Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

Hawks are most bet team for next superbowl: down 12-1 to 6-1

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13

  • 6-1 from 12-1, I wish I could put my bets in when it was 12-1.... to bad I live in this little state called Texas where Gambling is illegal haha.
    Axx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2091
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm


  • There goes my plan of getting rich for life off the Seahawks this year. Damn. I don't feel quite that bed because I wouldn't have been able to place a bet til around May but damn. That was quick!
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1551
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


  • I was just about to make a post about this. I am literally on a plane flying home from Vegas. I flew in to Vegas last night to make some investments on Seattle. Due to my late arrival and early departure I was only able to check out three Sportsbooks. The Tropicana and the Palms each had Seattle at 10-1 and 5-1 to win the Conference. The Orleans had Seattle at 10-1 to win it all.

    That line movement has to be 90%Sharp money because Seattle has never been a public side, although that will change. Soon.
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8498
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


  • I got 16-1. Still reeling from my 90-1 this season not coming in.
    Hawkspur
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1437
    Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm


  • There's still £44 available at 14/1 on Betfair, for any of you non-US based punters. Given the state of the AFC 20/1 on the Ravens looks good too if the Seahawks happen to fluff their lines.
    Hawkspur
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1437
    Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm


  • Hawkspur wrote:There's still £44 available at 14/1 on Betfair, for any of you non-US based punters. Given the state of the AFC 20/1 on the Ravens looks good too if the Seahawks happen to fluff their lines.


    I am always leery of letting my money sit in an offshore book for 10 months given the industry's volatility.
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8498
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


  • bestfightstory wrote:
    Hawkspur wrote:There's still £44 available at 14/1 on Betfair, for any of you non-US based punters. Given the state of the AFC 20/1 on the Ravens looks good too if the Seahawks happen to fluff their lines.


    I am always leery of letting my money sit in an offshore book for 10 months given the industry's volatility.


    Betfair's probably the safest one for 2 reasons. Firstly, it's German. Secondly, there is no bookmaker to go bust. Punters bet against each other rather than betting against the house.
    Hawkspur
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1437
    Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm


  • Hawkspur wrote:
    bestfightstory wrote:
    Hawkspur wrote:There's still £44 available at 14/1 on Betfair, for any of you non-US based punters. Given the state of the AFC 20/1 on the Ravens looks good too if the Seahawks happen to fluff their lines.


    I am always leery of letting my money sit in an offshore book for 10 months given the industry's volatility.


    Betfair's probably the safest one for 2 reasons. Firstly, it's German. Secondly, there is no bookmaker to go bust. Punters bet against each other rather than betting against the house.


    Good to know-thanks for the tip. Does Betfair have walk-ups in Germany proper??
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8498
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


  • I'm pretty sure it's all online
    Hawkspur
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1437
    Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm


  • Wait, is this good for the Seahawks or bad? ...like with Vegas having a lot to lose on the sharps betting on the Seahawks at 12-1 to move it that much, will the NFL use it's vegas/refree connection to screw us out of the win again, ala. XL? *adjusts tinfoil hat*
    chawx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1329
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Salt Lake City, UT


  • Blah. We're supposed to swoop under the radar!
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2547
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


  • The Outfield wrote:Blah. We're supposed to swoop under the radar!


    The best teams can only be under the radar for so long
    therealjohncarlson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4054
    Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm


  • Well lets hope that the people are right and that the Hawks pull it off!
    Blitzer88
    * NET Eeyore *
     
    Posts: 12771
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Seattle, WA


  • "Action dropped San Fran to the 9-to-2 solo favorite"

    Solo favorite...I like the sound of that! ;)

    Just messing with you guys. :)
    NinerLifer
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 690
    Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:30 pm


  • Damn. Heading out Monday and was hoping to get double digit odds.
    PhillySeahawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 146
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:55 pm
    Location: Illinois


  • PhillySeahawk wrote:Damn. Heading out Monday and was hoping to get double digit odds.



    As I said earlier in this thread......

    Still 10-1 at Tropicana and Palms.

    You're welcome.
    bestfightstory
    * Glitter over Knives *
     
    Posts: 8498
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm


  • NinerLifer wrote:"Action dropped San Fran to the 9-to-2 solo favorite"

    Solo favorite...I like the sound of that! ;)

    Just messing with you guys. :)


    42-13

    Just messing with you. ;)
    formido
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 547
    Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm
    Location: Ventura, CA


  • I can't, I've been burned! I hope the team chemistry stays the same, while I hope our deficiencies are addressed with each of the first three rounds of the draft. But my reptilian brain cannot overcome the emotional lows of 2006 like expectations. 2006 was a helluva year but not making it to the superbowl when you expect to sucks.

    What a freagin sweet game we took to the bears though after that horrid beatdown they gave us earlier that year!
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1738
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


  • formido wrote:
    NinerLifer wrote:"Action dropped San Fran to the 9-to-2 solo favorite"

    Solo favorite...I like the sound of that! ;)

    Just messing with you guys. :)


    42-13

    Just messing with you. ;)


    THISCLOSE

    Still messing with him ;) ;)

    gg NinerLifer
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1738
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


  • chawx wrote:Wait, is this good for the Seahawks or bad? ...like with Vegas having a lot to lose on the sharps betting on the Seahawks at 12-1 to move it that much, will the NFL use it's vegas/refree connection to screw us out of the win again, ala. XL? *adjusts tinfoil hat*


    Its good. As pointed out by CBS, the house stood to lose a ton if the Seahawks pulled off the win in XL due to the odds being something like 80 to 1.
    RichNhansom
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4244
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am


  • and now that a 12 flag has been planted/pictured atop Mt. Kilimanjaro (read HERE), and Vegas gets wind of it... our odds will drop to 3-1
    djTOY2000
    Eli Positioner Extraordinaire
     
    Posts: 1756
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:02 pm
    Location: S.W. Washington




It is currently Mon May 20, 2019 4:29 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online