Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:49 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 2638
DericLee wrote:
It's just another vague rule that will help the NFL control outcomes of games.

Luckily, Seattle is now one of the NFL's darling teams, so they will make sure it benefits us more then it hurts us :)


We'd have to hope so.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:50 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am
Posts: 2191
Future of the NFL:
http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-ep ... rcastaball


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:00 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10040
Until they have review for these penalties, this will be a stupid rule.

Kams hit on Davis last year should not have been flagged, but was. And this new rule falls under the same "error on the side of caution" type of referee enforcement.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:05 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am
Posts: 2191
Scottemojo wrote:
Until they have review for these penalties, this will be a stupid rule.

Kams hit on Davis last year should not have been flagged, but was. And this new rule falls under the same "error on the side of caution" type of referee enforcement.


Yep.. and those are the some of the most aggravating bad calls. When your player shows an increased intensity of play and then gets wrongfully penalized for it...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:08 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 3174
This will certainly affect Lynch, and the refs will be watching for him.

The actual quote from the ESPN article isn't "5 plays would've been flagged last year" but "5 backs would be flagged last year". They also go on to mention Forte, Lynch and Adrian Peterson by name as guys that will have to alter their style.

I also agree that this will be open to misinterpretation like the Kam hit on Davis last year. That could've cost us a TD if our defense wasn't on it that game. Notice that Kam got flagged, but he didn't get fined. It still affects the outcome of the game, and this new rule will as well.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:13 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10040
The Outfield wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
Until they have review for these penalties, this will be a stupid rule.

Kams hit on Davis last year should not have been flagged, but was. And this new rule falls under the same "error on the side of caution" type of referee enforcement.


Yep.. and those are the some of the most aggravating bad calls. When your player shows an increased intensity of play and then gets wrongfully penalized for it...


I will go one farther: Until the review is done by an official who is not one of the field crew, I won't buy that it is free of bias.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:22 am 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10462
Location: Pasco, WA
No matter what people think of this rule or what side they line up on in the debate one this is certain, it will affect us and our boy Marshawn negatively this year.

I mean whenever we did run a toss play with Marshawn, outside the tackle box, he would almost always finishes his runs by lowering his head and squeaking out as many yards as possible and now after doing it his entire career you expect him to change that overnight?........smh. This is a horrible rule and will hurt us way more than it will help.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:45 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:30 am
Posts: 736
Location: Van Buren, AR from Kent-Covington, WA
The NFL is a joke now. I am all for players not getting hurt but for F's-sake this game is a CONTACT sport, not baseball. Instead of keeping the game the way it is supposed to be, they want to ruin it. Instead of paying the players more and giving them guaranteed contracts, the NFL makes more and more and pays less. If they really cared about the players that's what they'd do, instead they just want to keep their "investments" on the field but don't care about the integrity of the game. With this move all they are trying to prevent is future lawsuits for brain damage and whatnot. Pretty soon the NFL will be the Arena League with 80-90% passes and running only to get 1 or 2 yards. I miss the game I grew up with.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:51 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10040
It is reported that this would have been called 5 times last year.

I will bet money it gets called more than 5 times this year. The refs will error on this one.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:52 am 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 421
Funny Jeff Fisher is behind this rule. Just sayin.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:54 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm
Posts: 1745
Three rule changes, all would of most likely changed the outcome of Seattle games. (Kicking rule, crown helmet rule, and down block lineman rule)

Smells like rotten BS.

_________________
NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:03 am 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11206
Another transparent attempt to turn the NFL into a pure passing league. I'm amazed by their ingenuity.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:23 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 2020
Scottemojo wrote:
It is reported that this would have been called 5 times last year.

I will bet money it gets called more than 5 times this year. The refs will error on this one.


So actually, its been reported that when they did their homework on this, they took every game from week 10 and week 16 and watched ever single play.
They said there was 5 cases in week 10 and 6 in week 16 that would be penalties.

Doing the math, there is about 130 plays in a game from both sides. week 10 had 14 games playing due to bye's. Week 16 had 16 games.

- so 30 games had an average of 3900 plays where 11 of them were deemed penalized for a ball carrier leading with his crown. I dont know what plays they deemed bad, so I looked up the injury reports for week 10 and week 16. Nobody was injured due to a ball carrier ramming them.

-So in 0.2% of plays in those two weeks, someone rammed with their head and nobody got hurt. Better make a rule for it........

_________________
Time of possession is the most meaningless statistic in football. -RolandDeschain


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:27 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 1035
Cartire wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
It is reported that this would have been called 5 times last year.

I will bet money it gets called more than 5 times this year. The refs will error on this one.


So actually, its been reported that when they did their homework on this, they took every game from week 10 and week 16 and watched ever single play.
They said there was 5 cases in week 10 and 6 in week 16 that would be penalties.

Doing the math, there is about 130 plays in a game from both sides. week 10 had 14 games playing due to bye's. Week 16 had 16 games.

- so 30 games had an average of 3900 plays where 11 of them were deemed penalized for a ball carrier leading with his crown. I dont know what plays they deemed bad, so I looked up the injury reports for week 10 and week 16. Nobody was injured due to a ball carrier ramming them.

-So in 0.2% of plays in those two weeks, someone rammed with their head and nobody got hurt. Better make a rule for it........


And that's the opinion of people looking at game film after the fact. The number of flags that would have ACTUALLY been thrown would almost certainly be much higher.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:31 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1840
Scottemojo wrote:
Until they have review for these penalties, this will be a stupid rule.

Kams hit on Davis last year should not have been flagged, but was. And this new rule falls under the same "error on the side of caution" type of referee enforcement.


Exactly. Those that blame the NFLPA don't. It's the owners afraid of concussions and the resulting law suits


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:32 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 1035
Scottemojo wrote:
The Outfield wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
Until they have review for these penalties, this will be a stupid rule.

Kams hit on Davis last year should not have been flagged, but was. And this new rule falls under the same "error on the side of caution" type of referee enforcement.


Yep.. and those are the some of the most aggravating bad calls. When your player shows an increased intensity of play and then gets wrongfully penalized for it...


I will go one farther: Until the review is done by an official who is not one of the field crew, I won't buy that it is free of bias.


This. Exactly. Not only free from bias, but a lot faster.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:52 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 2020
Shadowhawk wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
The Outfield wrote:

Yep.. and those are the some of the most aggravating bad calls. When your player shows an increased intensity of play and then gets wrongfully penalized for it...


I will go one farther: Until the review is done by an official who is not one of the field crew, I won't buy that it is free of bias.


This. Exactly. Not only free from bias, but a lot faster.


EXACTLY. With todays tv coverage and the speed they can rewatch plays, I dont understand why they cant just have someone dedicated to rewatching plays right after they happen and slow action plays down to quickly determine the proper outcome. They can handle this while the players are in huddle, and send a call down to the ref if they can reverse a blown call. The clock would be stopped for a bit anyway if its a flag, so you dont have to worry about hurry up offenses going too fast.

They only need to call-down during flags, and they'll have the time to help the field crew with the correct call. No ref running to the replay booth. They can talk it over on the field (which they do anyways) why the guy upstairs watches the film. Sends his verdict down. And in all honesty, it wouldnt even be used on obvious calls. Offsides, False starts, obvious interferences, the ref can just make the call on the field quickly. But timing calls, personal fouls, intentional grounding, should always be reviewed quickly upstairs with a verdict within 30 seconds.

_________________
Time of possession is the most meaningless statistic in football. -RolandDeschain


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:52 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:51 pm
Posts: 191
Location: new york,ny
Teqneek wrote:
Can we wait till the rule passes before we post completely false information? In no article I read could I even come to half a conclusion that rule was passed yesterday.

It is being voted on today.




read again!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:52 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 1547
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
Another transparent attempt to turn the NFL into a pure passing league. I'm amazed by their ingenuity.


Good point. I hadn't even considered that angle.

I hold nothing but contempt for those that made this rule possible.

_________________
Tall men come down to my height when I hit 'em in the body.

Jack Dempsey


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:05 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 2020
Fuzzman55 wrote:
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
Another transparent attempt to turn the NFL into a pure passing league. I'm amazed by their ingenuity.


Good point. I hadn't even considered that angle.

I hold nothing but contempt for those that made this rule possible.


Paul Allen was one of the people that voted yes for it. Im conflicted.

_________________
Time of possession is the most meaningless statistic in football. -RolandDeschain


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 1414
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
Another transparent attempt to turn the NFL into a pure passing league. I'm amazed by their ingenuity.

Yet the owners (ours included) voted for it...hmmm...maybe there is no vast conspiracy?

_________________
SUPERBOWL!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:25 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 3174
Cartire wrote:
That seems fine until you have refs calling the penalty in real-time. To many plays will get flagged because its to fast and the refs will flag it regardless. To many huge plays have been reversed because of flags. See Kam hit on Davis for an example. All were doing is giving the refs more opinionated control of the game.

This has way to much conspiracy written into it, but I truly think that money talks. And with the amount of money that football betting brings in, you would be stupid not to assume that some of these refs cant be bought. And you would also be stupid to not assume, that some of these rules are in place just to give the refs some extra ability at controlling games.

I think what pisses me off even more than giving SOME of these clowns the freedom to make a call like this without INSTANT replay conformation, or overturn, is the dumbass Leagues head honcho following up on a bad call with a f#^@&g fine.
That's like saying I don't care that this bad call was unwarented, just suck it up, and take the injustice up your ass.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:27 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4250
edogg23 wrote:
Hope they come to their senses and vote that one down. This is rediculous.

personally I think it's greendiculous, but that's just me.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:32 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 3174
kidhawk wrote:
sa_seahawker wrote:
So much for the goal line fullback dive. That move leads with the crown of the helmet too.


Dives are ALWAYS between the tackles, and this rule is only OUTSIDE the tackles. It doesn't change this one bit. This is for OPEN FIELD situations, not BUNCHED up groups.

So if it's done in a bunched up situation, it removes the penalty option, as well as the same possibility for injury?
I guess I don't understand the difference.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:41 pm 
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am
Posts: 2230
Location: St George, UT
The NFL is covering their ass, because there are too many bleeding hearts that would like to see football banned. :thfight7:

_________________
Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:46 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:29 pm
Posts: 1181
This is about former player lawsuits, not about player safety or anything else.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:54 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:48 am
Posts: 349
All this player safety BS is really starting to piss me off. Nobody forces the players to play, they all choose to because it beats pumping gas or working a checkout at Walmart.
There are so many far more dangerous jobs done by hard working people who never come close to seeing a million dollars in their whole lifetime never mind the tens of millions that some of these nancy boys make.
Another rule change or two similar to this one and it won't be long before teams are regularly racking up more penalty yards than passing yards.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:04 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 2260
Scottemojo wrote:
Until they have review for these penalties, this will be a stupid rule.

Kams hit on Davis last year should not have been flagged, but was. And this new rule falls under the same "error on the side of caution" type of referee enforcement.


How many other plays should not have been flagged but were due to "heat of the moment" flags?
ie. how many flags were thrown but fines not given for such plays for us last year?

Kam didn't get a fine for that play because they reviewed it and said it was OK.
I don't remember it happening any other time in over 1000 snaps. Note: I'm not talking about plays where the refs have thrown soft flags like Earl's PI against Miami or just about every call in the Green Bay game, I'm talking about ones where they've called a player's play dangerous when it was within the rules.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:23 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4627
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
hoxrox wrote:
This is about former player lawsuits, not about player safety or anything else.


While you and I .....and many folk with common sense...know this, many will "cover their asses" by saying that it is for "player safety"......all the time knowing that it will radically change the game as we now know it!! These "bleeding-heart Liberals" just can't help themselves!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:31 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 18457
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
My guess is that we won't even know this rule exists in 90% of games and it will not have any impact and we won't notice a different. Freaking out about nothing.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:37 pm 
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am
Posts: 2230
Location: St George, UT
JSeahawks wrote:
My guess is that we won't even know this rule exists in 90% of games and it will not have any impact and we won't notice a different. Freaking out about nothing.


True, but it's that 10% that "freaks" me out. This IS the Seahawks we're talking about :180670:

_________________
Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:50 pm 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11206
Hawkfan77 wrote:
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
Another transparent attempt to turn the NFL into a pure passing league. I'm amazed by their ingenuity.

Yet the owners (ours included) voted for it...hmmm...maybe there is no vast conspiracy?


Not there, but there might be a common belief that more passing = more points = more viewers = more revenue.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:56 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1290
Location: Olympia
For people who keep saying this is "ruining the game" I have to wonder, were my high school coaches ruining the game also when they taught us to never initiate contact with the top of our helmet on either side of the ball?

The way I see it, upset fans seem to have 2 different angles for their rage:

1. The reduction of violent collisions (which includes the 'two-hand touch' and 'pussification' crowds)
2. The in-game officials having too much subjective power

I can see the 2nd, but anyone upset by #1 must also think that youngsters have been taught the wrong way to play football – as it pertains to the crown of the helmet – since at least the 1990s.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:01 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4627
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
MontanaHawk05 wrote:

Not there, but there might be a common belief that more passing = more points = more viewers = more revenue.


As soon as this new rule is called twice a game, there will be an increase of pass plays by 10% or more. The demand for running backs will drop as they get fewer carrys as will their financial reimbursement. When this happens, the Player Association will see the folly of this lawsuit......and will drop it by mutual agreement.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:19 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 1362
What most of you don't realize is that the crown of your head is more towards the back of your head then the front of your head. The rule is being made a big deal, but truthfully it is best for all involved. This rule will not change much of the season- it's more to promote player safety and awareness as well as cover their butts.

The player can still put their head down a bit, they just can lead drop their chin to their chest all the way.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-videos/0ap2000000152145/Crown-of-the-helmet-hit-rule-explained?campaign=Twitter_videos_crown

Summary:
-Jeff Fisher points to the crown of his head (back top portion) and state that is the only part that is involved in this rule change. The face mask and front top of the head (hairline) is legal.
- They are going to send tape that is legal and a lot of it will be, there will only be a few instances in which it won't be legal.
- In order for this play to even be illegal the player must "line up" the other player in the open field.
- They will teach the on field officials the proper way. Before the penalty is called, the officials are encouraged to meet in a group to come to a consensus rather than calling it from just one view.

Notes:
-The Michael Robinson hit on the Bears CB was included, but I didn't see the Lynch play vs. the 49ers on there.


Do you really think 31 out of 32 teams would agree on this rule if it meant players couldn't be aggresive? Of course not. They are trying to make it clear that when you go up against another guy, you shouldn't drop your head so that your face mask is parallel with the ground which could cause serious spinal cord issues.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 1362
Also, on the Lynch hit vs. Goldson he hits his shoulder & head into him. I would be shocked if that is an illegal hit based upon what I've read and how to interpret it.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:25 pm 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10462
Location: Pasco, WA
Just listening to John Clayton on 710 ESPN he said the NFL only looked through 2 weeks of games to make a judgement on this rule. So those 11 timea it would be called a penalty number people were throwing out there.......those 11 were in only a 2 week stretch, not the entire season. Meaning that this would be a call or penalty much more often than it should be. Again......horrible rule.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:25 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 1047
I don't think hitting with face mask is going to be illegal, which is mostly what lynch does.

I think they are trying to stop this:


and it should be illegal. Defensive players have been getting jobbed for rule changes that are good for both players, this is just the offensive side of the ball picking up on safety.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:25 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 2267
sa_seahawker wrote:
So much for the goal line fullback dive. That move leads with the crown of the helmet too.


That wouldn't be affected. It's OUTSIDE the tackle box. It won't affect 3rd and short situations.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:27 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 1547
HawkAroundTheClock wrote:
For people who keep saying this is "ruining the game" I have to wonder, were my high school coaches ruining the game also when they taught us to never initiate contact with the top of our helmet on either side of the ball?

The way I see it, upset fans seem to have 2 different angles for their rage:

1. The reduction of violent collisions (which includes the 'two-hand touch' and 'pussification' crowds)
2. The in-game officials having too much subjective power

I can see the 2nd, but anyone upset by #1 must also think that youngsters have been taught the wrong way to play football – as it pertains to the crown of the helmet – since at least the 1990s.


They are talking about abandoning kickoffs. They've already almost made return specialists irrelevant by moving up the kickoff spot. How is that not changing the game? What about laying WRs out across the middle? A staple of players like Sam Huff, Ronnie Lott, and Tatum. That's gone. Now the RB, a position that up until this point has been sacrosanct because he's carrying the ball, is being meddled with. Walter Payton would laugh at the absurdity. They are indeed trying to change the game and the way it's played. If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you.

Rog is a lawyer and he's administering the league like a lawyer, with the approval of the owners. I have little patience anymore with their ridiculous fake crusade. It's probably why I get so irritated by the continuous stream of rules they insist on pushing through.

_________________
Tall men come down to my height when I hit 'em in the body.

Jack Dempsey


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:31 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:26 pm
Posts: 330
Here is a conversation between Sando and Carroll about the new rule...

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/94838/pete-carroll-helmet-rule-good-for-game

If I understand this correctly, leading with the forehead area is legal, but leading with the top of the head is not. If this is the case, I don't see this being too impactful on the game.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:32 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 2267
Scottemojo wrote:
It is reported that this would have been called 5 times last year.

I will bet money it gets called more than 5 times this year. The refs will error on this one.



NOT 5 times last year. 5 times in week 17 alone. So that would be roughly 85 calls in a single year.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:55 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1290
Location: Olympia
Fuzzman55 wrote:
HawkAroundTheClock wrote:
For people who keep saying this is "ruining the game" I have to wonder, were my high school coaches ruining the game also when they taught us to never initiate contact with the top of our helmet on either side of the ball?

The way I see it, upset fans seem to have 2 different angles for their rage:

1. The reduction of violent collisions (which includes the 'two-hand touch' and 'pussification' crowds)
2. The in-game officials having too much subjective power

I can see the 2nd, but anyone upset by #1 must also think that youngsters have been taught the wrong way to play football – as it pertains to the crown of the helmet – since at least the 1990s.


They are talking about abandoning kickoffs. They've already almost made return specialists irrelevant by moving up the kickoff spot. How is that not changing the game? What about laying WRs out across the middle? A staple of players like Sam Huff, Ronnie Lott, and Tatum. That's gone. Now the RB, a position that up until this point has been sacrosanct because he's carrying the ball, is being meddled with. Walter Payton would laugh at the absurdity. They are indeed trying to change the game and the way it's played. If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you.

Rog is a lawyer and he's administering the league like a lawyer, with the approval of the owners. I have little patience anymore with their ridiculous fake crusade. It's probably why I get so irritated by the continuous stream of rules they insist on pushing through.


Kickoffs have nothing to do with this thread. I never mentioned kickoffs.

And I did not say "change" the game. I was trying to find out the specific reason(s) why some people use the word "ruin" to describe what the crown rule is doing.

When I played in high school I was taught that no contact should be initiated with the crown of the helmet. So if this rule is "ruining" the game because it eliminates the battering effect of the crown of the helmet, then I guess my HS coaches were ruining football right from the get-go for me.

The game has seen many, many changes. This rule, by itself, is so minor as compared to so many other changes in the game's history (plastic helmets, facemasks, goal posts moved off the field, etc.). It's going to be in the application of it, i.e., how often it is called and how accurately it is called, that will determine how much it changes – or even ruins – the game.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:02 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 9805
JSeahawks wrote:
My guess is that we won't even know this rule exists in 90% of games and it will not have any impact and we won't notice a different. Freaking out about nothing.


How many little things cost us the division and a bye week last season? I don't think I'll soon get over that delay of game in the 49ers-Rams game. I wouldn't make the argument above. Little things can make a huge difference in hyper competitive situations.

As far as the rule, it would be a better rule if it was reviewable. Human error is what worries me, and I think the argument that this might increase injuries has some traction.

It didn't result in a penalty, but remember all the hand wringing over the Golden Tate block in the Dallas game last year? If nothing else, I'd like to tamper down that mindless debate, not exacerbate it. This isn't a good direction for the league to head in, IMO.

I'd support a system where plays are reviewed after games and fines/suspensions might be a consideration (1 game suspensions for flagrant/multiple offenders). That way you are incentivising safe play without inviting blown calls.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:14 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:30 am
Posts: 736
Location: Van Buren, AR from Kent-Covington, WA
I already posted earlier, but this league is starting to become a joke to me. If you can get past the 120-180min of commercials and stoppages and actually get to the 60mins of game time then you are a pro in your own right. It's just getting to point of unwatchable and all the pussy rules and over advertising is starting to make me sick. Unreal.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:20 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4627
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
Fuzzman55 wrote:

They are talking about abandoning kickoffs. They've already almost made return specialists irrelevant by moving up the kickoff spot. How is that not changing the game? What about laying WRs out across the middle? A staple of players like Sam Huff, Ronnie Lott, and Tatum. That's gone. Now the RB, a position that up until this point has been sacrosanct because he's carrying the ball, is being meddled with. Walter Payton would laugh at the absurdity. They are indeed trying to change the game and the way it's played. If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you.

Rog is a lawyer and he's administering the league like a lawyer, with the approval of the owners. I have little patience anymore with their ridiculous fake crusade. It's probably why I get so irritated by the continuous stream of rules they insist on pushing through.



You are 100% correrct!! Dead on!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 1414
JSeahawks wrote:
My guess is that we won't even know this rule exists in 90% of games and it will not have any impact and we won't notice a different. Freaking out about nothing.

This.

Much ado about nothing, imo. The people most upset probable have no idea about this rule and think "physical play" isn't allowed anymore.

_________________
SUPERBOWL!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:24 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm
Posts: 2081
el capitan wrote:
All this player safety BS is really starting to piss me off. Nobody forces the players to play, they all choose to because it beats pumping gas or working a checkout at Walmart.
There are so many far more dangerous jobs done by hard working people who never come close to seeing a million dollars in their whole lifetime never mind the tens of millions that some of these nancy boys make.
Another rule change or two similar to this one and it won't be long before teams are regularly racking up more penalty yards than passing yards.

None of this explains to me why you shouldn't care about their health. Nobody deserves to be paralyzed or become demented for your amusement. I worry about the subjectivity of this rule, and I'm not convinced it's going to work in practice, but as a philosophy I'm glad the league is trying to prolong players' careers and lives.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:42 pm 
* Capt'n Dom *
* Capt'n Dom *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8813
Location: Granite Falls, WA
McG wrote:
I already posted earlier, but this league is starting to become a joke to me. If you can get past the 120-180min of commercials and stoppages and actually get to the 60mins of game time then you are a pro in your own right. It's just getting to point of unwatchable and all the pussy rules and over advertising is starting to make me sick. Unreal.


Feel free to stop watching

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: well they pass the new rule leading with crown...
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:32 pm 
* NET Nobody *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 7596
Steve Mariucci comments

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000152448/Steve-Mariucci-addresses-new-helmet-hit-rule

And Charles Woodson

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000152158/Woodson-on-new-rules-free-agency?continuous=true

Edit: Mayock doesn't like it:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000152140/Mayock-on-new-rule-We-ve-crossed-a-line

_________________
RELEASE THE KRAKEN! (FREE BROWNER!)


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.