Random Thoughts™ on the Falcons game

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • Shadowhawk wrote:"My only criticism was Seattle not taking an intentional grounding on the final play of the first half."

    Isn't there an 10-second runoff if you ground the ball in that situation? That would have ended the half anyway.


    Except there were about 20 seconds left on the clock and it would've been enough time to line up while they were making the call.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2160
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


  • Meeker wrote:
    kearly wrote:-You kind of knew 31 seconds was enough time. At least I did. Wasn't actually that heartbreaking. More disappointing than heartbreaking.


    Yeah, I really didn't want to score on that first down...ugh.



    Ditto, my son and I were a little nervous about that as well. Kudos to the scrambling Russell finding marshawn for the palsy that set up the touchdown
    User avatar
    Aristotle22
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 445
    Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:48 pm


  • mrblitz wrote:on defense, i'd say keep loading up on safeties. find an earl clone so you can play a cover-2 look.

    could you imagine a 2-deep with 2 earls?


    I think the FO have considered that, remember they said they would have drafted Barron if he had been available at 12.
    Chancellor plays up in the box a lot too, a few people suggested before the draft we were considering Barron and moving Kam to LB. Considering he plays like an extra LB at times that probably wouldn't be a bad idea.

    It made me sick watching Gonzalez match up against Winston Guy though, Kam and Browner are the only two guys on the team big enough to go toe-to-toe with him, Kam should have been shadowing him all game.
    themunn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2520
    Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm


  • We get a pass rush and it's over, sb here we come, our secondary with a consitent pass rush and our speedy lb's and its curtains for anyone we play.
    Image
    User avatar
    SNDavidson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1441
    Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm


  • jkitsune wrote:
    Shadowhawk wrote:"My only criticism was Seattle not taking an intentional grounding on the final play of the first half."

    Isn't there an 10-second runoff if you ground the ball in that situation? That would have ended the half anyway.


    Except there were about 20 seconds left on the clock and it would've been enough time to line up while they were making the call.


    Hate to beat a dead horse -- but you know what kills me are the missed opportunities we had. That last second drive in which Wilson got sacked is one. But how about 2 series prior to that -- the idea of going for it on 4th and 1 at the Atlanta 11 yard line. In either case if we'd just gotten a field goal (in just ONE of those 2 series) ... we'd be on our way to San Francisco next weekend. AUGH!!!!!!
    User avatar
    Hawkscanner
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 981
    Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:28 am


  • morgulon1 wrote:Im pissed but over it at the same time. Make sense? I'm proud of my team . The way they played this year, the way they fought, the way they never got punked. They are a lot farther at this point than I thought they'd be. I love this team.

    Congrats....

    :13:
    kujohawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 108
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:21 pm


  • Hawkscanner wrote:Thanks for the write-ups you've done all season long on these post game thoughts (in this case we should definitely say Post Mortem thoughts). If you don't mind me chiming in, I'll comment on a few things and then I've got a few random thoughts of my own ...

    1) Well, the Magic Carpet Ride is finally over ... and to be honest, I do have a lot of the same feelings right now as I did back in 1995 when the Mariners went down to the Indians in the ALCS. Like a lot of you, my emotions are pretty raw right now. When the comeback was happening, there was a piece of me that honestly believed that the Seahawks were going to get it done. Unfortunately, when I realized that there 31 seconds left my heart sank, as in my heart of hearts I knew that it just wasn't going to be today.

    2) Completely agreed Kip -- Russell Wilson was awesome today. Eerily, I don't know why, but I'm drawing parallels in my mind right now to Wisconsin's Rose Bowl 35-28 Loss to Oregon. Hmm. That said, I completely agree that this is the beginning of a new era in Seahawks football ... and that that future is very bright. When it's all said and done for Wilson, I fully believe he will have guided the Seahawks to and won at least 1 Super Bowl (if not a few).

    3) Regarding the game today, it just goes to show you that you CANNOT allow yourself to get down by THAT many points AND turn the ball over on the road. Just cannot do that and expect to win at home. Home field advantage is everything. If this game had been played at Century Link ... I fully believe we would be heading to Candlestick next week.

    4) Have to agree with you that Sweezy's inexperience was a factor in this game. I know that Pete Carroll and Tom Cable say that he is the most athletic lineman they have and that they like his makeup ... but didn't we hear those same kinds of comments about James Carpenter? You just cannot have that kind of inexperience out there in a playoff game.

    5) A big reason that we lost this football game was Seattle's inability to get Marshawn Lynch and the running game going. If you can't get that going ... and don't keep Matt Ryan and those receivers off the field ... you're going to lose. We lost the Time of Possession Battle in this one -- a big No No on the road.

    6) Chris Clemons's absence loomed very large in this game. Without the ability to get consistent pressure with just the Front 4, that meant we had to blitz more. Against a team like this that has so many weapons, that's the death knell. Also, it was quite shocking to see a back like Michael Turner (who has really beat no one this year) to have the kind of game he had. To me, that is also directly related to Clemons being out. I have to agree with your point completely that Bruce Irvin (to me) seems like more of a situational pass rusher -- that's his upside. Now that's fine, but you've got to resign yourself to the fact that that's what he is ... and plan accordingly. Irvin just isn't all that good against the run ... and man, did it showin this game.

    7) Like you guys, the whole Time Out thing sticks in my craw (which I know it shouldn't ... but it did) since their kicker MISSED IT the first time. UGH! If we only hadn't called TO ... he'd have shanked it and the game would be over. Irrational thought for sure of mine ... but it's just one of a dozen or more "what if's" in this game.

    Flipping the page and breaking out the shopping list for the offseason, the needs on this team (from what I can see) are:

    1) Defensive End/Line (Pass Rusher/Run Stuffer Combo ideally)
    2) A young LB to succeed Leroy Hill (sorry man, but it's time) -- can we clone Aldon Smith or Novorro Bowman?
    3) Another CB to help compete with Jeremy Lane for the Nickel spot and a guy who could start if need be.
    4) Another WR with speed who can really stretch the field and put pressure on defenses.
    5) Offensive Line depth (maybe some more of those later round nuggets with starting potential).

    To me, the first 2 things are priorities 1A and 1B. Absolutely, positively have GOT to find a way to improve the pass rush and improve against the run. If that means in doing so that Red Bryant moves in to more of a rotational role than he's been in -- I'm fine with that. We saw the benefit of what you can do if you can generate pressure with just the Front 4 in the last Rams game. I'm looking for absolute stud DE and/or LB's who can really "tilt the room" in this upcoming draft. On the flip side, that Front 4 of the Rams really highlighted to me the real need to improve the Offensive Line. The Rams aren't going anywhere, as they have the youngest corps in the game and under Jeff Fisher are only going to get better.

    If we beef things up a bit this offseason (which I know John Schneider is going to do) ... the prospects look bright for next season, given that Russell Wilson and the offense will have an entire training camp together from Day 1 (instead of having to do this 3 QB rotation and figure out who's going to win the job). If we don't blow winable games by playing stupid ... there's no reason that this team can't be 12-4 ... or 13-3 next season and get Home Field Advantage in the playoffs. If I had to bet the farm, I'd bank on that happening next season. Now we got to sit back and watch the Falcons get smoked by the 49ers next week. Can't wait for the offseason and for the roster tweaking to begin.


    Deserves its own thread.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2160
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


  • When Bryant was healthy without the foot issues, he did a bit better and had a bigger impact. I'm wondering if they told him they needed him to play closer to 300 lbs if that would take pressure off of the feet and make him a bit quicker. He looked so much quicker last year and the year before, to be honest. Not sure if he gained weight this year, of it was the plantar fascitis

    I agree that I'd like to see an elite DE soon. We also need a better NIckle CB and WLB. Maybe this can be solved with our current roster just getting better and more experienced (Lane, Maxwell, Smith, Scruggs).

    We need a better 3 tech
    Hawks46
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3738
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm


  • theENGLISHseahawk wrote:
    kearly wrote:-You kind of knew 31 seconds was enough time. At least I did. Wasn't actually that heartbreaking. More disappointing than heartbreaking.


    This is exactly how I felt. I usually let out a neighbour-waking cheer when we score a big touchdown, but today just kind of smiled. I was saving the big cheer for the end. And next door will unfortunately never get to hear it.

    I had no confidence we'd get the stop... felt like we needed a big play first up (eg sack) to really set them back. That Falcons team is made to get yardage like that in a quick situation. It's a shame but I wasn't as gutted as I thought I would be.



    This. I was not celebrating because of the impending feeling of Atl marching down the field to kick the winning field goal was overcoming me.
    User avatar
    morgulon1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3524
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:07 am
    Location: Spokane, Wa


  • drdiags wrote:Our defense is not as physical as the talking heads make them out to be. Run defense has been trending down since mid-season. Pass rush and better DL/LB play will help going forward. I still cannot complain. This team has a chance to re-load and make another run at it with confidence that they belong and can play with the big boys.


    Our defense is very physical at home, but on the road it's hit and miss. Today was a miss. No physicality today at all.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11227
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • jkitsune wrote:
    Shadowhawk wrote:"My only criticism was Seattle not taking an intentional grounding on the final play of the first half."

    Isn't there an 10-second runoff if you ground the ball in that situation? That would have ended the half anyway.


    Except there were about 20 seconds left on the clock and it would've been enough time to line up while they were making the call.


    17 seconds. And 20 is not a sure thing. See 2011 Bengals game.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11227
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Hawkscanner wrote:

    Flipping the page and breaking out the shopping list for the offseason, the needs on this team (from what I can see) are:

    1) Defensive End/Line (Pass Rusher/Run Stuffer Combo ideally)
    2) A young LB to succeed Leroy Hill (sorry man, but it's time) -- can we clone Aldon Smith or Novorro Bowman?
    3) Another CB to help compete with Jeremy Lane for the Nickel spot and a guy who could start if need be.
    4) Another WR with speed who can really stretch the field and put pressure on defenses.
    5) Offensive Line depth (maybe some more of those later round nuggets with starting potential).

    To me, the first 2 things are priorities 1A and 1B. Absolutely, positively have GOT to find a way to improve the pass rush and improve against the run. If that means in doing so that Red Bryant moves in to more of a rotational role than he's been in -- I'm fine with that. We saw the benefit of what you can do if you can generate pressure with just the Front 4 in the last Rams game. I'm looking for absolute stud DE and/or LB's who can really "tilt the room" in this upcoming draft. On the flip side, that Front 4 of the Rams really highlighted to me the real need to improve the Offensive Line. The Rams aren't going anywhere, as they have the youngest corps in the game and under Jeff Fisher are only going to get better.

    If we beef things up a bit this offseason (which I know John Schneider is going to do) ... the prospects look bright for next season, given that Russell Wilson and the offense will have an entire training camp together from Day 1 (instead of having to do this 3 QB rotation and figure out who's going to win the job). If we don't blow winable games by playing stupid ... there's no reason that this team can't be 12-4 ... or 13-3 next season and get Home Field Advantage in the playoffs. If I had to bet the farm, I'd bank on that happening next season. Now we got to sit back and watch the Falcons get smoked by the 49ers next week. Can't wait for the offseason and for the roster tweaking to begin.



    Top 10 Wants/Needs
    1. Pass Rush DT (Upgrade J.Jones)
    2. 3 Down DE (Upgrade Big Red/replace Clemons)
    3. Big/Fast WR (Upgrade Tate on the opposite of Rice)
    4. Pass Catching TE (Upgrade Mccoy)
    5. OLB (Upgrade Hill/Smith)
    6. OT (Backup for Okung, can he stay healthy another full season)
    7. K (upgrade Hauska)
    8. CB (Competition for Lane/Maxwell depth to let Tru retire)
    9. OG (competition for Moffit/Sweezey/Carpenter)
    10. MLB (more LB depth)
    Image
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2181
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


  • Wenhawk wrote:Top 10 Wants/Needs
    1. Pass Rush DT (Upgrade J.Jones)
    2. 3 Down DE (Upgrade Big Red/replace Clemons)
    3. Big/Fast WR (Upgrade Tate on the opposite of Rice)
    4. Pass Catching TE (Upgrade Mccoy)
    5. OLB (Upgrade Hill/Smith)
    6. OT (Backup for Okung, can he stay healthy another full season)
    7. K (upgrade Hauska)
    8. CB (Competition for Lane/Maxwell depth to let Tru retire)
    9. OG (competition for Moffit/Sweezey/Carpenter)
    10. MLB (more LB depth)


    Hell, if we simply had Jason Jones OR Clemons available for this game, we probably win. Just improving the depth of our pass rushing capability would do it. One well timed sack to stall a Falcons drive, and we are on our way to SF for the NFC title game. We don't have to get a J.J. Watt to make the difference, just a Jason Jones or Chris Clemons equivalent who is on the field would do, and yeah, a Red Bryant replacement who can rush the passer.
    Even just another couple of PC/JS's 5th or 7th round gems addressing DL needs would put us over the top. Not saying we can't be greedy, just that the margin of improvement we need is so small.
    Hell, if we win one more game, Miami or Arizona opener, or Detroit, that translates into a win in this playoff game, because it's in Seattle at the Clink instead of at the Georgia done. Everything else the same, we easily win this game at the CLink.
    User avatar
    olyfan63
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 709
    Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Falcons game
Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:36 pm
  • Great stuff Kearly.

    Our number one need is pass rushing DT. And what I wouldn't give to get DeAndre Hopkins, that kid is a stud.
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 8716
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


  • Wenhawk wrote:
    Hawkscanner wrote:

    Flipping the page and breaking out the shopping list for the offseason, the needs on this team (from what I can see) are:

    1) Defensive End/Line (Pass Rusher/Run Stuffer Combo ideally)
    2) A young LB to succeed Leroy Hill (sorry man, but it's time) -- can we clone Aldon Smith or Novorro Bowman?
    3) Another CB to help compete with Jeremy Lane for the Nickel spot and a guy who could start if need be.
    4) Another WR with speed who can really stretch the field and put pressure on defenses.
    5) Offensive Line depth (maybe some more of those later round nuggets with starting potential).

    To me, the first 2 things are priorities 1A and 1B. Absolutely, positively have GOT to find a way to improve the pass rush and improve against the run. If that means in doing so that Red Bryant moves in to more of a rotational role than he's been in -- I'm fine with that. We saw the benefit of what you can do if you can generate pressure with just the Front 4 in the last Rams game. I'm looking for absolute stud DE and/or LB's who can really "tilt the room" in this upcoming draft. On the flip side, that Front 4 of the Rams really highlighted to me the real need to improve the Offensive Line. The Rams aren't going anywhere, as they have the youngest corps in the game and under Jeff Fisher are only going to get better.

    If we beef things up a bit this offseason (which I know John Schneider is going to do) ... the prospects look bright for next season, given that Russell Wilson and the offense will have an entire training camp together from Day 1 (instead of having to do this 3 QB rotation and figure out who's going to win the job). If we don't blow winable games by playing stupid ... there's no reason that this team can't be 12-4 ... or 13-3 next season and get Home Field Advantage in the playoffs. If I had to bet the farm, I'd bank on that happening next season. Now we got to sit back and watch the Falcons get smoked by the 49ers next week. Can't wait for the offseason and for the roster tweaking to begin.



    Top 10 Wants/Needs
    1. Pass Rush DT (Upgrade J.Jones)
    2. 3 Down DE (Upgrade Big Red/replace Clemons)
    3. Big/Fast WR (Upgrade Tate on the opposite of Rice)
    4. Pass Catching TE (Upgrade Mccoy)
    5. OLB (Upgrade Hill/Smith)
    6. OT (Backup for Okung, can he stay healthy another full season)
    7. K (upgrade Hauska)
    8. CB (Competition for Lane/Maxwell depth to let Tru retire)
    9. OG (competition for Moffit/Sweezey/Carpenter)
    10. MLB (more LB depth)


    Now that the season is over I feel confident saying that Tate had a better season than Rice
    themunn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2520
    Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm


  • It seemed obvious to me that our WR's were not getting open most of the year. Neither Tate or Rice have blazing speed and although Tate won many jump balls it would be more than just a luxury to have a Fast but bigger and physical WR on this team. WR maybe not be a weakness but I would not consider it a strength either.

    If we get a big pass catching TE that can split out wide then that would be big time. Zach Ertz or Tyler Effert could cause a ton of matchup problems and still bring power to our run game.
    Image
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2181
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


  • I actually said during the warmups for the NE/Houston game that I would "literally give up next years entire draft for a JJ Watt clone."

    A guy like that would make a ridiculous difference on this defense. We could keep big Red out there and still have a monster pass rush.
    President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013
    User avatar
    JesterHawk
    * Smackmeister *
     
    Posts: 7104
    Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm


  • vin.couve12 wrote:
    WindCityHawk wrote:
    kearly wrote:-You kind of knew 31 seconds was enough time.


    This. And it speaks volumes about our defense.

    Well, I kind of knew that Gus was going to go prevent. I had hoped not, but indeed that's what he did. I don't care to deviate from the norm in that situation. Many coaches go ultra conservative in that situation and many end up regretting it.


    Bradley DID NOT go to a PREVENT defense. WE blitzed On BOTH plays. that's not prevent defense. Matt Ryan just beat up on the blitz.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2427
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Falcons game
Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:31 pm
  • Wish the lynch fumble was reversed since you can't advance a fumble under 2minutes looked like I was recovered on the 1 inch line to me and we would of had to run one or more plays to get it in and take more time off the clock ...cause 6 seconds came off during their return .....only if right.....o well.....go hawks
    JERSEYHAWK
    User avatar
    Jersey_Hawk
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 10
    Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:06 am


Next


It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:08 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information