| Author |
Message |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:03 am |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10359 Location: Portland, OR
|
|
The media can call it what they want. We still have the win, the points, and the playoff berth.
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bobincovington
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:17 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 10:37 am Posts: 25
|
This may be the best way to respond to all the haters (found it in comments to an article about the Chicago allegations of Hawks getting away with something again) - it is a loop of the Kam hit on Vernon His comment: Seahawks fans currently unable to care about Goodell, too busy watching this on a permanent loop and looking forward to the playoffs… http://nesncom.files.wordpress.com/2012 ... =375&h=257
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:58 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16456 Location: SoCal
|
|
I've seen the real refs make so many more horrible calls than the replacement refs. That call was disputeable but ultimately correct.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CamanoIslandJQ
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:10 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am Posts: 800 Location: Camano Island, WA
|
|
ESPN's "coverage" of the same straight-on angle of the "catch" shown many 1000's of times is what everyone can't get past. ANY instant replay ALWAYS has multiple angles of the play. But NOT on this catch solely because ESPN wanted controversy with the replacement refs.
Any resonable person after looking at reverse angle footage in slow motion should be able to see that it was indeed a simultaneous catch with the tie going to the receiver, and was properly called a TD. The subsequent review of the play was correctly applied. So this whole "controversy" was FABRICATED by ESPN for their own agenda. What a bunch of BS.
_________________ <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--> GO SEAHAWKS <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.