 |
| Author |
Message |
|
BobcatHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:58 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:02 am Posts: 230 Location: Evanston, WY
|
|
I know it's not part of the scenario, but I would take Hass as the third string as long as we had a legit second string. That way, you have the experience factor for Wilson's development and Matt would have (having agreed to the role when signing the contract) no thought of taking over the starting role and complete focus on developing Russell. Just my two cents.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7332
|
Hasselbeck wrote: Just spit-balling here, this has no rumor behind it or anything.. but say the Seahawks move Flynn to the Jets or something for a pick and the Titans cut ties with Hasselbeck.
Would you welcome Hass back to be the vet backup behind Wilson? It would give us a solid guy to have just in case something happened to Wilson, while at the same time allow Hass to retire as a Seahawk.
Thoughts? I will answer your question with more questions. Do you want Hass to retire as a Hawk for sentimental reasons, or do you really think he both fits the offense and gives us a good chance to win if Russell gets hurt? Do you think there is much chance this front office would want Hass?
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6395
|
razgriz737 wrote: I didn't mean Hass was the only option, I'm just legitimately curious. A lot of the posters who said "no" said they would rather have Flynn, but the question specifically said Flynn is not an option. To be honest, I couldn't even tell you who's available. It just seems like as a fanbase, we don't know when to let go. Half the board were desperate to get Holmgren back when Ruskell got fired. Now we're discussing whether we'd like Matt Hasselbeck to come back aged 38 to be a backup and mentor for Russell Wilson - who hasn't needed a mentor or a big name backup for that matter so far. I'd rather just remember that team... Hass, SA, Big Walt, Holmy etc... for the era they created and that one great year that got this team to the big game. We've moved on now. Different era. Whoever backs up Wilson... he just needs to look good holding a clipboard.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:06 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9996 Location: King In The North
|
|
Hass has an 83 rating, a 62% completion percentage and more TD's than INT's this season. He's still plenty good enough to be a reliable back up for 1 more season.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
decaff907
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:12 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:45 pm Posts: 169 Location: Sunnyvale, CA
|
|
I'd love to see Matt Hasselbeck back in Seahawk blue. However, and I'm sure I"ll be bashed for this, but I'd be completely in favor of bringing Mike Vick in to back up Russell next year if we do indeed get rid of Flynn. In fact, I think he's a better fit in our offense than either Flynn or Hass. Just throwing it out there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6395
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Hass has an 83 rating, a 62% completion percentage and more TD's than INT's this season. He's still plenty good enough to be a reliable back up for 1 more season. We're also running zone read in Seattle, tons of bootleg and play action, run option. I'm guessing that's here to stay. We're taking shots downfield. We're not running a timing, short passing system. Would it not make sense to concentrate on signing a backup who can keep the offense as it is should Wilson pick up an injury?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm Posts: 2715
|
|
What would be the advantage of having a 38 year old player be our backup besides the nostalgia factor?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 680 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
decaff907 wrote: I'd love to see Matt Hasselbeck back in Seahawk blue. However, and I'm sure I"ll be bashed for this, but I'd be completely in favor of bringing Mike Vick in to back up Russell next year if we do indeed get rid of Flynn. In fact, I think he's a better fit in our offense than either Flynn or Hass. Just throwing it out there. I actually kinda agree, but I think he'd demand way too much money.
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:18 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9996 Location: King In The North
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Hass has an 83 rating, a 62% completion percentage and more TD's than INT's this season. He's still plenty good enough to be a reliable back up for 1 more season. We're also running zone read in Seattle, tons of bootleg and play action, run option. I'm guessing that's here to stay. We're taking shots downfield. We're not running a timing, short passing system. Would it not make sense to concentrate on signing a backup who can keep the offense as it is should Wilson pick up an injury? It would absolutely make sense. It would make perfect sense.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:19 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6640
|
decaff907 wrote: I'd love to see Matt Hasselbeck back in Seahawk blue. However, and I'm sure I"ll be bashed for this, but I'd be completely in favor of bringing Mike Vick in to back up Russell next year if we do indeed get rid of Flynn. In fact, I think he's a better fit in our offense than either Flynn or Hass. Just throwing it out there. Me too. But as a NFL fan I want to see Vick start one last time. Love watching him play too much when he's on. Here's to the 2013 Bills being lead by Vick!
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kobebryant
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:45 pm Posts: 872
|
|
I love Hass but his time has come and gone, he will be 38 and isn't very good anymore. Doesn't fit this offense at all. He casts a pretty big shadow here. I'm not into sentiment, I'm into winning football.
I see no reason not to roll with Flynn again, he has proven to be one of the best backups in the league. Between him and Russ we're still paying below average on the QB position.
Hypothetically, I'll play: if no Flynn, Tjack if available. Warrior and highly respected in the locker room, can win games with this team, knows the offense and could learn/operate the read option.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:24 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6640
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Hass has an 83 rating, a 62% completion percentage and more TD's than INT's this season. He's still plenty good enough to be a reliable back up for 1 more season. We're also running zone read in Seattle, tons of bootleg and play action, run option. I'm guessing that's here to stay. We're taking shots downfield. We're not running a timing, short passing system. Would it not make sense to concentrate on signing a backup who can keep the offense as it is should Wilson pick up an injury? Not saying I want him, but, I never agreed with Hass being a short-route, timing QB. He did very well using his IQ to throw open long routes to Britt and Wright. We'll never know for sure, but I think the WCO eventually prohibited his strength, his football IQ. Thats a total, "IMO".
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:26 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9996 Location: King In The North
|
|
Chances this team is going to bring back a QB that they've cut ties with in the past: slim to none.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9996 Location: King In The North
|
pehawk wrote: theENGLISHseahawk wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Hass has an 83 rating, a 62% completion percentage and more TD's than INT's this season. He's still plenty good enough to be a reliable back up for 1 more season. We're also running zone read in Seattle, tons of bootleg and play action, run option. I'm guessing that's here to stay. We're taking shots downfield. We're not running a timing, short passing system. Would it not make sense to concentrate on signing a backup who can keep the offense as it is should Wilson pick up an injury? Not saying I want him, but, I never agreed with Hass being a short-route, timing QB. He did very well using his IQ to throw open long routes to Britt and Wright. We'll never know for sure, but I think the WCO eventually prohibited his strength, his football IQ. Thats a total, "IMO". The offense we're running now is a lot like the one I'd always wanted to see Hass play in. As much as Holmgren helped Hass turn into the player he was, I also think he held him back. Just my opinion, obviously, and I'm an idiot.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 680 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
It will be interesting to see what happens in the next few seasons. I honestly don't think we keep Flynn for too long.
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
Last edited by razgriz737 on Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:36 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am Posts: 6897 Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
All you guys that want Hass remind me of Mariner fans.
Let's sign Joey Cora cause we liked him too.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: The offense we're running now is a lot like the one I'd always wanted to see Hass play in. As much as Holmgren helped Hass turn into the player he was, I also think he held him back. Just my opinion, obviously, and I'm an idiot. I agree with all of your points, except the ones you made in your first two sentences. 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:39 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9996 Location: King In The North
|
Tech Worlds wrote: All you guys that want Hass remind me of Mariner fans.
Let's sign Joey Cora cause we liked him too. Is Joey Cora still playing? Can he still hit?
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:40 pm |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm Posts: 14179 Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
I have to admit to laughing a lot at the thought of Flynn "demanding" a trade. pffft! He's under contract, what's he going to do not play? He's here to stay for at least the length of his contract cause his time has about come and gone too. You think other coaches will now think Pete has no clue about QBs and will take Flynn? And Matty? I truly think he will retire at the end of this season anyway. He got his pay day, sign with the Hawks for a day and retire a Seahawk cause everyone knows him as that. Either get into broadcasting or coaching, or just go to his home in Chelan and enjoy the good life he's earned. I think he's smart enough to know that. 
_________________  Still missing you everyday pal.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Would you accept Matt Hasselbeck in 2013 as Wilson's backup? Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 680 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Tech Worlds wrote: All you guys that want Hass remind me of Mariner fans.
Let's sign Joey Cora cause we liked him too. Is Joey Cora still playing? Can he still hit? Cora for Backup QB?
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 12thMan1, Anguish, Attyla the Hawk, Bill Assumpcao, BoatsAndHose, Chukarhawk, cvcahawk, dbmack, drdiags, FidelisHawk, FlyingGreg, gargantual, Google [Bot], hai, hawker232, HawkFan72, jdblack, JimZorn10, JonRud, loafoftatupu, Lynch Mob, MaverickHawk, Missing_Clink, nsport, oldhawkfan, PrepntheSep, razgriz737, rightbench, RolandDeschain, SeahawksFanForever, the ditch, the_12th_man, TheHawkster, Thepeelsessions, TJH, tooshort, TwistedHusky, Veilside, volsunghawk and 173 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|