Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:15 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4664
Location: The 5-0
razgriz737 wrote:
If anyone's curious, it was announced that Docket was fined 200k for the spitting incident. 200k.


Excellent. It's time these big dollar imbeciles actually feel the pang of a fine. Fining a multi-millionaire $5,000 for such transgressions don't send much of a message.

I really wanted Dockett coming out of FSU. He played with an attitude but wasn't known to be a spitter at the time. But we were already set forever, having used our 1st on Marcus Tubbs earlier in the day.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:39 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 1439
I hope they don't fire Whiz before the game this week. They're setting themselves up for better draft position by "letting" teams score. Maybe this week they'll punt on first down. What a train wreck.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:00 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:52 pm
Posts: 249
Wow. $200,000 is the biggest NFL player fine I've ever heard for a single incident. Tsk tsk, his disagreement must have been of the vehement kind.

_________________
February 2, 2014: The day Seahawks win their second Lombardi trophy
(The first one is located back east somewhere.)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:33 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 548
wow 200k seems like a bit much even for something disgusting like spitting, totally unrelated but Patriots were fined 500k for Bountygate.
I really hope this puts a strain on their relationship and leads the team to trading to a team in the AFC.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:04 am 
* Capt'n Dom *
* Capt'n Dom *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8820
Location: Granite Falls, WA
drdiags wrote:
Hearing more details, it was stated that Ray Horton had told the defense to let the Jets score so the Cardinals could get one last chance to score and with a 2 pt conversion, tie the game. Dockett refused to do it and after the play had an on-field argument with Rhodes. So the penalty is for insubordination. Failing to follow the directions of the coach, which makes more sense than the original spitting on Rhodes issue being the reason the Cardinals put a 6 figure fine on him.

Quote:
Kent Somers ‏@kentsomers
Docketts fined more than 100k. Refused to folol whiz order to let jets score. Picked tiff with Rhodes. May see mor punishment sunday


"folol" probably means "follow"

i dont blame him really. I would have a hard time lettng the Jets score as well. It is a matter of pride. Plus it was highly unlikely that the Cards offense was going to rally and win the game with the way they have been performing.

I am with Docket on this one.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:13 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10041
How would you like to be Ryan Lindley in the same locker room with Dockett this week?

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:18 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 548
Scottemojo wrote:
How would you like to be Ryan Lindley in the same locker room with Dockett this week?

lol It can't be any worse than playing behind that offensive line


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:21 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4509
Location: UT
In other words, we should suspend him, but we don't have the stones.

_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.