Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:45 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 2065
Location: Marysville, WA
You lost to Carolina too (@ home!!), I guess your team is garbage by your own definition.

_________________
Image Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:26 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:25 am
Posts: 145
AF_Hawk wrote:
You lost to Carolina too (@ home!!), I guess your team is garbage by your own definition.



WOW, you didnt read any of my post...holy crap...really guy? lol


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:06 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1297
Location: Olympia
How many Cardinals games did you watch? Seriously. I want a number. If you are in charge here of defining teams, how many Cardinals games did you watch, all the way through, and which ones?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:44 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 1554
Tech Worlds wrote:
Our home record has nothing to do with this game.



nope it sure don't but the Skins home record does, it means a home game isn't a lock for the skinnies as much as it is for the Hawks who have won 10 straight at home..

just a side note, the Skins did beat the Hawks last season week 12 in a 23-17 close game but thats with 2 totally different teams and seasons, all that means is this game isn't a lock either way they played close in their last meeting and both teams are much improved..

I'm looking for seahawks D putting the Skins O in lockdown Sunday in the nations capitol..

both teams can be proud being such underdogs to even make the playoffs, I remember the Hawks were 60-1 to win the SB, Skins 75-1... both teams really shook it up and are highly respected now with the Skins being 20-1 and the Hawks 9-1, they sure turned some heads in a hurry!!!

I am hoping for a clean respectable game of skill and prowess, drag the officials out on carts if they begin to taint the outcome!!!

GO HAWKS!!!

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:50 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 2065
Location: Marysville, WA
rdskns4eva wrote:
AF_Hawk wrote:
You lost to Carolina too (@ home!!), I guess your team is garbage by your own definition.



WOW, you didnt read any of my post...holy crap...really guy? lol


I'm sorry, I never saw you mention the Carolina loss but I was glad to help you with that just in case. That's an 0-2 record versus common opponents.

_________________
Image Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 1554
rdskns4eva wrote:
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
burggold75 wrote:
and the skins road record was 5-3....hmmm


True, but we didn't get to play the Cowboys and Eagles on the road.


You get to play the Rams and the Cardinals lol.

C'mon, everyone knows Divisional games are tough. Thats why the lowly Rams, and they are lowly, took you to the wire.


lol, those lowely rams would stomp the buzzard spit out of the skinnies, no joke, they are one of the most dangerous and underrated teams in the NFL, if you think otherwise you might want to take a look at who they already gifted L's to this season?

hawks and niners for starters, they actually denied the 11-4-1 niners 2 wins and that says a lot, they also denied the hawks a W and beat the Cards so bad they went on a 12 game losing streak, fact is the cards haven't won since they met the rams week 5 sending the cards into a massive downward spiral they were unable to recover from, and remember the Cards were one of only 4 undefeated teams at that time and considered the best team in the league by many..

they also beat the bucs in florida as well, sheesh the bucs could most likely beat almost every team the skins faced this year, did the bucs not beat the falcons and the vikings?

and lest not forget the rams beat the skins in week two, 31-28

said it before and I'll say it again, Rams could take the Skinnies, oh and I'm not just talking out my back side, I have proof this time... ;)

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:12 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 2360
rdskns4eva wrote:
AF_Hawk wrote:
rdskns4eva wrote:
Also, the Rams lost to

Lions lol
A Rookie led Dolphins team lol
The Sorry Jets...at home lol
The Vikings who have no quarterback
Bears, fine
Packers, fine
Pats, fine
Seahawks, fine


SOS is nice...if you are good as you say they are, they would beat good teams. Outside of the Redskins the Hawks (again, in Division), they havent beat anyone of consequence and they've lost to some very bad teams. The Rams have no quarterback and until then, they are going to suck.

So again, no, the Rams could not all of a sudden come into the NFC east, wear three of 4 teams play in cold weather, snow and rain and all of a sudden be able to beat the Dallas Cowboys, Washington Redskins and New York Giants on a consistent basis or take the Division. They MIGHT be able to be the Eagles consistently.


You do realize the Redskins actually lost to the Rams right? Or did you just start paying attention during the 7 game win streak?
http://espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=320916014

I forgot to add that Stephen Jackson wasn't even in this game. You can't call a team garbage when your own team can't even beat them.



The Patriots lost to the Cards...I guess that means the Cardinals arent a garbage team, right? Get real.



It's obvious that you do very little reading other that stan lines. The Cards were at full strength at the beginning of the season...they are a M*A*S*H unit now. The Rams are inconsistent right now because of their youth, but once all of that young talent comes together (especially on D)and the mistakes are reduced, they will be a force for years to come. I don't know why you laugh at Bradford either. Give him some protection and he'll light it up..he's very accurate


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:25 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 150
Location: Tri cities
cacksman wrote:
Tech Worlds wrote:
Our home record has nothing to do with this game.


You sound like an awesome guy to party with.

or a great guy to kick the crap out of. Sheeesh. Every single post is like douche city

_________________
richard sherman is a robot
russel wilson is a legend in the making
russell wilson was born 5ft 10"

new seahawks jersey. with the custom dunks!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hmmm, Seahawks only team in the NFL
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:43 pm 
NET Practice Squad
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:26 pm
Posts: 68
Who is hotter?

Skins last 8 games they are 7-1, opponents combined records 55-73. During this streak they have scored 223 points (24.8) while giving up 161 points (17.9) and are 2-2 against playoff teams this year

Hawks last 8 games they are 7-1 opponents combined records 62-66. During this streak they have scored 272 points (30.2) while giving up 111 points (12.3) and are 4-1 against playoff teams this year.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, acbass, austinslater25, bandiger, BCHawk, Beefy, bellingerga, Bigbadhawk, Birdfinger, bluengreen, Bob loblaw, bryantology79, bytor72, Cad, calihawk, calinator, canfan, CANHawk, Chapman, CHawkTailGator, checkdanews, ChiefHawk, Chrome_Seahawk, Clayfighter, coastalroofer, CrimsonWazzu, DavidSeven, DirtyDave, Donn2390, dontbelikethat, drdiags, DynoHawk, Floridahawk79, getnasty, Goodwin Seahawk, Google [Bot], halfrack, Hasselbeck, Hawk-A-Loogie, hawknation2014, Hawknballs, IcedHawk, Infamous425, jack_patera, Jase, jeremiah, Jsolo, keatonisballin, kobebryant, lobohawk, LudwigsDrummer, M2MG, MagHawk, Maxman186, McGruff, Meeker, MichaelHawk70, Missing_Clink, Msfann, Natethegreat, NorthwestSportsFan, oldhawkfan, Our Man in Chicago, PhillySeahawk, Plainshawk, PrepntheSep, Recon_Hawk, RedAlice, rideaducati, RiverDog, rj503, RolandDeschain, rpdan, SacHawk2.0, SalishHawkFan, seadoc30, Seahawkfan80, SEAHAWKSEAN, Seahawksfan425, Seahwkgal, Seaswab, Snakeeyes007, SNDavidson, Sonichellboy, Soppie, The Yugoslavian, theascension, TheHawkster, therealjohncarlson, Throwdown, Trenchbroom, TruHammer07, twisted_steel2, uncle fester, VancitySeahawk, Wilson2Harvin, Yxes1122, zack803, ZagHawk, Zebulon Dak, Zukistubbs and 415 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.