Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:35 am 
* NET Sports Handicapper *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am
Posts: 1408
Was just watching ESPN - Adam Schefter gave his ranking and we are #4. His comment: This is the team nobody wants to play against right now.

#1 - Denver
#2 - NE
#3 - Atlanta
#4 - Seattle

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:40 am 
[[ .NET Godfather ]]
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 7680
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Personally I think we should be #2.

_________________
Image

"We're about to be legendary." - Richard Sherman to the Seahawks sideline in the 3rd quarter of SBXLVIII


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:43 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 1847
power ranking are so freaking stupid,

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:43 am 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8883
Location: Covington, Washington
I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3, but as a division rival maybe I would not because it is what is expected.

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:48 am 
* NET Sage *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 4369
Second best in the NFC. I will take it.

_________________
February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:49 am 
* NET Sports Handicapper *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am
Posts: 1408
I'd put us at 3 - since DEN and ATL deserve #1 and #2. I don't think anyone in either league deserves #3 more than we would at this point.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:56 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:41 pm
Posts: 150
Aros wrote:
Personally I think we should be #2.

but we already are the *ish* Don Aros :th2thumbs:

_________________
Pinch me, I'm dreamin right?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:00 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1840
The AFC is weaker than the NFC. That alone should move up the 'Hawks. We have played a tough schedule as well


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 2539
the top 3 spots should be NFC teams, the AFC simply can not compete against the Best of the NFC this year.

my rankings,
1. Seattle
2. San Fran
3. Green Bay
4. New England
5. Denver
6. Atlanta


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:06 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 6190
My rankings.

1. Atlanta
2. Denver
3. Green Bay
4. Seattle
5. San Francisco
6. New England
7. Houston

How can anyone rank Atlanta low? Just because of a "feeling"? That team has been solid all year long winning close games.

_________________
SUPER BOWL 48 CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!!

RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 7863
Did he watch the Pats defense vs San Fran and Jacksonville?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:10 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1667
GoldenIsThyTate wrote:
power ranking are so freaking stupid,


So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 pm 
* Capt'n Dom *
* Capt'n Dom *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8836
Location: Granite Falls, WA
Okay so what bowl game does this ranking get us?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:19 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am
Posts: 2057
The Irrelevant Rankings Bowl.

_________________
Image

Go Hawks.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:23 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4631
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
MrCarey wrote:
GoldenIsThyTate wrote:
power ranking are so freaking stupid,


So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


Seems that folks here just love "bathing" in the good feelings that come from seeing their team ranked high.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:01 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 1443
drdiags wrote:
I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3, but as a division rival maybe I would not because it is what is expected.


You think just like the mediots doing the power rankings at ESPN. They still have the niners ahead of the Seahawks too. I don't know why though, Seattle has 5 quality wins compared to the niners 3 and has won just as many games as the niners.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:03 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 1443
Bigpumpkin wrote:
MrCarey wrote:
GoldenIsThyTate wrote:
power ranking are so freaking stupid,


So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


Seems that folks here just love "bathing" in the good feelings that come from seeing their team ranked high.


Now that we have a QB that ranks highly in QBR, it's a GREAT stat. But any stat that ranks Alex Smith as high as it does is still a questionable ranking system.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:11 pm 
* NET Curmudgeon *
* NET Curmudgeon *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 7225
Location: Eastern Washington
drdiags wrote:
I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3

Hey Doc, why would you have the Digits ranked ahead of us, after we just dismantled them?

_________________
49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:18 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 7863
#1 Denver
#2 Atlanta
#3 Green Bay
#4 Seattle

IMO


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:23 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8883
Location: Covington, Washington
BlueTalon wrote:
drdiags wrote:
I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3

Hey Doc, why would you have the Digits ranked ahead of us, after we just dismantled them?



Probably based on their entire season of work. They beat the Saints, Packers and Brady on the road. That carries weight in my mind. Upon further review it may not be a wise choice listening to the 9ers fans critique of their own team recent performances.

Bottom line, until I see the Seahawks dominating good teams on the road, I will have a skeptic sitting in the dark regions of my mind.

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schefter has us at #4
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:04 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 2362
Meh..we're peaking late, but had some stinkers on the road. We still haven't beat a good team on the road, so I'm looking at #4 as a good thing. Especially since all of the teams in that group have a better records. Those teams also took care of business in their division much better than we did.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.