personal issue with Flynn. Degrading Fynn has been his main objective since camp. Puts the insanity in Flynnsanity. Perhaps he boofed someone's GF?

    As of now, Flynn is a Hawk and IMO, should be treated with the same level of respect we bestow upon every Hawk. He has handled all of this incredibly well and I hope for his success either as our back-up or as a QB for a team in the AFC.
    User avatar
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6646
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0


  • Well said
    60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3218
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA



  • kearly wrote:So it's been a few hours now, I'm just going to assume the Rapoport report was either premature or misinterpreted


    It was Ian Furness not Ian Rapoport. Didn't want the wrong guy to get discredited. :D
    20% off Karmaloop & 10% off PLNDR, rep code: DUCK20
    User avatar
    dontbelikethat
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2437
    Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:40 pm


  • You have to look at Flynn's value in a couple of different ways: current market value and value to the team.

    I think it's funny how a lot of people were on board with the Harvin trade with the rationale that "hey, if Harvin were in the draft, he'd be a top 5 pick", so we're big winners. Absolutely no one in the media is castigating us for the trade; they all love it. So look at Flynn....he's NEVER been bad in a regular season NFL game....EVER. Two starts in GB (@ NE, and Detroit) and in mop up duty last year. Against the Cards they blitzed up the middle (and got good pressure) and had their starting D out there. Flynn would've dropped 30 on them that game as well. So, the guy has limited starts, but in that time, he just doesn't look bad. This is with limited prep time usually.

    So, in his NFL playing time, does Flynn grade out as a 1st rounder this year, with this crop of QB's ? I'd say yes. I theorize he's better than anyone you're getting in the draft right now, and for a team that needs a QB, with a GM desperate to keep his job, I'd bet someone rates Flynn as a 2nd or maybe even 1st rounder. Alex Smith was considered the best QB in free agency this year, and I think Flynn could be that good easily.

    Also, 3 teams are wanting him. That drives up the market with absolutely nobody left.

    Then look at what he's worth to us: is a 4th or 5th rounder worth losing insurance if Wilson gets hurt ? You can't predict injury, and I don't see anyone out there in FA or in the draft (I'm counting 1st rounders as well) that could come in off the bench and win us games in a pinch better than FLynn could. Hell, I don't think there's a FA QB out there that could even win any games for us. Fitzpatrick, Kolb, Vince Young, really ? Hell the 49ers are kicking the tires on Pat White, and I'd like that option better.

    The Hawks aren't in cap hell and don't have to trade Flynn. They've stated it, and stated he's not getting cut. We hold all the cards, and coming to us with a "you're lucky to get a 4th rounder out of him" attitude is wasting our FO's time and I bet the league knows it.
    Hawks46
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4065
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm


  • Yep. Hawks46 nailed it. Flynn's value only increases over time as we get closer and closer to the draft, and to another dozen or so teams staring a team with no starting quarterback in the face.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    Les Norton - gone but never forgotten. Rest in blue and green peace, my friend.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 19029
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • T-Sizzle wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games.


    16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know. If he was any good at all those numbers would be different. How do you know he isn't awful? Pretty clear the guy isn't starting material. Believing anything is is just that......blind faith. If he was any good he would have more than 16 starts in 9 years.


    OMFG! LOL! Are you for real? :lol:
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 9189
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:Yep. Hawks46 nailed it. Flynn's value only increases over time as we get closer and closer to the draft, and to another dozen or so teams staring a team with no starting quarterback in the face.


    Seahawk Sailor nailed the "nailed it" determination.
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 9189
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • Furness was just speculating, nothing more. He wasnt reporting anything he heard.
    Seaswab
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 932
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm


  • ivotuk wrote:
    Seahawk Sailor wrote:Yep. Hawks46 nailed it. Flynn's value only increases over time as we get closer and closer to the draft, and to another dozen or so teams staring a team with no starting quarterback in the face.


    Seahawk Sailor nailed the "nailed it" determination.


    Thankee thankee. And to further emphasize this, I offer the following:

    710 ESPN Seattle ‏@710ESPNSeattle 11m
    Huard: Barkley should, will be first QB off the board http://bit.ly/Xh3wqw (@BrockESPN)


    When that's the conversation regarding Flynn's competition, his value only increases. Remember how twitterpated we all were going into last year's draft, even with Flynn aboard? No one likes an unknown situation regarding the most valuable position on the team. We hold all the cards on this one, folks, especially with at least three quarterback-needy teams in the mix. We sit on them long enough and play them right, it'll be outright highway robbery.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    Les Norton - gone but never forgotten. Rest in blue and green peace, my friend.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 19029
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • And to think, all this time I didn't know Flynn has had 16 starts, in 9 years :roll: :thRocks:
    60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3218
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • ivotuk wrote:
    T-Sizzle wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games.


    16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know. If he was any good at all those numbers would be different. How do you know he isn't awful? Pretty clear the guy isn't starting material. Believing anything is is just that......blind faith. If he was any good he would have more than 16 starts in 9 years.


    OMFG! LOL! Are you for real? :lol:


    Threw this in my sig. We can take a look at it later. ;)
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2635
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am


  • I think it's funny how a lot of people were on board with the Harvin trade with the rationale that "hey, if Harvin were in the draft, he'd be a top 5 pick", so we're big winners. Absolutely no one in the media is castigating us for the trade; they all love it. So look at Flynn....he's NEVER been bad in a regular season NFL game....EVER. Two starts in GB (@ NE, and Detroit) and in mop up duty last year. Against the Cards they blitzed up the middle (and got good pressure) and had their starting D out there. Flynn would've dropped 30 on them that game as well. So, the guy has limited starts, but in that time, he just doesn't look bad. This is with limited prep time usually.

    So, in his NFL playing time, does Flynn grade out as a 1st rounder this year, with this crop of QB's ? I'd say yes. I theorize he's better than anyone you're getting in the draft right now, and for a team that needs a QB, with a GM desperate to keep his job, I'd bet someone rates Flynn as a 2nd or maybe even 1st rounder. Alex Smith was considered the best QB in free agency this year, and I think Flynn could be that good easily.


    .


    Well that's just not true. You CAN'T argue that he played well against DETROIT in 2010. That's ridiculous.
    Alot of you either don't remember history or are using selective stats. In 2010 Rodgers goes out at halftime with an injury. Flynn comes in for the 2nd half and DOESN"T SCORE A SINGLE POINT!

    He was 15-26 @ 57.7% completion % (not good), 177 yards @ 6.8 yards/Att (not bad, but not good either) 2 sacks, 1 INT.

    Green Bay losses that game 3-7.

    The next week he played the Patriots in his first NFL start and had a much better day.

    However in the 3 games Flynn has seen extensive action he is 1-2. That is not good. Also in the preseason this year he was unable to lead this team to a single TD (IIRC). So I'm not sure where all this crazy talk about how he's been exellent every time he's stepped on the field, because it's not true.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2478
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • We can argue all day about how good Flynn may or may not be, but the only thing that matters is how good Flynn is perceived to be by QB-needy general managers, and what those same managers think about the quarterbacks in this year's draft. I think it's obvious that no GM in the league is looking at Flynn and saying, "that's my franchise quarterback" or a deal would have been done already, so how DOES the rest of the league view Flynn? A potential starter? A backup? A "bridge" quarterback to hold down the fort while developing a rookie? And could a QB-needy general manager look at one of the quarterbacks in this year's draft and see a player he thinks had a higher potential upside than Flynn? Very possible, even with this year's QB class. Again, what matters in terms of whether we trade Flynn is whether these GM's THINK he is a better option than a rookie or vice versa.

    Personally, I don't think we're going to get an offer big enough to justify trading Flynn, even on draft weekend. All it takes is one GM to prove me wrong. But then again, if the QB-needy GM's think there are better options out there, they aren't going to pony up much if anything for #15.
    User avatar
    Shadowhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 1316
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am


  • Hawks46 wrote:You have to look at Flynn's value in a couple of different ways: current market value and value to the team.

    I think it's funny how a lot of people were on board with the Harvin trade with the rationale that "hey, if Harvin were in the draft, he'd be a top 5 pick", so we're big winners. Absolutely no one in the media is castigating us for the trade; they all love it. So look at Flynn....he's NEVER been bad in a regular season NFL game....EVER. Two starts in GB (@ NE, and Detroit) and in mop up duty last year. Against the Cards they blitzed up the middle (and got good pressure) and had their starting D out there. Flynn would've dropped 30 on them that game as well. So, the guy has limited starts, but in that time, he just doesn't look bad. This is with limited prep time usually.

    So, in his NFL playing time, does Flynn grade out as a 1st rounder this year, with this crop of QB's ? I'd say yes. I theorize he's better than anyone you're getting in the draft right now, and for a team that needs a QB, with a GM desperate to keep his job, I'd bet someone rates Flynn as a 2nd or maybe even 1st rounder. Alex Smith was considered the best QB in free agency this year, and I think Flynn could be that good easily.

    Also, 3 teams are wanting him. That drives up the market with absolutely nobody left.

    Then look at what he's worth to us: is a 4th or 5th rounder worth losing insurance if Wilson gets hurt ? You can't predict injury, and I don't see anyone out there in FA or in the draft (I'm counting 1st rounders as well) that could come in off the bench and win us games in a pinch better than FLynn could. Hell, I don't think there's a FA QB out there that could even win any games for us. Fitzpatrick, Kolb, Vince Young, really ? Hell the 49ers are kicking the tires on Pat White, and I'd like that option better.

    The Hawks aren't in cap hell and don't have to trade Flynn. They've stated it, and stated he's not getting cut. We hold all the cards, and coming to us with a "you're lucky to get a 4th rounder out of him" attitude is wasting our FO's time and I bet the league knows it.


    I would disagree with this statement. You are totally overhyping Flynn. I'd take Barkley over Flynn any day. 1- the 2 players are very similar, both are roughly the same size (6-2, 220) and both have similar "ARM" talent. Barkley has much more experience than Flynn and he's younger so I'd definately take him over a guy who will be 28 before the season starts. (Age also has to factor into the equation). Meanwhile Manuel and Smith have much more upside than Flynn does.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2478
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • Practice against nfl players and schemes has to count for something.

    Or do you think Barkley could have just stepped in and lit up that Detroit d the way Flynn did?
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10768
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • (Not sure if 3 threads were started on this but)

    Sounds like Raiders have "legitimate" interest here, while the Jags do not.

    Per Mike Silver article;
    Another possibility would be trading for Flynn, an expensive free-agent signee for the Seahawks in 2012 who was beaten out by rookie Russell Wilson in training camp. McKenzie previously worked as a personnel executive for the Green Bay Packers, where Flynn spent the first four years of his career as Aaron Rodgers' backup.
    A league source said the Raiders have legitimate interest in acquiring Flynn, who could likely be pried from Seattle for as little as a fourth-round pick. (Another source said the Jacksonville Jaguars, who according to a CBSSports.com report are also interested in Flynn, have little inclination to try to swing a trade.)
    However, with Flynn carrying a cap number of $7.25 million for 2013, acquiring him would still pose financial problems for the Raiders, as Palmer would count another $9.34 million against this year's cap were he to be released.

    http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl--so ... 06980.html
    User avatar
    GCrow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 701
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:05 am
    Location: Canada


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:Practice against nfl players and schemes has to count for something.

    Or do you think Barkley could have just stepped in and lit up that Detroit d the way Flynn did?


    Go look up just how depleted Detroit's secondary and linebackers were for that game. Then remember that Aaron Rodgers was the playcaller for Flynn in that game. Seriously, Green Bay was not taking the Lions seriously that game at all. Would Barkley have been able to chuck it for 48 and 6? I don't know if that can be answered. But Barkley has been playing with NFL talent for 4 years now.

    Barkley has been a starting QB for 4 years at USC, and won his job as a freshman. Part of me wonders if having given the job to a freshman Barkley helped Pete give the job to a rookie Wilson 3 years later.

    I think Flynn is a better QB than I had assessed him last year, he is a better athlete than I gave him credit for. But I still stand by my thinking that he has not proven on the field to be good at play action and is most effective from the gun. I also think he played the preseason last year very conservatively, like he was more concerned with making mistakes than making plays. There were reports from Milwaukee reporters that Flynn lost the job because his off field approach was a bit slacker and that was as much where Wilson took his job as on the field.

    I would take Barkley in the first round at any pick, I believe in his future that much. I don't think Barkley gets past the Raiders for sure, and I think he goes 2nd overall right now, no matter who takes him.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 12000
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:Practice against nfl players and schemes has to count for something.

    Or do you think Barkley could have just stepped in and lit up that Detroit d the way Flynn did?

    You mean like Wilson, Luck, RGIII, Dalton, Newton all did as rookies heck I'm sure I'm forgetting other rookies that did good in their first years. While I like Flynn as a steady backup for us, I think he is over valued by many, and am sure most of those people will be upset when he leaves and we don't get a first for him.
    run and shoot
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 68
    Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:43 am


  • He didn't just play well. What he did was historically good.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10768
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • T-Sizzle wrote:
    T-Sizzle wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games.

    16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know. If he was any good at all those numbers would be different. How do you know he isn't awful? Pretty clear the guy isn't starting material. Believing anything is is just that......blind faith. If he was any good he would have more than 16 starts in 9 years.


    OMFG! LOL! Are you for real? :lol:


    Threw this in my sig. We can take a look at it later. ;)



    Dude, you crack me up. I'm never sure where to take you seriously, but that was seriously funny :lol:
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 9189
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:He didn't just play well. What he did was historically good.


    If he plays a 16 game season what are his numbers? Where amongst the NFL starting QBs would you rank him?
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2635
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am


  • T-Sizzle wrote:
    SacHawk2.0 wrote:He didn't just play well. What he did was historically good.


    If he plays a 16 game season what are his numbers? Where amongst the NFL starting QBs would you rank him?


    Below Russell Wilson and above Blaine Gabbert.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10768
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:
    T-Sizzle wrote:
    SacHawk2.0 wrote:He didn't just play well. What he did was historically good.


    If he plays a 16 game season what are his numbers? Where amongst the NFL starting QBs would you rank him?


    Below Russell Wilson and above Blaine Gabbert.


    :34853_doh:

    I was hoping you had a little more confidence in what you say.

    He is probably around QB 25 or lower of the starting QBs imo. If he goes somewhere and gets the chance to start and play 16 games I would expect around 3500 yards passing and 16tds:18ints. More than likely where he gets traded too he will be a stop gap so he may only play 8 games and a rookie comes in to finish out the season.

    I understand not everyone feels this way, so no need for people to get upset. Just my opinion.
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2635
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am


  • NFL.com has jumped on the "Flynn to Raiders" bandwagon.

    Michael Silver of Yahoo! Sports reported Thursday that the Raiders have "legitimate interest" in acquiring Matt Flynn from the Seattle Seahawks. Raiders general manager Reggie McKenzie worked for years in Green Bay, where Flynn toiled for the Packers behind starter Aaron Rodgers, so the 27-year-old passer is something of a known quantity in Oakland's front office.


    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000154862/article/report-oakland-raiders-have-interest-in-qb-matt-flynn
    Image
    Radish and Cheinhill — Gone, but not forgotten
    User avatar
    HawkFan72
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 12217
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
    Location: Antioch, CA


  • Flynn is better than.

    Anyone on Arizonas roster

    Christian Ponder

    Anyone on Oaklands roster

    Anyone on Clevelands roster

    Anyone on Jacksonvilles roster

    Anyone on the Titans roster

    Anyone on the Jets roster

    Anyone on Buffalos roster

    Flynn, because of the unknown factor, I'd put on par with Alex Smith, but could be much higher.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10768
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • GCrow wrote:(Not sure if 3 threads were started on this but)

    Sounds like Raiders have "legitimate" interest here, while the Jags do not.

    Per Mike Silver article;
    Another possibility would be trading for Flynn, an expensive free-agent signee for the Seahawks in 2012 who was beaten out by rookie Russell Wilson in training camp. McKenzie previously worked as a personnel executive for the Green Bay Packers, where Flynn spent the first four years of his career as Aaron Rodgers' backup.
    A league source said the Raiders have legitimate interest in acquiring Flynn, who could likely be pried from Seattle for as little as a fourth-round pick. (Another source said the Jacksonville Jaguars, who according to a CBSSports.com report are also interested in Flynn, have little inclination to try to swing a trade.)
    However, with Flynn carrying a cap number of $7.25 million for 2013, acquiring him would still pose financial problems for the Raiders, as Palmer would count another $9.34 million against this year's cap were he to be released.

    http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl--so ... 06980.html



    This is factually INCORRECT. Flynn carries a $7.25 million cap hit for the Seahawks ONLY. His salary for 2013 is $5.25 million the $2million signing bonus would remain against the Seahawks cap. This is less or about what a first round qb would cost and only about $2million is guaranteed for 2014 so if he doesn't work out there is low to minimal risk

    Honestly this is the upside. The guy is under contract for 2 years with very low cost to release if he doesn't pan out and you don't have to waste a draft pick.......
    2014 inagural .net Survivor pool CHAMPION
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3854
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:Flynn, because of the unknown factor, I'd put on par with Alex Smith, but could be much higher.


    Smith's a former #1 overall pick who recently led his team to the NFC Championship game, and has since warranted a high second round pick from the Chiefs.

    I really don't see how Flynn is on par with the guy and could be 'much higher' in terms of quality. What evidence is there for that? One game against the Lions? Let's see him lead a team to within a couple of kick-off fumbles of the Super Bowl.
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8294
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am


  • It sure took Smith long enough though, didn't it Rob.

    Methinks coaching and surrounding talent had top do with that as well.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10768
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • Flynn showed what he is capable of in two NFL games. He stepped off the bench and set some records in the Lion game and did well against the Pats. What else could he do coming of the bench. If that's his ceiling its a pretty good one. I think in the right system he will be a gamer...If he goes to Oakland IMO he will be beat down after 4 or 5 games. I like him here but if its decided that we have to trade him I would like to see him go to a team that at least has an O-line. I like Flynn a heck of alot.
    travlinhawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 441
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:46 pm


  • It's not a very fair comparison to say "if Flynn was in the draft, where would he be drafted" and then expect that draft pick. There are big factors like age, money, and contracts to consider as well. Flynn is already 27 years old with limited experience....he is more expensive than a pretty much anyone in the draft...he isn't under contract for very many years.

    When considering more of the factors, I would think a 3rd round pick would be great for him, but it would probably more likely be a 4th round pick or something like that.
    User avatar
    chihawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 369
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:38 pm


  • The problem here is Flynn's value is higher to the Hawks than any team interested in him, therefore it's going to be difficult to receive adequate compensation for him.

    Meaning Flynn as the best backup in the league + low salary = more valuable to the Hawks than the Raiders or whoever risking a 3rd round pick + 5 million salary for a QB that might not be your starter.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4044
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:The problem here is Flynn's value is higher to the Hawks than any team interested in him, therefore it's going to be difficult to receive adequate compensation for him.

    Meaning Flynn as the best backup in the league + low salary = more valuable to the Hawks than the Raiders or whoever risking a 3rd round pick + 5 million salary for a QB that might not be your starter.


    So for the Seahawks the low salary for a backup is a plus but for Oakland the $5million for someone that MAY not be a starter is a negative?

    I am confused.......
    2014 inagural .net Survivor pool CHAMPION
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3854
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:Now THAT is funny.


    Now THAT is funny


    NOW that is funny
    scutterhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3899
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm


  • scutterhawk wrote:
    SacHawk2.0 wrote:
    SoulfishHawk wrote:Now THAT is funny.


    Now THAT is funny


    NOW that is funny


    Now that IS funny.
    Skittles - The candy of champions.
    User avatar
    Seahawksfan425
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1267
    Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:32 pm
    Location: Kenmore, WA


  • theENGLISHseahawk wrote:
    SacHawk2.0 wrote:Flynn, because of the unknown factor, I'd put on par with Alex Smith, but could be much higher.


    Smith's a former #1 overall pick who recently led his team to the NFC Championship game, and has since warranted a high second round pick from the Chiefs.

    I really don't see how Flynn is on par with the guy and could be 'much higher' in terms of quality. What evidence is there for that? One game against the Lions? Let's see him lead a team to within a couple of kick-off fumbles of the Super Bowl.


    I'm less a believer in Smith than you are, and I say that because Harbaugh's understanding of the QB position led him to make the change up for who he perceived as the better option at Quarterback for the 49rs.
    Harbaugh TRIED to persuede P. Manning to come to SF, and when that didn't happen, he then put Kaepernick in, he wasn't going to go back to the mediocrety.
    Let's be honest, Smith was drafted high, because the expectations were that he could possibly take the 49rs back to the glory days, and to continue with the honesty, he just couldn't work enough magic to get it done, and Harbaugh probably gave him the best of all advise to helping him get the most out of his talents.
    Flynn wasn't able to wrest the starting job from Wilson, (who could) but that doesn't mean that he couldn't flourish as a leader with his own team, given enough time to develop chemestry.
    scutterhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3899
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm


  • mikeak wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:The problem here is Flynn's value is higher to the Hawks than any team interested in him, therefore it's going to be difficult to receive adequate compensation for him.

    Meaning Flynn as the best backup in the league + low salary = more valuable to the Hawks than the Raiders or whoever risking a 3rd round pick + 5 million salary for a QB that might not be your starter.


    So for the Seahawks the low salary for a backup is a plus but for Oakland the $5million for someone that MAY not be a starter is a negative?

    I am confused.......


    Yes because our starter is only going to make 400k, so we have the luxury of having a 5 million a year backup. If you're Oakland is it worth it to bring in Flynn to compete for a starting position, when the outcome may be you have to pay Palmer AND Flynn.............AND give up a 3rd or 4th round pick to get Flynn?
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4044
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:
    mikeak wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:The problem here is Flynn's value is higher to the Hawks than any team interested in him, therefore it's going to be difficult to receive adequate compensation for him.

    Meaning Flynn as the best backup in the league + low salary = more valuable to the Hawks than the Raiders or whoever risking a 3rd round pick + 5 million salary for a QB that might not be your starter.


    So for the Seahawks the low salary for a backup is a plus but for Oakland the $5million for someone that MAY not be a starter is a negative?

    I am confused.......


    Yes because our starter is only going to make 400k, so we have the luxury of having a 5 million a year backup. If you're Oakland is it worth it to bring in Flynn to compete for a starting position, when the outcome may be you have to pay Palmer AND Flynn.............AND give up a 3rd or 4th round pick to get Flynn?


    OK different background thinking. There is no way EVER that they sign Flynn and keep Palmer. They will eat the money from cutting Palmer and have Flynn compete against Pryor. That is the backup I was thinking off. The negative is the cost of the Palmer cut but I simply don't see them keeping both and if they release Palmer this is the cheapest starter they can get unless they really believe in Pryor
    2014 inagural .net Survivor pool CHAMPION
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3854
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


  • New report that the Jags were initially interested in Flynn but decided not to pursue it:

    The Florida Times-Union reports the Jaguars explored the possibility of a Matt Flynn trade, but ultimately decided not to pursue it.

    CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora recently named the Jaguars as Flynn's "most likely destination," but it appears the quarterback's salary is a hindrance. GM Dave Caldwell is committed to building through the draft and not tying up money in veteran players. Flynn's age, 28 in June, likely also played a factor. The Raiders would seem to be his most likely landing spot.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2268
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • The Outfield wrote:New report that the Jags were initially interested in Flynn but decided not to pursue it:

    The Florida Times-Union reports the Jaguars explored the possibility of a Matt Flynn trade, but ultimately decided not to pursue it.

    CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora recently named the Jaguars as Flynn's "most likely destination," but it appears the quarterback's salary is a hindrance. GM Dave Caldwell is committed to building through the draft and not tying up money in veteran players. Flynn's age, 28 in June, likely also played a factor. The Raiders would seem to be his most likely landing spot.


    Thats explanation is pure spin.

    The Jaguars are the cheapest team in the NFL. The cash they have commited to spend so far in 2013 ranks last in the NFL as in #32nd ........ $14 million less (estimated) than the #31st ranked team.
    User avatar
    Jville
    * NET Alumni *
     
    Posts: 3767
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:49 pm


  • Flynn has very low miles for his age, is a capable QB, and seems to be a good teammate. If they send him out for next years 3rd would be a score. We'll see.
    User avatar
    Hendo66
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 531
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:28 pm
    Location: Scottsdale, AZ


  • Gabbert is the Jaguars ticket to LA or London. Why would they mess that up by trading for Flynn?
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 12000
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • JSeahawks wrote:If we could send Flynn to jacksonville and flip 2nd round picks with them that would be ideal.

    Having first pick in the 2nd round is either a great way to get somebody who slipped out of the first round, or maybe even better is a nice trade chip. All those teams who didnt fill all their needs in the first round have a night to think about who's left over and try to move up and get their guy. We could probably turn that in to 3 or 4 more picks if we were so inclined.


    Swapping picks would be great. Picking up extra picks would be good for subsequent years.
    gmor
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 123
    Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:03 pm
    Location: Oak Harbor, WA


  • Scottemojo wrote:Gabbert is the Jaguars ticket to LA or London. Why would they mess that up by trading for Flynn?



    Actually their lease is going to pretty much guarantee they stay.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9365
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


PreviousNext


It is currently Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:39 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information