| Author |
Message |
|
hawks02
|
Post subject: Cam Chancellor - liability?  Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:37 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 311
|
|
I love Cam for what he does in bringing the big hits, but. . . . . . . he was responsible or partially responsible for our last 4 TD's given up. Of course I don't know the coverages that were called but in the Redskins game both TD's were right in front of his zone and today he looked to have over the top help on the Roddy White TD as well as coverage on the Gonzalez TD. As I said, they may not have been his coverage, but it sure looks like offenses are exploiting zones that are awfully near Chancellor.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
bellingerga
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 5301
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawks02
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:38 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 311
|
|
Your mother, Kam you good now?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WindCityHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 1120
|
|
I love Kam, but when all these rookie contracts are up and we have to decide who we're going to pay, I don't think he makes the cut.
_________________
"I'm gonna call him--what do you call the guy on the trampoline?--Harry Houdini or something like that." -Warren Moon on Golden Tate
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 499
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawks02
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:46 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 311
|
|
Browner didn't have all 4 TD's scored on him in the last 2 games.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
seahawks08
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:15 pm
Posts: 608
|
|
He will only get better, he is the only one who hits hard the most that breaks the other teams will. He is really really valuable, he will just become more seasoned and better. I think the player to watch out is LANE. He will turn out to be one fine player and take over from Trufant, so he can take away the TE plays.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Axx
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:55 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 2539
|
|
He was covering a Elite Tight End.
This game was all on the running defense, I didnt think Clemons was this important for us.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GeekHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:56 pm |
|
| US Navy ET Nuc |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 3859
Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet
|
hawks02 wrote: Your mother, Kam you good now? 299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OkieHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 1852
Location: Oklahoma City
|
|
I love all these blame games, why not just fire everyone and start over?
_________________ Tokadub wrote: I'm telling you guys Bennett is super overrated he's gonna be a piece of dino poo next season and I'm gonna LOL.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GeekHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:16 pm |
|
| US Navy ET Nuc |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 3859
Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet
|
|
Lol at responding to Axx when you're pissed at me. Just like a third grader.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:18 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 8923
|
|
Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawks02
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:19 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 311
|
GeekHawk wrote: hawks02 wrote: Your mother, Kam you good now? 299 posts is a lot for a third-grader... I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:20 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 6373
|
Jazzhawk wrote: Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack. On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawks02
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:22 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 311
|
|
He's an in the box safety and a coverage liability. Go look at who's standing next to every touchdown receiver in our 2 playoff games. Chancellor.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawknballs
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am
Posts: 2218
|
|
the strong safetey on any team can 'potentially' be responsible for every TD given up by any team because of the position. Try not to be too critical.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GeekHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:33 pm |
|
| US Navy ET Nuc |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
Posts: 3859
Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet
|
hawks02 wrote: GeekHawk wrote: hawks02 wrote: Your mother, Kam you good now? 299 posts is a lot for a third-grader... I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1453
Location: Victoria BC
|
|
NOPE
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1429
|
|
NO
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 8923
|
-The Glove- wrote: Jazzhawk wrote: Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack. On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom. No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Schadie001
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:32 pm
Posts: 525
|
|
It all goes back to pressure on the qb. You can't cover good receivers forever and in zone coverage a qb will pick any d apart given time. We have the best 4 DBS in football. We don't however have a pass rush.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 6373
|
Jazzhawk wrote: -The Glove- wrote: Jazzhawk wrote: Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack. On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom. No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point. He doesn't have to a damn specialist...he should be able to at least keep players in front of him and make a play on the ball. I'm not saying he's been crap all season but to say he's not a liability in coverage is BS.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BillHawks
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:23 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:12 pm
Posts: 351
|
|
He definitely has struggled in coverage this year, but I think it would help if we had a reliable nickel guy. I would LOVE WTIII to be healthy and play the slot, or for Lane to develop into that role, but right now we're easily exploited in certain looks. The Falcons had a lot of good plays where they managed to get Gonzalez on Chancellor and a slot receiver/RB on Trufant. I'm pretty sure the coaching staff expected this because Guy was out there much more than he ever was earlier in the year.
The Hawks are probably the only team that can come close to "winning" the matchups vs. the Falcons offense. You just have to score more. The Seahawks did enough to win this game, but just gave it away in about 20 seconds after fighting back into the game.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
thegreeninyoureye
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:27 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:47 pm
Posts: 350
|
|
I like cam but at va tech he was a huge liability when it came to the pass. As a pro he has gotten better a lot better. I didnt like the pick at first because he wasnt that good at playing the pass in college. He could hit like a ton of bricks. I would still rather have him than not dude is a beast.
_________________
The office of Thomas and Chancellor specializing in Defense.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kmedic
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
Posts: 1286
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
I thought Winston Guy let Gonzalez make more catches than Kam. T. Gonzalez is one of a kind. Thank goodness we don't have to face him ever again (he has stated multiple times that he will retire after this season).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MrCarey
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1667
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Cam Chancellor - liability? Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:30 pm |
|
| * NET Eeyore * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10499
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
No he is not a liability.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 27 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
