 |
| Author |
Message |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: If/when we get rid of Flynn, would you want Hasselbeck back?  Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:40 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9705
|
volsunghawk wrote: If Hass hadn't played for the Seahawks before and attained the status he did with this team, there is not a SINGLE ONE of you who would be suggesting we bring him in. Think about that. Think about what that means for the value he would represent to the team. Well, there is the occasional weird one. "Bring in Kerry Collins? Can't hurt." "Bring in Mark Brunell? Can't hurt." "Bring in Marc Bulger? Can't hurt." _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
  |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: If/when we get rid of Flynn, would you want Hasselbeck back? Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 6:21 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6183
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: volsunghawk wrote: If Hass hadn't played for the Seahawks before and attained the status he did with this team, there is not a SINGLE ONE of you who would be suggesting we bring him in. Think about that. Think about what that means for the value he would represent to the team. Well, there is the occasional weird one. "Bring in Kerry Collins? Can't hurt." "Bring in Mark Brunell? Can't hurt." "Bring in Marc Bulger? Can't hurt." Yeah, I forgot about those folks. Hey, guys, I hear that Daunte Culpepper is available. He's younger than Hass, has a similar injury history, has a better career completion rate, has a better career passer rating and a higher TD percentage, and has thrown for more yards per game over his career than Hass has. Anybody want HIM? _________________  Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: If/when we get rid of Flynn, would you want Hasselbeck back? Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:36 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 6897
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
volsunghawk wrote: MontanaHawk05 wrote: volsunghawk wrote: If Hass hadn't played for the Seahawks before and attained the status he did with this team, there is not a SINGLE ONE of you who would be suggesting we bring him in. Think about that. Think about what that means for the value he would represent to the team. Well, there is the occasional weird one. "Bring in Kerry Collins? Can't hurt." "Bring in Mark Brunell? Can't hurt." "Bring in Marc Bulger? Can't hurt." Yeah, I forgot about those folks. Hey, guys, I hear that Daunte Culpepper is available. He's younger than Hass, has a similar injury history, has a better career completion rate, has a better career passer rating and a higher TD percentage, and has thrown for more yards per game over his career than Hass has. Anybody want HIM? Can't hurt to kick the tires! _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: If/when we get rid of Flynn, would you want Hasselbeck back? Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 6400
|
|
I interviewed Daunte Culpepper the week of the Super Bowl and he sounded like he was in great shape. His voice could definitely run a 4.53.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: If/when we get rid of Flynn, would you want Hasselbeck back? Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:29 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 4974
|
AbsolutNET wrote: SacHawk2.0 wrote: AbsolutNET wrote: Hass never played for this coaching regime, so his connection to the organization right now is the same as any other aging veteran QB. I love the guy but the only reason we could bring him back is for sentimental reasons to the fans. You must not remember the Beast Quake game where Hass threw for 4 TDs You mean when we had a different offensive coordinator, QB coach, and offensive system? Yeah I remember that. At least you used a large sample size over the past few years to form your argument. Yeah but to be fair you said "this regime". The head coach is implied when you talk about coaching regimes.
_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: @cro, A World Peace, Allweatherfan, AVL, Bakergirl, BirdsCommaAngry, brettb3, chawx, Deterrence, GawksAtHawks, Gcheck2181, GCrow, geoff21, gladdy206, Grahamkrackker253, HawkinInLA, Hawknballs, hawksfanohio, hawxfreak, heffmanhere, homerun1970, jammerhawk, JerHawk81, Jsolo, Killa Kam, KillerB, McGruff, misfit, MOCHawk, mrblitz, OreIdahawk, PrepntheSep, redeye81, scutterhawk, Seahwkgal, Seanhawk, SeatownJay, Shadyhawk182, Shock2k, Smoke, Sonichellboy, therealjohncarlson, Throwdown, Tubafor, tubbs51, Uberman, warden, Wiseguy, YaktownHawK, Yoonhawk and 211 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
