Cam Chancellor - liability?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:37 pm
  • I love Cam for what he does in bringing the big hits, but. . . . . . . he was responsible or partially responsible for our last 4 TD's given up. Of course I don't know the coverages that were called but in the Redskins game both TD's were right in front of his zone and today he looked to have over the top help on the Roddy White TD as well as coverage on the Gonzalez TD. As I said, they may not have been his coverage, but it sure looks like offenses are exploiting zones that are awfully near Chancellor.
    hawks02
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:38 pm
  • who's Cam Chancellor?
    User avatar
    bellingerga
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5313
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
    Location: Beaverton, Oregon


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:38 pm
  • Your mother, Kam you good now?
    hawks02
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:39 pm
  • I love Kam, but when all these rookie contracts are up and we have to decide who we're going to pay, I don't think he makes the cut.
    "I'm gonna call him--what do you call the guy on the trampoline?--Harry Houdini or something like that." -Warren Moon on Golden Tate
    User avatar
    WindCityHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1124
    Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:51 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:40 pm
  • What about Browner?
    Carmon1274
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:46 pm
  • Browner didn't have all 4 TD's scored on him in the last 2 games.
    hawks02
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:50 pm
  • He will only get better, he is the only one who hits hard the most that breaks the other teams will. He is really really valuable, he will just become more seasoned and better. I think the player to watch out is LANE. He will turn out to be one fine player and take over from Trufant, so he can take away the TE plays.
    seahawks08
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 631
    Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:15 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:55 pm
  • He was covering a Elite Tight End.
    This game was all on the running defense, I didnt think Clemons was this important for us.
    User avatar
    Axx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:56 pm
  • hawks02 wrote:Your mother, Kam you good now?


    299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...
    User avatar
    GeekHawk
    US Navy ET Nuc
     
    Posts: 3965
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
    Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:57 pm
  • I love all these blame games, why not just fire everyone and start over?
    Zebulon Dak wrote:If any Twitter employees get assassinated I'll vote Republican from here on out.
    User avatar
    OkieHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2355
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
    Location: Oklahoma City


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:16 pm
  • Lol at responding to Axx when you're pissed at me. Just like a third grader.
    User avatar
    GeekHawk
    US Navy ET Nuc
     
    Posts: 3965
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
    Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:18 pm
  • Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.
    Image
    User avatar
    Jazzhawk
    * NET News Scoop *
    * NET News Scoop *
     
    Posts: 8989
    Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:19 pm
  • GeekHawk wrote:
    hawks02 wrote:Your mother, Kam you good now?


    299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...


    I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.
    hawks02
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:20 pm
  • Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

    On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7022
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:22 pm
  • He's an in the box safety and a coverage liability. Go look at who's standing next to every touchdown receiver in our 2 playoff games. Chancellor.
    hawks02
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:31 pm
  • the strong safetey on any team can 'potentially' be responsible for every TD given up by any team because of the position. Try not to be too critical.
    Image
    User avatar
    Hawknballs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2702
    Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:33 pm
  • hawks02 wrote:
    GeekHawk wrote:
    hawks02 wrote:Your mother, Kam you good now?


    299 posts is a lot for a third-grader...


    I got more to do than live on a sports forum. Coming from a guy named GeekHawk though I understand how you were probably a dip$hit and never played sports so your living vicariously through thousands of online forum posts. You're scoring big now stud almost 3000 posts.


    :lol:
    User avatar
    GeekHawk
    US Navy ET Nuc
     
    Posts: 3965
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
    Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:34 pm
  • NOPE
    Member of 38 Plus club. Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
    User avatar
    rainger
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1696
    Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
    Location: Victoria BC


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:35 pm
  • NO
    Image
    User avatar
    SNDavidson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1437
    Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:37 pm
  • -The Glove- wrote:
    Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

    On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

    No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point.
    Image
    User avatar
    Jazzhawk
    * NET News Scoop *
    * NET News Scoop *
     
    Posts: 8989
    Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:37 pm
  • It all goes back to pressure on the qb. You can't cover good receivers forever and in zone coverage a qb will pick any d apart given time. We have the best 4 DBS in football. We don't however have a pass rush.
    Schadie001
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 533
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:32 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:42 pm
  • Jazzhawk wrote:
    -The Glove- wrote:
    Jazzhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor? Seriously? The dude is money, and you are whack.

    On coverage? No! No he's not. Time to be realistic. If it wasn't for Sherman and ET, Legion of Boom would be Legion of Doom.

    No Strong Safety is a Coverage specialist, especially in this defensive scheme. Get real. Can't believe you are even making that point.


    He doesn't have to a damn specialist...he should be able to at least keep players in front of him and make a play on the ball. I'm not saying he's been crap all season but to say he's not a liability in coverage is BS.
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7022
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:23 pm
  • He definitely has struggled in coverage this year, but I think it would help if we had a reliable nickel guy. I would LOVE WTIII to be healthy and play the slot, or for Lane to develop into that role, but right now we're easily exploited in certain looks. The Falcons had a lot of good plays where they managed to get Gonzalez on Chancellor and a slot receiver/RB on Trufant. I'm pretty sure the coaching staff expected this because Guy was out there much more than he ever was earlier in the year.

    The Hawks are probably the only team that can come close to "winning" the matchups vs. the Falcons offense. You just have to score more. The Seahawks did enough to win this game, but just gave it away in about 20 seconds after fighting back into the game.
    BillHawks
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 366
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 4:12 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:27 pm
  • I like cam but at va tech he was a huge liability when it came to the pass. As a pro he has gotten better a lot better. I didnt like the pick at first because he wasnt that good at playing the pass in college. He could hit like a ton of bricks. I would still rather have him than not dude is a beast.
    The office of Thomas and Chancellor specializing in Defense.
    thegreeninyoureye
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 356
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:47 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm
  • I thought Winston Guy let Gonzalez make more catches than Kam. T. Gonzalez is one of a kind. Thank goodness we don't have to face him ever again (he has stated multiple times that he will retire after this season).
    kmedic
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1287
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am
    Location: Los Angeles, CA


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:28 pm
  • Seriously? No.
    User avatar
    MrCarey
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1679
    Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm


Re: Cam Chancellor - liability?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:30 pm
  • No he is not a liability.
    Image
    User avatar
    Blitzer88
    * NET Eeyore *
     
    Posts: 11034
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Pasco, WA




It is currently Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:08 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information