| Author |
Message |
|
bigdaddydave
|
Post subject: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:08 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:26 am Posts: 92
|
What do you guys think about the 'Hawks pickin' up Martelluss Bennett as our 2nd TE? I think he'd definitely help in the redzone, and he's damn hard to defend against! Oh, and he's about a million times better than brick-hands McCoy! 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:12 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 10006 Location: King In The North
|
|
A million?
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am Posts: 897 Location: Everett, Wa
|
|
You must not have seen that article about McCoy and his stats showing him making the best of his opportunities. He has been doing better catching the balls as of late. Now he needs to breakout like a mad man taking names and kickin ass. I'd say if he doesn't then we really need to think of other options.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Seeker
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:41 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm Posts: 531
|
|
What does Martelluss Bennett look like?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:43 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm Posts: 1115
|
Seeker wrote: What does Martelluss Bennett look like? What?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:58 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm Posts: 893
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:04 am |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 11339 Location: Graham, WA
|
|
Am I missing something? Did McCoy have an issue with the drops this season? I don't recall that being a problem this past season. We gave him a good ass QB and he balled out at times.
_________________ Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:35 am |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7234
|
Seeker wrote: What does Martelluss Bennett look like? themunn wrote: What? sturg78 wrote: say what again 
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RockinHawks
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:34 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:52 pm Posts: 466
|
|
What ain't no country I ever heard of...they speak English in What?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:03 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm Posts: 1431
|
|
what?
_________________ I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Killa Kam
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:27 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm Posts: 416
|
|
He's just as inconsistent as McCoy, even the Coyboys didn't want him back. McCoy struggled a little at the end of the season but was solid for the most part, I say we get another TE in the mid rounds of the draft
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:51 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am Posts: 2094
|
Killa Kam wrote: He's just as inconsistent as McCoy, even the Coyboys didn't want him back. McCoy struggled a little at the end of the season but was solid for the most part, I say we get another TE in the mid rounds of the draft Like Vance McDonald. He'd be an upgrade over McCoy, imo.
_________________ "Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 8:41 am |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15442 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
I dont understand the desire for another tight end. Imo, tight end is one of the more solid and deep positions on our team, and they're all pretty young.
I'd stick with Miller, McCoy, McGrath and Morrah for this year and try to add either Colt Lyerla or Austin Sefarian Jenkins next year.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Rat
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 8:52 am |
|
| * NET Cynic * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm Posts: 3492 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
Bennett looked pretty damn good this year. I wouldn't say we're in desperate need of someone like him, but this roster is deep enough to be able to afford some luxuries, if the price isn't bad.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Wenhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am Posts: 1270
|
JSeahawks wrote: I dont understand the desire for another tight end. Imo, tight end is one of the more solid and deep positions on our team
I respectfully disagree, and I'd be surprised if PC & JS didn't too. I think McCoy is an average #2 TE. I think they rely so heavily on 2 TE sets that have two #1 TE's would make sense for us. With the FA TE's available and the TE class this year there are a ton of great options to bring something "different" or "special" to the team. Bennett cause mismatch issues and was somewhat successful as a #1 TE, I'd say he is bottom 1/3 but he is still a much bigger receiving threat than McCoy was. Bennett had some drop issues but it seems most super athletic TE's (Bennett, Cook, Finley, Davis and others) have all had some issues with drops. If they didn't the'd be the elite. I'd be in for signing him just as I want some veteran DL brought in. If we can get our roster set before the draft we will have the freedom to do whatever we want and pick up the guys who provide the most value.
_________________  Beastquake with epic commentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd_Vd43Vxa0
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
getnasty
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 pm Posts: 525
|
|
I wouldn't mind a upgrade at TE but i would rather see money and draft picks spent on DT,DE,WR and LB before we go out and grab a backup TE. Plus a think McCoy is only going to get better with time.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Shadowhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:09 am |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am Posts: 623
|
CurryStopstheRuns wrote: what? English, $&@#%@&#%$*#, do you speak it?!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bigdaddydave
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:16 am |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:26 am Posts: 92
|
Wenhawk wrote: JSeahawks wrote: I dont understand the desire for another tight end. Imo, tight end is one of the more solid and deep positions on our team
I respectfully disagree, and I'd be surprised if PC & JS didn't too. I think McCoy is an average #2 TE. I think they rely so heavily on 2 TE sets that have two #1 TE's would make sense for us. With the FA TE's available and the TE class this year there are a ton of great options to bring something "different" or "special" to the team. Bennett cause mismatch issues and was somewhat successful as a #1 TE, I'd say he is bottom 1/3 but he is still a much bigger receiving threat than McCoy was. Bennett had some drop issues but it seems most super athletic TE's (Bennett, Cook, Finley, Davis and others) have all had some issues with drops. If they didn't the'd be the elite. Absolutely agree! Bennett causes HUGE problems for the defense. I think he'd work out perfectly for our 2 TE sets, especially in the redzone!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Chukarhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:14 pm Posts: 919
|
|
he was my favorite TE coming out of the draft that year and never came close to reaching his potential until last year. TE is not a big need, Id take him if he was cheap. I Think Mccoy is fixing to have a breakout year.
_________________  "God Bless Russell Wilson"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JKent82
|
Post subject: Re: Martelluss Bennett?! Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm Posts: 2815
|
|
If we go the FA route, I'd only want a cheaper pass catching first guy, ie Fred Davis or Jared Cook. Assuming one of their prices actually falls, I don't think paying a lot for one is a good route when we already pay Miller so much and have McCoy who is coming into his own in my opinion.
Otherwise I'd be happy adding a pass catching joker style TE anywhere in the draft or a mid-later round more well rounded blocking type one, like say Travis Kelce. I think we could use a third one to at least compete with McGrath/Morrah.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 12evanf, Anguish, Barthawk, bestfightstory, BirdsCommaAngry, Blitzfan, BoatsAndHose, CANHawk, CPHawk, cvcahawk, dbmack, Deixis, EverydayImRusselin, Fitz the Ram, geoff21, GoldenTater81, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawksSoc, hawxfreak, HunnyBadger, IcedHawk, kf3339, legend38, Missing_Clink, ORSeaNut, QuickLightning, red17hawk, ruffENrowdy, ShyCheetah, Spleenhawk2.0, tacomahawk, twisted_steel2, TwistedHusky, uncle fester, usc17hawk, v1rotv2, Veilside, Yoonhawk and 183 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |