 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Spleenhawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:59 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:45 am Posts: 113
|
|
Dan Quinn would be a great choice. What he has done with the Florida defense has been impressive. He is familiar with the system, and expectations - and could be paid a load of money from Allen. But is he frustrated at the fact that he was not chosen originally as DC when brought in by Pete? Quinn seemed to be preferred coach for the position, but then Gus was brought back as DC. He is also a East Coast guy, only spending two short stints on the West Coast - 2 years with SF and one year with Seattle. I think it is the best choice, but I get the feeling it is a long shot
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
lukerguy
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:00 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm Posts: 887
|
|
Dan Quinn would be an upgrade to Bradley IMO. Similar style, but his speciality was Dline pressure, and stopping run. Florida was exceptional at both of those categories last year.
_________________  "We all we got, we all we need"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
GCrow
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:02 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:05 am Posts: 329 Location: Canada
|
|
Ya, i'd be pretty happy with Quinn. He is a D-Line guy and to be frank ours needs quite abit of work
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
PatsFanNH
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:03 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am Posts: 246
|
Largent80 wrote: Who is your choice for DC if Bradley leaves?
I am undecided. You guys think Romeo Crennell fit the bill for your D? He is an AMAZING D coordinator! (who has had AWFUL luck as a HC)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:06 am |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am Posts: 6793 Location: PNW
|
|
I doubt we go with a guy like Romeo or Lovie. This is Pete's defense and whoever comes in won't be able to do their thing. Guys that have been around and been head coaches don't fit that profile, imo.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sc85sis
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:06 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:40 am Posts: 3197 Location: Southern CA
|
GCrow wrote: If were keepin on the PC connection, another name i've seen is Joe Berry. Currently Linebackers coach with the Chargers and apparently worked under Carroll at SC albeit briefly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_BarryAlso, Marinelli would be awesome. Barry worked as LB coach under Kiffin after Pete left for Seattle.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
GCrow
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:11 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:05 am Posts: 329 Location: Canada
|
sc85sis wrote: GCrow wrote: If were keepin on the PC connection, another name i've seen is Joe Berry. Currently Linebackers coach with the Chargers and apparently worked under Carroll at SC albeit briefly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_BarryAlso, Marinelli would be awesome. Barry worked as LB coach under Kiffin after Pete left for Seattle. Holy heck did I get my years mixed up there. /brews another pot of coffee
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawkAroundTheClock
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:12 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm Posts: 782 Location: Olympia
|
|
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter There is a "strong possibility" Florida DC Dan Quinn will return to Seattle to replace Gus Bradley as DC, though CLEV and PHIL interested.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:16 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am Posts: 1100
|
HawkAroundTheClock wrote: Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter There is a "strong possibility" Florida DC Dan Quinn will return to Seattle to replace Gus Bradley as DC, though CLEV and PHIL interested. PC should have his pick of litter. I can't imagine why any aspiring coach would not frothing at the mouth to coach the Hawks' D. I'm not worried about any other teams being more appealing roster-wise, but obviously compensation is just as important.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:19 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6592 Location: Covington, Washington
|
|
Another name (didn't read all current 5 pages) is Ray Horton. I saw references that he may not be retained if Arians comes on board. Not sure his style meshes with Pete but folks wouldn't be complaining about soft zones I bet.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sturm
|
Post subject: Re: D.C If Bradley bolts Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:24 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:11 pm Posts: 2067
|
JSeahawks wrote: It doesnt matter. PC runs the defense.
I expect to elevate one of our own. What does this mean exactly and where's your proof?
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:25 am |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6674
|
drdiags wrote: Another name (didn't read all current 5 pages) is Ray Horton. I saw references that he may not be retained if Arians comes on board. Not sure his style meshes with Pete but folks wouldn't be complaining about soft zones I bet. This is why Bevell will end up getting the AZ job. Arians already has a DC, forget whom, but he's not going to budge on it. Although, I wish you're statement was probable. I dont know why, but having a brother with cornrows running a defense just feels right to me. That's either racism or years or narcotics use.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:28 am |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10355 Location: Portland, OR
|
HawkAroundTheClock wrote: Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter There is a "strong possibility" Florida DC Dan Quinn will return to Seattle to replace Gus Bradley as DC, though CLEV and PHIL interested. I really hope this is true. If Quinn is looking to be an NFL head coach at any point, Seattle is a going to be a great place to get his name out there if Seattle has another top 5 defense next year. (Ironically enough given our South Alaska location.)
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Treefiddy
|
Post subject: Re: D.C If Bradley bolts Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:31 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:32 am Posts: 200
|
Sturm wrote: JSeahawks wrote: It doesnt matter. PC runs the defense.
I expect to elevate one of our own. What does this mean exactly and where's your proof? Ray Horton brings nasty QB pressure and he's from Seattle. Make it happen
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:32 am |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2670
|
|
Dan Quinn seems to be the most logical choice. Would be a real seamless transition.
Sounds more and more like Lovie Smith is sitting 2013 out. He wants a HC job.
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:34 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6592 Location: Covington, Washington
|
|
As others pointed out, Ray comes from the Pittsburgh/Bengals Labeau 3-4 style, so having him mesh with Pete's 4-3 under may not be the best of fits. Sounds like Dan Quinn makes the most sense but the point about him leaving to go to Florida after Bradley got DC from Mora and then with Pete, we will have to see if he wants to come back to the PNW. Not sure he does.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
entropyrulesall
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:37 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 172 Location: Federal Way, WA
|
|
Quinn is going to go to JAX with Bradley. They are already close and with Quinn at the University of Florida, it's a short move for him too. Quinn was the one who suggested the Red Bryant experiment though so I'm not sure if him coming back would be a good thing.
What about AZ's DC?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:38 am |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6674
|
|
I know the conventional wisdom is Pete WONT switch to a 3-4, but I'm not so sure. He's done nothing BUT adapt and change his ways since joining the team. From Bates, from flirting w/ J McDaniel, from Bandit, Hass, Tjack, Wilson's zone-read, he's adapted when he's had to. The Hawks defense is actually built for a 3-4, from a personnel perspective.
Pete would do it, if he thought it was best. Hell, he let Gus call the plays.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ParisPC07
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:43 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:14 pm Posts: 388 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
|
Tony Ventrella
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JonRud
|
Post subject: Re: D.C. Since Bradley has bolted Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:44 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:58 pm Posts: 740 Location: Dodoma in the United Republic of Tanzania
|
|
Nobody's up for John Marshall 2.0 ?
_________________ Win Forever!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 671hawk, AbsolutNET, Animalman, Basis4day, Biggiec76, BoatsAndHose, bytor72, CamanoIslandJQ, City, Clayfighter, CornerHawk, CurryStopstheRuns, DavidCruz24, DavidSeven, dbmack, drdiags, dumbrabbit, Floridahawk79, Frostbyte, geoff21, GoldenTater81, grizbob, Hawk-A-Loogie, hawkfan333, Hawks46, hawksfan1976, HighlandHawk, HoustonHawk82, judgemint, lacenterhawk, loafoftatupu, Maelstrom787, Mandu, Missing_Clink, MoneyLynch24, MontanaHawk05, Morpheus08, NYCoug, OkieHawk, oregonhawkfan, red17hawk, RynoHawk, sainthawk29, Sarlacc83, SilNWest, silverjoel, Starrman44, streets24, T-Sizzle, the_12th_man, thecycle, Tical21, travlinhawk, twisted_steel2, Zukistubbs and 206 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|