Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Worst move by the GM and coach we shall not name?
Dropping Weaver for Justin Griffith 8%  8%  [ 8 ]
Signing Housh 14%  14%  [ 15 ]
Keeping 2 kickers and Cutting Mr. Bennett 32%  32%  [ 34 ]
Curry!! 46%  46%  [ 49 ]
Total votes : 106
 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:40 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:46 pm
Posts: 742
Location: in "The" mouth
I shudder even thinking of the dark days only a few years ago. The moves were plentiful and most left me distraught. Which one had you screaming at your Tv/computer/significant other?

For me it was surely the "Weaver isn't worth $2mil" move :pukeface:

But Dropping our newest DE/DT weapon back then to keep 2 kickers was epic (in the context of epicly stupid).

_________________
Image

Said Wilson: " before I got back to the tunnel, walking off the field, I got so excited for the next opportunity, next year We have a great football team."


Last edited by tooshort on Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:43 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11338
Location: Graham, WA
Curry, We could've had Orakpo or any other pass rusher, but dude really got caught up in the Curry hype, so much so that he OPENED a hole by trading Peterson to get him.

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:47 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 4975
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Well hindsight is 20/20 , but damn near everyone was all over Currys Jock. "safest pick" and "best linebacker to come out of college in a decade" and blah blah blah. So as bad as that pick was you can pretty much take it off the list because no matter what your opinion of him was at that time, no one saw him being a complete, total and absolute bust. Anyone could have made that mistake.

There are other really bad mistakes that aren't listed here too like.... pisspoor attempts at replacing the best left guard of all time who left because of he-who-shall-not-be-named, or trading a 1st rounder for Deion Branch. Thinking that Julius Jones was the answer at RB. Drafting horribly damn near every single year, the list just goes on and on.

Picking just out of your poll choices here though I'd say dropping Weaver but thats just my personal opinion of course. I loved Weaver, hated seeing him go.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:48 am 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14205
Location: Kirkland, WA
Curry, and it's not even close, IMO. As Bellinger points out though, EVERYONE had him ranked way too highly. If that disqualifies it in a manner of speaking, then dropping Weaver.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:57 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:46 pm
Posts: 742
Location: in "The" mouth
I should have coined this "in the LAST dark year"

The moves after 2005 were somewhere between above average and awful.. 2009?gaaaaahhhh!

_________________
Image

Said Wilson: " before I got back to the tunnel, walking off the field, I got so excited for the next opportunity, next year We have a great football team."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:02 am 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7234
Uh, transition tag anyone?

Branch trade, Babin release, and ditching Arian Foster at the 7th round altar deserve mention as well.

Edit: Oh, you just mean in 2009? Curry by a landslide, with Foster, Babin, and Bennett all eating Curry's dust. We also got Unger that year and a pick that turned into Earl Thomas. It was a complicated offseason, to say the least.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Last edited by kearly on Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:11 am, edited 4 times in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:04 am 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7234
bellingerga wrote:
Well hindsight is 20/20 , but damn near everyone was all over Currys Jock. "safest pick" and "best linebacker to come out of college in a decade" and blah blah blah. So as bad as that pick was you can pretty much take it off the list because no matter what your opinion of him was at that time, no one saw him being a complete, total and absolute bust. Anyone could have made that mistake.

There are other really bad mistakes that aren't listed here too like.... pisspoor attempts at replacing the best left guard of all time who left because of he-who-shall-not-be-named, or trading a 1st rounder for Deion Branch. Thinking that Julius Jones was the answer at RB. Drafting horribly damn near every single year, the list just goes on and on.

Picking just out of your poll choices here though I'd say dropping Weaver but thats just my personal opinion of course. I loved Weaver, hated seeing him go.


Every time someone mentions this I always have to re-tell the story.

It's funny, I think there were exactly 3 Seahawks fans that broke down Curry's tape and gave an independent informed opinion on him before that draft. English, Snohomie, and myself. We all hated Curry as a prospect and thought he was clearly fool's gold. I don't think any of us even viewed him as a 1st rounder.

Snohomie and myself flipped shit pretty badly when Seattle picked him. Some people around here remember it well, unfortunately for me.

Also, you know where the "safest player in the draft" label came from? Mel Kiper. I rest my case.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Last edited by kearly on Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:11 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:57 am
Posts: 139
They key here for me was " worst" move.
So i voted for the kicker/ Bennett move * which after today it isnt hard to talk about anymore*
They drafted Curry who many believed was the "safest" choice because he was the most NFL ready.
Yes they could of used it on someone else that could have the current team improved .BUT they could of got sanchez.
The dark road that sends the team down is so mind numbingly scary...He shines for the first few seasons...then just a drop off...the chaos the team would be in now....thats a story for another time.
The Curry thing could of led to MUCH worse situations.
id rather bite the bullet on that then what might have happened if they didnt get him.
But keeping a kicker over a young shining pass rusher...come on.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:14 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:46 pm
Posts: 742
Location: in "The" mouth
kearly wrote:
Uh, transition tag anyone?

Branch trade, Babin release, and ditching Arian Foster at the 7th round altar deserve mention as well.

Edit: Oh, you just mean in 2009? Curry by a landslide.


so you don't like us? Ruskell slams down phone VS Harvin,Avril,Bennett all lovin where they're going...It's a new day!

_________________
Image

Said Wilson: " before I got back to the tunnel, walking off the field, I got so excited for the next opportunity, next year We have a great football team."


Last edited by tooshort on Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:15 am 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7234
Funny thing about the Curry pick, as awful as it was, it helped get Tim Ruskell fired. Maybe if he takes Sanchez, maybe Ruskell gets a 2 year extension on account of a new QB. I don't know what the alternate timelines look like, but I have to believe it at least played a factor. If it did, you could argue that it was the best 1st round pick in the history of the franchise.

Also, we have a 5th rounder coming in this draft for Curry, in a year where a 5th feels an awful lot like a 3rd. We got a 7th last year- a pick that turned into JR Sweezy, who is already a more promising pro than Curry ever was.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:26 pm
Posts: 2350
Location: Longview, WA
Of course curry is gonna win the vote. Hindsight is 20/20. But really. When it come to actual roster moves, on a team lacking big play makers, weaver was a beast. Plain and simple

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:09 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6144
Location: Renton Wa.
This question is like saying which of those dishes in the frige are you going to eat that have been sitting for three weeks in tupperware, moldy and all bad, some you just want to toss the tupperware and whats inside without braving the circumtsance to find out.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:30 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11338
Location: Graham, WA
RolandDeschain wrote:
Curry, and it's not even close, IMO. As Bellinger points out though, EVERYONE had him ranked way too highly. If that disqualifies it in a manner of speaking, then dropping Weaver.


Ruskell was being paid to be smarter than us, I don't see that as an excuse.

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:05 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
Posts: 281
Location: Spokane, WA
The Curry pick was the worst, with Housch a close second.

However, the only good thing this regime did was trade our 2nd round pick to the Broncos in exchange for a 1st
round pick the next year. We then used this pick on Earl Thomas.

_________________
No autographs please


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:08 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 623
I find it amusing that Ruskell's worst and best moves came in the same draft: taking Curry and trading for an extra first rounder in 2010.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:10 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:14 am
Posts: 567
Location: Blaine, WA
Bennett was not related to the kicker thing.

_________________
<A>
<IMG></A>


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:12 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:14 am
Posts: 567
Location: Blaine, WA
McGruff wrote:
Bennett was not related to the kicker thing.


Bennett actually made the final roster his rookie year. But he was cut early in the season due to injuries at OT. We cut him to sign LT Kyle Williams.

_________________
<A>
<IMG></A>


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In the Dark Times
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:14 am 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14205
Location: Kirkland, WA
Throwdown wrote:
Ruskell was being paid to be smarter than us, I don't see that as an excuse.


Good thing that totally works. :lol:


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:15 am 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16277
Location: Bothell
So many bad decisions. Why stop at just four options?

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In our last Dark Year
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:16 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 7464
Location: Monroe, WA
kearly wrote:
Funny thing about the Curry pick, as awful as it was, it helped get Tim Ruskell fired. Maybe if he takes Sanchez, maybe Ruskell gets a 2 year extension on account of a new QB. I don't know what the alternate timelines look like, but I have to believe it at least played a factor. If it did, you could argue that it was the best 1st round pick in the history of the franchise.

Also, we have a 5th rounder coming in this draft for Curry, in a year where a 5th feels an awful lot like a 3rd. We got a 7th last year- a pick that turned into JR Sweezy, who is already a more promising pro than Curry ever was.

Except, Tim wasn't fired, he quit before the end of the season, which left Mora twisting in the wind and the players all wondering why they should care when the front office was so screwed up. If Timmay hadn't hit the door early, Mora might have gotten another season, which would have delayed Pete's arrival, maybe permanently.

IAE, I consider draft busts somewhat understandable in the shit happens category,and FAs disappoint all the time, especially in Seattle, so I had to go with the 2 kickers fiasco. At the time I remember somewhat understanding the idea behind the 2 kicker reasoning, but losing Bennett sucked big time. Was there no one else they could have cut?

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.