 |
| Author |
Message |
|
IronSaint
|
Post subject: Re: Open letter to Seahawks fans  Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:57 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:23 pm
Posts: 189
Location: New Orleans
|
Generic name here wrote: Compared to Saints fans, you guys were great. How cute, I love you too.  Generic name here wrote: GA Dome hitting 115dB at points. LOL, maybe by pumping it in through the PA system.  _________________ pehawk wrote: I have a boner, right now, as I type this.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Generic name here
|
Post subject: Re: Open letter to Seahawks fans Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:24 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:21 am
Posts: 7
|
IronSaint wrote: Generic name here wrote: Compared to Saints fans, you guys were great. How cute, I love you too. Generic name here wrote: GA Dome hitting 115dB at points. LOL, maybe by pumping it in through the PA system. Ha. Wasn't expecting to see your likes around here. Oh well, I stand by my statement.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Open letter to Seahawks fans Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:35 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1116
|
Generic name here wrote: It kills me that people's first reaction to us being in the playoffs is because we had "the easiest schedule". However playoff teams, Washington (24th tied with ATL), San Francisco (24th tied with ATL), New England (32nd), Green Bay (31st) and Houston (29th) all either had an easier schedule or a same strength schedule. Yet nobody cares to mention their schedules. Don't have a clue what you're talking about here, Atlanta's SoS was 0.422 which was the easiest in the league by a significant margin. http://nfltraderumors.co/2012-nfl-strength-of-schedule/
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Generic name here
|
Post subject: Re: Open letter to Seahawks fans Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:51 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:21 am
Posts: 7
|
themunn wrote: Generic name here wrote: It kills me that people's first reaction to us being in the playoffs is because we had "the easiest schedule". However playoff teams, Washington (24th tied with ATL), San Francisco (24th tied with ATL), New England (32nd), Green Bay (31st) and Houston (29th) all either had an easier schedule or a same strength schedule. Yet nobody cares to mention their schedules. Don't have a clue what you're talking about here, Atlanta's SoS was 0.422 which was the easiest in the league by a significant margin. http://nfltraderumors.co/2012-nfl-strength-of-schedule/Ah, he11. Just realized my original source was from the preseason based on 2011 wins. Oh well, I still stand by my other comments. We didn't pick our schedule, we just play the games they give us. So far, we've beaten every team on our schedule.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: Aerik, Bigpumpkin, Bobblehead, brettb3, Cartire, formido, Google [Bot], HansGruber, HopScotch, kamikazehawk, KitsapHawk, Landhawk1, LargentFan, madbohem, Maelstrom787, Majestic-12 [Bot], MaverickHawk, morgulon1, Pandion Haliaetus, PlinytheCenter, SeaHawker, SilNWest, Skeeve, Speakinhawk68, Spounge84, Uberman and 115 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
