Is Freeney out of the Picture?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:53 pm
  • John took on a new title? "The amount of work that Seahawks general namager John Schneider"
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 7880
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:03 pm
  • i think with the additions of avril and bennett, we'd be better served shoring up some middle of the d-line beef...
    User avatar
    jack_patera
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 208
    Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:37 pm
    Location: ..Location..Location


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:08 pm
  • I think many here think that we are not OK at DT. I think we should resign Branch for sure. If not, we can add a player at #56.

    But this draft is deeper at other positions than DT. Remember Howard worked with Quinn at Florida and they are re-united (and it feels so good :shock: ) He should be able to get more out of him.

    Getting D.F. would make us absolutely sick on the D.L.
    Image
    User avatar
    Largent80
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 22153
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
    Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:17 pm
  • Hell, it would be worth it to sign Freeney just for all the priceless reactions it would get...

    Seahawks fan reaction:

    Image

    49ers fan reaction:

    Image

    Rams fan reaction:

    Image

    Cardinals fan reaction:

    Image

    Media reaction:

    Image

    Football God's reaction:

    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    Winterfell
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 128
    Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:55 pm
    Location: The Wall


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:01 pm
  • Priceless.. You RULE the thread and internet. Awesome.. :thmusik36:
    Image
    User avatar
    Largent80
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 22153
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
    Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:03 pm
  • Winterfell wrote:Hell, it would be worth it to sign Freeney just for all the priceless reactions it would get...

    Seahawks fan reaction:


    That Post Says it All !

    My 2 cents, Freeney is Not Needed..but would be a welcomed addition on a 1 year agreement, with the acquisitions of Avril and bennet we need to focus the remain Cap towards other areas with more pressing concern. Saving Money for our upcoming FA's is going to be Key.
    But it totally seems like this team has a WIN NOW mentality (and by now I mean this upcoming season)
    I Bleed Blue/Green/White
    Seattle Seahawks/Vancouver Canucks
    Always tuned into Covino & Rich (Sirius XM 104 - 9AM - 1 PM)
    User avatar
    seahawkcanuck
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 11
    Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:45 am


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:11 pm
  • seahawkcanuck wrote:
    Winterfell wrote:Hell, it would be worth it to sign Freeney just for all the priceless reactions it would get...

    Seahawks fan reaction:


    That Post Says it All !

    My 2 cents, Freeney is Not Needed..
    But it totally seems like this team has a WIN NOW mentality (and by now I mean this upcoming season)


    Not needed?...Do you personally know Chris Clemons rehab and if he will be ready to play come Sept.?


    And yes, we are trying to win the Super Bowl RIGHT NOW, that is the goal. The goal isn't to win it in the future, the future is RIGHT NOW.
    Image
    User avatar
    Largent80
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 22153
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
    Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:55 pm
  • Largent80 wrote:I think many here think that we are not OK at DT.


    I definitely do not think we are ok at the 3 tech.

    Bennett is a situational pass rusher. He can play 3 much like the Jason Jones role. He is better at the run, but it's not something I would want him doing for a whole game. We don't have a guy to play the 3 that can adequately collapse the pocket in our base defense.

    Branch should be a situational 3 in short yardage. He provides almost zero pocket push as is. We are entirely too dependent on wholesale sub packages. We got burned hard by SF when they mixed up their play calls to take advantage of our substitutions. Their OL is plenty good enough to convert 3rd and 5 against our pass rush package.

    This becomes a problem when we play teams that are balanced. And in the NFC, the competitors for the conference (SF, Sea, Atl, NYG/Wash) all have the ability to run or pass effectively. It is a weakness that is exploitable by the very teams we need to beat.

    If we were in the AFC, I wouldn't sweat it. But the top teams in this conference are still committed to running the ball.
    Attyla the Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 666
    Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:38 pm


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:36 pm
  • Largent80 wrote:
    seahawkcanuck wrote:
    Winterfell wrote:Hell, it would be worth it to sign Freeney just for all the priceless reactions it would get...

    Seahawks fan reaction:


    That Post Says it All !

    My 2 cents, Freeney is Not Needed..
    But it totally seems like this team has a WIN NOW mentality (and by now I mean this upcoming season)


    Not needed?...Do you personally know Chris Clemons rehab and if he will be ready to play come Sept.?


    And yes, we are trying to win the Super Bowl RIGHT NOW, that is the goal. The goal isn't to win it in the future, the future is RIGHT NOW.



    I do, the cap at this point just doesn't allow for another high profile signing

    Dwight Freeny
    YEAR BASE S. BONUS MISC. CAP HIT
    2012 14,035,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 19,035,000

    Seahawks salary cap space remaining after Harvin/Avril/Bennett acquisitions: $6.43 million
    I Bleed Blue/Green/White
    Seattle Seahawks/Vancouver Canucks
    Always tuned into Covino & Rich (Sirius XM 104 - 9AM - 1 PM)
    User avatar
    seahawkcanuck
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 11
    Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:45 am


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:30 pm
  • Largent80 wrote:
    And yes, we are trying to win the Super Bowl RIGHT NOW, that is the goal. The goal isn't to win it in the future, the future is RIGHT NOW.


    Actually, if I've heard Carroll correctly, the goal is to win FOREVER. Not just RIGHT NOW.

    Sacrificing the future just for the CHANCE to win RIGHT NOW is stupid. I'm not saying that signing Freeney would be sacrificing the future, but the mentality that a team has to completely sell out to win IMMEDIATELY and damn the consequences in 2014 and beyond is ridiculous. It's what leads to a decade of the Redskins sucking and what leads to the Eagles' "Dream Team" winning 5 games.

    There's no guarantee that Freeney would make a significant impact on our pass rush. I've seen him dominate, but I've also seen him get stonewalled, and he's not getting younger. How much of his decline last year was due to a scheme change in Indy, and how much was his getting on in years? It's impossible to say either way with any level of certainty.

    So my argument would be instead of possibly hamstringing the team in the future by awarding an aging vet a pricy contract (if, indeed, that's what Freeney gets) and making it harder for us to re-sign Chancellor, Thomas, etc., why not just put yourself in the best position to make the playoffs EVERY YEAR instead of RIGHT NOW. Because anything can happen in the postseason.
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7912
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:06 pm
  • You (plural) do know this whole discussion is based on a month-old opinion piece, right? I wonder if Wyman would still have that opinion after the Bennett and Avril signings, or if he has changed his views in light of them.
    49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
    49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.
    User avatar
    BlueTalon
    * NET Curmudgeon *
    * NET Curmudgeon *
     
    Posts: 7367
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
    Location: Eastern Washington


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:26 pm
  • Though he may not be Dwight Freeney, I have high hopes for Dexter Davis as a Leo/LB pass rusher. Looking forward to see him come back from IR.
    User avatar
    godawg
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 468
    Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm


Re: Is Freeney out of the Picture?
Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:24 pm
  • Largent80 wrote:I don't think the amount of snaps matter to him, he wants to win, and quite frankly, a loaded gun is dangerous. The more we can arm ourselves with, the better off we are.


    Freeney is going to sign somewhere he can play.

    We don't know where Clemons is going to play when he gets healthy, I doubt Freeney wants to be our fourth defensive end. I bet the Hawks sign a DT who can play inside, I think that's the #1 weakness on our defense.
    WestcoastSteve
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1141
    Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm




It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:44 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online