| Author |
Message |
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:34 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am Posts: 164 Location: Vancouver WA
|
|
Wouldn't that be our 2nd best record ever? I know we've finished 10-6 and 9-7 a handfull of times but I'm pretty sure that 11-5 would place 2nd. I could be wrong. Anyone?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Escamillo
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:38 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:54 pm Posts: 59
|
|
IIRC, in 2005 we went 13-3, and 1984 we went 12-4.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sgt Largent
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:40 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:39 pm Posts: 108
|
|
I think 3rd best, 13 and 3, and get this, we were 12-4 in the AFC West one year which was good for a WILDCARD spot if you can believe that. The division was beastly that year. Didn't look it up, using my dain bramaged memory but I think I'm right on this...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:41 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am Posts: 164 Location: Vancouver WA
|
|
ok so 3rd. Not bad as long as we beat the Rams.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:42 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am Posts: 6948 Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
11 wins is fantastic. That is a good team.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ParisPC07
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:43 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:14 pm Posts: 390 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
|
I think I picked 11-5 in a poll at the beginning of the season. Anyone able to drag that thread back from the dead?
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:52 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am Posts: 164 Location: Vancouver WA
|
|
Not to knock on the 2005 Seahawk team. But if they played the schedule we played this year. I don't think they win 13. They most likely win 11 or 12. The NFC west was at the lowest of lows back then. The Rams were still somewhat good with Bulger Holt and Bruce. The Cards were worse then they are now. The Niners were coming off the Garcia and Owens hangover and had no furture in sight. We almost lost to the Niners at the stick and barely beat the Rams. We played the AFC south. All of those teams but the Colts were bad. The Colts rested their starters. The NFC East was tougher back then and the two hardest teams in that divison played us at home. That 13-3 record as fluffed a bit. I really think this is the best Seahawk team ever.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:52 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3474
|
|
The year we finished 12-4 I predicted 14-2 prior to the season and bet my dad $100 on it.... it was a no pay bet on my end, which meant I risked nothing, but if it came true he'd give me $100 for it. He was THAT sure it wasn't going to happen. I predicted it immediately after we beat Miami in the playoffs the previous year, and then when they announced the schedule I went through and predicted every win and loss. I was 100% right on the season, up until the last two weeks. I believe we played 2 teams that really really sucked. I am sure one of them was Kansas City, and the other was Pittsburgh I think (who had simply gone into the toilet at that point).
I had those both circled as wins, and we went and lost both and ended up 12-4 instead of 14-2. I was so bummed out. I stopped betting on sports... and that was when I was 11. Haha. I wonder how well I would have done had I stuck with it. Probably my life wouldn't have been any worse than now. I should have stuck with it.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:57 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am Posts: 164 Location: Vancouver WA
|
ParisPC07 wrote: I think I picked 11-5 in a poll at the beginning of the season. Anyone able to drag that thread back from the dead? I picked 10 or 11 wins during the preseason. Big up's to anyone who digs that trend outta the grave lol
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawks875
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:19 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:14 am Posts: 208
|
|
I predicted 11-5 before the season started but I predicted losses to Carolina, New England, @ San Francisco, Detroit and buffalo and we won 3 of those games.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Atradees
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:04 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm Posts: 2005 Location: South of Heaven
|
|
I was thinking 11 and five but not until right uo to the Stanford/Ducks game. I also picked Notre Dame and Oregon in the BCS title game.
I think 11 and five is a damn fine record.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:46 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6727 Location: Covington, Washington
|
ProckHawks wrote: ParisPC07 wrote: I think I picked 11-5 in a poll at the beginning of the season. Anyone able to drag that thread back from the dead? I picked 10 or 11 wins during the preseason. Big up's to anyone who digs that trend outta the grave lol They put these type links in the archive. Will go take a quick look but that is where you would find the picks. Yep, the link was in the Archive ForumCode: 1 Sun, Sep 9 @ Arizona Cardinals - W 2 Sun, Sep 16 vs Dallas Cowboys - L 3 Mon, Sep 24 vs Green Bay Packers - L 4 Sun, Sep 30 @ St. Louis Rams - W 5 Sun, Oct 7 @ Carolina Panthers - W 6 Sun, Oct 14 vs New England Patriots - L 7 Thu, Oct 18 @ San Francisco 49ers - L 8 Sun, Oct 28 @ Detroit Lions - L 9 Sun, Nov 4 vs Minnesota Vikings - W 10 Sun, Nov 11 vs New York Jets - W 11 Bye 12 Sun, Nov 25 @ Miami Dolphins - W 13 Sun, Dec 2 @ Chicago Bears - L 14 Sun, Dec 9 vs Arizona Cardinals - W 15 Sun, Dec 16 @ Buffalo Bills - L 16 Sun, Dec 23 vs San Francisco 49ers - W 17 Sun, Dec 30 vs St. Louis Rams - W
FINAL RECORD: 9-7 (That should keep those ESPN West Blog folks happy) PLACE IN DIVISION: 2nd
_________________  "The Seahawks are now known league wide as the team sooooooo badass and smashmouth and hard hitting that they couldn't even go thru their own practices without laying smack down on fools." - JSeahawks
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:47 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am Posts: 7579 Location: Monroe, WA
|
I predicted 11-5. It's in the archive thread on page 3. I missed on a few of the idividual game selections, but I'm waiting for sunday afternoon so I can throw my shoulder out patting myself on the back.  I also predicted we'd win the Div championship. Oh well, there's still hope. 
_________________ Talent can get you to the playoffs. It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SoulfishHawk
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:34 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am Posts: 725
|
|
11-5 is incredible for a team with a rookie QB etc. If someone would have told me 11-5, I would have asked them to put down the pipe. Incredible season so far, time to finish it up right into February. I truly believe we are as good as any team in the NFL right now, and can win the whole flippen thing.
_________________ 60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
KARAVARUS
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:09 am Posts: 2353 Location: Omaha, NE
|
|
I was one of the first responders to that thread, and while my games were off, I think I had us 11-5 or 12-4... Hmmm
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SoulfishHawk
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:35 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am Posts: 725
|
|
Damn good prediction
_________________ 60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
rastahawk
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:40 am |
|
| * Just Chillin' * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:51 am Posts: 744 Location: Los Angeles
|
|
How did you guys predict 10 or more wins? I looked at our schedule (before preseason) and I think the best I saw without my rose colored glasses was 8-8. Man am I stoked right now. And to think we should have maybe won a couple more.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SoulfishHawk
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:41 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am Posts: 725
|
I think I had us at 9-7, and thought that was a reach. Love being wrong 
_________________ 60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
KARAVARUS
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:13 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:09 am Posts: 2353 Location: Omaha, NE
|
rastahawk wrote: How did you guys predict 10 or more wins? I looked at our schedule (before preseason) and I think the best I saw without my rose colored glasses was 8-8. Man am I stoked right now. And to think we should have maybe won a couple more. I for sure had my homer glasses on, but I had us beating the packers and niners, maybe even the pats. I was actually having trouble picking games I thought we'd lose. Lol I think I had us losing at Carolina and Chicago.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: 11-5 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:57 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am Posts: 8188 Location: Antioch, CA
|
|
The NFC West was MUCH easier in 2005 too. That was the worst division in football during that time. This year the 49ers are in the conversation for best team in the NFL, the Cards have a top 10 D and the Rams are battling for .500.
This team would have had 13 wins with the 2005 version of the NFC West, easy.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: BCHawk, bobincovington, bryantology79, Cartire, Chukarhawk, cubbyhawkfan, DaveG, dbmack, dopeboy206, drdevin, drdiags, DSM, ensett, FlyingGreg, Google [Bot], gtcotcakya, Jville, Kixkahn, RolandDeschain, Seahwkgal, Sports Hernia, stonewallj799, tjgamer555, Travis, Trenchbroom, VancitySeahawk, VB Hawk, vin.couve12 and 154 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |