| Author |
Message |
|
oldhawkfan
|
Post subject: Kam at LB?  Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:29 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 149
Location: Spokane
|
|
I have seen some rumblings about moving Kam to LB and moving Jeron Johnson to his safety position. Or just having him play closer to the LOS with an extra DB in the lineup. Are these rumblings based on anything PC or JS have said or are they just armchair coaches and GMs spouting their opinions?
_________________
Go Hawks!
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
sainthawk29
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:37 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:15 am
Posts: 326
|
|
There were rumblings last year. When JS said he wanted Mark Barron in the draft.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jlwaters1
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 1906
|
|
dumb idea. I still don't get the love for Jeron Johnson. He's a decent player, but not anything spectacular. Chancellor is fine where he's at.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:39 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10271
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
|
Maybe we can just have one huge "Which players should we try in new positions" thread?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:42 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm
Posts: 296
|
jlwaters1 wrote: dumb idea. I still don't get the love for Jeron Johnson. He's a decent player, but not anything spectacular. Chancellor is fine where he's at. Winston Guy.
_________________
Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:55 am |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11354
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
No, just no, where the hell are the rumblings? I'm not seeing it coming out of the Seahawks camp, I do see some stupid ideas from fans about it though.
_________________  Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:03 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1291
|
|
Changing a player's starting position is reserved for ineffective players at their current position. Prime examples being Red Bryant as a DT and JR Sweezy at DT.
Not a discussion for all-pros or pro-bowl caliber players, unless you play too much Madden or FF.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12th_Bob
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:04 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm
Posts: 1062
|
|
Naw, move a player to where you have a hole in the defense you just create another hole in the secondary. Just pick an outside LB with some coverage ability and keep Kam where he has played well.
_________________
NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kthebestwayw
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:07 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:42 am
Posts: 655
Location: New Jersey
|
|
not happening...ever
_________________
***In Carroll We Trust***
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkfan77
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:07 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 1140
|
|
It hasn't been talked about this year. JS mentioned something about it last year had they drafted Mark Barron. But he also said that had they drafted Barron, Barron, Kam and ET would still all see the field at the same time in the secondary. So even then, they didn't want to move Kam to OLB full time.
Kam is a Safety.
_________________
Team Hansen
|
|
| |
|
|
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:11 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 1132
|
|
Not Madden.
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:16 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8774
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
|
I could see it being done situationally to take advantage of a match-up or to counter a mis-match, but likely not as a full time position change. We're lucky to have two pretty talented depth players in Jeron Johnson and Winston Guy that could allow them to be a little creative with how they deploy Earl and Kam (Earl looked pretty good in the slot at the Pro Bowl with that pick).
No it's not Madden but in case you haven't noticed, being a slave to "Conventional Wisdom" is kinda frowned upon around here.
_________________
My milkshake brings all the turtles to the yard.... damn right... and men's room Drakkar... damn right... and men's room Drakkar.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:36 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5714
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
We should move Clint Gresham to WR.
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6185
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
FlyingGreg wrote: We should move Clint Gresham to WR. Makes sense. How about Matt Flynn to LEO? _________________  Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Winterfell
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:43 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:55 pm
Posts: 119
Location: The Wall
|
volsunghawk wrote: FlyingGreg wrote: We should move Clint Gresham to WR. Makes sense. How about Matt Flynn to LEO? I think his sizable forehead could potentially lead to more batted down passes than JJ Watt. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:11 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5714
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
volsunghawk wrote: FlyingGreg wrote: We should move Clint Gresham to WR. Makes sense. How about Matt Flynn to LEO? Only on passing downs. _________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:16 am |
|
| * NET Baller * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11354
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
Haushka should totally be moved to RT
_________________ Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:18 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8174
Location: Antioch, CA
|
CANHawk wrote: I could see it being done situationally to take advantage of a match-up or to counter a mis-match, but likely not as a full time position change. We're lucky to have two pretty talented depth players in Jeron Johnson and Winston Guy that could allow them to be a little creative with how they deploy Earl and Kam (Earl looked pretty good in the slot at the Pro Bowl with that pick).
No it's not Madden but in case you haven't noticed, being a slave to "Conventional Wisdom" is kinda frowned upon around here. This. Kam could not be an every down LB in the NFL, but I could see him playing there on occasion if the situation called for it. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:22 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1192
|
|
We should just end all these Fitzgerald fantasies and move Sherman to WR. Its been 2 years and he hasnt made the pro bowl at CB so i think its time we try something new with him!
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Kam at LB? Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:24 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8147
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
I would not be okay with moving him there permanently, but on occasion on passing downs to help him get in position to cover the TE I might be okay with it.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 425HawkSpark, AbsolutNET, akula, Animalman, BCHawk, Beefy, BirdsCommaAngry, bobincovington, brettb3, c-hawkin, CPHawk, dbmack, falcongoggles, Floridahawk79, Google [Bot], Grahamkrackker253, Hachtung, Hawk Finn, jdblack, JimZorn10, Kixkahn, Leep, McGruff, mrblitz, NorthwestSportsFan, otter, quadsas, RealDeal, RussellMania, SacHawk2.0, seafence82, Seaswab, ShyCheetah, SilNWest, SnowMan, TalontedNoseRider, thecycle, theseahawkguy, travlinhawk, Yoonhawk and 140 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
