 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Schadie001
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?  Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:32 pm
Posts: 525
|
|
It all goes back to pressure on the qb. You can't cover good receivers forever and in zone coverage a qb will pick any d apart given time. We have the best 4 DBS in football. We don't however have a pass rush.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 5907
|
Jazzhawk wrote: -The Glove- wrote: Jazzhawk wrote: Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack. On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom. No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point. He doesn't have to a damn specialist...he should be able to at least keep players in front of him and make a play on the ball. I'm not saying he's been crap all season but to say he's not a liability in coverage is BS.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BillHawks
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:23 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:12 pm
Posts: 350
|
|
He definitely has struggled in coverage this year, but I think it would help if we had a reliable nickel guy. I would LOVE WTIII to be healthy and play the slot, or for Lane to develop into that role, but right now we're easily exploited in certain looks. The Falcons had a lot of good plays where they managed to get Gonzalez on Chancellor and a slot receiver/RB on Trufant. I'm pretty sure the coaching staff expected this because Guy was out there much more than he ever was earlier in the year.
The Hawks are probably the only team that can come close to "winning" the matchups vs. the Falcons offense. You just have to score more. The Seahawks did enough to win this game, but just gave it away in about 20 seconds after fighting back into the game.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
thegreeninyoureye
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:27 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:47 pm
Posts: 350
|
|
I like cam but at va tech he was a huge liability when it came to the pass. As a pro he has gotten better a lot better. I didnt like the pick at first because he wasnt that good at playing the pass in college. He could hit like a ton of bricks. I would still rather have him than not dude is a beast.
_________________
The office of Thomas and Chancellor specializing in Defense.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kmedic
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
Posts: 1286
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
I thought Winston Guy let Gonzalez make more catches than Kam. T. Gonzalez is one of a kind. Thank goodness we don't have to face him ever again (he has stated multiple times that he will retire after this season).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MrCarey
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1665
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:30 pm |
|
| * NET Eeyore * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10327
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
No he is not a liability.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thManNorth, 707HAWKfan, 98pack_09hawks, AbsolutNET, acbass, Allweatherfan, aredub, arghawkfan, AsylumGuido, Atradees, BAJAHAWK, ballard1951, BeaHUman, bearhawk, benthebeerman, BHF, Bigbadhawk, Bitter, Bobblehead, Brahn, bryantology79, bytor72, cacksman, canfan, Canhawks, canucklhead, CaptainRipper, Cartire, ChiefHawk, chrispy, Chrome_Seahawk, coach78, conman14, CPHawk, CurryStopstheRuns, davidonmi, DavidSeven, doughboy63, drcool, drrew, edogg23, ensett, ErikG803, EverydayImRusselin, Evil_Shenanigans, Exploding, ferrocious, Floridahawk79, FlyingGreg, Fudwamper, G-Money, gargantual, GCrow, GFang, GhostHawk, godzillarad, Google [Bot], Greenhell, hambaggers, Hasselbeck, Hawken-Dazs, HawkFanNC, HawkinInLA, HawkinNY, HawkMeat, hawknation2014, Hawknight, HAWKS2theBONE, hawksfan515, hawksfanohio, Hawksnutt12, HawksSoc, Hendo66, hickey32, HoustonHawk82, hyrailyn, IcedHawk, Incubus, irfuben32, jblaze, Jdm675, Jeremy517, JimZorn10, Jville, keatonisballin, Kennedyin92, King Dog, lacenterhawk, Laloosh, Largent80, LegionHawk12, longsh0t, LusciousJames, MagHawk, ManBunts, McG, McGruff, MidwestHawker, mikeak, Missing_Clink, MizzouHawkGal, MizzouHawks, NYCoug, oasis, okhawkfan, oldhawkfan, OLYhawks, Onyx, ottawahawkfan, Our Man in Chicago, peachesenregalia, Penman96, purpleworld, rcaido, Recon_Hawk, rickychen, rightbench, RolandDeschain, seahawk 17, Seahawk Mike, SeahawkFrost, seahawks08, SeahawksFanForever, SeahawksMSHing, Seahawkwalt1967, Seahwkgal, SHOCKER315, SilNWest, silvergun, six sigma, Skottt, smoothmaw, Snakeeyes007, SonicHawk, SoulfishHawk, soxhawk, SPRC, Starrman44, streets24, suppaball, Swedishhawkfan, Team Slapaho, Terpdragon, thaima1shu, thecycle, TheGreenMan, Tical21, tmartin1313, tooshort, TorontoHawk, TriCHawk, Tune, TXHawk, Veilside, vin.couve12, Wartooth, Xarbx425, Yoonhawk, ZagHawk, Zybot and 543 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
