Cam Chancellor - liability?

I love Cam for what he does in bringing the big hits, but. . . . . . . he was responsible or partially responsible for our last 4 TD's given up. Of course I don't know the coverages that were called but in the Redskins game both TD's were right in front of his zone and today he looked to have over the top help on the Roddy White TD as well as coverage on the Gonzalez TD. As I said, they may not have been his coverage, but it sure looks like offenses are exploiting zones that are awfully near Chancellor.

who's Cam Chancellor?

Your mother, Kam you good now?

I love Kam, but when all these rookie contracts are up and we have to decide who we're going to pay, I don't think he makes the cut.

What about Browner?

Browner didn't have all 4 TD's scored on him in the last 2 games.

He will only get better, he is the only one who hits hard the most that breaks the other teams will. He is really really valuable, he will just become more seasoned and better. I think the player to watch out is LANE. He will turn out to be one fine player and take over from Trufant, so he can take away the TE plays.

He was covering a Elite Tight End.
This game was all on the running defense, I didnt think Clemons was this important for us.

hawks02":24c9w2d6 said:

Your mother, Kam you good now?

Click to expand...

299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...

I love all these blame games, why not just fire everyone and start over?

Lol at responding to Axx when you're pissed at me. Just like a third grader.

Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

GeekHawk":1g5n37mo said:

hawks02":1g5n37mo said:

Your mother, Kam you good now?

Click to expand...

299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...

Click to expand...

I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.

Jazzhawk":1l4vo3yc said:

Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

Click to expand...

On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

He's an in the box safety and a coverage liability. Go look at who's standing next to every touchdown receiver in our 2 playoff games. Chancellor.

the strong safetey on any team can 'potentially' be responsible for every TD given up by any team because of the position. Try not to be too critical.

hawks02":1vf8kcs0 said:

GeekHawk":1vf8kcs0 said:

hawks02":1vf8kcs0 said:

Your mother, Kam you good now?

Click to expand...

299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...

Click to expand...

I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.

Click to expand...

:lol:

NOPE

NO

-The Glove-":lz3zut1t said:

Jazzhawk":lz3zut1t said:

Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

Click to expand...

On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

Click to expand...

No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point.