Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:22 am 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:42 am
Posts: 6
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
Well, the records (and I believe three people are tied with 63) were all outside if I recall correctly. At least two were - one in Denver and one in Tennessee, no? Sure, he hasn't kicked one that long before, but he's got a few factors on his side: it's inside, it's for the win in the playoffs, it's for a record. Don't think his adrenalin wouldn't propel that sucker a few more feet than normal. I'd have loved to see them try.

Yeah, but when the longest he was hitting in practice was 50, I don't think those factors add up to another 15-17 yards..


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:44 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1990
Location: Seattle
They attempted one pass play before the hail mary. They should have went for one large gain, called a timeout then kicked a field goal.

_________________
~ The Stache'


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:48 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:18 am
Posts: 463
This topic is completely idiotic


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:49 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Posts: 807
Location: Behind you
can we be done with this silly speculation. Longwell couldnt even kick a touchback, let alone a 55 yard field goal

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:50 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 3412
Zowert wrote:
They attempted one pass play before the hail mary. They should have went for one large gain, called a timeout then kicked a field goal.


There were 2 seconds left on the clock after the pass. Even something a little bit longer likely would have ended the game


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:02 am 
* NET Sage *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 4369
A 65 yard FG from a kicker that's nearly 40?

:lol:

_________________
February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:27 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4290
glowingeyedseahawk wrote:
The odds of making this are NO DIFFERENT than a Hail-Mary attempt.

Longwell's longest is 55 yards.
Could he connect and get one 30 feet longer ??
Maybe......
Indoors,
No weather elements to factor in ??
Kick-offs ~ (from a tee, I know) ....spotted from the 35 to the endzone = 65 yards
I know this is different, but he was putting this balls CLOSE to th endzone on kick-offs.
He's been in the league for how long ??
.....give him a shot !!
What did we bring him in for ??
.....60 yard kick-offs to the 5 yard line, I guess ????? :229031_banghead:



If it were true that the odds of making a 65 yard FG are NO DIFFERENT than making a Hail Mary attempt, then why, thoughout the history of the NFL, has there been quite a few times that a Hail Mary has worked and NO ONE has ever kicked a 65 yard FG?

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:34 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9561
Location: Monroe, WA
glowingeyedseahawk wrote:
...just a silly question to all of this...

What are the rules for the offensive team of scoring off a short FG attempt ??
I know the defense has a chance to return a short FG - if caught in the air and returned like a punt.
Can the offense score on a FG that is "popped-up" - caught in the air, like a pass, and run into the endzone ??
Crazy I know, ....just asking ?? :stirthepot:

No. Once the ball is kicked, it is essentially a change of possession. On a punt, if the kicking team touches it first, it is downed at that spot. I'd assume a FG would be the same. The only kick the O can advance, I believe would be a kickoff, and I'm not sure about that. You can take possession, but may not be allowed to advance it.

If the d touches it first, it could be ruled a muff, which can also not be advanced. If that happens and is recovered in the end zone, it's a score, but not otherwise, IIRC.

Gawd, did I really kick this thread again? Sorry.

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:38 am 
* Natural Rubbing Action *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17587
Location: The beautiful PNW
SalishHawkFan wrote:
If it were true that the odds of making a 65 yard FG are NO DIFFERENT than making a Hail Mary attempt, then why, thoughout the history of the NFL, has there been quite a few times that a Hail Mary has worked and NO ONE has ever kicked a 65 yard FG?


Because kickers. Haven't you seen Ace Ventura?

_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 am 
* NET Curmudgeon *
* NET Curmudgeon *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 7225
Location: Eastern Washington
glowingeyedseahawk wrote:
but people,

My question is:
Why not try ???

The odds of success for the two cases is very minimal..........

Let's assume for the sake of the argument that the odds are exactly the same.

WTF are you complaining about? Turn your question around -- why not try the hail mary?


To answer your question, why not try the 65 yard long kick?

A. Pete obviously thought that FG attempt had less of a chance of succeeding than a pass play (which, I remind you, we have had success with earlier in the year with the same QB and receivers).

B. The last time he faced that situation while playing the Falcons, he did try the long field goal. It was unsuccessful, and he got raked over the coals for it.

_________________
49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:59 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9561
Location: Monroe, WA
Also, on the hail mary attempt, there is the possibility of a PI call, which would give the O one more play. The half/game can't end on a defensive penalty. Shifts the debate a bit.

;)

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:14 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:50 am
Posts: 299
All season long we saw Wilson lead us on game winning drives, many of which had a long TD passes to seal it. No reason to take the ball out of his hands for a 65 yarder. It just didn't work out this time.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:17 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 3412
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
SalishHawkFan wrote:
If it were true that the odds of making a 65 yard FG are NO DIFFERENT than making a Hail Mary attempt, then why, thoughout the history of the NFL, has there been quite a few times that a Hail Mary has worked and NO ONE has ever kicked a 65 yard FG?


Because kickers. Haven't you seen Ace Ventura?


But how many times has a 65 yarder been the distance you need. Usually on hail marys its longer


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:35 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am
Posts: 2193
With Clemons and Miller out, 49ers home field advantage, and their pumped up attitude, I do not doubt there was a strong chance we would have lost this game.

It's not worth spending too much time and energy on ifs, ands, and buts.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:54 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:05 am
Posts: 2
BlueTalon wrote:
B. The last time he faced that situation while playing the Falcons, he did try the long field goal. It was unsuccessful, and he got raked over the coals for it.


Thank you!

I've been reading these forums for a long time and finally registered here because I couldn't believe nobody was bringing this up. Exact same score and team...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:59 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 499
What would had been very hilarious was Pete going for FG and then calls timeout, and lets his kicker practice, then go back and call RW in to go for hail mary. :P


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:26 pm 
* PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Posts: 540
Location: Sinking Spring, PA
sutz wrote:
Also, on the hail mary attempt, there is the possibility of a PI call, which would give the O one more play. The half/game can't end on a defensive penalty. Shifts the debate a bit.

;)


Thank You, Sutz !!! :th2thumbs:
FINALLY, a response that I can totally agree with.....
I'll bye the hail-mary play to get a possible PI call and one more final play for the win......THIS MAKES SENSE

Otherwise, I'd have to "agree to disagree" with most responses from this thread...
sorry, I just think the FG was worth the try here....something tells me it was makeable at that time ??

_________________
"If You're Good At Making Excuses, You'll Never Be Great At Anything Else." ~ Richard Sherman

GO HAWKS !!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:17 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 1554
glowingeyedseahawk wrote:
The odds of making this are NO DIFFERENT than a Hail-Mary attempt.

Longwell's longest is 55 yards.



I saw Longwell making 55 yarders during Viking practice easily near the tops of the goal posts, they weren't squeeking by they were sailing..

its real sad to me

the Gods were speaking and thats why the Hawks kicker was hurt and Longwell came aboard, so he could set a FG post season winning record of 65 yards, the GODS WERE SPEAKING

sadly no one was listening, Longwell was supposed to go down in history, the Gods were smited, I've competed enough to know what happens when you smite the Gods, typically they smite you back.. ;)

some times its better to roll with the punches than to have the punches roll you...

so many mental errors, learn from it and move on.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:21 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm
Posts: 287
Location: Washington
OP, i think you only dwell on wanting to see the 65 yard attempt just because of the "what if" possibility.

If we would have kicked that 65 yarder and came up short (most likely) then the whole idea would have sounded ludicrous. And there would be a "would if" thread about a hail marry attempt.

_________________
TOUCHDOWN SEAHAWKS!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:31 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 1554
Hawk-A-Loogie wrote:
OP, i think you only dwell on wanting to see the 65 yard attempt just because of the "what if" possibility.

If we would have kicked that 65 yarder and came up short (most likely) then the whole idea would have sounded ludicrous. And there would be a "would if" thread about a hail marry attempt.


the percentage of kicking the FG is hihger than the 65 yarder, simply because there are no fails, cuz no one trys em

it was a sign, new kicker, FG to win, 63 yards is the current record, rookie in the superbowl...

you guys don't get how magic works or why it works for that matter, keep fighting it, see how that works out for ya...

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:42 pm 
*The Prophet*
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:43 pm
Posts: 858
I hate to say this, but I think Longwell is actually the guy who cost us the game. After Seattle scored the go ahead Touch down, all he needed to do was boot the ball out of the endzone and give them the ball at their 20.
NO. His kick off was returned to the 33 yards line. That's a massive difference of 13 yards. I don't know if Matt Ryan would have completed three long passes in a row. Everyone of the Falcons offense started well above the 25 yards line, while the Seahawks had to go 80 yards.

_________________
Joe


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:47 pm 
* NET Curmudgeon *
* NET Curmudgeon *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 7225
Location: Eastern Washington
It was a team loss. Longwell didn't cost us anything all by himself, but he certainly contributed per your observation.

_________________
49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:52 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 1141
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
Well, the records (and I believe three people are tied with 63) were all outside if I recall correctly. At least two were - one in Denver and one in Tennessee, no? Sure, he hasn't kicked one that long before, but he's got a few factors on his side: it's inside, it's for the win in the playoffs, it's for a record. Don't think his adrenalin wouldn't propel that sucker a few more feet than normal. I'd have loved to see them try.


When it hit the ground before even reaching the end zone you wouldn't have loved it.

I could get your "adrenaline" argument for a 55 or 58 yarder. A 65 yarder? Not a chance in hell.

I remember when I was a kid playing Madden, if you tried over a 55 yarder and missed. Madden would laugh at you and say, "Who do they think their kicker is, Superman?"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:09 pm 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10541
Location: Pasco, WA
Longwell would not even come close, just does not have that type of leg, heck not many kickers period have that type of leg, at least a hail-mary gave us a slim chance.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:31 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 412
The Hail Mary at least had a chance Wilson got the ball into the end zone also we could have gotten a PI call and won the game that way, the FG is never going to happen with Longwell from 65 yards. OP is saying well it's just an extra 30 feet well that's a big deal and Longwell is a long way from his prime when he could kick a 55 yarder.

We could go out there with 1000 footballs, no defense on the field and just let him kick every one of them from 65 he's not going to make any not a week ago, not today and at no point in the future is he making a 65 yard field goal.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:33 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7726
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
glowingeyedseahawk wrote:
sutz wrote:
Also, on the hail mary attempt, there is the possibility of a PI call, which would give the O one more play. The half/game can't end on a defensive penalty. Shifts the debate a bit.

;)


Thank You, Sutz !!! :th2thumbs:
FINALLY, a response that I can totally agree with.....
I'll bye the hail-mary play to get a possible PI call and one more final play for the win......THIS MAKES SENSE

Otherwise, I'd have to "agree to disagree" with most responses from this thread...
sorry, I just think the FG was worth the try here....something tells me it was makeable at that time ??


Well, that weed legalization thing just kicked in, didn't it? Maybe that's what's telling you it was a makeable kick.

Look, only 12 FGs in NFL history have been 60+ yards. Only 4 have been made from 63, and two of those were at a mile elevation where the thinner air aided the kick. It's not an accident that there are so few successful kicks from that range.

_________________
Image

Super Bowl XLVIII Champions


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am
Posts: 581
Greg Zeurlein of the Rams I'd let try the 65-yarder, but nobody else in the league would even be close.
It could have been interesting to line up like attempting a FG but then throw the Hail Mary. Except I think Jon Ryan is the holder. So there's the case for signing Tebow, right there. Line up for the FG, Tebow as the holder, either throw the Hail Mary to Tate/Rice for the win, or run it in himself, or maybe a throw to Tate on the left, then a 31-home-run-throwback to Tebow on the right. Actually make that first throw to Rice. And there's always the hook and ladder play back to the QB. (Remember the Dolphins hook-and-ladder that beat the Steelers?)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:18 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:33 am
Posts: 389
In Denver on a clear day with a perfectly straight tail wind...I'd still go for the hail mary.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:28 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:18 am
Posts: 463
Can we lock this topic?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:44 pm 
* NET Sage *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 4369
Twisted wrote:
Hawk-A-Loogie wrote:
OP, i think you only dwell on wanting to see the 65 yard attempt just because of the "what if" possibility.

If we would have kicked that 65 yarder and came up short (most likely) then the whole idea would have sounded ludicrous. And there would be a "would if" thread about a hail marry attempt.


the percentage of kicking the FG is hihger than the 65 yarder, simply because there are no fails, cuz no one trys em

it was a sign, new kicker, FG to win, 63 yards is the current record, rookie in the superbowl...

you guys don't get how magic works or why it works for that matter, keep fighting it, see how that works out for ya...


:lol:

He's damn near 40.. the ball wouldn't have gone past the 5.

_________________
February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:17 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 1554
joeseahawks wrote:
I hate to say this, but I think Longwell is actually the guy who cost us the game.



meh, smite the Gods they will smite you back 10 fold

NOT having longwell kick the 2 3s in the first half were the real mistakes, payback, karma whatever, it was a poor decision to not kick the 3 and maybe one that will haunt PC the rest of his life, especially if he never gets to the bowl game...

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:36 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
Posts: 302
Location: Spokane, WA
Well, some kid at my old high school here in Spokane made a 67 yard field goal.

If some 17 year old kid can make a 67 yard field goal, why can't a 38 year old make a 65 yarder?

Well, it's all in the past now. We already had one hail mary this season, I suppose that was enough

_________________
No autographs please


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:40 am 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 11181
Location: Antioch, CA
Jerhawk wrote:
Well, some kid at my old high school here in Spokane made a 67 yard field goal.

If some 17 year old kid can make a 67 yard field goal, why can't a 38 year old make a 65 yarder?

Well, it's all in the past now. We already had one hail mary this season, I suppose that was enough


That 17 year old kid didn't have an entire line of 6' 4" 250 pound men who are some of the best athletes in the country jumping up to try and block the kick.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:11 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 9:36 pm
Posts: 206
Zowert wrote:
They attempted one pass play before the hail mary. They should have went for one large gain, called a timeout then kicked a field goal.


It took them 4 seconds to get what 5-8 yards on the first pass play. You think they had time for another 15 yards? NO WAY


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:35 pm 
NET Ring Of Honor
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 21159
Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014
Holy shit man, why is this still being discussed.. Does the term move along mean anything?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:56 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 3080
Location: Anchorage, AK
Jerhawk wrote:
Well, some kid at my old high school here in Spokane made a 67 yard field goal.



become his friend


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:20 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:20 am
Posts: 111
Jerhawk wrote:
Well, some kid at my old high school here in Spokane made a 67 yard field goal.

If some 17 year old kid can make a 67 yard field goal, why can't a 38 year old make a 65 yarder?

Well, it's all in the past now. We already had one hail mary this season, I suppose that was enough


The kid in your highschool used a tee. Not to mention the fact that he didn't have to kick over a NFL size defensive line.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:04 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1522
olyfan63 wrote:
Greg Zeurlein of the Rams I'd let try the 65-yarder, but nobody else in the league would even be close.
It could have been interesting to line up like attempting a FG but then throw the Hail Mary. Except I think Jon Ryan is the holder. So there's the case for signing Tebow, right there. Line up for the FG, Tebow as the holder, either throw the Hail Mary to Tate/Rice for the win, or run it in himself, or maybe a throw to Tate on the left, then a 31-home-run-throwback to Tebow on the right. Actually make that first throw to Rice. And there's always the hook and ladder play back to the QB. (Remember the Dolphins hook-and-ladder that beat the Steelers?)


I'd let Janikowski try it, he might have the strongest leg in the league. The Raiders even tried a 76 yarder, into the wind, with him a few years ago. He only kicked it to the 1 or 2 yard line, but that's still pretty good. Other than that, yeah. 65 yard FGs are something you only try if the conditions are all in your favor, and even then, its iffy.

_________________
----


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:21 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
Posts: 302
Location: Spokane, WA
mikeak wrote:
Jerhawk wrote:
Well, some kid at my old high school here in Spokane made a 67 yard field goal.



become his friend


Ok, i'll do that thanks for posting your expert opinion

_________________
No autographs please


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Still hung-up on the 65-yard FG attempt...
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:53 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 1141
Someone mentioned being in a dome would have extended his range. Domes only help with directional kicks, not with the distance.

Longwell played in Minnesota several years, and his career long was still only 55.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.