USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:45 am
  • http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2013/03/18/free-agency-grades-report-cards-seahawks/1996523/?sf10582197=1

    Lists every team and their grade thus far (albeit early) in free agency. Seahawks are one of only 2 teams with a solid "A". A few other have an "A-"

    Seattle Seahawks (A): The offense (Harvin) and defense (DEs Cliff Avril and Michael Bennett) have been supercharged, and the pay scale really didn't suffer much even if GM John Schneider had to part with a few picks, including this year's first rounder, for Harvin. The Niners should be worried.
    Image

    :les: Check your PM's....We miss you :les:
    User avatar
    kidhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 14012
    Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


Re: USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:58 am
  • Glad we got an A, IMHO they were a bit too generous with other teams grades, some teams hardly did anything and still got high grades.
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11939
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


Re: USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:59 am
  • Sports Hernia wrote:Glad we got an A, IMHO they were a bit too generous with other teams grades, some teams hardly did anything and still got high grades.


    Yeah, there wasn't a lot of depth to them. Seems like they didn't really put a ton of effort into the list, but it's the offseason, and it's good seahawks press, so I'm rolling with it :)
    Image

    :les: Check your PM's....We miss you :les:
    User avatar
    kidhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 14012
    Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


Re: USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:09 pm
  • I dunno. We also got an A in the 09 draft when we got Aaron curry. Look how that turned out. I think we did do well but the grade means nothing. In the pc js era we got bad draft grades, like last year I think we got a D but it turned out to be one of the best in the nfl
    Check out My Seahawks Youtube Channel:

    Image

    http://www.youtube.com/rxstr8
    User avatar
    FreshlySnipes
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 537
    Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:28 pm
    Location: Mercer Island/ Menlo Park


Re: USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:14 pm
  • All the hawks have done is fill needs with great players, anything other then A/A+ would be unfair and laughed at.
    Spokane
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 700
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am


Re: USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:26 pm
  • lul the Niners have a B
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2242
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


Re: USA Today NFL Free Agency Report Card
Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:54 pm
  • FreshlySnipes wrote:I dunno. We also got an A in the 09 draft when we got Aaron curry. Look how that turned out. I think we did do well but the grade means nothing. In the pc js era we got bad draft grades, like last year I think we got a D but it turned out to be one of the best in the nfl


    Very true. However, that draft did get us two all-pros though, albeit one indirectly.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11227
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Why do the Packers get an A- for losing their best WR and not signing anyone? Yahoo, you so funny.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3474
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


  • FreshlySnipes wrote:I dunno. We also got an A in the 09 draft when we got Aaron curry. Look how that turned out. I think we did do well but the grade means nothing. In the pc js era we got bad draft grades, like last year I think we got a D but it turned out to be one of the best in the nfl


    Although I don't put stock into any of the grades, whether it be free agent or draft, I do find them interesting in regards to national opinions.

    Also, I don't think grading drafts and free agency is very much alike. Too many people try to grade the draft without any knowledge of what these players honestly can bring to the team that drafted them. It really takes 2-3 years MINIMUM before you can fully grade out a draft class. Even last years class started out very low and is now being regarded as one of the best, but IMO we still need to see what happens in 2 more years and see what they've continued to bring to our team before we can give it a TRUE grade.

    Free agency is different because you are bringing in established veterans who have histories in the NFL to base the projections on. I still think the final grades come out on free agency later in the season and perhaps not until after the Superbowl, but much quicker than final draft grades.
    Image

    :les: Check your PM's....We miss you :les:
    User avatar
    kidhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 14012
    Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:Why do the Packers get an A- for losing their best WR and not signing anyone? Yahoo, you so funny.


    Because everything they do is awesome. lol.

    Yahoo=Bleacher Report.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9291
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:Why do the Packers get an A- for losing their best WR and not signing anyone? Yahoo, you so funny.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9291
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


  • I am totally cool with the media respect. The Hawks deserve it. Unlike previous regimes, PCJS aren't looking for has-beens or aging vets to band-aid issues.


    In the Ruskell era, it was Wistrom, Branch, TJ, JJ, Pollard and Kerney.

    They made SWEET deals to improve the pass rush with young, value-added-blue-chip players. Then spent some money on explosive to an already dangerous offense.

    They still haven't drafted for 2013, they have plenty of picks to satisfy any issues they might perceive and it is safe to say given their previous draft success that they will hit on probably two players at minimum.

    The thing I like the most about all the hype is that none of it will go to RW's head. This isn't the Michael Vick, Desean Jackson Eagles labeling themselves the "dream team". The only ones doing that are the ones that hope the Hawks fail.
    "The life you lose may be your own" - Drunk dude at the bar
    User avatar
    loafoftatupu
    I'M JIMMY!
     
    Posts: 5885
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
    Location: Auburn, WA


  • Sgt. Largent wrote:Why do the Packers get an A- for losing their best WR and not signing anyone? Yahoo, you so funny.


    Great point... So the Vikes take away one of the Packs best players, adding it to their roster (let's not forget that Jennings knows the offense quite well) while the Pack does nothing of any impact and they get a grade at all?

    The Packers need to create a defense and a running game with the draft and late pickups from the wire. The NFCW teams are going to destroy the NFCN teams next year. Niners will MAUL that Packer team, the Hawks will take out the Vikes and the Rams will eat the Bears for breakfast. The Lions, are actually my pick out of the North next year. I think they are better than last year by far and get the last place schedule on top of it.
    "The life you lose may be your own" - Drunk dude at the bar
    User avatar
    loafoftatupu
    I'M JIMMY!
     
    Posts: 5885
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
    Location: Auburn, WA


  • kidhawk wrote:
    FreshlySnipes wrote:I dunno. We also got an A in the 09 draft when we got Aaron curry. Look how that turned out. I think we did do well but the grade means nothing. In the pc js era we got bad draft grades, like last year I think we got a D but it turned out to be one of the best in the nfl


    Although I don't put stock into any of the grades, whether it be free agent or draft, I do find them interesting in regards to national opinions.

    Also, I don't think grading drafts and free agency is very much alike. Too many people try to grade the draft without any knowledge of what these players honestly can bring to the team that drafted them. It really takes 2-3 years MINIMUM before you can fully grade out a draft class. Even last years class started out very low and is now being regarded as one of the best, but IMO we still need to see what happens in 2 more years and see what they've continued to bring to our team before we can give it a TRUE grade.

    Free agency is different because you are bringing in established veterans who have histories in the NFL to base the projections on. I still think the final grades come out on free agency later in the season and perhaps not until after the Superbowl, but much quicker than final draft grades.

    Very true, I try to look at it almost like entertainment. Some of these bozos know less than we do as average Joes and like us sometimes let their biases get in the way.
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11939
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


  • Harvin wasn't acquired through free agency and free agency has just started. This report gives credit for street free agent signings and trades. Poor report. And really who cares who wins March. I want the Hawks to win January and February.
    I'm In!


    What attracted you to the Seahawks?
    “It’s a combination of what I believe the coaches are doing here, the atmosphere and what I think we’re going to do here in the future. I think we’re going to win and win a lot and be a championship team.” – Zac Miller, August 4, 2011
    User avatar
    Seafan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3499
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:30 pm
    Location: Helotes, TX


  • CALIHAWK1 wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:Why do the Packers get an A- for losing their best WR and not signing anyone? Yahoo, you so funny.


    Because everything they do is awesome. lol.

    Yahoo=Bleacher Report.


    It isn't Yahoo!, it's USA Today.
    User avatar
    NorthDallas40oz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 681
    Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:04 pm




It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 2:28 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online