JSeahawks wrote:kearly wrote:Scottemojo wrote:Baldwin can get a RFA tag next year, so why is he part of this question? And Tate is going to want paid. But by the end of this year he just could warrant a good payday too. Tag him if need be.
Way too soon to start worrying about crap like this.
I imagine Seattle will place a 2nd round RFA tag on Baldwin next year and hope a team steps up to help them recoup that mid rounder from the Harvin trade.
Tate is going to be a restricted free agent as well I believe? Or will he be unrestricted? He'll be 4 years into his career, dont you need 5 to be unrestricted?
Basis4day wrote:It suggests to me that it's the end of Ben Obomanu and his 2.3 million contract next year.
DJrmb wrote:Tech Worlds wrote:Both will be on the team.
Why would we want to go and weaken a position that we just shored up? Crazy talk.
You weaken the position by keeping too many of the same type of player. There are 3 different WR spots. With 3 different responsibilities and ideal attributes. You can't just keep all slot guys...
It's crazy talk to think that you can just throw a slot WR out as a flanker and be fine.
People realize there is a difference between a SS and a FS. You wouldn't play Kam Chancellor in Earls role. Well same with WR...