 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game  Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:41 am |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7702
|
|
Scoring Defense - 15.5 pts/gm - #2 in the league behind only San Fran
Passing Defense - 196 yds/gm - Tied for #3 in the league with the Jets
Defense Interception - 14 - Tied for #10 in the league
Defensive Sacks - 32 - Tied for #10 in the league (with the 49ers)
Defensive Passing TD's - #1 in the league only giving up 12 on the season
Rushing Defense - 105.4 - #10 in the league
Defensive Rushing TD's - #6 in the league tied with Eagles and Giants
Defensive Forced Fumbles - Tied for #7 in the league
Turnover Ratio - #5 in the league at +8
I was pleasantly surprised with our Passing Defense being rated so high, with everyone complaining so much about it earlier in the season.
_________________ 
|
|
  |
|
|
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:06 am |
|
| * NET Injury Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
Posts: 1174
Location: Poulsbo, WA
|
|
Wins - 8 Tied for #9 in the league
_________________  The NFL need to start fining QB's that throw the ball across my middle... #DangerZone -Kam Chancellor
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:09 am |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7702
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: Wins - 8 Tied for #9 in the league Hahaha nice. - Touche' _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:10 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5689
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
49ers have 32 sacks, and Aldon Smith has like 20 of them!
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:11 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5689
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
Also, our point differential just skyrocketed. Winning 58-0 will do that!
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
formido
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:14 am |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 97
|
|
Heh. Turnover ratio basically all from the last game.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
twisted_steel2
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:15 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:41 am
Posts: 3714
Location: South End
|
|
Defense
#3 in NFL, yards/game
#2 in NFL, pts/game
Amazing.
Remember years ago when we'd dream of having a Top 10 defense?
_________________
You're the new Oakland Raiders; class-less and dirty (with trash-talking players, and an unapologetic head coach), no respect for the game, with a stadium filled with obnoxious/rude fans dressed up in corny Halloween costumes/flare. -49er fan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
formido
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:23 am |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 97
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: Wins - 8 Tied for #9 in the league I actually don't quite get your point. Are you not aware that it's long since been proven that other stats besides won/loss record are far better predictors of future success? Research shows that won/loss record is affected to a very significant degree by chance because of the small sample of games during the course of the season. For an obvious example this year, Russell Wilson had two QBR scores in the top 40 this year year where Seattle still lost the game. This almost never happens, but sometimes it does, due to bad luck. Or are you saying that despite clear evidence that the Seahawks are very, very good, the accident of the variance in our current won/loss record will cause us to miss an opportunity at the championship? This doesn't seem right either. Football Outsiders had our chances of making the playoffs at like 78%, I think, before this last win. It should be even higher now.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:28 am |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 14179
Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
formido wrote: IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: Wins - 8 Tied for #9 in the league I actually don't quite get your point. Are you not aware that it's long since been proven that other stats besides won/loss record are far better predictors of future success? Research shows that won/loss record is affected to a very significant degree by chance because of the small sample of games during the course of the season. For an obvious example this year, Russell Wilson had two QBR scores in the top 40 this year year where Seattle still lost the game. This almost never happens, but sometimes it does, due to bad luck. Or are you saying that despite clear evidence that the Seahawks are very, very good, the accident of the variance in our current won/loss record will cause us to miss an opportunity at the championship? This doesn't seem right either. Football Outsiders had our chances of making the playoffs at like 78%, I think, before this last win. It should be even higher now. I think the point was all the stats were listed but the one that keeps us in the hunt. Prior to fantasy football most of that stuff would have been ignored if even visible. _________________  Still missing you everyday pal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:39 am |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7702
|
|
The point of the original post was to show where we stand in raw stats. No more no less. Not trying to prove some formula shows us we are better than the raw stats say. Some of them surprised me a little, so I thought I'd share them. And, I disagree with Les, prior to Fantasy, ALL those stats were discussed and considered valuable. Frankly, none of those have anything to do with Fantasy Football.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:38 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4863
|
Nice work Jazz  _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:46 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 893
|
|
Nasty nasty D. Yesterday was an example (against a terrible team) of what happens when all 3 facets of our team plays well. 1st it was the D being stellar, then the O stepped up and the D had a few let downs, now (yesterday) we had everyone playing to their ability and we may have "broken the cardinal franchise", as someone said yesterday.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Twisted
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm
Posts: 1554
|
sturg78 wrote: Nasty nasty D. Yesterday was an example (against a terrible team) of what happens when all 3 facets of our team plays well. 1st it was the D being stellar, then the O stepped up and the D had a few let downs, now (yesterday) we had everyone playing to their ability and we may have "broken the cardinal franchise", as someone said yesterday. add a cup of luck to that recipe
_________________
GO HAWKS!!!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MrCarey
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1482
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:53 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4863
|
|
LOL! MrCarey that is hilarious!
_________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
oregonhawkfan
|
Post subject: Re: Some new raw stats after the Cardinals game Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:15 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 1636
|
|
OMG, that is effin hilarious. Laughing tears.
_________________
Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI
Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the best NFL secondary also known as the "Legion of Boom"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, BamaHawk, bellingerga, Bill Assumpcao, bloodkingg, brettb3, ccla, CEHawk, Clayfighter, coorslighthawk, cvcahawk, dbmack, Digsbone, Filydan, freakshow, Frostbyte, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawkAroundTheClock, hawker84, hawkfan333, HawkFan72, Hawknballs, HawksSoc, HoustonHawk82, IcedHawk, JKent82, KentuckyHawk, LymonHawk, LyndseyG, McGruff, Missing_Clink, Mistashoesta, Morpheus08, nsport, onanygivensunday, PrepntheSep, quadsas, rickychen, rj503, sainthawk29, Sarlacc83, SeahawksFanForever, Seahwkgal, Seaswab, Shaz, slipwax, smoothmaw, Speakinhawk68, SPRC, T-Sizzle, TDBinOLY, the ditch, The Outfield, Treefiddy, TriCHawk, TwistedHusky, Uppercase, vin.couve12, volsunghawk, WestcoastSteve, XxxZagnutxxX and 159 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
