0 sacks

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:33 pm
  • that number needs to change next week. Lets hope our ball-less wonder of a D-coord can figure a way to knock RGIII on his keister a few times next week, otherwise it might be a long day.
    42-13, 29-3, and 23-17 and a Lombardi trophy from THIS millennium.....deal with it niner trolls

    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10818
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:40 pm
  • I'm hoping that PC is keeping the stunt and blitz schemes tucked away for the playoffs.
    User avatar
    SoCalSeahawk
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 310
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:15 pm


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:44 pm
  • SoCalSeahawk wrote:I'm hoping that PC is keeping the stunt and blitz schemes tucked away for the playoffs.


    That is my desire as well. The Hawks need to "ramp up" to the level of play that they had last week playing the Niners. It didn't even look like that same team on the field this afternoon!
    Bigpumpkin
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 4764
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
    Location: Puyallup, WA USA


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:44 pm
  • yes, i also felt like Seattle didnt want to reveal their hand to to whoever they face in the playoffs, our base rush outside of the greenbay game has not been stellar
    User avatar
    Axx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:45 pm
  • Tyler Polumbus is one of the Redskins starting tackles. Remember that guy? If we cant get a sack against him we might as well just give up.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18499
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:49 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:Tyler Polumbus is one of the Redskins starting tackles. Remember that guy? If we cant get a sack against him we might as well just give up.


    This is where you would normally get a "Like" or a "retweet." I agree, I'm hoping they were saving something because the pass rush was atrocious today. I swear I saw 5 guys block 7... Ha. I think we will turn it on. Having Browner back will be a big help. If we can disrupt their timing at the line it should create some opportunities for our pass rush. :49ersmall:
    User avatar
    acbass
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 418
    Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:55 pm
    Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota/Charleston, South Carolina


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:51 pm
  • If we have another game with pass rush that horrid we will have a very short off season. This game showed some things that need to be worked on and it was a great time for it. Pete and crew can now know exactly what to fix.
    "When is the NFL going to start fining receivers for running routes across KAM’S MIDDLE?!?!"
    -bpup33
    User avatar
    Sprfunk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 705
    Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:57 pm


Re: 0 sacks
Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:34 pm
  • This fact surprised me the most today. Until the Tampa game two weeks ago, Bradford had been sacked in 30 straight games. He might have the NFL record, I'm not sure.
    Los Angeles Rams' fan who lives in San Diego.
    User avatar
    RedAlice
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 591
    Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:47 am
    Location: San Diego




It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2014 3:38 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online