Signing Brandon Browner

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:06 am
  • I still think he would be a better SS .. one that Will intimidate as well as have better cover skills.

    Then maybe take a look at Smith from Miami.. big Seahawkish type CB that would fit perfect.
    User avatar
    Bobblehead
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 262
    Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:52 am


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:12 am
  • Browner is a blue collar kind of player. Not the marquee talent you pay the huge bucks, but someone you absolutely want to keep happy because he's vital to your team's success.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15164
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:39 am
  • The list of Boom signings (from most important to least):

    Thomas
    Sherman
    Chancellor
    Browner

    Love Browner, I really do. But he's approaching 30 and he's barely quick enough right now at his size to pace his man. I worry that in a few years he'll be too old/slow. If the deal is below market value, yes.
    _________________
    "I can deal with Kap looking/acting like a douchebag so long as he wins. You can't be a douche AND a loser, Kap. Get your ---- together, a-hole."

    .....................................................................................-Webzone Niner fan GhostOfJimmyDean
    User avatar
    Trenchbroom
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1867
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:47 am
    Location: Spokangeles


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:05 am
  • Trenchbroom wrote:The list of Boom signings (from most important to least):

    Thomas
    Sherman
    Chancellor
    Browner

    Love Browner, I really do. But he's approaching 30 and he's barely quick enough right now at his size to pace his man. I worry that in a few years he'll be too old/slow. If the deal is below market value, yes.



    I totally agree that Browner is the lowest priority out of the defensive backfield (maybe Kam) but I get this feeling that if we let Browner walk we as fans will be missing him desperately. He's not the most talented but I absolutely LOVE the way he plays. The exchanges this year with S. Moss and Greg Jennings were two of my favorite moments ALL YEAR.

    It's interesting when you think about it like this:

    On on side (figuratively) you have Sherman and Thomas - probably the better two football players, and two incredible play makers.
    On the other - Browner and Chancellor. Both guys seem more expendable, but it's these two who absolutely set the physical tone for the back half of our D.

    I don't want to think about where this defense would be without them. Let's keep the Legion together!!!!
    Image
    User avatar
    SirTed
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 727
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:25 am
    Location: Queen Anne


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:20 am
  • Browner is basically the exact player Carroll had in his dreams when he came to Seattle. He looked all over the country for a huge, physical CB, and when he couldn't find one, he turned to Canada. There's just not a lot of guys like him anywhere. I'm guessing Carroll has him pretty high on his priority list.
    User avatar
    DavidSeven
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3743
    Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:16 pm
  • True, but then the FO could grab a 6'4" physical wide receiver that can't catch for shiz and try to convert them to DB.

    They something similar with Sweezy, so it may not be out of the question.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10123
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:33 pm
  • Scottemojo wrote:Browner is more valuable to this defense than Kam. Vs Atlanta, Browner was lights out. And Browner can play safety if his wheels get a little rusty.


    He was also more valuable to the defense @WSH, and Kam was awful that game as well.
    Image

    "We all we got, we all we need"
    User avatar
    lukerguy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1438
    Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:47 pm
  • Browner is 4 years older than Chancellor. That plays a much larger role in who I prefer than performance is a game or two. Browner is getting close to 30. I don't think it's close to realistic to think he can stay at his current level of play as long as Kam can. Football is a young man's game. Especially on the defensive side of the ball. The only corners you see with prolonged elite level play are all-world guys like Champ Bailey. I like Browner. But I don't see a giant dude like him, who is already prone to getting torched here and there, aging gracefully.
    User avatar
    SeaTown81
    * NET Alumni *
     
    Posts: 4629
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:47 pm
  • I think when it comes time to re-sign these guys they will pull a Tom Brady and be willing to take less than their market value just to keep this unit together and this team a contender
    Image
    User avatar
    dunceface
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3318
    Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:50 pm
  • And quite frankly, I'm not exactly sure how long the NFL is going to allow Browner to knock the crap outta wr's after 5 yards of contact, as he got away with against the Redskin wr's in the playoffs. That entire game I was just waiting for him to get called for penalties. He already gets enough every now and again. I really feel it's only a matter of time until his game is keyed in on by refs and they go into games looking for it. Sherm plays physical also. But he doesn't rely on it nearly as much as Browner does. You take away Browner's ability to knock guys around, his value plummets. And yes, I do worry that it's going to become an issue with refs at some point down the road, if not soon. And if it does, that makes him aging and slowing down matter all that much more.
    User avatar
    SeaTown81
    * NET Alumni *
     
    Posts: 4629
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:10 pm
  • SeaTown81 wrote:And quite frankly, I'm not exactly sure how long the NFL is going to allow Browner to knock the crap outta wr's after 5 yards of contact, as he got away with against the Redskin wr's in the playoffs. That entire game I was just waiting for him to get called for penalties. He already gets enough every now and again. I really feel it's only a matter of time until his game is keyed in on by refs and they go into games looking for it. Sherm plays physical also. But he doesn't rely on it nearly as much as Browner does. You take away Browner's ability to knock guys around, his value plummets. And yes, I do worry that it's going to become an issue with refs at some point down the road, if not soon. And if it does, that makes him aging and slowing down matter all that much more.



    Are you worried more about the global shift away from contact, or are you worried more specifically about Browner being targeted or called out specifically?
    Ike Taylor plays really similarly and has had a nice career. Why would they target Browner now? I don't think you (or Browner) can worry about that kind of thing. It's all about consistency - if he plays that way the whole game it makes it very difficult for the ref to throw a flag on specific plays.

    He gets penalties, and that can be annoying but typically he's worth a lot more good than the occasional bad.
    Image
    User avatar
    SirTed
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 727
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:25 am
    Location: Queen Anne


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:55 pm
  • Browner received 2 contact penalties in 2012. The team received 12 total good for 27th place
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1862
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:49 pm
  • I'm not saying he got a lot of penalties. I'm saying I wonder if his style of play will get more attention in light of things like Harbaugh complaining and him throwing receivers all over the field being replayed over and over during the playoffs, and the announcers questioning the legality of what he was doing. I like the guy. But a lot of what he does is borderline. All it takes is for refs to call it tighter on him and a lot of what he is good at can be taken away. Not saying this is going to happen. Just threw it out as a thought that crosses my mind when considering how far you might go to keep a guy like him nearing 30.
    User avatar
    SeaTown81
    * NET Alumni *
     
    Posts: 4629
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:15 pm
  • OP - I get your point about front-loading so that we can re-sign Sherman after next year and RW year after that.

    What you probably forgot is that you can now rollover cap space. Savin the money now allows you to use that same money next year so no need to front load. In fact it hurts you to re-sign now as you would spend more money overall.

    For the person that didn't miss Browner. We plate one team that attacked the secondary at the end. How did that Chicago game go?.....pretty sure Marshall did just about what he wanted
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3368
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:03 am
  • SeaTown81 wrote: Just threw it out as a thought that crosses my mind when considering how far you might go to keep a guy like him nearing 30.



    Agreed. I just think his age is going to be the bigger issue. The combine showed the unreal speed of some of the receivers as well as DBs. We don't get faster as we age.
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1862
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:41 am
  • Thing that worries me about Browner is his knock-knees.

    My doctor friend says growing up with knock-knees places added stress on the medial collateral ligaments and tends to cause a degenerative effect on the lateral collater ligaments. This is good for trauma from the outside in, but one good hit from the inside out and "snap!". I realize every player is only one good hit away, but I think Brandon should strongly consider a safe lateral after his interceptions to avoid that angry over-tackle from that TE that just got picked.

    I'd like to see some emphasis placed on strengthening-up those chicken legs in the weight room, and perhaps some MRI monitoring of the knees to make sure they are not getting any worse.
    "...Seattle has become the capital city of the New NFL" - Kip Earlywine
    User avatar
    HoustonHawk82
    * NET Mechanic *
     
    Posts: 6345
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
    Location: Beneath, Between & Behind


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:53 am
  • Browner MUST stay..dude takes no shizzle from nobody..He doesnt cost much but adds that kickass swag to the team..
    User avatar
    BGHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 702
    Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 7:32 am
    Location: Battleground,WA


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:46 am
  • mikeak wrote:For the person that didn't miss Browner. We plate one team that attacked the secondary at the end. How did that Chicago game go?.....pretty sure Marshall did just about what he wanted


    mike, Browner played in the Chicago game. In the last four games we played against Larry Fitzgerald, Stevie Johnson, Michael Crabtree and Danny Amendola. All four of them are very good receivers (understatement in some cases) and all of them had their chances against Lane and he did well. It's true that he gave up two touchdowns in four games, but that is pretty damn good. The team overall gave up only four touchdowns during Browner's self imposed absence (it's funny how no one calls Browner a cheater, but Sherman gets it a lot).

    I don't say all that to say I don't like Browner or what he brings to the table. I love our cornerbacks. I think the long time fans remember what it was like to play against Hayes and Haynes and now we get to finally see it from the Raiders perspective after all these years. Frankly I am enjoying it.

    As far as locking Browner up long term, it will be a hard decision to make, but I think the team has to take a wait and see attitude on it. Perhaps his impact plays will lessen without the focusing help of the adderall, but it is something the team needs to consider.
    Image
    User avatar
    BASF
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1518
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:07 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:38 am
  • I've posted this before, but feel the need to post it whenever a Browner topic gets started. I've got even MORE love for Browner now that my girlfriend got me a UNIQUE (Bootleg) Browner jersey for Christmas. I seriously have this grey (but not wolf grey) offshoot of the "Shadow" jersey sitting in my closet. I've gotta be honest, it's pretty sweet, despite what I thought it would look like before it arrived. I'll take some pictures of it and post them some time.

    http://seafense.blogspot.com/2012/10/some-love-for-brandon-browner.html\

    Browner's one of my absolute favorite Seahawks. He's sort of a Beast Mode-lite in my opinion, in that the attitude and physicality he plays with sort of sets the tone for the rest of the defense as Marshawn does for the offense. Now, he doesn't create the identity of the entire team like 'Shawn does so that's where the comparisons stop. I honestly don't think he'll be too tough to re-sign. He'll only be a restricted free agent next season and when he does become a UFA he'll be 30 years old. No spring chicken.

    He'll probably be looking for his 1 (and most likely only) "big" contract in the NFL at that point. However, with his age, the odds of some teams throwing crazy money at him are kind of slim. Also, as much as I hate to entertain the possibility, it's certainly possible that his skills erode or decline by this point. At least somewhat. I hope not, but it's certainly possible. Regardless, he strikes me as the type of player that's infinitely more valuable to what Seattle's trying to do than mostly any other team in the league. Sure, the Jags could use him now since Gus Bradley might be trying to build a similar D in Jacksonville but that's about it. Big, physical corners still aren't the rage yet in the NFL although they certainly might be in 2 years time.

    As far as the idea of moving him to SS is concerned, I actually love the idea and it's something I thought about after the playoff loss to the Falcons. I was kind of down on Kam after the 2 playoff games and I started thinking about the possibility of moving Kam to the WILL and Browner to SS. I think Browner would be an incredible presence at SS and wouldn't be surprised to see a move there during the later stages of his career. However, I don't see the Seahawks messing with a good thing right now and I can't blame them, so I doubt it ever happens.

    The verdict? I'd venture that Browner gets a new deal next season, despite only being an RFA, that mirrors that of Clemons' this year. 3 years/21 million entering his age 30 season. Assuming he doesn't get hurt in the mean time, knock on wood.
    Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/
    User avatar
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1407
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:06 am
  • :thirishdrinkers: :179422:
    Image
    User avatar
    dunceface
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3318
    Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:25 am
  • But, but, but... those knock-knees...
    "...Seattle has become the capital city of the New NFL" - Kip Earlywine
    User avatar
    HoustonHawk82
    * NET Mechanic *
     
    Posts: 6345
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
    Location: Beneath, Between & Behind


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:01 am
  • Didn't Browner run down AP from behind on that long run against us? He could have pulled up and let him stroll in but instead he caught him and took him down, dude plays HARD. I think he deserves a decent contract.
    User avatar
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2687
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
    Location: Battle Ground, Wa


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:28 am
  • dunceface wrote:I think when it comes time to re-sign these guys they will pull a Tom Brady and be willing to take less than their market value just to keep this unit together and this team a contender


    Very wishful thinking...
    WestcoastSteve
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1155
    Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:29 am
  • mikeak wrote:OP - I get your point about front-loading so that we can re-sign Sherman after next year and RW year after that.

    What you probably forgot is that you can now rollover cap space. Savin the money now allows you to use that same money next year so no need to front load. In fact it hurts you to re-sign now as you would spend more money overall.

    For the person that didn't miss Browner. We plate one team that attacked the secondary at the end. How did that Chicago game go?.....pretty sure Marshall did just about what he wanted


    Browner played in the Chicago game...
    WestcoastSteve
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1155
    Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm


Re: Signing Brandon Browner
Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:54 pm
  • WestcoastSteve wrote:
    dunceface wrote:I think when it comes time to re-sign these guys they will pull a Tom Brady and be willing to take less than their market value just to keep this unit together and this team a contender


    Very wishful thinking...


    Yes it is :mrgreen:
    Image
    User avatar
    dunceface
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3318
    Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am




It is currently Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:37 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online