Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:46 pm 
* NET Cynic *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: St. Louis, MO
With their minimal contracts, we get next to no salary cap relief by getting rid of either. Having too many good targets in the passing game is hardly a bad thing.

That being said, I'd listen to trade offers. I doubt we'd get more than a third for either, however, and that wouldn't be worth it. Tate is a clutch guy, and while Baldwin disappointed me somewhat last year, he's still useful.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:50 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 1141
JSeahawks wrote:
kearly wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
Baldwin can get a RFA tag next year, so why is he part of this question? And Tate is going to want paid. But by the end of this year he just could warrant a good payday too. Tag him if need be.

Way too soon to start worrying about crap like this.


I imagine Seattle will place a 2nd round RFA tag on Baldwin next year and hope a team steps up to help them recoup that mid rounder from the Harvin trade.


Tate is going to be a restricted free agent as well I believe? Or will he be unrestricted? He'll be 4 years into his career, dont you need 5 to be unrestricted?


They changed it in the new CBA, unrestricted after the 4th year. The bright side to that is you get to keep Baldwin for dirt cheap.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:01 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 3183
Basis4day wrote:
It suggests to me that it's the end of Ben Obomanu and his 2.3 million contract next year.

This, Pete isn't going to screw around with the chemestry that Wilson and Tate have developed.
Why is bringing in Harvin an automatic assumption to canning a POSITIVE??
Obo will likely be shown the exit door, but Baldwin and Tate?, I'd say are safe at home.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:18 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 am
Posts: 757
I think Tate and Baldy stay in 2013.

However, if Harvin blows up the Seahawks offense, Superbowl or not, Bevell is going to be a head coach somewhere. Depeneding on the team that hires him, I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if Flynn and Tate or Baldy follow him.

thinking Idzik in New York, and the leash that Rex Ryan and Sanchez will be on, might be a destination.

_________________
Last edited by Russell Wilson on Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:20 pm, edited 29-3 times in total.
Last edited by NFC Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:14 pm, edited 23-17 times in total.
Last edited by World Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Feb 2, 2014 7:14 pm, edited 43-8 times in total.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:39 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: The 5-0
There has to be someone out there that would give us a 1st for Flynn, Baldwin, Obo and Washington. C'mon...someone. We are a pass rush away from history. C'mon...someone.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:27 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:06 pm
Posts: 951
After thinking about it, Tate will stay for a variety of reasons.

-To take over PR/KR duties from Leon (no I dont want Harvin doing PR/KR after signing a huge contract)
-Although Harvin is greatly a better WR than Tate, Tate is a better deep threat and the best deep threat on the team.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:57 am 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:18 am
Posts: 334
heard schneider is real big on the stephen williams kid... hes a big physical wr and wouldnt be surprised if hes part of the 53!!! I dont see us drafting a wr now, i see us addressing the d line, lb, off line, 3rd rb, and joker tight end!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:23 am 
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:31 am
Posts: 1135
Location: Washington
Both will be here...Obo out. IMHO


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the end of Tate or Baldwin?
 Post Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:44 am 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:14 am
Posts: 1429
Location: Blaine, WA
DJrmb wrote:
Tech Worlds wrote:
Both will be on the team.

Why would we want to go and weaken a position that we just shored up? Crazy talk.


You weaken the position by keeping too many of the same type of player. There are 3 different WR spots. With 3 different responsibilities and ideal attributes. You can't just keep all slot guys...

It's crazy talk to think that you can just throw a slot WR out as a flanker and be fine.

People realize there is a difference between a SS and a FS. You wouldn't play Kam Chancellor in Earls role. Well same with WR...


Tate is not a slot guy. Just cause he's short doesn't make him a slot. Tate is a split end, end of story.

Harvin is multi-dimensional. He'll play flanker or split end in two WR sets. They'll even put him and Rice to one side opposite a TE. He'll move to the slot in three WR sets. He'll line up in the backfield and be a threat to run or receive.

Baldwin is a pure slot guy.

_________________
<A>
<IMG></A>


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 707HAWKfan, 86Hawk, AbsolutNET, ASuperForce, AVL, balko56, Barthawk, BeaHUman, benthebeerman, Blitzer88, blue 22, Brahn, brodad, bryantology79, CANHawk, Chrome_Seahawk, Cinque52, CitrusHawk, Crabhawk, DavidSeven, Deterrence, drdiags, drrew, DynoHawk, EverydayImRusselin, FearTheBeak, fridayfrenzy, G-Money, Geologic, GoHawks, Goodwin Seahawk, Google [Bot], Greenhell, grizbob, Hasselbeck, Hawkfan77, hawknation2014, Hawknballs, heffmanhere, HuskyHawk, IcedHawk, IndyHawk, Jase, JZ#1, KARAVARUS, Largent80, LusciousJames, MadSweeney, ManBunts, Marvin49, MexHawk, MichaelHawk70, Missing_Clink, Nateruw, Natethegreat, Our Man in Chicago, PhillySeahawk, razgriz737, rj503, RobBaker7714409, Rob_Grimm, Rocket, RockHawk, RolandDeschain, RynoHawk, SacHawk2.0, salukihawk12, Seahawks4life, seahawksny, SHOCKER315, Snakeeyes007, SNDavidson, SnowMan, SPOHAWK, Terpdragon, theascension, TheHawkster, TheRealDTM, therealjohncarlson, Throwdown, tjgamer555, tom95, TorontoHawk, Trenchbroom, TriCHawk, TruHammer07, Tune, twisted_steel2, TXHawk, UK_Seahawk, valleyflyfisher, VancitySeahawk, Vpk0718, Wilson2Harvin, wyliecat, Yahoo [Bot], ZagHawk, Zebulon Dak and 380 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.