Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:05 am 
* Smackmeister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6384
QB
Russell Wilson

RB
Marshawn Lynch
Robert Turbin
Michael Robinson

WR
Percy Harvin
Golden Tate
Sidney Rice
Doug Baldwin

TE
Zach Miller

OL
Russell Okung
John Moffit
Max Unger
James Carpenter
Breno Giocamini
J.R. Sweezy


I see 11 of those 14 on the field the majority of the game. Are we done? Are we still missing anything?

IMO that is a dream offense. When the Cardinals went to the Superbowl and lost in the final minute to the Steelers, they had Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin (both in their prime) and Kurt Warner (at the end of his career) and not much of a running game. With the offensive weapons we'll be trotting out next season we have playmakers at every position. We have a QB who can run or pass, we have a WR who can line up anywhere and is a homerun threat everytime he touches the ball. We have two WR who can throw beautiful TD passes...

_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:08 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 943
We STILL need Carpenter to remain healthy @ LG. And if that's the case, I would prefer an upgrade @ RT. And preferably RG as well, if neither Sweezy or Moffit can step it up. Sweezy has potential I think, but until he cleans things up, he's still a project. And just the fact that Moffit didn't start over him, leads me to believe that the team isn't necessarily too impressed- which is enough for me to downplay him, as much as I like his personality and believe he's great in the locker room. So in other words, I would gladly take some help on the O-line.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:11 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1291
The pieces are there for sure. Any additions, to me, are nitpicking at his point and depend on your overall offensive philosophy.

I still have high hopes for Carp there. Look what happened to Unger and Okung at the three year mark.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:12 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:01 pm
Posts: 1701
Location: Vancouver, Wa
I'd say the core of the offense is on the roster, but with as much two tightend sets the hawks run, I'd like to see an upgrade over McCoy with a better receiver, YAC type.

I'd also like a speed RB added to replace Leon.

_________________
I got passion for my Hawks and I ain't afraid to show it


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:12 am 
* NET E-Knight *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3526
nategreat wrote:
We STILL need Carpenter to remain healthy @ LG. And if that's the case, I would prefer an upgrade @ RT. And preferably RG as well, if neither Sweezy or Moffit can step it up. So in other words, I would gladly take some help on the O-line.


Breno graded out pretty highly at RT, and cut down on the flags a lot by the end of the season. I think the idea of upgrading ANY position sounds great on paper, but the likelyhood of doing that at RT will be harder than most people think.

I 100% agree with you though, LG/RG are really the only spots that are wild cards for me on offense.

To Jester's OP, this is as complete of an offense as we have fielded in a LONG time (maybe ever). And we aren't even half way through the offseason yet.

_________________
cboom wrote:
Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:15 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 11:27 pm
Posts: 730
Get us a pro bowler right guard and we are set on offense although id love to have Reggie Bush on our roster also.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:18 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 2815
Move TE is about it in my opinion, don't really have space for a big Mike Williams type at this point. And a scat back behind Turbs and Marshawn.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:22 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:28 am
Posts: 265
Location: Lewiston Idaho
i would say another pass catching tight end to compliment Miller and push McCoy. I could live with Breno another season at RT if we couldn't find some where better as it was stated already that he did cut down on his penalties as the season wore on.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:23 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 2090
Location: Tri Cities, WA
i don't think we need to address TE at all, i'm happy with McCoy behind Miller... just needs to get a little more consistant.. but he's shown he can come up with big plays.. and Miller was off the Charts last part of the season..

i think they should focus on defense at this point.

_________________
On to the Next Episode


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:23 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:44 am
Posts: 1089
I don't know about complete, but probably adequate. As already mentioned, some retooling of the OL is likely in order. And another wideout. I really have grown to covet Va Tech WR Marcus Davis. 6'4, 230. 44" vert / 4.37 40. Could be a steal in the 4th/5th rd and surprise a lot of people.

_________________
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 300 character limit.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:24 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10268
Location: Anchorage, AK
Recon_Hawk wrote:
I'd also like a speed RB added to replace Leon.


Harvin and Tate can both be that speed guy being used with the occasional end around, or in the screen game to supplement the power run attack.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:29 am 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15442
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Add either Sefarian Jenkins or Colt Lyerla in next year's 1st round, then its complete.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:33 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:45 pm
Posts: 537
Location: Yakima
Pass blocking. Whether it's new blood or upskilling the guys that are there,
Russell needs just a little more time.

I hope they re-sign Frank Omiyale who provided good play when he was needed.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:38 am 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8754
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
Recon_Hawk wrote:
I'd say the core of the offense is on the roster, but with as much two tightend sets the hawks run, I'd like to see an upgrade over McCoy with a better receiver, YAC type.

I'd also like a speed RB added to replace Leon.


I think McCoy is just fine as depth for Miller. He was really solid as a second TE last year. What I'd like to see is that H-back/Joker type of tight end added to the group, but if we go into the season with just Miller and McCoy, I'll be comfortable with that.

From what I've seen on him, I don't think it's all that much of a stretch to envision Harvin in the back field as the 3rd down back. In 2011 Harvin rushed 52 times for 350 with a 6.6 yard average. That's pretty consistent with anything Leon's ever done as a "change of pace", and I think we'd all agree that Harvin is a much bigger receiving threat than Leon. That would be a pretty dynamic look actually; 3 wide with Rice, Tate, Baldwin and Miller at TE with Harvin in the backfield. The possibilities out of a look like that are almost endless... Trips, trips bunch, read option... read option end around out of trips bunch... read option end around WR pass to a streaking Russell Wilson down the sideline... omg... it's crazier than Tecmo Bowl.

The O-line is pretty solid IMO, just need to get Carp healthy. Okung and Unger are all world talents as far as I'm concerned. Carp looked pretty good at LG, but needs to stay healthy (I still have lots of hope for him). Breno's really pulled up his socks with the bonehead stuff and was pretty good last year. Sure we could upgrade, but it's not a huge need right now. If there's a weak spot, it's RG. Either Sweezy or Moffitt really needs to step up and take over the position this year. Glad to have McQuistan though. Guy is a swill army knife. Omiyale and Lemuel seem to be pretty solid back ups.

So yeah, I'd say the offense is about as complete as you can ever hope to get anything complete in today's NFL.

_________________
My milkshake brings all the turtles to the yard.... damn right... and men's room Drakkar... damn right... and men's room Drakkar.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:39 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 943
kidhawk wrote:
Recon_Hawk wrote:
I'd also like a speed RB added to replace Leon.


Harvin and Tate can both be that speed guy being used with the occasional end around, or in the screen game to supplement the power run attack.


True, but we are going to need to have 3 RB on the depth chart, regardless, IMO. And with Beast Mode and Turbin having somewhat similar styles, I would prefer a speed-back type as a change of pace- someone like Kendall Hunter or LaMichael James. I'm sure this can be found in the draft.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:43 am 
* NET E-Knight *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3526
nategreat wrote:
kidhawk wrote:
Recon_Hawk wrote:
I'd also like a speed RB added to replace Leon.


Harvin and Tate can both be that speed guy being used with the occasional end around, or in the screen game to supplement the power run attack.


True, but we are going to need to have 3 RB on the depth chart, regardless, IMO. And with Beast Mode and Turbin having somewhat similar styles, I would prefer a speed-back type as a change of pace- someone like Kendall Hunter or LaMichael James. I'm sure this can be found in the draft.


If the have 3 RBs, it will most likely be for the sake of special teams, and obviously not on returns. Turbin as big as he is, really is more of a COP than Lynch. They loved using Turbin on third down last year, and I think that continues into next. Harvin/Tate both have the ability to be scatbacks, with Turbin providing the more traditional change of pace. If they do keep a 3rd I don't see a situation, outside of injury or simply blowing a team out of the water, where we see him on the field much on offense.

_________________
cboom wrote:
Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:45 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10268
Location: Anchorage, AK
nategreat wrote:
kidhawk wrote:
Recon_Hawk wrote:
I'd also like a speed RB added to replace Leon.


Harvin and Tate can both be that speed guy being used with the occasional end around, or in the screen game to supplement the power run attack.


True, but we are going to need to have 3 RB on the depth chart, regardless, IMO. And with Beast Mode and Turbin having somewhat similar styles, I would prefer a speed-back type as a change of pace- someone like Kendall Hunter or LaMichael James. I'm sure this can be found in the draft.


Honestly I don't see a specific need for a 3rd RB on the roster. I can see us drafting one later in the draft and maybe putting them on the practice squad, but Leon was pretty much just there for special teams and really only played RB very rarely.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:51 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:58 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Anchorage, AK
OL edit: Okung-Carp-Unger-McQuistain-Gacospagetti

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:51 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:14 am
Posts: 567
Location: Blaine, WA
We need one of our three young guards to become what we hope they can be . . . and we need long term upgrades to Giacomini and McQuistan.

_________________
<A>
<IMG></A>


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the offense "complete"?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:51 am 
* Smackmeister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6384
I would rather see Michael Robinson's eventual replacement as a 3rd RB. Love MRob but he is 30 this year, we gotta get the FBOTF on the roster NOW!

_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.