Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:18 am 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:46 pm
Posts: 31
hawker84 wrote:
i watched the game again last night on Replay.. morris was vertually untouched running through the holes, that's why he was able to gash Dallas for big gain after another, then when they did get to him the missed tackle after tackle... Dallas Defense is putred, i would not put much stock into that performance to measure his ability... damn good back, but he can be contained. RG3 scares me way more than morris.

He's been doing it all year though. 1600 yards and 13 TDs. With a gimpy RG3, shutting down AlMo should be your guys focus. RG3 has been off with his accuracy since his injury as well. Making him beat me would be my gameplan.

The reason Dallas went with the gameplan of stopping the pass was due to Thanksgivings 304 yard 4TD performance. Pick your poison.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:17 am 
I'M JIMMY!
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
Posts: 4347
Location: Auburn, WA
When the Hawks REALLY wanted serious pressure on Bradford, they got it.

It isn't like the Rams scored a bunch of points, they positioned the Line and Bradford in a spot to protect him well, but tried to spread the defense.

Ultimately, it didn't work.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:24 am 
* NET Hottie *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 2127
I am also worried about the 6 sacks on Wilson. Anyone want to tell me about that since I didn't see the game? Sweezy?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:46 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:16 am
Posts: 112
Location: Northern CA
Seahawkgal it was kinda a combo if the whole line. The Rams have a very good defensive line and they were bringing it. The Hawks didnt help themselves by using any plays such as screens or draws to slow down the pressure. Just my opinion but we need to do something different this week if they bring pressure early and often.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:10 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 3870
Location: Tri Cities, WA
LuvMySkins wrote:
hawker84 wrote:
i watched the game again last night on Replay.. morris was vertually untouched running through the holes, that's why he was able to gash Dallas for big gain after another, then when they did get to him the missed tackle after tackle... Dallas Defense is putred, i would not put much stock into that performance to measure his ability... damn good back, but he can be contained. RG3 scares me way more than morris.

He's been doing it all year though. 1600 yards and 13 TDs. With a gimpy RG3, shutting down AlMo should be your guys focus. RG3 has been off with his accuracy since his injury as well. Making him beat me would be my gameplan.

The reason Dallas went with the gameplan of stopping the pass was due to Thanksgivings 304 yard 4TD performance. Pick your poison.


this was in response to a posters concern about morris agaist Dallas so i was just focusing on that game.. i'm fully aware Morris has been outstanding all season... but he can be contained, especially since Bob is a bit gimpy now, he will be a little more one demintional, but still dangerous to scramble as we saw against dallas.. it will be a tough matchup for sure.

_________________
World Champs - Sounds good don't it


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:23 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am
Posts: 2885
Seahwkgal wrote:
I am also worried about the 6 sacks on Wilson. Anyone want to tell me about that since I didn't see the game? Sweezy?

Partially, but most were coverage sacks wherein Wilson couldn't find an open receiver and couldn't escape the pressure (usually from two defenders) when he stopped looking down field.

_________________
EastCoastHawksFan posted... "Trading for Harvin is by far the worst move John S has ever made." (March 18, 2014)

Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 34 years and counting.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:27 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2748
onanygivensunday wrote:
Seahwkgal wrote:
I am also worried about the 6 sacks on Wilson. Anyone want to tell me about that since I didn't see the game? Sweezy?

Partially, but most were coverage sacks wherein Wilson couldn't find an open receiver and couldn't escape the pressure (usually from two defenders) when he stopped looking down field.


They have a great D-Line and sacks tend to come in bunches. It happens.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:40 am 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10248
Location: Vancouver, WA
loafoftatupu wrote:
When the Hawks REALLY wanted serious pressure on Bradford, they got it....

Yes. Late in the game they dialed up some blitzing after going 4 man rush nearly the entire game before that. It worked too as Bradford lost accuracy and nearly fumbled for a TD for Seattle (damn tuck rule!!). I also am hoping Pete and Gus chose only to blitz late to secure the win and were vanilla before that so as not to show too much to the Foreskins relative this week.

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:42 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2471
hawksfan515 wrote:
I think Pete was holding something back because the game was meaningless, and he didn't want to tip his hand to Washington.

IMO


Partly true. But let's give the Rams some credit, they have a very good front seven (much better than Washington's).........and they truly did play their ass off for pride.

IMO the stats from the Rams game show that the Rams are a much improved football team that matches up well against the Hawks, rather than anything to worry about with the Skins game.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:13 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 812
Location: Canby, OR
T-Sizzle wrote:
Starrman44 wrote:
I will be super disappointed if we don't win Saturday. I don't see us losing this game (but I have been wrong before).

You will be disappointed then.


I know, I keep doing this. :oops: I got my internal clock set for Saturday for the playoff games.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Worried looking at stats from St. Louis game.
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:28 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
Posts: 3297
Location: Sammamish, WA
The lack of pressure/pass rush is a concern but IMO it had to do with having a Clemons/Mebane/Branch/Bryant Dline. There's only one pass-rush specialist in that scenario. This is where not having Jason Jones hurts. However, when they put Scruggs in, he was better than Branch but not to the level of Jones. Hopefully, they will be work that out this week. They need to get more pressure on the QB. Outside pressure isn't effective when there isn't any push from the inside. Bradford is as stiff as it comes (terms of mobility) and they couldn't lay a hand on him. Not good.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, Aerik, BAJAHAWK, balko56, bandiger, BCHawk, Bigbadhawk, Bill Assumpcao, Blitzer88, Bloodrunsblue, BlueBlood, Bob loblaw, bryantology79, bytor72, Cad, CalboHawk, calinator, CANHawk, Cartire, checkdanews, ChrisB Bacon, City Of Reign, coach78, coastalroofer, CrimsonWazzu, crucifyd, Digsbone, DirtyDave, dontbelikethat, DynoHawk, FDNYHAWK, Floridahawk79, gargantual, getnasty, Google [Bot], grizbob, HansGruber, harrad, Hasselbeck, Hawk-A-Loogie, Hawkfish, hawknation2014, Hawknballs, hawksfanohio, Hawk_Nation, IBleedBlueAndGreen, IcedHawk, Infamous425, jake206, Jase, jblaze, jdblack, jeremiah, JimmyNightshade, Jsolo, keatonisballin, kobebryant, Kooshster, lobohawk, longsh0t, MagHawk, Maxman186, McGruff, MichaelHawk70, Missing_Clink, Msfann, nepahawk, NorthwestSportsFan, NoTurnUnstoned, oldhawkfan, Onyx, Our Man in Chicago, Painhawk, Plainshawk, Polaris, purpleworld, RedAlice, rj503, RobBaker7714409, RockHawk, RolandDeschain, run and shoot, SacHawk2.0, samwize77, Sanity, scutterhawk, seadoc30, Seahawkfan80, Seahawks1983, Seahawksfan425, Seahwkgal, Seaswab, seatt1eslew, SilNWest, Smellyman, SNDavidson, Sonichellboy, Soppie, streets24, taz291819, theascension, TheHawkster, themunn, TheRealDTM, therealjohncarlson, twelthmanfan, twisted_steel2, VancitySeahawk, VivaEfrenHerrera, Wilson2Harvin, Yahoo [Bot], zack803, ZagHawk, Zebulon Dak, Zukistubbs and 432 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.