Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:11 am
  • [quote="kearly"
    -Something about getting screwed by the refs makes you want to win a game even more, and even before then this was like a playoff game for Seattle. So yeah, this game was very emotional. It was probably the most emotional game I've experienced in the regular season since the Giants game in 2005. What a great win.[/quote]


    Yea, I almost forgot who we were playing, the Bears or the Refs, almost like a Superbowl repeat I watched some time ago. :sarcasm_off:
    Image
    Beer, Football, Family=A wonderful life.
    Hawknight
    * Class Act Hawk Fan *
     
    Posts: 989
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:38 pm
    Location: Hayward, California


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:16 am
  • therealjohncarlson wrote:
    I know the view and what they were saying but I just wasn't seeing it. I wasn't trying to be biased either, just as a football fan I did not see anything but a catch.


    As long as the receiver has possession of the ball, it can touch the ground. The receiver can't use the ground to 'make the catch', though.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15026
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:27 am
  • Great write up as always. I believe the rule to be that a 15 yard penalty only overrides a 5 yard penalty. It offsets a 10 yard penalty. They call it the 5/15 rule.
    User avatar
    MOCHawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 103
    Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:33 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:13 am
  • therealjohncarlson wrote:
    Aros wrote:Good stuff per usual kearly. I politely disagree with you about the Edwards TD overturn call. I watched that play from every angle they gave us and I simply could not see any evidence to overturn the call. His hands were under the ball when it arrived and had control the whole time. If the ball moved around a bit, it's moot as his hands were still between the ball and the grass. However, regardless, I agree they did not have enough clear evidence to overturn the call yet they did any way. The officiating today hasn't been this blatantly one-sided since SBXL*.

    How fun is it going to be to get to root on Russell Wilson for the next several years? Holy cow I'm positively glowing.


    There was a front angle view that pretty clearly showed the front nose of the ball on the ground between his hands.


    The ball CAN touch the ground as long as he maintains possession. It's the Burt Emmauel rule that came from the Tampa Bay losing the the Rams in the NFC championship game in 1999. He had his hands under the ball.

    Frankly I agree that it probably should have been an incomplete. However, the initial call was TD and I don't think was indisputable evidence that he didn't maintain possession of the ball. From everything I saw he had his hands under it the entire time and controled dispite the nose touching the ground.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2409
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:16 am
  • Kearly, Chicago's 40% on 4th downs is misleading because surely all of their 4th down attempts haven't been 4th and inches. Their odds of making it on that play had to be a decent bit better than 40%.
    User avatar
    MidwestHawker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1265
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
    Location: Indianapolis


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:23 pm
  • kearly wrote:Just after Brandon Marshall somehow hauled in that unbelievable 56 yard completion near the end of regulation, my dad turned to me and said "well, if Seattle misses the playoffs, this is the play we'll look back on." Of course, Seattle could look back at a lot of plays this season (I'll spare you the recap) and wonder. He was right though. As tough as the Stafford comeback was, as tough as the endings in Arizona and Miami were, what Chicago did in the final 20 seconds of regulation was essentially unprecedented. The NFL was stunned when Atlanta pulled a similar play to beat Carolina, but that drive began with 45 seconds on the clock. Chicago had just 20.


    If I'm dissecting the game film and looking for concerns, Brandon Marshall's production yesterday would be right near the top of my list. Do you realize that Chicago's receiving corps as a whole had 17 catches ... and Marshall had 10 of those. Essentially, he WAS Chicago's passing offense (exactly as I had said in the Preview thread). To me, that is highly concerning and Jerry Brewer was right on the money to throw out the whole PED question today. I figured with Trufant's absence it would be addition by subtraction -- but that wasn't the case. Trufant according to Stats Inc had a burn rate of 72.4% -- the 2nd Worst starting 3rd CB in all the league. To me, I'm starting to think long and hard about the need to draft another nickel CB (especially given the impending suspensions).

    kearly wrote:And if Seattle had lost in overtime, that's all we'd be talking about. It was the perfect exclamation point on a growing theme in recent weeks: that Seattle's defense is more of a cause for concern than the offense is. Jay Cutler is one of the most sacked QBs in the NFL. He was not sacked today and was barely touched. The secondary again played too much zone defense and allowed Brandon Marshall to embarrass them on numerous occasions.


    How the heck Cutler's jersey remained clean is absolutely beyond me. That was a very patchwork offensive line that came in to yesterday's contest having given up 35 Sacks (3rd Worst in the NFL) ... and 67 hits on the QB (5th worst). YET, Seattle's defense couldn't touch him for the most part. With Red Bryant's plantar fasciitis and the D Line's performance yesterday, I'm thinking Defensive Line is increasingly becoming a top priority moving in to this year's NFL Draft.

    kearly wrote:But even saying that, if Seattle had lost- I would have pulled the "officiating sucked" card. Some people wouldn't want to hear it- after all Seattle's defense did almost everything they could to lose this game. I don't like blaming the officials, in fact I go out of my way to point them out when they have a solid outing. But today was just awful. Not just awful, but one sided, with all the terrible calls going against Seattle and often at critical times.


    Hard to disagree with any of the bad calls that you mentioned. They were unbelievably bad IMO. I know refs are supposed to be neutral, but most of those really smacked of homer calls to me.

    kearly wrote:Today Seattle faced a great defense with a good QB and a great WR. They faced a team with an 8-3 record that is in contention for a bye. This game was on the road at 10am. And during this game the defense played poorly and the NFL went to WWE referees. Yet despite all those things, Seattle still somehow won the game, for one reason and one reason only.

    Russell Wilson.


    I've made no bones about it -- he willed them to a victory yesterday. It's like he was saying, "We are NOT going down today!" And he took responsibility to win that game completely on his shoulders. He has come of age. If I could pick Colbert's Alpha Dog of the Week, it would be Wilson -- 2 game winning games against what was arguably the NFL's best defense IN CHICAGO -- are you kidding me?!? Future Super Bowl winning QB -- absolutely I got that feeling -- felt like I was watching a future HOF'er.

    kearly wrote:Doug Baldwin had a nice game. I sure hope he's okay.


    Doug Baldwin (to me) was one of the unsung heroes of the game. He was absolutely CLUTCH yesterday and a HUGE reason that the Seahawks won yesterday. People are going to focus on Rice and Tate -- and rightfully so. But, this team doesn't win without:

    A key 3rd Down catch for 20 yards right before Halftime (lead to a FG)
    2 clutch 3rd Down catches on that 4th Quarter drive that lead to Tate's TD.
    Another clutch 3rd down catch in OT on 3rd down and 10. His catch came right before Rice's game winner ... but it doesn't happen without Baldwin's catch.

    That was the Doug Baldwin we saw all last year ... and it was very good to have that Baldwin back yesterday.
    User avatar
    Hawkscanner
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 969
    Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:28 am


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:31 pm
  • Hawkscanner wrote:Doug Baldwin (to me) was one of the unsung heroes of the game. He was absolutely CLUTCH yesterday and a HUGE reason that the Seahawks won yesterday. People are going to focus on Rice and Tate -- and rightfully so. But, this team doesn't win without:

    A key 3rd Down catch for 20 yards right before Halftime (lead to a FG)
    2 clutch 3rd Down catches on that 4th Quarter drive that lead to Tate's TD.
    Another clutch 3rd down catch in OT on 3rd down and 10. His catch came right before Rice's game winner ... but it doesn't happen without Baldwin's catch.

    That was the Doug Baldwin we saw all last year ... and it was very good to have that Baldwin back yesterday.

    Good post scanner. We've all been waiting for the DB of last year to show up and he did yesterday.
    From the white sands
    To the canyon lands
    To the redwood stands
    To the barren lands

    Image
    User avatar
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11139
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:46 pm
  • Great post Kearly. The facemask call on Irvin was a bad call. The Chicago Olineman had his had on Irvin's facemask. I thought that's what they were going to call. It seemed like SBXL all over again with the amount of lobsided calls. it seemed like the Seahawks couldn't get any break. The cool thing is that the Hawks found a way to overcome that. In the past, they would have succumbed to this but they kept at it and found a way to win. Nice to see.
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3610
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Random Thoughts™ on the Bears game
Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:11 am
  • MidwestHawker wrote:Kearly, Chicago's 40% on 4th downs is misleading because surely all of their 4th down attempts haven't been 4th and inches. Their odds of making it on that play had to be a decent bit better than 40%.


    Well, teams usually aren't going for it on 4th and 10. Most 4th down tries are short (or desperate). Granted, the real number is probably neither 40% nor 75%, since neither number accounts for Seattle's 4th down defense (which is pretty good) or their excellent run defense in short yardage situations. At best we are left with guesses and approximations.

    Hawkscanner wrote:If I could pick Colbert's Alpha Dog of the Week, it would be Wilson


    Hah! Nice reference. That gets a tip of the hat.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 10928
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am




It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:17 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online