Cam Chancellor - liability?

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:37 pm
  • It all goes back to pressure on the qb. You can't cover good receivers forever and in zone coverage a qb will pick any d apart given time. We have the best 4 DBS in football. We don't however have a pass rush.
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 723
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:32 pm

Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:42 pm
  • Jazzhawk wrote:
    -The Glove- wrote:
    Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

    On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

    No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point.

    He doesn't have to a damn specialist...he should be able to at least keep players in front of him and make a play on the ball. I'm not saying he's been crap all season but to say he's not a liability in coverage is BS.
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 7901
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am

Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:23 pm
  • He definitely has struggled in coverage this year, but I think it would help if we had a reliable nickel guy. I would LOVE WTIII to be healthy and play the slot, or for Lane to develop into that role, but right now we're easily exploited in certain looks. The Falcons had a lot of good plays where they managed to get Gonzalez on Chancellor and a slot receiver/RB on Trufant. I'm pretty sure the coaching staff expected this because Guy was out there much more than he ever was earlier in the year.

    The Hawks are probably the only team that can come close to "winning" the matchups vs. the Falcons offense. You just have to score more. The Seahawks did enough to win this game, but just gave it away in about 20 seconds after fighting back into the game.
    NET Starter
    Posts: 390
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:27 pm
  • I like cam but at va tech he was a huge liability when it came to the pass. As a pro he has gotten better a lot better. I didnt like the pick at first because he wasnt that good at playing the pass in college. He could hit like a ton of bricks. I would still rather have him than not dude is a beast.
    The office of Thomas and Chancellor specializing in Defense.
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 760
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:47 pm

Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm
  • I thought Winston Guy let Gonzalez make more catches than Kam. T. Gonzalez is one of a kind. Thank goodness we don't have to face him ever again (he has stated multiple times that he will retire after this season).
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 1392
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
    Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm
  • Seriously? No.
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 1681
    Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:30 pm
  • No he is not a liability.
    User avatar
    * NET Eeyore *
    Posts: 12641
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Seattle, WA

It is currently Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:14 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member


  • Who is online