We're at least the 5th seed in the Playoffs!

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
  • Tim Booth ‏@ByTimBooth
    #Seahawks clinch at least No. 5 seed in NFC playoffs with 42-13 rout of #49ers


    Word!
    "The ultimate number is W's, and that’s what matters in Santa Clara. As such, Jed York does not own the 49ers; Russell Wilson does." - Paul Gutierrez
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 22274
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: Nirvana


  • Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?
    Annual Adopt a Rookie: Vannett
    User avatar
    OkieHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8539
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
    Location: Oklahoma City


  • OkieHawk wrote:Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?


    Good news everyone.. This is correct I believe..
    User avatar
    HOLLYWOOD
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 781
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:56 am
    Location: Closer than you think...


  • Cowboys or Redskins.

    I think we beat them both.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 21814
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:
    Tim Booth ‏@ByTimBooth 42-13 rout of #49ers


    Word!


    This is all that matters to me tonight. ROUT OF THE 49ers! I LOVE THIS TEAM!!!
    Image
    User avatar
    HawkAroundTheClock
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2282
    Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
    Location: Over There


  • OkieHawk wrote:Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?


    Packers would be the 2 seed. We need them to lose to the Vikings
    HawkRiderFan
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 441
    Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:10 pm


  • HOLLYWOOD wrote:
    OkieHawk wrote:Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?


    Good news everyone.. This is correct I believe..

    Aren't Packers 12-4 if they win next week?
    This summer so far.......
    Image

    Proud member of the 38 Club

    Proud member of the .Net Old Farts Society
    User avatar
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 19961
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


  • OkieHawk wrote:Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?


    GB needs to lose aswell
    "Whoever drafts Golden Tate is gonna win the Super Bowl" - Me
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2010
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm


  • hawksfansinceday1 wrote:
    HOLLYWOOD wrote:
    OkieHawk wrote:Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?


    Good news everyone.. This is correct I believe..

    Aren't Packers 12-4 if they win next week?


    I sit corrected.. :-)
    User avatar
    HOLLYWOOD
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 781
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:56 am
    Location: Closer than you think...


  • OkieHawk wrote:Now if only the Tards will cooperate next week and we don't succumb to a Lambs trap game then we would be #2 seed, no?


    If by trap game, you mean bear trap waiting for the Rams to step on, then sure. Mary and her little lamb are going to lose a leg.
    Super Bowl Champions XLVIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 17115
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR




It is currently Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:55 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information