| Author |
Message |
|
FargoHawk
|
Post subject: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?  Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:02 am
Posts: 638
|
Sorry as I am posting this from my phone but I just read that Dockett was fined six figures from the Cards and is expected to have a limited role this weekend. https://twitter.com/mikejurecki/status/ ... 5021441024Quote: Mike Jurecki
@mikejurecki
I’m hearing that Darnell Dockett has been fined six figures from the Cardinals organization, & could have a limited role vs. Seattle.
via Adam Caplan
| Last edited by AbsolutNET on Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:01 pm, edited 3 times in total. |
| Link added |
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:39 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3523
|
FargoHawk wrote: Sorry as I am posting this from my phone but I just read that Dockett was fined six figures from the Cards and is expected to have a limited role this weekend.
Definitely helps our oline! I bet this stems from the spitting incident he had with Rhodes. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:46 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6316
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
Guy is a major league a-hole. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. Damned good player though. Hope for our team's sake he doesn't even see the field.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seaswab
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:48 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Posts: 426
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahwkgal
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:49 pm |
|
| * NET Hottie * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 1304
|
|
He spit on his own team mate?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am
Posts: 2074
|
Seahwkgal wrote: He spit on his own team mate? That was the original report, which has since been retracted. Link to story... http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ry-rhodes/
_________________
"Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
Last edited by onanygivensunday on Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 6394
|
|
He's a classic douche... but man our defense truly would be 'elite' with him playing in the middle. We need a guy like Dockett.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:02 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6316
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: He's a classic douche... but man our defense truly would be 'elite' with him playing in the middle. We need a guy like Dockett. Yep. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1826
|
|
Suh and Dockett
_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 876
|
onanygivensunday wrote: That was the original report, which has since been retracted. How can the Cardinals retract it, then fine Dockett? "Nothing to see here people! Dude you're fined!" My guess is "limited role" = sits out the first couple of series, then comes on and creates havok with our O-line like he always does.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Shadowhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 620
|
|
Dockets himself never denied it when he had the chance and I doubt they would fine him $100,000 or more if he hadn't done something like that.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7698
|
|
I don't actually believe the 'limited role' part until I don't see him on the field.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:48 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 6563
Location: Covington, Washington
|
Hearing more details, it was stated that Ray Horton had told the defense to let the Jets score so the Cardinals could get one last chance to score and with a 2 pt conversion, tie the game. Dockett refused to do it and after the play had an on-field argument with Rhodes. So the penalty is for insubordination. Failing to follow the directions of the coach, which makes more sense than the original spitting on Rhodes issue being the reason the Cardinals put a 6 figure fine on him. Quote: Kent Somers @kentsomers
Docketts fined more than 100k. Refused to folol whiz order to let jets score. Picked tiff with Rhodes. May see mor punishment sunday
"folol" probably means "follow" _________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:59 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 160
|
|
He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6316
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
Carmon1274 wrote: He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D. If you're referring to the posts above, Rob (English) said "a guy LIKE Dockett" and I agreed. As in the quality of his play and the need for a really studly DT on the Hawks, not who he is as a person. So um.......we good here dude? Oh, and please read the ENTIRE post people make. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:46 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1390
|
|
If he was told by a coach to let them score and refused to do it he may actually sit. I mean seriously this was a 1pt game and that would be the only way to win the game and he cost them that opportunity....
This is a coaching staff that may get fired. I am sure they are PISSED and so they should be
On the other hand - they are a coaching staff about to get fired give it one series and then they will be concerned about their jobs and play him....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 982
Location: The 5-0
|
|
If someone sees Dockett this week, please kick him in the nuts and tell him Darnell sounds like a girl's name. For your safety, tell him it's from me. If he still wants to make a big deal out of it, click your heels together while saying RussellWilson. Do so until he leaves.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Carmon1274
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:46 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 160
|
hawksfansinceday1 wrote: Carmon1274 wrote: He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D. If you're referring to the posts above, Rob (English) said "a guy LIKE Dockett" and I agreed. As in the quality of his play and the need for a really studly DT on the Hawks, not who he is as a person. So um.......we good here dude? Oh, and please read the ENTIRE post people make.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 666
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
If anyone's curious, it was announced that Docket was fined 200k for the spitting incident. 200k.
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
| |
|
|
|
warden
|
Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role? Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:52 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1392
|
|
I would welcome Dockett on the Seahawks in a heartbeat but he isn't going anywhere. Chances are the Cardinals coaching staff and higher management are the ones who will be leaving Arizona
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: AKSeahawker, baumer64, Beeker, Bigpumpkin, BirdsCommaAngry, CEHawk, ChrisB Bacon, Cirmman, deucediggity, fenderbender123, FlyingGreg, freakshow, garrylt4, Google [Bot], hawksincebirth, hgwellz12, hwkfan4life, jdblack, lacenterhawk, Landhawk1, largenutz, Leep, Maelstrom787, mgschwa, nsport, Pandion Haliaetus, RussellMania, sainthawk29, salukihawk12, silverjoel, smashmouth59, SmokinHawk, smoothmaw, SPRC, Terpdragon, TheHawkster, Tivopaul, tooshort, Uberman, xtm059 and 139 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
