Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:51 am
  • Just in case it hasn't been mentioned, C.J. Spiller is ridiculously fast. It seemed like there were multiple cases of a defender looking like he had a good angle on him, and then suddenly Spiller was past him.
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8499
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:03 am
  • This was an interesting game, and really an interesting day of football. It felt like the closest, nailbiting 50-point blowout I've ever watched. I think partially because of the 10 points the Bills put up, rather with ease, just before the half. Even though they were still down big, it felt like they could come back and close the gap quickly, forcing us to rely on an offense we're not used to being so potent to score big points again. Coupled with wins by the Packers and especially the 49ers, it felt a lot more like a Pyrrhic victory than it should have. It wasn't, but it felt like it. A lot.

    The 49er victory last night really took the sails out of next week's game. Yea, it's still a "win and we're in" scenario against a division foe, but it feels far less impactful knowing we're probably not playing for the outright division title. Sure, the Cardinals could pull out a victory the last week of the season, but it's not likely. And it's not even likely we'll win next week either. They're a pretty damned good team, and it'll be a real fight to win it. I just hope the 12th Man is as fired up about it as they could have been following a 49er loss.

    I think in part what scares me so much about that is this new Seahawks offense. They have looked unbelievable the past few weeks. Taken great strides forward. They look more like the Patriots than the Cardinals, as Kip said earlier here. And that's what's a bit scary. It's hard to believe that's the case, with a brand new, unexpectedly talented rookie quarterback at the helm. It's new territory for us. We haven't had that happen to us before, this drafting a superstar quarterback, and it takes a little getting used to. We keep waiting for the letdown, that previously inevitable feeling that we knew our great fortune just couldn't last.

    Still, it's been an incredible year - a year full of shoulda woulda coulda's. But that's exactly what year three should look like. I'm stoked for the future, and still cautiously optimistic for this postseason.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    Les Norton - gone but never forgotten. Rest in blue and green peace, my friend.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 19059
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:05 am
  • Yeah Spiller is a bawse. Too bad he's completely wasted in buffalo. Like a less atrocious version of a decade of wasting barry sanders in detroit.
    WAR BEAVER!!
    User avatar
    CANHawk
    * Gangnameister *
     
    Posts: 11668
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
    Location: PoCompton, BC Canada


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:07 am
  • kearly wrote:Seattle's offense is beginning to look almost unstoppable. Seattle's offense was already very good when it relied on Wilson as a passer, but the dual threat of Lynch-Wilson on read option just isn't fair to defenses. Wilson did not run much read option in college but like everything else he's picked it up quickly and his ability to execute a play has always been one of his biggest strengths. Seattle did not punt until there was a minute remaining before halftime, and by then Seattle had already amassed well over 300 yards of offense and 31 points.


    Overall the offense did OK, but the OL actually remains a liability. RW continues to be forced to run for his life every other play. First possession was a sack. Once they beef up that OL, 300+ yards passing would then be routine for RW. I have no problem with RW throwing on the run, but it hurts his game to be forced to do so so frequently. If we had a QB other than the elusive and quick-thinking RW, we'd be watching ugly sack-o-ramas.

    kearly wrote:It's also a bummer that Colin Kaepernick is growing up before our eyes and could make the NFC West extremely challenging for a decade to come. I never thought I'd say that a weekend with a 50-17 win would be a tough weekend, but yeah, it kind of was.


    If Seattle had offensive linemen like SF's, they would be putting up 400+ yards/game in the air. Seems to me that SF's line is so good just about any QB could notch a 90+ QB rating behind it.
    February 2, 2014: The day Seahawks win their second Lombardi trophy
    (The first one is located back east somewhere.)
    User avatar
    Ruminator
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 342
    Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:52 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:20 am
  • We can still get a home playoff game..
    quadsas
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 93
    Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 12:34 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:36 am
  • A few thoughts - Chicago was blowing out crappy teams early in the year... The offense is clicking but the Arizona score was a result of turnovers so I hope people don't look at the 108 points and say we have the most potent offense in the NFL....... We are definately miles ahead of where we were to start the season but personally I can't wait to go up against the 49ers to find out what we really have.

    49ers - I think I prefer the possible turnovers that comes with Kapernick starting over Alex Smith going over the middle again and again and again against us. I think with Kap we will see more possesions (faster scoring / faster to 3 and out / faster turnovers) compared to the slow moving the ball across the field scoring that we saw in the first game. I think the way this Seahawks team is right now that benefits us and I rather see 49ers take shots against our secondary than short slant routes. I also rather see RW with the ball in his hand more than 4 times in the second half.......

    49ers lost to Minnesota, Rams (1 1/2 times) and the Giants. They are going to put a rookie up against the Arizona defense that can be good. They will probably win the game because the 49ers offense will score 21pts on interceptions but if that somehow doesn't happen it is a game that the 49ers can loose. I put their chances at 70-30 in that game. I think it is very easy for them to be looking ahead to the playoffs.

    The division is still in play 2 weeks to go. This is a lot better than not even being in the playoff picture or relying on others to get into the playoffs.......
    2014 inagural .net Survivor pool CHAMPION
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3864
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:36 am
  • What's scary is, if we have a draft somewhere between 2011 and 2010 in success, think of how good the team will be.

    Hard to beat last year's just based on finding a franchise QB in the 3rd round. Add a starting potential Pro Bowl MLB, a starting caliber RB for a backup, and some good role players and secondary depth, and it was a good draft.

    If we added a dominant interior OLman and a dominant WR, we could truly be sick.
    Hawks46
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4114
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:06 am
  • cj spiller is a boss, I wanted the Seahawks to draft him. Thanks again kearly for the postgame writeup!
    User avatar
    largenutz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 884
    Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:56 pm
    Location: Denver, Colorado


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:53 am
  • Lamenting the importance of next weeks game because the 9ers had a great win is crazy! No one seriously thought this would start getting easier, did they?

    This upcoming game is still huge. I can't wait to not have my stream crash at a critical time.
    User avatar
    AVL
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 363
    Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 4:11 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:10 am
  • Ruminator wrote:
    kearly wrote:Seattle's offense is beginning to look almost unstoppable. Seattle's offense was already very good when it relied on Wilson as a passer, but the dual threat of Lynch-Wilson on read option just isn't fair to defenses. Wilson did not run much read option in college but like everything else he's picked it up quickly and his ability to execute a play has always been one of his biggest strengths. Seattle did not punt until there was a minute remaining before halftime, and by then Seattle had already amassed well over 300 yards of offense and 31 points.


    Overall the offense did OK, but the OL actually remains a liability. RW continues to be forced to run for his life every other play. First possession was a sack. Once they beef up that OL, 300+ yards passing would then be routine for RW. I have no problem with RW throwing on the run, but it hurts his game to be forced to do so so frequently. If we had a QB other than the elusive and quick-thinking RW, we'd be watching ugly sack-o-ramas.

    kearly wrote:It's also a bummer that Colin Kaepernick is growing up before our eyes and could make the NFC West extremely challenging for a decade to come. I never thought I'd say that a weekend with a 50-17 win would be a tough weekend, but yeah, it kind of was.


    If Seattle had offensive linemen like SF's, they would be putting up 400+ yards/game in the air. Seems to me that SF's line is so good just about any QB could notch a 90+ QB rating behind it.

    whoa! I thought I was hard on them. They aren't a liability. Are they perfect in pass pro? No, but they are getting better even with the guards rotating with Carpenter out. Outside of the Miami game they've been very good, sometimes even dominant in run blocking. Can they get some more talent, absolutely, and I would love the picks. However I have backed off dramatically on the need of drafting o line because their play has gotten better as time goes on.
    BAllenHawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 291
    Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 10:45 am
    Location: Tri-Cities, WA


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:14 pm
  • Ruminator wrote:Overall the offense did OK, but the OL actually remains a liability. RW continues to be forced to run for his life every other play. First possession was a sack. Once they beef up that OL, 300+ yards passing would then be routine for RW. I have no problem with RW throwing on the run, but it hurts his game to be forced to do so so frequently. If we had a QB other than the elusive and quick-thinking RW, we'd be watching ugly sack-o-ramas.


    Giving up a couple sacks on creative pass rush plays does not mean our line sucks. I agree with you that our skill players help make our line look better than it really is, but still, our line ranked 3rd in run blocking and 16th in pass protection before the Bills game. We have a good line, and I think it's time Seahawks fans start giving it the credit it deserves. Without their terrific run blocking, we wouldn't have the balance on offense which allows Russell Wilson to be such a fantastic difference maker.

    That's no knock on Wilson, but in college he had a HUGE boost his senior year when being paired with Wisconsin's line and Montee Ball. It's a very similar situation here in Seattle. Point guards at the QB position like Wilson are enablers and ball distributors. Some QBs are gloryhogs and other QBs are just facilitators who look great because they make their teammates play better. Wilson is the latter type, with the talent level of the former type. The threat of Lynch and our great run blocking has made Wilson deadly in read option, which has helped him out as a passer as well.

    Or to put it another way, Wilson's role on this type of offense is to open up the running game by forcing defenses to respect other threats. He's done an outstanding job of that. In the last two games, Seattle has 554 yards rushing, which is pretty mindblowing when you remember that Seattle took their starters out for about 3 quarters between those two games.

    We don't have an elite line, but for the offense we run, there are only a handful of lines in the league I would trade our line for (SF's being one of them). If we had the same line the 2010 team had, this offense would be a huge mess. Remember, that offense had Lynch too and couldn't run the ball to save it's life most games.

    Scottemojo wrote:And Kip, i wonder if you share a thought with me on this: I never expected the surgical feel of the offense in the last two games. I think we have had a glimpse of the future here in the last two weeks. There is going to come a time when Wilson has full control of the offense, the kind of control Brady has, and Seattle will have a top 5 offense. We aren't there yet, right now we are gutting bad teams, but I can see it now.


    I put a lot of stock into football outsiders numbers and they already see a top 5 offense in Seattle, and that's even when factoring the games earlier this season.

    I agree though, the execution on offense has taken it to a new level in the last two weeks. Almost Patriot like, if the Patriots were capable of rushing for 550+ yards over two games.

    mikeak wrote:A few thoughts - Chicago was blowing out crappy teams early in the year... The offense is clicking but the Arizona score was a result of turnovers so I hope people don't look at the 108 points and say we have the most potent offense in the NFL....... We are definately miles ahead of where we were to start the season but personally I can't wait to go up against the 49ers to find out what we really have.


    True, but Seattle averaged over 8 yards per play yesterday. That's insanely good. Their yards per play against Arizona was also very high.

    quadsas wrote:We can still get a home playoff game..


    I think the Lakers have a better shot at getting a top 4 seed at this point. We really needed the Patriots to win that game, because Arizona has about as good a chance to beat SF in week 17 as they did of beating Seattle last week when the Seahawks destroyed them 58-0. That reminds me, the Patriots went 1-3 vs. the NFC West this year and are currently 9-1 against everyone else. Go figure.
    Last edited by kearly on Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:36 pm, edited 3 times in total.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11570
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:28 pm
  • kearly wrote:
    -Pete Carroll scrambled to tell reporters after the game that his fake punt while nursing a 30 point lead was a case of forgetting to change a predetermined play. I trust Pete, but this strikes me as a little hard to believe. I played the game at two levels and I never really bought into the sportsmanship thing. These are grown, tough men. It's not something worth being offended by. That said, this was clearly poor sportsmanship if done intentionally. And I think I'd rather believe that Pete is a poor sport than a guy who doesn't even know what play his team is running. Either way, it's nothing worth caring about, although it will probably effect his image in the national media.


    I don't find it hard to believe at all. What Pete said was that it was part of the game plan, based on a certain look the Bills could give, and if they gave it, would automatically be the call.

    Remember when Sherman had his Sack? Not really a different thing ... The team was coached to do what they did if they saw a particular formation being lined up. The one difference being Sherman was taking his cue from camp, and the fake punt was part of something practiced in the week specifically for the Bills.
    Image
    User avatar
    madbohem
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 169
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:37 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:32 pm
  • Good observation madbohem.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11570
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:33 pm
  • For whatever reason, it's really hard for us to accept. We're all clamoring for reasons why the Hawks offense ISN'T elite. Maybe it’s because it’s a rookie QB, maybe because Pete's a defensive coach, maybe due to the opposition, but we need to come to grips with it.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 12274
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:39 pm
  • It's not hard for me to accept. I'm honestly 0% surprised by Wilson's success. If I could give a negative percentage I would, because I thought he'd be this good in week 1. I was the guy talking up our WR/TE group when everyone thought they sucked earlier this year. I was defending Bevell when he was getting bashed after every loss. I'm the guy talking up our O-line right now. I think it's time Seahawks fans trust their eyes and forget about past history. This is nothing like any Seahawks offense we've ever had before.
    Last edited by kearly on Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11570
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:43 pm
  • kearly wrote:It's not hard for me to accept. I'm honestly 0% surprised by Wilson's success. If I could give a negative percentage I would, because I thought he'd be this good in week 1. I was the guy talking up our WR/TE group when everyone thought they sucked earlier this year. I'm the guy talking up our O-line right now. I think it's time Seahawks fans trust their eyes and forget about past history. This is nothing like any Seahawks offense we've ever had before.


    I should've prefaced that statement with "sans Kearly". And agree, wholeheartedly with the above.

    You deserve ALOT of credit for being a respected blogger/writer AND letting your enthusiasm show. Most people in your sitation are too afraid of being wrong to show such enthusiasm. That's why I'm currently outside your window, blasting "In your eyes" via an I-Pod, wearing only a sock and a snug breathe-rite strip.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 12274
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 8:28 pm
  • HawkHack wrote:Our zone read options is killer right now. RW is so good at selling the thing he doesn't do. If you watch his college tape, you see the same thing.

    I hope it will last a few more games. One of the criticisms of a "fast" D is typically that they overpursue, and the Hawks have been guilty of that. Can we get SF's "fast" D to overpursue on the zone reads?

    I hope we keep Clemons. He's the most disruptive part of our D line.

    Finally, I love when the refs let teams play. The game is just so much better. Thanks, guys. No, seriously.


    did you catch Howie Long on the halftime show. talking about how his boys played against rw in high school, and he played exactly the same way.
    I don't know why I bother... no one cares what I think.
    zhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 542
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 7:35 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:36 pm
  • I may be misunderstanding it, but I think the fake punt is an on field decision based on what coverage the players saw. So while Pete says it's his fault, he'd probably have had to call a time out to stop it from being run.
    Help bring peace to the South LA / Puget Sound communities. Are you in?
    http://www.abetterla.org | http://www.abetterseattle.com
    User avatar
    sc85sis
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 5111
    Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:40 am
    Location: Southern CA


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:03 pm
  • i'm not even going to read anymore posts in this thread.
    Simply because putting up 50 points in a game for 2 games..
    We either have a good offense or a good defense.. but yet this thread seems littered with OK offense and bad defense..

    To me... its been the best season I can remember as a fan... and even if it ends tomorrow it was worth every single penny of my season tix all 4 of em
    --/*Seattle Seahawks*\--
    User avatar
    hawks4thewin
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 716
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:05 pm
  • pehawk wrote:
    kearly wrote:It's not hard for me to accept. I'm honestly 0% surprised by Wilson's success. If I could give a negative percentage I would, because I thought he'd be this good in week 1. I was the guy talking up our WR/TE group when everyone thought they sucked earlier this year. I'm the guy talking up our O-line right now. I think it's time Seahawks fans trust their eyes and forget about past history. This is nothing like any Seahawks offense we've ever had before.


    I should've prefaced that statement with "sans Kearly". And agree, wholeheartedly with the above.

    You deserve ALOT of credit for being a respected blogger/writer AND letting your enthusiasm show. Most people in your sitation are too afraid of being wrong to show such enthusiasm. That's why I'm currently outside your window, blasting "In your eyes" via an I-Pod, wearing only a sock and a snug breathe-rite strip.



    And I'm beside him eating a bagel.
    User avatar
    morgulon1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3672
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:07 am
    Location: Spokane, Wa


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bills game
Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:05 am
  • kearly wrote:The 49ers now only need to beat the lowly Cardinals, at home, to secure the division. That "delay of game" tie against the Rams will likely bite us in the ass after all.

    If the 49ers had lost that game and all results since then remain the same, we would be in the same position as we are now - needing two wins and the 49ers to lose to the Cardinals to win the division. The 49ers would've had the tiebreaker over us (assuming they beat Arizona week 17) so the tie was as good as a 49ers loss from the Hawks' perspective.
    jewhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 551
    Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:39 pm




It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:27 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information