 |
| Author |
Message |
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags  Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:58 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 548
|
Congratulations to Gus. He was a part of the Seahawks defense before Pete got to Seattle and impressed Pete enough to earn the right to stay. He took one of the worst defenses in the league and turned it in to one of the best in the league. If Gus is given a good GM to work with, I think he'll do very well and I wish him the best except when the Jags play the Seahawks. As for the next DC, I have faith in the Seahawk front office to make a good hire. I'm sure that most defensive coordinators do better when they are given good players to work with so it won't matter who they hire because John Schneider has already given the next guy a lot of really good players to work with. Here's to hoping we see some pressure on QBs next season. 
Last edited by rideaducati on Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
SeaHawk80
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:58 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:53 am
Posts: 161
Location: Pe Ell, WA
|
|
Think about the ties to nick holt.. I just shivered.. Please be Quinn.. Of Course just lke the draft we may have a WTF moment and then half way through next year we will all be like "I never doubted, oh pete and JS we love you..... slurp slurp.. just sayin
_________________ "Go Hawks" Russlemainia Hawknballs wrote: If he keeps making plays and fighting his way into the end zone he can do the entire interview while taking a dump and eating potato chips for all i care.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:00 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8733
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
Killa Kam wrote: Am i the only one that finds it funny that all of the credit goes to Pete but all of the Defense's blame goes to Bradley. I don't believe this is all that big of a loss because the system we run is mostly Pete's but to put the blame of our Defensive lapses strictly at the hand of Bradley is wrong imo. But that's what lackeys are for! _________________   Papaki douchebag love turtle long time What...? it's not like anyone banged a turtle or anything. Just chill.....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Aristotle22
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:07 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:48 pm
Posts: 202
|
Mandu wrote: Aristotle22 wrote: Lovie  ???????Exactly what I was thinking
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sports Hernia
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:22 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 5391
|
Scottemojo wrote: We play Jacksonville next year. With Bradley's insider knowledge, what should be an easy game just got a bit tougher. Nope, a soft zone - prevent defense is easily beatable!
_________________
Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksSoc
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:27 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 154
Location: Ireland!
|
Jake Hawks wrote: HawksSoc wrote: On the article on the subject on nfl.com; http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000 ... uars-coachIt states that the Hybrid system we run was Bradley's thing, "Bradley favored", I was under the impression this was Pete's system? Also go go Jason Babin to be Bradley's new Leo! The article also says we pressured the quarterback all season. Yeah that was one of my favorite quotes of that, after I finished reading it earlier I just sighed and stuck it up here so my .net brethren could tear it asunder!
_________________
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Mark Twain.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bellyfat
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:51 am |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:56 am
Posts: 337
|
Scottemojo wrote: We play Jacksonville next year. With Bradley's insider knowledge, what should be an easy game just got a bit tougher. WE ARE NOT LOSING AT HOME.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CaptainSkybeard
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:34 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 528
|
|
I must be the only one who has been pretty darn unhappy with our defense for a while?
All anyone talks about is how great Seattle's defense is. Is that really true? How many games did the offense lose us vs how many games did the defense lose us? You can really only pin ONE lose on the offense, and that was Week 1.
The fact that Sherman and Thomas, and to a lesser extent Browner, Chancellor, Wagner, Clemons are such amazing individual players has masked the fact that our defense (schematically mostly) has been average at best most of the time. Don't get me wrong, the defense has had some amazing games, but usually against dysfunctional teams.
Clearly our line is the biggest problem followed by the linebackers and don't forget the nickel corner spot.
Wheres the turnovers? Wheres the pass rush? Whats going on with 3rd down?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:36 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6324
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
nwgamer wrote: The Jags new GM already stated he wasn't bringing in Tebow. Now the Flynn issue is another story. He can say whatever he wants. He still works for the owner and the owner needs to sell tix. Tebow will sell tix.......for a while. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1113
|
CaptainSkybeard wrote: I must be the only one who has been pretty darn unhappy with our defense for a while?
All anyone talks about is how great Seattle's defense is. Is that really true? How many games did the offense lose us vs how many games did the defense lose us? You can really only pin ONE lose on the offense, and that was Week 1.
The fact that Sherman and Thomas, and to a lesser extent Browner, Chancellor, Wagner, Clemons are such amazing individual players has masked the fact that our defense (schematically mostly) has been average at best most of the time. Don't get me wrong, the defense has had some amazing games, but usually against dysfunctional teams.
Clearly our line is the biggest problem followed by the linebackers and don't forget the nickel corner spot.
Wheres the turnovers? Wheres the pass rush? Whats going on with 3rd down? You can MAYBE pin the Rams game on special teams, no way can you put it on the defense though, essentially gave up 4 field goals, 2 of 58 and 60 yards and the other of 48 yards, despite shortened fields due to 2 interceptions (the third didn't really impact the score in the end). I think that game is on the offense, moreso than the Arizona game where the defense allowed Kolb to breeze his way to a TD and someone has to take the blame for SF. No matter how good your defense is, you don't win games when you score 6 points. Unless you're playing a Charlie Whitehurst/Justin Forsett tag team
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bradley goes to the Jags Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:58 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
|
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8733
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
bellyfat wrote: Scottemojo wrote: We play Jacksonville next year. With Bradley's insider knowledge, what should be an easy game just got a bit tougher. WE ARE NOT LOSING AT HOME. Or on the road. _________________ Papaki douchebag love turtle long time What...? it's not like anyone banged a turtle or anything. Just chill.....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thManNorth, AbsolutNET, Aerik, bestfightstory, Bigpumpkin, birdman5, BirdsCommaAngry, Blitzer88, bloodkingg, Blueboy, bryantology79, CANHawk, Cartire, CFraychineaud, Chrome_Seahawk, Chukarhawk, Clayfighter, coach78, dbsn2420, DSM, DynoHawk, FidelisHawk, Floridahawk79, grizbob, HagFaithful, HansGruber, Harperville, HawkAroundTheClock, Hawkfan77, Jimmy, JSeahawks, KCHawkGirl, LusciousJames, MexHawk, misfit, mrdaija, MSN [Bot], NinerLifer, nsport, oldhawkfan, onanygivensunday, ottawahawkfan, Sarlacc83, Scottemojo, Seahawksfan425, SeahawksFanForever, seahawksTopGear, SeaMeat, Shaz, Shirkophobe, SHOCKER315, Slick, sturg78, SweTard, thecycle, themunn, Throwdown, Trenchbroom, TwilightError, twisted_steel2, usc17hawk, USChawk, Zer0veritas and 175 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
