Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:45 pm
  • You lost to Carolina too (@ home!!), I guess your team is garbage by your own definition.
    Image Image
    User avatar
    AF_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2139
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
    Location: Marysville, WA


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:26 pm
  • AF_Hawk wrote:You lost to Carolina too (@ home!!), I guess your team is garbage by your own definition.



    WOW, you didnt read any of my post...holy crap...really guy? lol
    rdskns4eva
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 145
    Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:25 am


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:06 pm
  • How many Cardinals games did you watch? Seriously. I want a number. If you are in charge here of defining teams, how many Cardinals games did you watch, all the way through, and which ones?
    Image
    User avatar
    HawkAroundTheClock
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1647
    Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
    Location: Olympia


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:44 pm
  • Tech Worlds wrote:Our home record has nothing to do with this game.



    nope it sure don't but the Skins home record does, it means a home game isn't a lock for the skinnies as much as it is for the Hawks who have won 10 straight at home..

    just a side note, the Skins did beat the Hawks last season week 12 in a 23-17 close game but thats with 2 totally different teams and seasons, all that means is this game isn't a lock either way they played close in their last meeting and both teams are much improved..

    I'm looking for seahawks D putting the Skins O in lockdown Sunday in the nations capitol..

    both teams can be proud being such underdogs to even make the playoffs, I remember the Hawks were 60-1 to win the SB, Skins 75-1... both teams really shook it up and are highly respected now with the Skins being 20-1 and the Hawks 9-1, they sure turned some heads in a hurry!!!

    I am hoping for a clean respectable game of skill and prowess, drag the officials out on carts if they begin to taint the outcome!!!

    GO HAWKS!!!
    GO HAWKS!!!
    User avatar
    Twisted
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1554
    Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:50 pm
  • rdskns4eva wrote:
    AF_Hawk wrote:You lost to Carolina too (@ home!!), I guess your team is garbage by your own definition.



    WOW, you didnt read any of my post...holy crap...really guy? lol


    I'm sorry, I never saw you mention the Carolina loss but I was glad to help you with that just in case. That's an 0-2 record versus common opponents.
    Image Image
    User avatar
    AF_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2139
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
    Location: Marysville, WA


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:02 pm
  • rdskns4eva wrote:
    Seahawk Sailor wrote:
    burggold75 wrote:and the skins road record was 5-3....hmmm


    True, but we didn't get to play the Cowboys and Eagles on the road.


    You get to play the Rams and the Cardinals lol.

    C'mon, everyone knows Divisional games are tough. Thats why the lowly Rams, and they are lowly, took you to the wire.


    lol, those lowely rams would stomp the buzzard spit out of the skinnies, no joke, they are one of the most dangerous and underrated teams in the NFL, if you think otherwise you might want to take a look at who they already gifted L's to this season?

    hawks and niners for starters, they actually denied the 11-4-1 niners 2 wins and that says a lot, they also denied the hawks a W and beat the Cards so bad they went on a 12 game losing streak, fact is the cards haven't won since they met the rams week 5 sending the cards into a massive downward spiral they were unable to recover from, and remember the Cards were one of only 4 undefeated teams at that time and considered the best team in the league by many..

    they also beat the bucs in florida as well, sheesh the bucs could most likely beat almost every team the skins faced this year, did the bucs not beat the falcons and the vikings?

    and lest not forget the rams beat the skins in week two, 31-28

    said it before and I'll say it again, Rams could take the Skinnies, oh and I'm not just talking out my back side, I have proof this time... ;)
    GO HAWKS!!!
    User avatar
    Twisted
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1554
    Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:12 pm
  • rdskns4eva wrote:
    AF_Hawk wrote:
    rdskns4eva wrote:Also, the Rams lost to

    Lions lol
    A Rookie led Dolphins team lol
    The Sorry Jets...at home lol
    The Vikings who have no quarterback
    Bears, fine
    Packers, fine
    Pats, fine
    Seahawks, fine


    SOS is nice...if you are good as you say they are, they would beat good teams. Outside of the Redskins the Hawks (again, in Division), they havent beat anyone of consequence and they've lost to some very bad teams. The Rams have no quarterback and until then, they are going to suck.

    So again, no, the Rams could not all of a sudden come into the NFC east, wear three of 4 teams play in cold weather, snow and rain and all of a sudden be able to beat the Dallas Cowboys, Washington Redskins and New York Giants on a consistent basis or take the Division. They MIGHT be able to be the Eagles consistently.


    You do realize the Redskins actually lost to the Rams right? Or did you just start paying attention during the 7 game win streak?
    http://espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=320916014

    I forgot to add that Stephen Jackson wasn't even in this game. You can't call a team garbage when your own team can't even beat them.



    The Patriots lost to the Cards...I guess that means the Cardinals arent a garbage team, right? Get real.



    It's obvious that you do very little reading other that stan lines. The Cards were at full strength at the beginning of the season...they are a M*A*S*H unit now. The Rams are inconsistent right now because of their youth, but once all of that young talent comes together (especially on D)and the mistakes are reduced, they will be a force for years to come. I don't know why you laugh at Bradford either. Give him some protection and he'll light it up..he's very accurate
    "I cannot believe this............ I am stunned right now. This is now a rebuilding year for us. Our offense is crap now"

    Blitzer88 regarding trading Percy to the Jets
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2882
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:25 pm
  • cacksman wrote:
    Tech Worlds wrote:Our home record has nothing to do with this game.


    You sound like an awesome guy to party with.

    or a great guy to kick the crap out of. Sheeesh. Every single post is like douche city
    World champs

    russell wilson was born 5ft 10"
    User avatar
    hawksincebirth
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 278
    Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:12 pm
    Location: mountlake terrace


Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:43 pm
  • Who is hotter?

    Skins last 8 games they are 7-1, opponents combined records 55-73. During this streak they have scored 223 points (24.8) while giving up 161 points (17.9) and are 2-2 against playoff teams this year

    Hawks last 8 games they are 7-1 opponents combined records 62-66. During this streak they have scored 272 points (30.2) while giving up 111 points (12.3) and are 4-1 against playoff teams this year.
    slybry75
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 69
    Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:26 pm




It is currently Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:20 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information