 |
| Author |
Message |
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: Doug Baldwin to be traded? (Colts, speculation)  Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am
Posts: 2098
|
|
Baldwin's not going anywhere soon.
I can't imagine any team wanting to trade for him at his current value.
_________________
"Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: Doug Baldwin to be traded? Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:38 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4873
|
ivotuk wrote: Smelly McUgly wrote: Add to this that I think Jim Irsay is unstable and needs to be removed from Twitter This is an excellent idea! Irsay's ignorant and juvenile tweet's only further prove Smelly's point: “ColtFans, we already past the cap cash wise/ we’re working on a deal, 1 we’ve been workin on for 5 days/ we’re very,very close 2 making it work.’’ “Everyone stand buy,pour strong drink…do ur voodoo,Colts need the strength and it’s nation to get this wopper in the boat! DO U UNDERSTAND!?” Maybe all of this was about signing Hasselbeck?  _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Doug Baldwin to be traded? (Colts, speculation) Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:33 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8751
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
McGruff wrote: DJrmb wrote: If Harvin goes down Tate can slide into that position better than anyone. How long have people been saying he's the poor mans Percy Harvin? Then you play an Outside WR in Tate's old spot not a slot guy. Thats why Kearse and Williams are guys I'd keep, they're both more of your Outside WR than Baldwin.
People seem to be low on Kearse here but he's shown some flashes and is one of the few guys that could play Sidney's role in a pinch. Tate is NOT a slot receiver. Doesn't have the skills for it. He's an outside guy only. If Harvin went down, Tate would play outside and Baldwin would play slot. I know, I keep hearing this thought that Tate is some slot guy repeated over and over but it just doesn't add up. You have to be a precise route runner to be a slot guy, and Tate's biggest knock has always been his lack of precise route running. No, Tate has made his money on the outside. Watch his hilights. He's a "go get it" kind of reciever and every good catch I remember him making ocurred near the sideline. Calling Tate a slot guy because he's short is just a lazy analysis...
_________________
My milkshake brings all the turtles to the yard.... damn right... and men's room Drakkar... damn right... and men's room Drakkar.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Doug Baldwin to be traded? (Colts, speculation) Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1196
|
|
Not judging anyone, but why is this thread 9 pages long?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CALIHAWK1
|
Post subject: Re: Doug Baldwin to be traded? (Colts, speculation) Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:16 am |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 6255
Location: Is Everything
|
SNDavidson wrote: Not judging anyone, but why is this thread 9 pages long? Because of posts like yours and mine.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Starrman44
|
Post subject: Re: Doug Baldwin to be traded? (Colts, speculation) Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:34 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Canby, OR
|
CALIHAWK1 wrote: SNDavidson wrote: Not judging anyone, but why is this thread 9 pages long? Because of posts like yours and mine. +1 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thMan1, 671hawk, Animalman, Basis4day, BCHawk, BoatsAndHose, bryantology79, bytor72, CamanoIslandJQ, City, Clayfighter, CornerHawk, DavidCruz24, DavidSeven, dbmack, drdiags, DSM, dumbrabbit, Evil_Shenanigans, Floridahawk79, FormerEvil, Frostbyte, geoff21, GhostHawk, Google [Bot], grizbob, Hawk-A-Loogie, Hawker, hawkfan333, Hawks46, hawksfan1976, hedgehawk, Jadow, jammerhawk, jdblack, Lieutenant Dan, loafoftatupu, Maelstrom787, Mandu, MontanaHawk05, Msfann, OkieHawk, oldhawkfan, onanygivensunday, openureyez, oregonhawkfan, red17hawk, RolandDeschain, sainthawk29, Sarlacc83, Scottemojo, SDHawk, Sgt. Largent, Shock2k, SilNWest, silverjoel, SirTed, Spounge84, SPRC, Starrman44, Stone Cold, streets24, T-Sizzle, tacomahawk, the_12th_man, thecycle, travlinhawk, twisted_steel2, xCalibur, Zukistubbs and 186 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
