| Author |
Message |
|
Badjujus
|
Post subject: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:18 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:53 pm Posts: 21
|
|
With our scheme and all it really seems that we dont blitz...
Can someone recall during 2010 and 11 if we blitzed more often.
I just pray carroll is holding back a rabid pack of devil dogs that come alive in the Sb and sack Manning/brady 10 times.
I JUST WANT TO BE INSIDE THEIR BRAINS!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan68
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:25 am |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am Posts: 2663 Location: Sammamish, WA
|
|
Be careful what one wishes for, blitzing too much is a double-edged sword. It can work or hurt. Blitzing Matt Ryan, IMO, is not a good idea. He's got great weapons and has experience to beat the blitz. He has a legendary TE, top WR, and a good slot receiver in Harry Douglas. If they use Jeron Johnson, as they did against Redskins late in that game, then that would work. Johnson has proved he's capabale of getting to the QB in a hurry. I'd like to see Hill rush the passer more as well from the LB spot. Early in his career, Hill was an excellent pass rush LB. I believe he had 7-8 sacks in 2005.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 8:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm Posts: 1165
|
hawkfan68 wrote: Be careful what one wishes for, blitzing too much is a double-edged sword. It can work or hurt. Blitzing Matt Ryan, IMO, is not a good idea. He's got great weapons and has experience to beat the blitz. He has a legendary TE, top WR, and a good slot receiver in Harry Douglas. If they use Jeron Johnson, as they did against Redskins late in that game, then that would work. Johnson has proved he's capabale of getting to the QB in a hurry. I'd like to see Hill rush the passer more as well from the LB spot. Early in his career, Hill was an excellent pass rush LB. I believe he had 7-8 sacks in 2005. there's blitzing too much and there's blitzing too little. It's good that we can on occasion bring a blitz and have it work fantastically because the offense doesn't expect it But it's bad that they don't expect it, you need to blitz enough so that they're wary at all times and this affects decision making and playtime. And just like Kam hitting TEs in the middle a couple of times makes them wary of catching balls, getting a few QB hits is great for disrupting rhythm of the QB and instilling fear. Right now we don't blitz enough, I'm not saying do what Washington do - that kind of blitzing needs to be done because they don't have a great secondary, however, we do and hence don't need to rely on it as much - in fact as has been proven, we can get by without it fairly well, but it'd be stupid to ignore it completely, I like the safety blitzes with ET the best, the QB has to get rid of the ball quickly so he is still doing his job essentially - taking away the deep ball, as typically the QB will check down to a TE or RB (if he has time) who should be able to be stopped by the LBs or Kam.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm Posts: 6177 Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
Oh no Mattie Ice don't blitz him, he will pick us apart, he's better then Brady, Manning,Brees Farve he will kill us. Better to let him have all day and make our defense run around and try to cover 3 or 4 of the better receivers in the game for 5 to 10 seconds every play.
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:03 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1447
|
^ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
formido
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:49 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm Posts: 133
|
|
We held teams to the 3rd lowest passer rating in the NFL this year so not blitzing is working perfectly.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
parson420
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:37 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:02 pm Posts: 52
|
|
Remember, we don't have Clemons on the d line. We may blitz a little more than usual.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bmorepunk
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:41 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:56 pm Posts: 198
|
|
Maybe the Falcons think that since there is no Clemons there will be more blitzing so the Seahawks coaches will plan for less blitzes. But then the Falcons will realize this and then the Seahawks will have to call more blitzes to trick them. But the Falcons anticipate this so the Seahawks will trick them by blitzing the usual amount.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2202 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
formido wrote: We held teams to the 3rd lowest passer rating in the NFL this year so not blitzing is working perfectly. true that worked good with clemons on the line and rushing 4, if bruce can't generate pressure they might have to go with some blitz packages to compensate.
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Falcan Moore
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:51 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:25 pm Posts: 92
|
|
I honestly hope you blitz him, just because that leaves less people on our wideouts, and Ryan has been top 10 consistently against the blitz year after year, top 5 for three of the years I believe. It's pressure with the front four that gets him. Especially interior push. Need your DL to step it up.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawksfan4ever
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:57 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:44 am Posts: 37 Location: Issaquah, WA
|
Falcan Moore wrote: I honestly hope you blitz him, just because that leaves less people on our wideouts, and Ryan has been top 10 consistently against the blitz year after year, top 5 for three of the years I believe. It's pressure with the front four that gets him. Especially interior push. Need your DL to step it up. Agreed. Our D line has to push in order to delay and stop Ryan passing the ball. We will get our sacks...pressure from our down lineman for sure. Ryan has some great tools at the LOS, but we are not afraid to play press coverage with our D line wrecking havoc.
_________________ 
Last edited by seahawksfan4ever on Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sc85sis
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:59 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:40 am Posts: 3267 Location: Southern CA
|
|
We can blitz a little, but if we do we have to be prepared for the screens. We also can throw some blitz fakes in there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
LymonHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:00 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm Posts: 4776 Location: Skagit County, WA
|
|
Ya can't make a living off of blitzing guys like Ryan, Payton, and Pretty Boy. It would be a short lived career.
_________________ If you're walking on thin ice, you might as well dance.................................................Mom
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
zayden185
|
Post subject: Re: Blitzing Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:52 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am Posts: 588
|
|
If pretty boy is Matt Ryan...he isn't Brady or mannings. Or even Eli for that matter
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |