Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:13 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:13 pm
Posts: 1736
The above list omits the name of S- Winston Guy, Seahawks who was also suspended for adderall.

_________________
Until we develop a pass rush that will cause opposing teams to be forced to scheme to defend it we will never be able to completely take the final step. Until the OLine is strengthened the team will remain weak.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:13 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2471
Sherman needs to pick one of those lame excuses, and stick with it......cause the two excuses combined don't work. You can't say I drank out of a teammates drink, then at the same time say the testing system is flawed.

Either way, neither excuse will hold any water I don't think. Unless Sherman and his agent provide evidence that indeed the testing system is flawed.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:20 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1401
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
jammerhawk wrote:
The above list omits the name of S- Winston Guy, Seahawks who was also suspended for adderall.

I THINK it's because he was suspended by the team and not the league, but I'm not sure.

_________________
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:
Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:25 pm 
* NET E-Knight *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
razgriz737 wrote:
jammerhawk wrote:
The above list omits the name of S- Winston Guy, Seahawks who was also suspended for adderall.

I THINK it's because he was suspended by the team and not the league, but I'm not sure.


Why would the team suspend him? Also, Moffit and Barbre were suspended. Seattle has 5 players suspended for PED in just over a year, if that isn't the league high I would be surprised.

_________________
cboom wrote:
Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:33 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1401
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
HawksFTW wrote:
razgriz737 wrote:
jammerhawk wrote:
The above list omits the name of S- Winston Guy, Seahawks who was also suspended for adderall.

I THINK it's because he was suspended by the team and not the league, but I'm not sure.


Why would the team suspend him? Also, Moffit and Barbre were suspended. Seattle has 5 players suspended for PED in just over a year, if that isn't the league high I would be surprised.

I don't know, that's just what I thought I read somewhere. That's why I said I'm not sure.

_________________
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:
Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:18 pm 
* NET Shrink *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:04 pm
Posts: 1551
Location: Seattle, WA
Cartire wrote:
I have a serious question. Why is Adderal considered a PED? Why is it even tested for? Why does it matter to anyone if the player takes adderal?


ah, cuz it's a stimulant?


i find it funny how all these cornerbacks are testing positive for adderall


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:53 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: The 5-0
With Sherman's personality, I was hopeful he had been on the stuff for years, and that would be the basis for his (winning) appeal. Now? Pretty clear he's going down. Drinking from another player's water bottle? C'mon bro. Grade schoolers fabricate better excuses. I agree with the previous posters requesting he start his suspension immediately. One poster chimed in that we may not make the POs without he and Browner, but it really don't matter one way or the other. I'll take our chances of winning our home games without them. Even should we lose in Toronto, we still may make the POs and they will then be available (a scenario where we will most likely be on the road and their presense will be crucial).


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 812
Location: Canby, OR
If he can get Russell Wilson to represent him, maybe he wins. Russell will wave his hand and all this will go away. I'm a believer...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:56 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:51 pm
Posts: 1883
razgriz737 wrote:
HawkFan72 wrote:
razgriz737 wrote:
I don't buy this. There are more players being accused of violating the drug policy than just BB and Sherm, and some are on "money teams". Here's the list so far:

Andre Brown - Giants RB (suspension overturned)
Brandon Browner - Seahawks CB
Jermaine Cunningham - Patriots DE
Joe Haden - Browns CB
Joe Hawley - Falcons C
Will Hill - Giants S
Tyler Sash - Giants S
Richard Sherman - Seahawks CB
Aqib Talib - Patriots CB
Eric Wright - Bucanneers CB


Notice how many are DBs...

That is odd.

Maybe because the drug is mainly used to help keep focus? Or at least that's what I hear. Who would benefit from it most in that respect?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:30 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:06 am
Posts: 242
This is all gamesmanship, folks... the Seahawks are simply trying to avoid playing four games without both Sherman and Browner. Browner is serving his suspension now in order to be back for the first game of the playoffs. Sherman made a B.S. appeal that he knows will get rejected just to buy some time, play in a few games now, and come back if we go deep in the playoffs. The problem is that it's looking like both Sherman and Browner will be missing for the home game against SF. They'd be missing that game anyway if they had both took their 4-game suspensions immediately or this week, but both (instead of just Browner) would be back for the playoffs. Why didn't they just do that?

Anybody else thinking the same thing?

_________________
:49ersmall:


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:11 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 605
Why are people still talking about the "water bottle" thing that was debunked? It aggravates me when people refuse to actually read something before commenting.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PFT: Sherman has two arguments for his PED appeal
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:51 am 
* NET Cynic *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 3512
Location: St. Louis, MO
Navyhawkfan187 wrote:
Why are people still talking about the "water bottle" thing that was debunked? It aggravates me when people refuse to actually read something before commenting.

I believe it was debunked and then re-confirmed.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.