Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:12 am 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:05 pm
Posts: 17
I'm curious why this isn't brought up more. Atlanta struggles against the run and I expect Lynch to have a big day because of it. But Atlanta also gave up a 100 yards a game against Newton this year. Everyone wants to talk about their passing offense and its matchup with our DB's. Our running game against this defense seems to be the most lopsided matchup of the game and that tends to bode well for Seattle. If they can't stop Wilson or Lynch it makes our zone read packages and our play action even tougher to defend. This is getting surprisingly little talk on the board....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:13 am 
*NET #1 Sherman Fan*
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 247
True, but they also did really well against Bob Griffin's running.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:14 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 556
Seattle's offense as a whole is a great match up against the Failcons. Their offense vs. Seahawk defense is a wash.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:15 am 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:05 pm
Posts: 17
Griffin got hurt in one of the games against them if I'm not mistaken?

I agree. We have favorable match ups at almost every spot on offense. Looking forward to Wilson have a big day.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:17 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1824
austinslater25 wrote:
Griffin got hurt in one of the games against them if I'm not mistaken?

I agree. We have favorable match ups at almost every spot on offense. Looking forward to Wilson have a big day.


Yeah they knocked him out with a concussion, Cousins came in and threw 2 picks and Washington lost the game in the 4th quarter.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:19 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 100
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:21 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1824
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Griffin didn't run out of bounds and took a big hit that may have cost them the game. Wilson is a lot shiftier than Griffin, if you're expecting the same type of quarterback play, you're in for a surprise.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:21 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 891
First of all you need to delineate mobile QBs vs Read Option QBs.

He faced 3 mobile QBs all season- Vick, RGIII, an Newton.

-Vick is not a read option QB so we can cancel him out.
-RGIII is a read option QB, but they only ran it one time before he was concussed.
-Newton is a read option QB, and ran the play multiple times over the 2 games period- he averaged 100 ypg and they absolutely obliterated them between D.williams/Stewart, and Newton the read option run. Newton was also able to shred them in the air as a result of it's effectiveness.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:22 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 100
12evanf wrote:
austinslater25 wrote:
Griffin got hurt in one of the games against them if I'm not mistaken?

I agree. We have favorable match ups at almost every spot on offense. Looking forward to Wilson have a big day.


Yeah they knocked him out with a concussion, Cousins came in and threw 2 picks and Washington lost the game in the 4th quarter.

Yep, he tried to run into the endzone. What he didn't realize was how fast Sean Weatherspoon's closing speed was. Which is why he got knocked out.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:23 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 556
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Mike Vick's team was awful all year and Bob was knocked out early. The Falcons haven't faced Wilson yet and there is no comparison to him except Drew Brees. Brees did well...we shall see.


Last edited by rideaducati on Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:23 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 509
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Griffin ran ONCE before his concussion. The Eagles don't run much zone read stuff. Russell runs more like Cam than he does like Vick or Bob. The only difference is that Cam will truck a LB, Russ will throw a wicked pump fake and then break their ankles with a juke.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:24 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 556
rideaducati wrote:
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Mike Vick's team was awful all year and Bob was knocked out early. The Falcons haven't faced Wilson yet and there is no comparison to him except Drew Brees. Brees did well...we shall see.


except for the 6 picks anyway.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:24 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 100
12evanf wrote:
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Griffin didn't run out of bounds and took a big hit that may have cost them the game. Wilson is a lot shiftier than Griffin, if you're expecting the same type of quarterback play, you're in for a surprise.

Like I said our D closes in fast. They can handle the shifty dudes. It's the one's that outmuscle them who cause the problems.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:25 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1824
Dirty Bird wrote:
12evanf wrote:
austinslater25 wrote:
Griffin got hurt in one of the games against them if I'm not mistaken?

I agree. We have favorable match ups at almost every spot on offense. Looking forward to Wilson have a big day.


Yeah they knocked him out with a concussion, Cousins came in and threw 2 picks and Washington lost the game in the 4th quarter.

Yep, he tried to run into the endzone. What he didn't realize was how fast Sean Weatherspoon's closing speed was. Which is why he got knocked out.


What your language, Big Brother is watching....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:33 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 1340
Location: Marysville, WA
If we CAN establish the run with Lynch, Wilson or both then we control the game (he who controls the game, controls the clock). If we struggle I don't expect us to win a shoot out.

_________________
Image Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:34 am 
US Navy Air VP 56 `74-`78
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:44 pm
Posts: 1064
Location: Smokey Point
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Wilson is going to be a big problem. Atlanta's run D is not as stellar as you think it is. As your team begins to sell out to stop Marshawn, the play action is going to hurt big time.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:36 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1447
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


This would make perfect sense if you tackled Cam and he demolished you. If you need a better picture of that I have a video coming up starring Lynch and I will air it for you at 1pm on Sunday.

The reason you guys did better with Vick and Griffin is because they run all over the place. It isn't because they were smaller right? You are going to get confused by RW's running out of the read option where he will run into big holes. Once you figure it out he will burn you for an accurate 50 yard pass down the field. Don't get confused of the missed bombs in the Redskins game pretty sure your turf will play very well into our hands


Last edited by mikeak on Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:36 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 530
If the offense just does there thing they will score a decent amount of points. The game will be decided by whether our D can get a couple unexpected stops.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:37 am 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:44 am
Posts: 37
Location: Issaquah, WA
Wilson's running ability, coupled with a precocious sense of situation decision making, will be a difference in this game. And our ability to run against Atlanta fits into the base strategy to contain Atlanta's offense: keep Atlanta'a offense on the sideline. Eat up the clock. Strike when we can, score, no turnovers.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Atlanta against mobile QB's
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:40 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 891
Dirty Bird wrote:
What you failed to mention is that Atlanta struggles against big, PHYSICAL, mobile QB's such as Cam Newton. Atlanta can handle the smaller QB's. We held Robert Griffin and Mike Vick in check. Griffin only rushing for 7 and Vick for 42. I don't expect Wilson to be a problem.


Go watch the 72 yard run by Newton...they didn't put a hand on him..As I mentioned in my earlier post. It has nothing to do with size or physicality..it has to do with the system.

I will write this post again as it seems everyone ignored it but it is the truth of the matter..no reason to debate:

Quote:
First of all you need to delineate mobile QBs vs Read Option QBs.

He faced 3 mobile QBs all season- Vick, RGIII, an Newton.

-Vick is not a read option QB so we can cancel him out.
-RGIII is a read option QB, but they only ran it one time before he was concussed.
-Newton is a read option QB, and ran the play multiple times over the 2 games period- he averaged 100 ypg and they absolutely obliterated them between D.williams/Stewart, and Newton the read option run. Newton was also able to shred them in the air as a result of it's effectiveness.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.