Sherman just said he is very optimistic about his appeal...

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • HawkWow wrote:You're right, other than Stevens, we were a very respectable group (and still got hosed). I mean no disresepct here, but using such logic is like saying, I got hit by a Kam truck (lol) while walking on the sidewalk, so from now on, I might as well walk on the freeway.

    I just think it's better to not rile these aholes. As you suggest, they have it in for us already. BTW, I think the teary-eyed retirement of "the face of the NFL", Jerome Bettis, playing his final game in his home town, played a role against us in XL. I could be wrong.


    I was posting just as you were writing this, didn't see your post first, and all I could recall, storyline-wise from XL was the "win a title for the Bus" angle the media played. So two of us independently mention that as the dominant media storyline going into Super Bowl XL. ESPN's writeup of the game starts like this... "The Pittsburgh Steelers were the overwhelming sentimental Super Bowl XL favorites, both here and in Las Vegas, but for better than three quarters, the Seattle Seahawks had Pittsburgh engaged in a serious football game." The reason Seattle lost the game... lack of compelling storylines to counter the "Win one for the Bus" angle.

    OK, not the real reason Seattle *lost* the XL game, but the reason we got crappy reffing that contributed. The real reason for the XL loss was lack of depth in the defensive backfield, and the 3rd-string man-off-the-street Free Safety Etric Pruitt who got burned for the Steelers two big-play touchdowns, the Willie Parker run, and the Antwaan Randle-El pass for a TD. Yeah, both TDs, same dude burned. We got "Next man up" under Carroll, so that won't be happening. Second reason Seattle loses, Hass throws a bonehead pick in the Red Zone after the bogus holding penalty. We've got RW as our QB, and he would be very unlikely to make a play like that.

    But I digress. Sherman needs to keep talking and creating drama and interest, so the Seattle storylines are at least as interesting and compelling as their opponent's. The other smart thing the 'Hawks could do, if they make the Super Bowl, would be to find a way to independently trot out Holmgren, where he isn't under team employ, to talk about the biased and poor officiating in XL, and raise the storyline, "will Seattle get an even break from the officials in this Super Bowl." We found out in XL that the NFL has more in common with WWE than we thought. So let's have multiple interesting storylines.
    User avatar
    olyfan63
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 695
    Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am


  • This is what he actually said. Its on NBC Sports.com. When asked about his opinion on winning his appeal? Word for word.

    "I'm incredibly optimistic. They broke rules that you can't break. And ummm unless they just you know say they can break rules and you know suspend me than we should be fine."
    Last edited by SEC FAN on Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:13 am, edited 2 times in total.
    SEC FAN
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 332
    Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:39 pm


  • @&$! the league. The league is retarded.
    User avatar
    MrCarey
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1679
    Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm


  • olyfan63 wrote:
    HawkWow wrote:Sherman needs to keep talking and creating drama and interest, so the Seattle storylines are at least as interesting and compelling as their opponent's. The other smart thing the 'Hawks could do, if they make the Super Bowl, would be to find a way to independently trot out Holmgren, where he isn't under team employ, to talk about the biased and poor officiating in XL, and raise the storyline, "will Seattle get an even break from the officials in this Super Bowl."


    That is a fascinating idea. Just take it to 'em. Play the media game and play it so well the league has reason to drum us up the way they did Bettis. Only our storyline is the beginning of something big rather than the end of a career. Very clever.
    Image
    User avatar
    HawkAroundTheClock
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1552
    Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
    Location: Olympia


  • JSeahawks wrote:I cant believe Pehawk's too much of a puss to fly out to New Jersey. Someone take away his man card.


    J you ignorant slut :mrgreen: I'll be at McDonalds on St George Blvd at 6 am :lol: really couldn't help myself :D
    Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(
    User avatar
    grizbob
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 2334
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am
    Location: Born in Oakharbor, raised in the west, sentenced to life in St George


  • Seems like we'll hear one way or the other before noon today.
    _______________________
    Remember, it's all for fun.
    User avatar
    Hawkstorian
    * NET Staff *
     
    Posts: 2913
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
    Location: Spokane


  • Goodell is a loser.
    Image

    Pick the score, Seahawks edition - 1st Season
    http://seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=96154

    "Somehow a second year quarterback was more ready for this game, than a first ballot hall of famer!?"
    -DMac 104.3 Denver The Fan
    User avatar
    NFSeahawks628
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2335
    Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:33 pm
    Location: Born: Tacoma, WA Current Location: Augusta, GA (Road Hawk)


  • HawkWow wrote:
    Sherm is arguably my favorite player. Believe me, I want to be wrong, but aside from all of the "that's just him" commentary here, how would you explain, or rationalise his comment "the league can break rules but players can't"? (para-phrased). That is the 'in the heat of the moment, eurphoric from the win' comment that is the source of my uncertainty. How does that translate to..."I did nothing wrong"?


    Ok what he really said was "they might SAY they can break the rules and players can't and still suspend me, but I'm optimistic. They broke the rules...etc etc etc..."
    That might not be 100% exactly right but its way closer the tone than what you've been implying.
    User avatar
    Navyhawkfan187
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 605
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am


  • Any news on when is the most likely time we will hear the outcome of his appeal?
    Image Image
    User avatar
    AF_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2128
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
    Location: Marysville, WA


  • "face to face" is code word for bumping uglies
    User avatar
    Slick
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 619
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:52 am
    Location: Bellevue, WA


  • rastahawk wrote:The thing that worries me the most is that regardless of the arguments the league doesn't really care. Has any case involving banned substances ruled in favor of the defendant?


    Yes there was a player on the Bears whose suspension was overturned just this year.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2426
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • HawkAroundTheClock wrote:
    olyfan63 wrote:
    HawkWow wrote:Sherman needs to keep talking and creating drama and interest, so the Seattle storylines are at least as interesting and compelling as their opponent's. The other smart thing the 'Hawks could do, if they make the Super Bowl, would be to find a way to independently trot out Holmgren, where he isn't under team employ, to talk about the biased and poor officiating in XL, and raise the storyline, "will Seattle get an even break from the officials in this Super Bowl."


    That is a fascinating idea. Just take it to 'em. Play the media game and play it so well the league has reason to drum us up the way they did Bettis. Only our storyline is the beginning of something big rather than the end of a career. Very clever.


    Your comment got me started down this track, when you pointed out that we toed the line, nice boys with good manners for Super Bowl XL, and then we got JOBBED in the big game. If acting like nice boys and minding our manners just got us screwed before, as you pointed out, why do it again??!! From there, connecting some dots, the NFL is an ENTERTAINMENT *product*, it's all about money and ratings, etc., and then viewing the competition, "Reality" TV, it becomes apparent the formula for success there is creating drama and emotional engagement among the viewership. When Seattle makes the Super Bowl again, we need to make sure a major storyline is "will Seattle get an even break from the refs this time", "is the NFL an honest product or is it WWE in helmets", etc. Along with storylines of "Richard Sherman, wrongly-accused underdog hero, or cheating villain scum?" Quick, name 3 players from the Detroit Lions. Along with Megatron and Stafford, was Suh in the first 3? We will watch, hoping to see the villain get his comeuppance. The more emotionally compelling, interesting storylines associated with the Seahawks, the better the chances the NFL doesn't try to influence the game outcomes in the name of TV ratings and dollars. The "Can Seattle get an even break from the refs this time?" storyline, if we were able to get national media to push it a little, could also have the effect of embarrassing the NFL into ensuring the next Super Bowl game involving the Seahawks is officiated competently and fairly.

    Who knew it was the Sh--- er, Pittsburgh PR staff that was really responsible for their Super Bowl XL "victory" by getting the media hooked into the "Win a title for the Bus" storyline? By implication, the Seattle PR staff is partly responsible for allowing this to happen, an absence of compelling Seattle storylines (possibly influenced by Holmgren) that led to the refs subconsciously looking for ways to help the "sentimental favorite" win. So the Seahawks PR and media staff needs to set a tone that we will never allow a Super Bowl opponent to hijack the storyline again!! Always compete!! Even (especially?) in the team's PR and Media office!!
    User avatar
    olyfan63
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 695
    Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am


  • Yep. Clearly there's no evidence that anything is fixed, etc. etc., but I hear ya. It seems like most SB winners in recent memory have had a disproportionate amount of 'feel good' or attention-getting storylines leading up to the big game. Whether it's just a perception or not, the sports entertainment aspect you mention is undeniable. More viewers = more money, no way around that. So the more interesting our story, the more media attention, the better the ratings, and the better our chance of getting a fair shake. Sounds good.
    Image
    User avatar
    HawkAroundTheClock
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1552
    Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
    Location: Olympia


Previous


It is currently Mon Oct 20, 2014 3:49 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online