I love Cam for what he does in bringing the big hits, but. . . . . . . he was responsible or partially responsible for our last 4 TD's given up. Of course I don't know the coverages that were called but in the Redskins game both TD's were right in front of his zone and today he looked to have over the top help on the Roddy White TD as well as coverage on the Gonzalez TD. As I said, they may not have been his coverage, but it sure looks like offenses are exploiting zones that are awfully near Chancellor.

who's Cam Chancellor?

Your mother, Kam you good now?

I love Kam, but when all these rookie contracts are up and we have to decide who we're going to pay, I don't think he makes the cut.

What about Browner?

Browner didn't have all 4 TD's scored on him in the last 2 games.

He will only get better, he is the only one who hits hard the most that breaks the other teams will. He is really really valuable, he will just become more seasoned and better. I think the player to watch out is LANE. He will turn out to be one fine player and take over from Trufant, so he can take away the TE plays.

He was covering a Elite Tight End.
This game was all on the running defense, I didnt think Clemons was this important for us.

hawks02 wrote:Your mother, Kam you good now?

299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...

I love all these blame games, why not just fire everyone and start over?

Lol at responding to Axx when you're pissed at me. Just like a third grader.

Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

GeekHawk wrote:

hawks02 wrote:Your mother, Kam you good now?

299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...

I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.

Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

He's an in the box safety and a coverage liability. Go look at who's standing next to every touchdown receiver in our 2 playoff games. Chancellor.

the strong safetey on any team can 'potentially' be responsible for every TD given up by any team because of the position. Try not to be too critical.

hawks02 wrote:

GeekHawk wrote:

hawks02 wrote:Your mother, Kam you good now?

299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...

I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.

NOPE

NO

-The Glove- wrote:

Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point.

It all goes back to pressure on the qb. You can't cover good receivers forever and in zone coverage a qb will pick any d apart given time. We have the best 4 DBS in football. We don't however have a pass rush.

Jazzhawk wrote:

-The Glove- wrote:

Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point.

He doesn't have to a damn specialist...he should be able to at least keep players in front of him and make a play on the ball. I'm not saying he's been crap all season but to say he's not a liability in coverage is BS.

He definitely has struggled in coverage this year, but I think it would help if we had a reliable nickel guy. I would LOVE WTIII to be healthy and play the slot, or for Lane to develop into that role, but right now we're easily exploited in certain looks. The Falcons had a lot of good plays where they managed to get Gonzalez on Chancellor and a slot receiver/RB on Trufant. I'm pretty sure the coaching staff expected this because Guy was out there much more than he ever was earlier in the year.

The Hawks are probably the only team that can come close to "winning" the matchups vs. the Falcons offense. You just have to score more. The Seahawks did enough to win this game, but just gave it away in about 20 seconds after fighting back into the game.

I like cam but at va tech he was a huge liability when it came to the pass. As a pro he has gotten better a lot better. I didnt like the pick at first because he wasnt that good at playing the pass in college. He could hit like a ton of bricks. I would still rather have him than not dude is a beast.

I thought Winston Guy let Gonzalez make more catches than Kam. T. Gonzalez is one of a kind. Thank goodness we don't have to face him ever again (he has stated multiple times that he will retire after this season).

Seriously? No.

No he is not a liability.