This Week's Enemy Fan Forums: Wild Card Edition!

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • The Hogster wrote:
    Decimation wrote:Nobody is laughing. Only YOU delusional redskin fans are. You bring up the road woes that we've had in the past.. but to be honest, what has your team amounted to in the past twenty years? Oh that's right, NOTHING.


    We have the best fans in the NFL. I guarantee you won't see more than a handful of Seahawks fans in our stadium. And, if you're going to talk about history & relevance, try winning something first. Your team has been chained up in the dungeon of struggle since your franchise was born. Your team switched from the AFC to the NFC and nobody noticed or cared. If your losing tradition continues, you'll be in the Pac 10 looking for a BCS bid.


    Best fans in the NFL that didn't jump on the wagon until the end of the year, barely at that. 86.9% of full attendance isn't that good buddy.
    Image Image
    User avatar
    AF_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2067
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
    Location: Marysville, WA


  • Tech Worlds wrote:Shouldn't this be in the shack? It's nothing but smack talk.

    You guys are ruining our forums just like 49ers fans do.

    You suck.


    If this is Smack talk, then you must watch football at Starbucks.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • AF_Hawk wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:
    Decimation wrote:Nobody is laughing. Only YOU delusional redskin fans are. You bring up the road woes that we've had in the past.. but to be honest, what has your team amounted to in the past twenty years? Oh that's right, NOTHING.


    We have the best fans in the NFL. I guarantee you won't see more than a handful of Seahawks fans in our stadium. And, if you're going to talk about history & relevance, try winning something first. Your team has been chained up in the dungeon of struggle since your franchise was born. Your team switched from the AFC to the NFC and nobody noticed or cared. If your losing tradition continues, you'll be in the Pac 10 looking for a BCS bid.


    Best fans in the NFL that didn't jump on the wagon until the end of the year, barely at that. 86.9% of full attendance isn't that good buddy.


    You have no clue what you're talking about. I've been a fan since 1980.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • AF_Hawk wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:
    Decimation wrote:Nobody is laughing. Only YOU delusional redskin fans are. You bring up the road woes that we've had in the past.. but to be honest, what has your team amounted to in the past twenty years? Oh that's right, NOTHING.


    We have the best fans in the NFL. I guarantee you won't see more than a handful of Seahawks fans in our stadium. And, if you're going to talk about history & relevance, try winning something first. Your team has been chained up in the dungeon of struggle since your franchise was born. Your team switched from the AFC to the NFC and nobody noticed or cared. If your losing tradition continues, you'll be in the Pac 10 looking for a BCS bid.


    Best fans in the NFL that didn't jump on the wagon until the end of the year, barely at that. 86.9% of full attendance isn't that good buddy.


    The Redskins have a consecutive sellout streak that dates back to 1966, including preseason games and are in the top 10 in highest ticket prices. They are currently the 3rd highest valued team in all of sports worldwide according to Forbes. They have the largest seating capacity in the NFL. The Seahawks are 21st in stadium capacity. The Seahawks are also 20th in average tickets and could not sellout Husky stadium prior to Qwest opening to avoid several tv blackouts with the extra 5,000 seats in that stadium.

    Redskins fans support the team in good and bad times and sellout the stadium regardless of the quality of the team. That is not the case with the Seahawks. Seattle sports fans only support winners. That is also why the Super Sonics now play in Oklahoma. It would be hard to find a fan base with more bandwagon fans in the NFL. To your credit, you do generate a lot of noise at the stadium in the years you decide to show up.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • +100
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • la_nfl_fan wrote:
    AF_Hawk wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:
    We have the best fans in the NFL. I guarantee you won't see more than a handful of Seahawks fans in our stadium. And, if you're going to talk about history & relevance, try winning something first. Your team has been chained up in the dungeon of struggle since your franchise was born. Your team switched from the AFC to the NFC and nobody noticed or cared. If your losing tradition continues, you'll be in the Pac 10 looking for a BCS bid.


    Best fans in the NFL that didn't jump on the wagon until the end of the year, barely at that. 86.9% of full attendance isn't that good buddy.


    The Redskins have a consecutive sellout streak that dates back to 1966, including preseason games and are in the top 10 in highest ticket prices. They are currently the 3rd highest valued team in all of sports worldwide according to Forbes. They have the largest seating capacity in the NFL. The Seahawks are 21st in stadium capacity. The Seahawks are also 20th in average tickets and could not sellout Husky stadium prior to Qwest opening to avoid several tv blackouts with the extra 5,000 seats in that stadium.

    Redskins fans support the team in good and bad times and sellout the stadium regardless of the quality of the team. That is not the case with the Seahawks. Seattle sports fans only support winners. That is also why the Super Sonics now play in Oklahoma. It would be hard to find a fan base with more bandwagon fans in the NFL. To your credit, you do generate a lot of noise at the stadium in the years you decide to show up.


    What the hell do you know about the Sonics? We're the ones who stand up for what's right and stick it to the owner when he acts like a petulant child. While you, on the other hand, go and pay $25 for preseason parking and don't give a damn that your owner sues Grandmas.
    User avatar
    thebanjodude
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 472
    Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:18 am


  • Actually, Clay Bennett stole the team. You have no clue about the situation and you're being extraordinarily ignorant and have no idea what you're talking about. If you're going to post such nonsense, then take it to the shack. A LOT of Seattle sports fans would LOVE to have the Sonics come home in a new arena, idiot.

    Edit: Quote fail.
    User avatar
    Decimation
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 745
    Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 9:28 am


  • That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • la_nfl_fan wrote:That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.

    And yet their attendance is way under 100%...something is not adding up.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 10514
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • la_nfl_fan wrote:That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.

    Saying you guys have the best fans in sports is like saying the Cowboys, Steelers, and the 49ers have the best fans in sports.
    User avatar
    Decimation
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 745
    Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 9:28 am


  • Scottemojo wrote:
    la_nfl_fan wrote:That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.

    And yet their attendance is way under 100%...something is not adding up.



    They have a sell out streak since 1966. Every seat is sold. The no show rate may fluctuate week to week but with the largest capacity in the NFL it happens.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • Decimation wrote:
    la_nfl_fan wrote:That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.

    Saying you guys have the best fans in sports is like saying the Cowboys, Steelers, and the 49ers have the best fans in sports.


    A lot of bandwagons in that list. I would put Redskins fans and Packers as the top two based on year after year of support in good and bad times.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • True. How about Forbes? Credible enough for you?

    Different research. Same result.

    Seattle is the #1 WORST Sports City in America

    Put simply, you suck. And, now I see why.

    http://www.forbes.com/2011/02/28/seattle-atlanta-phoenix-business-sports-miserable-sports-cities_slide_2.html

    It must be a blast watching Kevin Durant and the Thunder dominate the NBA from Oklahoma City this year.


    All eyes on D.C. The real Washington. The capital of this great nation, and a city where people actually prefer their football with beer & wings, not pumpkin spice latte's and biscotti. The 12th man = your sound guy. That's why you're a fraud away from Century Stink Field.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • Scottemojo wrote:
    la_nfl_fan wrote:That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.

    And yet their attendance is way under 100%...something is not adding up.


    The tickets are sold, but the actual attendance varies based on a variety of factors. If you ever lived in a real east coast city, you'd understand. But, whatever. When you live in a big city and your stadium seats almost 100,000 you understand this. I could see how a Seattle fan wouldn't get it.

    So, why did the Sonics leave??

    What, :thumbup: too soon?
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • la_nfl_fan wrote:
    Scottemojo wrote:
    la_nfl_fan wrote:That's why Redskins fans are the best in sports or at least the most loyal. Unconditional love for the team. Principles and stands take a backseat to supporting the team. $25 parking even for preseason is a deal at FedEx.

    And yet their attendance is way under 100%...something is not adding up.



    They have a sell out streak since 1966. Every seat is sold. The no show rate may fluctuate week to week but with the That many lame fans in the NFL it happens.
    Fixed it for ya.

    Seriously, and the no show rate dropped after Schneider got rid of huge block of bad seats. Your team leads the league in tickets given to politicos, lobbyists, and corporate slackies. Which accounts for the library level noise.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 10514
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • Well let's see if Russell Wilson finds it quiet enough to read the defense in the "library."
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am






  • Seriously, and the no show rate dropped after Schneider got rid of huge block of bad seats. Your team leads the league in tickets given to politicos, lobbyists, and corporate slackies. Which accounts for the library level noise.


    Snyder never gives anything away. Premium seats are not shared revenue with the opposing team. The general admission seats are. Skins have the most premium seats in the NFL because of the demand from lobbyists etc.

    There has only been 1 playoff game at FedEx. I was there in 1999. Louder than RFK. With the drought in playoff games, bitterness at being home underdogs and general dislike of the Seahawks based on recent history, the stadium will be rocking tomorrow.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • You people have obviously never been to DC. If anything Skins fans get heat for being too loyal. Die Hard.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.
    User avatar
    Harperville
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 88
    Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:34 pm


  • Just dropping in to say I have huge respect for your team and expect only the finest Redskin effort, plus a break or two, will be able to swing the game our way. RW is amazing, Lynch is a true beast and that D is quick and powerful. Should be a fun game and perhaps just the first in a series of playoff matchups between these exciting young QBs. Best of luck to y'all.
    SkinsFan72
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 2
    Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:45 pm


  • Harperville wrote:I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.


    Sensitive much?? It's not trolling. It's football. It's what men do. Talk trash. What do men in Seattle do for football games ??

    :177692:

    Nevermind I don't want to know.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • The Hogster wrote:
    Harperville wrote:I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.


    Sensitive much?? It's not trolling. It's football. It's what men do. Talk trash. What do men in Seattle do for football games ??

    :177692:

    Nevermind I don't want to know.



    One more day and you can crawl back to whatever forum you came from, and start talking about your offseason. Enjoy this evening...it's going to be the last one of the season for you and your team.
    Kam Chancellor: The Chancellor of Defense
    Bruce Irvin: BruceMode
    Tharold Simon: Humble Thug
    Paul Richardson: BPR
    User avatar
    FortWorthSeahawk
    USAF BadAss
     
    Posts: 1047
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:24 am
    Location: Charlottesville, VA


  • Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • FortWorthSeahawk wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:
    Harperville wrote:I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.


    Sensitive much?? It's not trolling. It's football. It's what men do. Talk trash. What do men in Seattle do for football games ??

    :177692:

    Nevermind I don't want to know.



    One more day and you can crawl back to whatever forum you came from, and start talking about your offseason. Enjoy this evening...it's going to be the last one of the season for you and your team.


    That would be Washington DC. The greatest city in the world. You enjoy End of Season Eve yourself there buddy.

    At first you'll be :D then you'll be :cry:

    Like always. Unhappily ever after.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • I'm going Skins 31, Hawks 30 on a Kai Forbath FG to win. RGIII runs for one TD throws for two, one to Garçon one to Hankerson. Lynch and Alfred Morris both top 100 yards.
    SkinsFan72
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 2
    Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:45 pm


  • The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    You talking smack, or do you really believe that? I'm genuinely curious.
    User avatar
    Shock2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1115
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm


  • The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    Skins have been pretty lucky with the fumble. Think I heard they put it on the ground 17 times but only lost 6 or 7 right?
    User avatar
    birdman5
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 110
    Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:31 am


  • Shock2k wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    You talking smack, or do you really believe that? I'm genuinely curious.


    Genuinely, yes. And, in all seriousness. I would not feel the same way if this game were in Seattle.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • birdman5 wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    Skins have been pretty lucky with the fumble. Think I heard they put it on the ground 17 times but only lost 6 or 7 right?


    Yes. We've had some luck on the fumbles. But, RGIII rarely throws a pass that is even close to being intercepted. He has 5 INTS all year. And, at least 2-3 of them were tipped passes.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • We played the equivelent to a play off game last week at home, many of our players have playoff experience, the hardest aspect of a game to pick up is that it ramps up another level, refs tend to let guys play more. Fletcher and Moss can help a lot but until they start playing you can't understand it by hearing players interview after their first game. In short many of our young guys know what it's like to play in the playoffs, Redskins will have to pick up on the fly.

    I think Seattle has this advantage and having played the knock the snot out of you style all season may be more comfortable starting out.
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
    .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 9687
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


  • chris98251 wrote:We played the equivelent to a play off game last week at home, many of our players have playoff experience, the hardest aspect of a game to pick up is that it ramps up another level, refs tend to let guys play more. Fletcher and Moss can help a lot but until they start playing you can't understand it by hearing players interview after their first game. In short many of our young guys know what it's like to play in the playoffs, Redskins will have to pick up on the fly.

    I think Seattle has this advantage and having played the knock the snot out of you style all season may be more comfortable starting out.


    Not sure I agree with this. The following players on the Redskins have playoff experience.

    Defense

    Stephen Bowen
    Barry Cofield - Superbowl
    London Fletcher
    DeAngelo Hall
    Josh Wilson
    Reed Doughty
    Kedric Golston

    Offense

    Santana Moss
    Pierre Garcon
    Chris Chester
    Lorenzo Alexander

    We will be fine. The Cowboys game last week was a playoff game. Win or go home. National TV. They know what this means.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • The Hogster wrote:
    Shock2k wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    You talking smack, or do you really believe that? I'm genuinely curious.


    Genuinely, yes. And, in all seriousness. I would not feel the same way if this game were in Seattle.


    31-0 at halftime skins. 38-14 final score.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • Ummmm, how long has it been since you skins were a playoff team? Seems to me with all those guys you listed you're team is old. And playoff experience is overrated for us as PC and JS only select and sign players who are not intimidated by a big or bigger stage.
    seedhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2457
    Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:51 am


  • Ok. I've been lurking in this thread and at this point I've had it.

    Not Smadk talk? Hawk fans can't take it? Please. Let's reference the thin skinned, totally defensive minded folks at ERTEMESKINS. The stuff we tried to post there isn;t even to the level you are going and WE WERE BANNED, so stop being a hypocrite. This is our board. This is our house. If you want friendly banter. Fine, but dont come into our house with your sliding to sh@t attitude

    What's the difference between Politians, MSNBC, Fox News and Reddskin fans? NOTHING. Spin and deflect is all you do.

    In 2007, the Redskins had a 5-7 record and looking at missing the playoffs. Your godfather, legendary head coach Gibbs is looking at a pink slip from your bozo owner ...ours has more class in his pinky ....but, oops, I'm pulling an extremeskin move....DIGRESS!

    Anywho, the Redskins win 4 straight games and get into the playoffs. Todd Colins throws for 240+ yards, Clinto Portis runs for over 100 yards against the Cowboys in week 17. The fans and players are riding an emotional high.

    Sound familar?

    2007 playoff game results: Seahawks 31, Redskins 21.

    But, in classic DC style, let's deflect. Oh, those Seahawk fans were mean to me. They are the worst fans in the world. Who the fu@k cares.. Again, let's focus what happened on the field.....You lost!!!

    And, the Redskin fans were at it prior to the game....we bad. We'll beat the Seachickens...Let me spin up some stats to show you we will beat you. blah, blah....Oh sh@t. We lost...let's not talk about the score....let's cry about the abuse we took at the stadium.

    The polictians are not the only ones who are messed in DC.

    Cant wait for the game to begin and can't wait for the spin from Redskin fans when they lose. Seems like that's one thing you guys are good at.

    Enough!
    truehawksfan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 526
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:55 pm


  • truehawksfan wrote:Ok. I've been lurking in this thread and at this point I've had it.

    Not Smadk talk? Hawk fans can't take it? Please. Let's reference the thin skinned, totally defensive minded folks at ERTEMESKINS. The stuff we tried to post there isn;t even to the level you are going and WE WERE BANNED, so stop being a hypocrite. This is our board. This is our house. If you want friendly banter. Fine, but dont come into our house with your sliding to sh@t attitude

    What's the difference between Politians, MSNBC, Fox News and Reddskin fans? NOTHING. Spin and deflect is all you do.

    In 2007, the Redskins had a 5-7 record and looking at missing the playoffs. Your godfather, legendary head coach Gibbs is looking at a pink slip from your bozo owner ...ours has more class in his pinky ....but, oops, I'm pulling an extremeskin move....DIGRESS!

    Anywho, the Redskins win 4 straight games and get into the playoffs. Todd Colins throws for 240+ yards, Clinto Portis runs for over 100 yards against the Cowboys in week 17. The fans and players are riding an emotional high.

    Sound familar?

    2007 playoff game results: Seahawks 31, Redskins 21.

    But, in classic DC style, let's deflect. Oh, those Seahawk fans were mean to me. They are the worst fans in the world. Who the fu@k cares.. Again, let's focus what happened on the field.....You lost!!!

    And, the Redskin fans were at it prior to the game....we bad. We'll beat the Seachickens...Let me spin up some stats to show you we will beat you. blah, blah....Oh sh@t. We lost...let's not talk about the score....let's cry about the abuse we took at the stadium.

    The polictians are not the only ones who are messed in DC.

    Cant wait for the game to begin and can't wait for the spin from Redskin fans when they lose. Seems like that's one thing you guys are good at.

    Enough!


    You lost me at ExtremeSkins. I didn't even read the rest of your speech. FYI - the true Skins fans are members of other sites like http://www.thehogs.net
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • FortWorthSeahawk wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:
    Harperville wrote:I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.




    One more day and you can crawl back to whatever forum you came from, and start talking about your offseason. Enjoy this evening...it's going to be the last one of the season for you and your team.


    That would be Washington DC. The greatest city in the world. You enjoy End of Season Eve yourself there buddy.

    At first you'll be :D then you'll be :cry:

    Like always. Unhappily ever after.


    Come back tomorrow :)
    Kam Chancellor: The Chancellor of Defense
    Bruce Irvin: BruceMode
    Tharold Simon: Humble Thug
    Paul Richardson: BPR
    User avatar
    FortWorthSeahawk
    USAF BadAss
     
    Posts: 1047
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:24 am
    Location: Charlottesville, VA


  • The Hogster wrote:
    Harperville wrote:I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.


    Sensitive much?? It's not trolling. It's football. It's what men do. Talk trash. What do men in Seattle do for football games ??

    :177692:

    Nevermind I don't want to know.


    First we are a bunch of thugs then we are sensitive. Talk about being a bunch of over sensitive fans, the "official" Redskin forum has fans with such a thin skin, they almost immediately ban any fan of any other team for really nothing at all. You would have been banned there (if you were a fan of another team) for your first post alone. Yup, that is men being men. I guess men in the DC area hide behind their mommy's aprons while clinging to their skirts.
    User avatar
    Bitter
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 464
    Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:38 pm


  • SkinsfortheWin wrote:2007 has nothing to do with this weekends game.


    The 2011 game has everything to do with it though, according to the rest of the Skins fans
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8684
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


  • The Hogster wrote:
    Harperville wrote:I'm glad our moderators aren't so girly that they ban you even though it's clear you're just trolling. I'd like to see if you come back once your team loses.


    Sensitive much?? It's not trolling. It's football. It's what men do. Talk trash. What do men in Seattle do for football games ??

    :177692:

    Nevermind I don't want to know.


    Hogster, this is the one warning you get to keep the smack in the smack shack and out of the main forum. Frankly I should have already given you one. Head to the shack where the rest of your buddies are hanging out.
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8684
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


  • AbsolutNET wrote:
    SkinsfortheWin wrote:2007 has nothing to do with this weekends game.


    The 2011 game has everything to do with it though, according to the rest of the Skins fans


    Being that most of the players from the 2011 game are the same, and virtually nobody from 2007......ah never mind.

    You'll see tomorrow.

    HAIL TO THE REDSKINS
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • The Hogster wrote:
    AbsolutNET wrote:
    SkinsfortheWin wrote:2007 has nothing to do with this weekends game.


    The 2011 game has everything to do with it though, according to the rest of the Skins fans


    Being that most of the players from the 2011 game are the same, and virtually nobody from 2007......ah never mind.

    You'll see tomorrow.

    HELL TO THE REDSKINS


    Fixed
    User avatar
    birdman5
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 110
    Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:31 am


  • The Hogster wrote:
    AbsolutNET wrote:
    SkinsfortheWin wrote:2007 has nothing to do with this weekends game.


    The 2011 game has everything to do with it though, according to the rest of the Skins fans


    Being that most of the players from the 2011 game are the same, and virtually nobody from 2007......ah never mind.

    You'll see tomorrow.

    HAIL TO THE REDSKINS

    Actually, that's not true..

    - We have a new QB, who tied peytons rookie TD record and is now playing at a top level.
    - O-line is playing at top level.
    - Legion of Boom has earned their nickname this season.
    - Richard Freakin' Sherman..
    - BWagz, all I have to say.
    - Our young guys have progressed tremendously, and we had another great draft!

    Nope, we're much different from 11'. Maybe you guys' team are the same, not us. :D

    HAIL TO THE RUSSELL.
    User avatar
    Decimation
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 745
    Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 9:28 am


  • The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    Two touchdown win, huh? Even though your only wins by that margin are against the Browns, and Eagles when Foles was making his first start. Not likely. Your cute little winning streak comes to an end tomorrow.
    camdawg
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 101
    Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:22 pm


  • Decimation wrote:Actually, that's not true..

    - We have a new QB, who tied peytons rookie TD record and is now playing at a top level.
    - O-line is playing at top level.
    - Legion of Boom has earned their nickname this season.
    - Richard Freakin' Sherman..
    - BWagz, all I have to say.
    - Our young guys have progressed tremendously, and we had another great draft!

    Nope, we're much different from 11'. Maybe you guys' team are the same, not us. :D

    HAIL TO THE RUSSELL.


    We have a new QB also. RGIII, I think you may have heard of him. I'm sure Russell Wilson has, since he's who he wants to play like.

    Russell Okung made a Pro Bowl. So did Trent Williams. Our O Line is paving the way for the #1 rushing offense in the league there buddy. We aren't bad either.

    Legion of Boom?? :34853_tinfoil: You had the same defense last year, except for Bobby Wagner and a few other players.

    Richard Sherman played last year. So did Browner, Chancellor and Thomas. Nobody fears them. Sorry to break it to you.

    Not to mention, aside from our Pro Bowl QB, we have Alfred Morris, Pierre Garcon, & Leonard Hankerson killing defenses. Yours will be no different.
    Threesus Is My Homeboy
    User avatar
    The Hogster
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 54
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am


  • The Hogster wrote:
    Decimation wrote:Actually, that's not true..

    - We have a new QB, who tied peytons rookie TD record and is now playing at a top level.
    - O-line is playing at top level.
    - Legion of Boom has earned their nickname this season.
    - Richard Freakin' Sherman..
    - BWagz, all I have to say.
    - Our young guys have progressed tremendously, and we had another great draft!

    Nope, we're much different from 11'. Maybe you guys' team are the same, not us. :D

    HAIL TO THE RUSSELL.


    We have a new QB also. RGIII, I think you may have heard of him. I'm sure Russell Wilson has, since he's who he wants to play like.

    Russell Okung made a Pro Bowl. So did Trent Williams. Our O Line is paving the way for the #1 rushing offense in the league there buddy. We aren't bad either.

    Legion of Boom?? :34853_tinfoil: You had the same defense last year, except for Bobby Wagner and a few other players.

    Richard Sherman played last year. So did Browner, Chancellor and Thomas. Nobody fears them. Sorry to break it to you.

    Not to mention, aside from our Pro Bowl QB, we have Alfred Morris, Pierre Garcon, & Leonard Hankerson killing defenses. Yours will be no different.


    As your relative would say. "OK did he seriously just say that?"
    User avatar
    birdman5
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 110
    Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:31 am


  • NFL.com has a story on their site, titled, "Top 5 Most annoying types of NFL fans".

    As noted, I've been lurking on several Redskins boards and The Wadhington Post. And, I saw post from the fanatics as well as regular fans who posted comments in The Post and I nvere felt so annoyed by the constant noise from Redskins fans.

    But, now I know after reading the mentioned story on NFL.com. Redskins fans have shown 3 out of the top 5 traits! 3 out of 5.

    This includes the constant reference to past championships won decades ago. Thank God I'm not the only one who gets sick and tired of hearing about this worn out story! The others include constant stats, but....

    The one I cracked up about is the overly optimistic fanbase. They show a Redskins fan holding up a RGIII banner in that one. :lol:

    Glad to see a story backs up my feelings about these loud mouth, over bearing, thin skin fans.

    http://blogs.nfl.com/2013/01/02/top-5-m ... -nfl-fans/
    truehawksfan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 526
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:55 pm


  • camdawg wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    Two touchdown win, huh? Even though your only wins by that margin are against the Browns, and Eagles when Foles was making his first start. Not likely. Your cute little winning streak comes to an end tomorrow.



    Skins win by 3 TD's because Shanahan has too much class to run up the score like Carroll.
    la_nfl_fan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:59 pm


  • la_nfl_fan wrote:
    camdawg wrote:
    The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    Two touchdown win, huh? Even though your only wins by that margin are against the Browns, and Eagles when Foles was making his first start. Not likely. Your cute little winning streak comes to an end tomorrow.



    Skins win by 3 TD's because Shanahan has too much class to run up the score like Carroll.

    You listen to the media too much.

    They play till the whistle blows, and that's what the hawks do. Always compete.

    The Cardinals, 49ers, and Bills (our last three opponents that we've put a chunk of points on, if that's what you're referring to as "running up the score") just couldn't stop us and kept throwing the ball towards our direction.

    WE ALL WE GOT, WE ALL WE NEED.
    User avatar
    Decimation
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 745
    Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 9:28 am


  • Richard Sherman played last year. So did Browner, Chancellor and Thomas. Nobody fears them. Sorry to break it to you.


    Yeah sure well tomorrow we will see how many catches are dropped due to the no fear of these guys or how many are getting smelling salts after coming across the middle.

    Really wish a player had said that, ya think they Chip team is pissed already something like that would have them in a frothing frenzy.
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
    .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 9687
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


  • The Hogster wrote:Seriously. The only way that I could see the Seahawks keeping this game close is with a Special Teams score. RGIII doesn't turn the ball over. And, your team is weak on the road.

    31-17

    SKINS


    no team has beat us by more than 7, and that was SF who happens to be leaps and bounds better than the redskins in every phase of the game... what makes you think the redskins can beat us by more... absolutely zero factual evidence to back up this ridiculous and homeristic statement.... you['re just being silly now, homer.
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3877
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


PreviousNext


It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:41 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
cron