We're better off as the #5 seed

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:52 am
  • We embarrassed the Packers once, we can do it twice. They proved after the game against us they aren't mentally stable enough to be able to play us again without spazzing out and falling into a complete spiral. Guarantee they'd cry to the media about it again too.
    ----
    ensett
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1522
    Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:57 am
  • ensett wrote:We embarrassed the Packers once, we can do it twice. They proved after the game against us they aren't mentally stable enough to be able to play us again without spazzing out and falling into a complete spiral. Guarantee they'd cry to the media about it again too.


    We embarrassed the Packers? I'd hardly call getting a gift TD on the last play of the game "embarrassing" somebody.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2757
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:03 am
  • Plus the packers are getting healthy, Clay Mathews is back, Greg Jennings is back, and Jordy will be back soon. Aaron Rodgers is probably the best QB in the league and it would take a miricle for the hawks to go into a disgruntled Green Bay and impose our will on them. I don't expect another 8 sack first half.

    I want to play the floundering Giants or Cowboys, or a RGIII vs RW #3 and let the amazing rookies decided who is better. I'd alos love to be the team to knock out the Niners to creat an even more bitter rivialry.

    ATL's homefield is nothing compared to the GB's
    Image
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2122
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:10 am
  • Sgt. Largent wrote:
    ensett wrote:We embarrassed the Packers once, we can do it twice. They proved after the game against us they aren't mentally stable enough to be able to play us again without spazzing out and falling into a complete spiral. Guarantee they'd cry to the media about it again too.


    We embarrassed the Packers? I'd hardly call getting a gift TD on the last play of the game "embarrassing" somebody.


    We sacked them 8 times and they were given gifts of their own, theres no "shouldnt have won" involved.
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8687
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:40 am
  • Right. Don't pretend a 50/50 call exaggerated by the media into the worst call of all time makes the rest of the game go away. The Packers didn't beat Seattle in an any sort of predictive sense. It was an even game and Seattle was a lot worse back then.
    formido
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 472
    Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm
    Location: Ventura, CA


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:47 am
  • I rather not have a bye.

    I just have a bad feeling with bye's because the team gets rusty. Rather be hot!

    Look what happened to the Packers last year, and us to Miami this year. Seems like a trend.
    TOUCHDOWN SEAHAWKS!!!
    User avatar
    Hawk-A-Loogie
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm
    Location: Washington


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:56 am
  • AbsolutNET wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:
    ensett wrote:We embarrassed the Packers once, we can do it twice. They proved after the game against us they aren't mentally stable enough to be able to play us again without spazzing out and falling into a complete spiral. Guarantee they'd cry to the media about it again too.


    We embarrassed the Packers? I'd hardly call getting a gift TD on the last play of the game "embarrassing" somebody.


    We sacked them 8 times and they were given gifts of their own, theres no "shouldnt have won" involved.


    I never said we shouldn't have won (although there's a solid argument for that). I said "embarrassed" is not a word I'd use. 58-0, that's embarrassed. 50-17, that's embarrassed. 14-12 with last second controversial TD? Not embarrassed.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2757
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:49 pm
  • AbsolutNET wrote:
    Sgt. Largent wrote:
    ensett wrote:We embarrassed the Packers once, we can do it twice. They proved after the game against us they aren't mentally stable enough to be able to play us again without spazzing out and falling into a complete spiral. Guarantee they'd cry to the media about it again too.


    We embarrassed the Packers? I'd hardly call getting a gift TD on the last play of the game "embarrassing" somebody.


    We sacked them 8 times and they were given gifts of their own, theres no "shouldnt have won" involved.


    None of those sacks in the 2nd half.
    User avatar
    PhillySeahawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 135
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:55 pm
    Location: New Jersey


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:54 pm
  • rideaducati wrote:
    PhillySeahawk wrote:Anything to avoid the Packers in Green Bay until the NFC Championship. Playing at the NFC East champ then at Atlanta doesn't scare me as much as playing in Green Bay.


    After Seattle beats the whiners, Green Bay will be the #2 seed.


    Exactly my point. Avoid Green Bay in the NFCC semis. Barring a #6 seed upset (Vikes/Giants/Cowboys/Redskins going into San Fran and beating them), the #5 seed avoids the Packers until the NFC Championship.

    Despite our publicized road woes, I think they're a thing of the past. I really like our chances at Washington/Dallas then at Atlanta. Green Bay in mid-January scares me. I think we matchup well (especially if Sherman is still playing) and absolutely can win, but now as confident as I am against any other NFC foe. The Russell Wilson coming back to Wisconsin angle is intriguing as well.
    User avatar
    PhillySeahawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 135
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:55 pm
    Location: New Jersey


Re: We're better off as the #5 seed
Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:00 pm
  • Sgt. Largent wrote:
    GoldenIsThyTate wrote:lets just make the playoffs, im still worried about that. could care less who we play it'll be a tall task either way


    All we have to do is win one of our two remaining home games.......one in which is against the Rams who will already have their golf clubs out and bags packed for Hawaii.

    If we lose the next two home games we don't deserve to go to the playoffs.


    Image

    If we make it in, we deserve it. That includes if we lose out and get help to get in, though that isn't a likely scenario.

    If we don't make it in, we don't deserve it.

    This isn't the BCS.
    User avatar
    MidwestHawker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1247
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
    Location: Indianapolis




It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:48 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information