 |
| Author |
Message |
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Do we need a burner? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm Posts: 1116
|
Hawks46 wrote: A burner wouldn't have changed things today. Atlanta was playing a Cover 2 shell today; it's specifically designed to keep WRs in front of the secondary and not give up the big play. Having a guy vertically stretch the field into the teeth of the defense wouldn't have changed anything.
The way you beat that is what we did a bit in the 1st half, hit the TE. A running game would've made the safeties creep up, and then get hit over the top with the PA pass. The lack of a run game hurt us more than missing an elite WR, although it would be nice to see Tate and Rice win some one on one matchups against better than average CBs.
What we need is at least one more dominating OG. Sweezy isn't there yet (might not ever be dominating) and Moffitt just doesn't look like he takes it seriously enough. Well two things, it could either create even MORE space in that intermediate gap if you have a guy flat out running towards the end-zone, second, if they catch the ball in that middle area and make one guy miss they can take it to the house. Right now I feel that even though Tate and Rice can catch the ball in the middle of the field and make a guy miss and/or break a tackle, they're still going to get caught before they break off a huge run
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
purpleworld
|
Post subject: Re: Do we need a burner? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:09 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:18 am Posts: 287
|
|
Another weapon would be awesome....i'd like to see us package picks to get 4 or 5 guys we REALLY want....this team is young as is so lets get 'quality' rather than 'quantity'....
_________________ "I didn't do anything...i just headbutted him!"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker232
|
Post subject: Re: Do we need a burner? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:09 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:18 pm Posts: 93
|
|
If we want a true burner, I think we would take a shot at Wallace. Dude is FAST.
But I see us approaching a true pass rusher. Maybe getting Randy Starks from Miami to stuff the run and provide some more pressure.
_________________ "You're going to fall off your seat when you see how good this Seahawk squad really is" - Skip Bayless
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
GeorgeKush
|
Post subject: Re: Do we need a burner? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:11 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:39 am Posts: 172 Location: i like hawks
|
hawker232 wrote: If we want a true burner, I think we would take a shot at Wallace. Dude is FAST.
But I see us approaching a true pass rusher. Maybe getting Randy Starks from Miami to stuff the run and provide some more pressure. yep mike wallace is one of the fastest receivers out there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
NJSeaHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Do we need a burner? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:42 am Posts: 1073 Location: New Joisey
|
|
what about the Rocket Lockette?
Im sure the Niners drop him
_________________ " Cuz It's gonna be rainy up there Russell. If you are listening to me, get some of those gloves and get used to throwing in the wet rain." Jon Gruden on Seahawks Draft
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: CHawks4L, dbmack, fisholot, GoldenIsThyTate, Google [Bot], Grahamkrackker253, hgwellz12, HopScotch, IcedHawk, kamikazehawk, Killa Kam, Majestic-12 [Bot], MaverickHawk, McG, McGruff, oregonhawkfan, Recon_Hawk, redeye81, rickychen, Skeeve, SmokinHawk, SPOHAWK, Stoned Cold, tooshort, Uberman, vin.couve12, Zukistubbs and 140 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|