 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
SEC FAN
|
Post subject: Power Rankings  Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:52 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 332
|
|
I'd first like to say is don't take these things very serious, they are just opinions. I read them weekly just for fun. Enjoy.
Fox Sports (Brian Billick)
8. Didn't move up. The 58 points the Seahawks scored was a franchise record ... oh, and they didn't allow any points either.
ESPN
10. Moved up 2. Sando picked us 7th. Anything's possible for the Seahawks, who could be the NFC's top seed -- or miss the playoffs entirely. (Sando)
USA Today
8. Moved up 4. Win-win. A 58-point victory vs. a division rival and some key players get a short day at the office.
CBS (Pete Prisco)
10. Moved up 2. They are surging. Are they the team nobody wants if they get to the playoffs?
NFL.com (Elliot Harrison)
7. Moved up 3. The Seattle Seahawks' defense just scored another touchdown. Come back later.
NBC Sports/PFT (Mike Florio)
7. Didn't move up. Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
sainthawk29
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:01 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:15 am
Posts: 321
|
|
Colin Cowherd has us ranked 3rd. San Fran 8th
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1390
|
Missed the Cowherd show but he put us 3rd.......... I like that one better 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sam1313
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:06 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 1629
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
sainthawk29 wrote: Colin Cowherd has us ranked 3rd. San Fran 8th Wow, gimme some Cowpuke love!
_________________
[RE Lynch's foot injury] He'll be fine. Better to rest him at this point. Pretty sure he has the playbook down.
"Get ball from Wilson, run over bitches".
Hasselbeck
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 1097
|
|
I saw that POS Graziano at ESPN had us 12th, with the Bears at 9. Usually I don't care about power rankings, but that guys needs to get punched.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am
Posts: 2083
|
Missing_Clink wrote: I saw that POS Graziano at ESPN had us 12th, with the Bears at 9. Usually I don't care about power rankings, but that guys needs to get punched. +1  Earlier in the season he defended his lower ranking of the Hawks because "they can't win on the road". How does the Hawks victory over the Bears AT SOLDIER FIELD not put us ahead of them in his petrified, pea-brained head.!!!!!! Also, the Hawks are on a roll... and the Bears are stumbling and about to be put out of their misery by the Packers next week. NEWSFLASH: the Chicago Bears don't make the Playoffs, just like last year.
_________________
"Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
652cHAWK
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:54 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:20 am
Posts: 762
|
Quote: Anything's possible for the Seahawks, who could be the NFC's top seed -- or miss the playoffs entirely. (Sando)
So true. I'll have a better opinion about this, after I see how our team does in Toronto this weekend. Hope we're getting our mojo on when it really matters. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
KitsapHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:57 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Posts: 457
Location: Behind you
|
_________________  
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 893
|
|
ESPN also has a funny shot on the Falcons, something along the lines of "Good to see the Falcons are in playoff form" after they lost. BURN!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve2222
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:09 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:12 am
Posts: 366
|
SEC FAN wrote: I'd first like to say is don't take these things very serious, they are just opinions. I read them weekly just for fun. Enjoy.
Fox Sports (Brian Billick)
8. Didn't move up. The 58 points the Seahawks scored was a franchise record ... oh, and they didn't allow any points either.
ESPN
10. Moved up 2. Sando picked us 7th. Anything's possible for the Seahawks, who could be the NFC's top seed -- or miss the playoffs entirely. (Sando)
USA Today
8. Moved up 4. Win-win. A 58-point victory vs. a division rival and some key players get a short day at the office.
CBS (Pete Prisco)
10. Moved up 2. They are surging. Are they the team nobody wants if they get to the playoffs?
NFL.com (Elliot Harrison)
7. Moved up 3. The Seattle Seahawks' defense just scored another touchdown. Come back later.
NBC Sports/PFT (Mike Florio)
7. Didn't move up. Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle. This last one confused me. Was he saying the 2005 team couldnt win big games on the road? We lost to Jacksonville, Washington, and GB (with our starters playing like a series). We beat Philly (destroyed them), Tennessee, and our division.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cartire
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:21 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 265
|
Steve2222 wrote: SEC FAN wrote: I'd first like to say is don't take these things very serious, they are just opinions. I read them weekly just for fun. Enjoy.
Fox Sports (Brian Billick)
8. Didn't move up. The 58 points the Seahawks scored was a franchise record ... oh, and they didn't allow any points either.
ESPN
10. Moved up 2. Sando picked us 7th. Anything's possible for the Seahawks, who could be the NFC's top seed -- or miss the playoffs entirely. (Sando)
USA Today
8. Moved up 4. Win-win. A 58-point victory vs. a division rival and some key players get a short day at the office.
CBS (Pete Prisco)
10. Moved up 2. They are surging. Are they the team nobody wants if they get to the playoffs?
NFL.com (Elliot Harrison)
7. Moved up 3. The Seattle Seahawks' defense just scored another touchdown. Come back later.
NBC Sports/PFT (Mike Florio)
7. Didn't move up. Unlike the 2005 team that made it to the Super Bowl, this team can win big games away from Seattle. This last one confused me. Was he saying the 2005 team couldnt win big games on the road? We lost to Jacksonville, Washington, and GB (with our starters playing like a series). We beat Philly (destroyed them), Tennessee, and our division. Yea, a bunch of guys were making comments on that page. we had a 5-3 road record in 2005. Made no sense at all what he said.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
entropyrulesall
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:24 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:00 pm
Posts: 172
Location: Federal Way, WA
|
|
Graziono discounts us in the power rankings due to GoldenGate. So according to his rankings we are 7-6. A$$hole
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeaWolv
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:13 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:31 am
Posts: 151
|
mikeak wrote: Missed the Cowherd show but he put us 3rd.......... I like that one better I heard that today. He kept asking who's better and saying they're a complete team.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ChrisB Bacon
|
Post subject: Re: Power Rankings Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:26 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:42 pm
Posts: 449
|
|
Really confused about Florio's comment. What? That makes absolutely no sense.
_________________
Follow me on Twitter: @ChrisB_Bacon
2012 Adopt-a-Rookie: Bobby "BigDogg" Wagner
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, AgentDib, arghawkfan, Big D, Blitzer88, bryantology79, cacksman, Cartire, CEHawk, CHawks4L, chihawk, CornerHawk, dbmack, Digsbone, Douze, Evil_Shenanigans, ferg82, FlyingGreg, geoff21, Geordie Hawk, Giedi, godzillarad, Google [Bot], grizbob, gtcotcakya, Hawks46, hawksfansinceday1, Jase, JimZorn10, Kixkahn, Largent80, Mandu, MANUNITED23, MichaelHawk70, misfit, onanygivensunday, PasteyNuTTeR, Pick6, PrepntheSep, RockHawk, RynoHawk, sainthawk29, seahawk17, Seattle_Stunna_MD, SharkHawk, Shock2k, SilNWest, smoothmaw, Terpdragon, thebanjodude, TheHawkster, themunn, volsunghawk, Zebulon Dak and 209 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
