Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:02 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 3521
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
Emmet Smith was correct, "This rule doesn't make any sense."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:07 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1447
Don't blame Godell for anything. He isn't suing the league.....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:10 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15597
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Bigpumpkin wrote:
Emmet Smith was correct, "This rule doesn't make any sense."


Emmitt Smith probably isnt smart enough to know what the potential new rule is. Its only for leading with the helmet when outside of the tackle box. And it makes perfect sense. Why should RB's be able to lead with the helmet when defenders cannot? It will have no effect in short yardage situations and will have no effect on beast mode since he rarely leads with his head in the open field, preferring to give monster stiff arms.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:24 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:17 am
Posts: 642
Location: Lewiston, CA (but Seattle native :)
JSeahawks wrote:
Its only for leading with the helmet when outside of the tackle box. And it makes perfect sense. Why should RB's be able to lead with the helmet when defenders cannot?


Seems reminescent of what MRob did in a game (can't remember which one) where he lowered his head and just ruined a corner...and then immediately went over to see if the guy was alright, looking real concerned. Is that what they're talking about here?

_________________
Image
"John Schneider is...half ninja assassin, half shark. This
man does not screw around...So glad he is our GM."
- PGunning101


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:28 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15597
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
gargantual wrote:
JSeahawks wrote:
Its only for leading with the helmet when outside of the tackle box. And it makes perfect sense. Why should RB's be able to lead with the helmet when defenders cannot?


Seems reminescent of what MRob did in a game (can't remember which one) where he lowered his head and just ruined a corner...and then immediately went over to see if the guy was alright, looking real concerned. Is that what they're talking about here?


I know the play youre talking about but can't remember if M Rob led with his head or not. The play I remember is Adrian Peterson spearing Early Thomas 20 yards down the field. Pissed ET off pretty badly.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:29 pm 
NET Veteran
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1443
gargantual wrote:
JSeahawks wrote:
Its only for leading with the helmet when outside of the tackle box. And it makes perfect sense. Why should RB's be able to lead with the helmet when defenders cannot?


Seems reminescent of what MRob did in a game (can't remember which one) where he lowered his head and just ruined a corner...and then immediately went over to see if the guy was alright, looking real concerned. Is that what they're talking about here?


No. The play you mentioned was a shoulder to shoulder hit on Jennings from the Bears.

_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:39 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
Like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt62eVLZprc

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:44 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
I don't like the rule. The enforcement of the current helmet-to-helmet contact rule (the official name escapes me) has been inconsistent at best, and this would be no different, IMO.

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:46 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:17 am
Posts: 642
Location: Lewiston, CA (but Seattle native :)
CurryStopstheRuns wrote:
gargantual wrote:
JSeahawks wrote:
Its only for leading with the helmet when outside of the tackle box. And it makes perfect sense. Why should RB's be able to lead with the helmet when defenders cannot?


Seems reminescent of what MRob did in a game (can't remember which one) where he lowered his head and just ruined a corner...and then immediately went over to see if the guy was alright, looking real concerned. Is that what they're talking about here?


No. The play you mentioned was a shoulder to shoulder hit on Jennings from the Bears.

Yup, that's the one. Da Bears game last year.

I coulda sworn he lowered his head and hit with his helmet. (It made such an impression that maybe my mind was getting it mixed up with that Tatupu hit in the NFCC Game, which was a helmet to helmet cruncher!).

Of course any way getting hit by Michael Robinson would be devastating to take!

_________________
Image
"John Schneider is...half ninja assassin, half shark. This
man does not screw around...So glad he is our GM."
- PGunning101


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:47 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am
Posts: 719
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Running backs are going to look so STUPID running around with their bodies straight up and down.


If this passes, I will have lost all hope for the future of the NFL.

_________________
Go Hawks.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:06 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6177
Location: Renton Wa.
It's spearing with your helmet not lowering your shoulders, using the crown of your helmet as a weapon type hit. If your lower your shoulders your head will follow and hit somwhere but not the noticable head dip to use the headbutt.

All that being said in a moment of impact I'm sure the officials will screw this up more then get it right.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:13 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 1362
Rog and the owners - as good as the game has been to them - what a bunch of scared little boys.

They're so afraid of litigation they'll diminish the NFL until it's unrecognizable. No backbone. No line in the sand. I wish this would come back and bite them somehow, but they're too busy making money hand over to fist to care.

_________________
Tall men come down to my height when I hit 'em in the body.

Jack Dempsey


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:31 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1165
Basically they want RBs to run like they want defenders to tackle - ie. no leading with the head, which is fine by me. I hate seeing running backs do to wannabee tacklers exactly what they're not allowed to do to the running backs.

Fortunately Lynch doesn't run like that, he puts his head down and runs but he'll never use it to take a defender out (physically, mentally he takes defenders out all the time)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 8:18 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
Posts: 288
Location: Spokane, WA
This rule better not be passed. How is the running back supposed to protect himself if he has to keep his head up and be exposed to shots under the chin?

It makes no sense!

_________________
No autographs please


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:37 pm 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8942
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
Jerhawk wrote:
This rule better not be passed. How is the running back supposed to protect himself if he has to keep his head up and be exposed to shots under the chin?

It makes no sense!


You know how you make people stop leading with their head? Get rid of the helmets. Self preservation instincts will kick in.

As iconic as the football helmet has become to the sport, it has caused (imo) just as many injuries as it has ever prevented.

_________________
Hodor Hodor Hodor. HODOR HODOR!! Hodor? Hodor...? HODOR HODOR!? Hodor.....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:40 pm 
NET Pro Bowler
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16615
Location: SoCal
So, they are saying the running back should stop and say, you silly savage, you can tackle me after the game? Pathetic does not even describe this.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:46 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm
Posts: 1499
Horrifying.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:52 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm
Posts: 1499
JSeahawks wrote:
They were talking about this on the radio the other day. It would only be in effect when the runner is outside of the tackle box. So would not be in effect on 3rd and 4th adn short situations or when running between the tackles.

They're talking about plays like when Adrian Peterson speared Earl Thomas last year. I think its a good rule personally. And would not effect Beast Mode at all.


Weak and lame.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:55 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1313


I think this is more in line with their intentions.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New rule might hurt Beast Mode running style
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:56 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15597
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Basis4day wrote:


I think this is more in line with their intentions.


That was in the tackle box so would be allowed within the rules, from what I understand.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.