| Author |
Message |
|
Coug_Hawk08
|
Post subject: Osi to the hawks very logical per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:49 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:26 am Posts: 2266
|
|
Was listening to his show, and he thinks its the most logical landing spot. Said we could expect something like a 1year 4 million type deal.
Now, Clayton is wrong pretty much 95% of the time these days, but I'd like this one to work out as he says. Just seems to make a ton of sense for both parties.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:52 am |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 7032
|
|
That would be a good deal.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:53 am |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6649
|
|
Whaaaaat? I campaigned for this LAST off-season. Not so sure I care so much this year-as I didn't pay any attention to him and don't know what he has left. Is he a free agent? Whoever we go after, I'm expecting us to load up on players across the D-Line and let them battle it out in camp.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
brendonkuhn
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:54 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:55 pm Posts: 17
|
|
Thread title is a little misleading. A logical landing spot does not mean "very likely."
Last edited by brendonkuhn on Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TDOTSEAHAWK
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:55 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:16 pm Posts: 2605 Location: Hamilton
|
|
We need a dude like this on our team - if he is serious about winning. I don't a single player on our team has won a Super Bowl and having a veteran oh his caliber would be nice.
_________________ Beast Mode...try BORG MODE Driver of the PC/JS Bandwagon since 2010
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:55 am |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7443
|
|
That would be friggin great, and would let us spend some on a WR.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
parson420
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:55 am |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:02 pm Posts: 52
|
Osi = 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawk2k
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:59 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm Posts: 956
|
|
I think Osi is a little over the hill and I'm not a big fan of his attitude. But if we got him for cheap, sure, why not, give it a go.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Coug_Hawk08
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:00 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:26 am Posts: 2266
|
|
He talked about it a bit the other day as well. Saying our system is set up well for Osi to succeed and produce sacks (allowing him to potentially get one more big deal the following season). Osi made it no secret last season he liked the hawks, and the hawks had interest in trading for him. Compensation was too great, so we did not make the move. Now that he is a free agent, lets hope it all comes together.
Would be very clutch if Clem can't star the season. Would be awesome to see a NASCAR type package with Clem, osi and Irvin. Bring the heeeeeeeeeeat!
Osi is the same age as Clem by the way. . . With no acl injuries. The age comments are a bit silly.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:03 am |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7443
|
Coug_Hawk08 wrote: He talked about it a bit the other day as well. Saying our system is set up well for Osi to succeed and produce sacks (allowing him to potentially get one more big deal the following season). Osi made it no secret last season he liked the hawks, and the hawks had interest in trading for him. Compensation was too great, so we did not make the move. Now that he is a free agent, lets hope it all comes together.
Would be very clutch if Clem can't star the season. Would be awesome to see a NASCAR type package with Clem, osi and Irvin. Bring the heeeeeeeeeeat!
Osi is the same age as Clem by the way. . . With no acl injuries. The age comments are a bit silly. I will be stunned if Clem sees the field very much, if at all next year.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zowert
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm Posts: 1718 Location: Seattle
|
|
I was lingering around the Vikings forums and noticed more than one thread about Jared Allen. Seems to be quite a bit of talk about the Vikings off-loading Jared Allen this off season since he is coming to the final year of his contract. Allen is 30 years old and I suppose the Vikings are trying to get as much as they can for him, before his value drops significantly.
In 2011 Jared Allen has 22 sacks. Then this last season he put up 12 sacks, quite the drop. But 22 sacks in a single season is ridiculous anyway.
This is all rumor. So i'm not thinking anything of it. But I wouldn't mind the Hawks pursuing Jared Allen. The downside is his contract. He will take up a considerable amount of cap space, however its only for one season. Then we could sign him to a two or three year deal and have him for the twilight of his prime, up to age 33, then let him walk. Thirty years old isn't too old for a DE is it? Especially an elite pass rusher like Jared Allen.
Not sure why the Vikings would want to get rid of Allen, other than his value..? Or wait, the Vikings do have a pretty solid D-line already, but Allen is their D-line's workhorse. Maybe they want to open up some cap space..
_________________ ~ The Stache'
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:15 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am Posts: 2008
|
Do it.......Do it 
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:18 am |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6649
|
Scottemojo wrote: I will be stunned if Clem sees the field very much, if at all next year. Isn't there some kind of new roster injury exception where we can let him focus on healing and then return for the last portion of the season and playoff run or am I imagining this to make myself feel better?
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jkitsune
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:21 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm Posts: 1514
|
bestfightstory wrote: Scottemojo wrote: I will be stunned if Clem sees the field very much, if at all next year. Isn't there some kind of new roster injury exception where we can let him focus on healing and then return for the last portion of the season and playoff run or am I imagining this to make myself feel better? Yes, this exists now. You can designate one (I think) player as IR but eligible to return. There's also the PUP list, and players can come off of that after a certain amount of time. I wouldn't be surprised if Clemons is able to return in the latter half of the year.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:23 am |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3554
|
bestfightstory wrote: Scottemojo wrote: I will be stunned if Clem sees the field very much, if at all next year. Isn't there some kind of new roster injury exception where we can let him focus on healing and then return for the last portion of the season and playoff run or am I imagining this to make myself feel better? If you are thinking of the new IR rule, I believe he would have to pass a physical first to be considered for it. There is the PUP list, which basically would hold him out until week 7 at the earliest, week 12 at the latest.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:23 am |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7443
|
bestfightstory wrote: Scottemojo wrote: I will be stunned if Clem sees the field very much, if at all next year. Isn't there some kind of new roster injury exception where we can let him focus on healing and then return for the last portion of the season and playoff run or am I imagining this to make myself feel better? Yes. IR doesn't have to end the season now. There just isn't any track record for defensive ends having much impact the season after an ACL, especially in the 30's. I think Pete's admission we need a couple of pass rushers was open admission Clem is not being relied on to come back in 2013.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very likely per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:29 am |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3554
|
Scottemojo wrote: bestfightstory wrote: Scottemojo wrote: I will be stunned if Clem sees the field very much, if at all next year. Isn't there some kind of new roster injury exception where we can let him focus on healing and then return for the last portion of the season and playoff run or am I imagining this to make myself feel better? Yes. IR doesn't have to end the season now. There just isn't any track record for defensive ends having much impact the season after an ACL, especially in the 30's. I think Pete's admission we need a couple of pass rushers was open admission Clem is not being relied on to come back in 2013. If Clem can't pass his physical before the first week of the season, I don't think he can be eligible for the new IR rule. I could be remembering this incorrectly, but I believe in order to use the eligible to return designation, the player must be on the final 53 man roster. It makes a lot more sense to put him on the PUP list, and stretch it out the maximum amount of time, which is I believe 12 weeks (6 weeks, plus 3 practice, plus 3 to activate).
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
warden
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very logical per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:32 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm Posts: 1427
|
|
Unlikely
JS/PC will not spend large on someone in their thirties. Any big free agent signing will be for someone in their early to mid twenties. If that someone is not available, they will be low key in FA.
That has pretty much been the course of action the first 3 offseason with these two in charge
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Coug_Hawk08
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very logical per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:26 am Posts: 2266
|
warden wrote: Unlikely
JS/PC will not spend large on someone in their thirties. Any big free agent signing will be for someone in their early to mid twenties. If that someone is not available, they will be low key in FA.
That has pretty much been the course of action the first 3 offseason with these two in charge Disagree. When faced with similar issues, we have dipped into FA for cast off vets. Alan branch, Raheem Brock, milloy etc. With the injury to Clem, we can not afford to sit idle in FA just because some hot shot 26 year old that we like is not available. 4 million for Osi is cheap, and he has proven production. If we can draft someone and sign him, even better. A one year deal is pretty low key IMO. I just think we will do whatever it takes to win now, while not hindering the future. A middle of the road one year deal is win/win under the circumstances. We shall see.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
entropyrulesall
|
Post subject: Re: Osi to the hawks very logical per Clayton Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:15 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 172 Location: Federal Way, WA
|
Coug_Hawk08 wrote: warden wrote: Unlikely
JS/PC will not spend large on someone in their thirties. Any big free agent signing will be for someone in their early to mid twenties. If that someone is not available, they will be low key in FA.
That has pretty much been the course of action the first 3 offseason with these two in charge Disagree. When faced with similar issues, we have dipped into FA for cast off vets. Alan branch, Raheem Brock, milloy etc. With the injury to Clem, we can not afford to sit idle in FA just because some hot shot 26 year old that we like is not available. 4 million for Osi is cheap, and he has proven production. If we can draft someone and sign him, even better. A one year deal is pretty low key IMO. I just think we will do whatever it takes to win now, while not hindering the future. A middle of the road one year deal is win/win under the circumstances. We shall see. Also, Robert Gallery. We signed him to a 3 yr, front heavy deal. He was stop gap for one year and we cut him after that and he retired. I would love for Osi to come here and do the same. Except, of course, for him to perform better than Gallery did.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: ArrogantShawn, bloodkingg, cubbyhawkfan, djTOY2000, Fudwamper, Google [Bot], IcedHawk, Majestic-12 [Bot], smashmouth59, Smoke and Beers, sturg78, themunn, vin.couve12, Yoonhawk and 85 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |