So, Are Sherman and Browner out for the last 4 games?

NFSeahawks

New member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
0
I was just curious if there are any updates on this, did they appeal yet, how long does it take to get a ruling.

Would like to have them back during the playoffs, even though our pass defense has been nothing less of suspect recently.
 

entropyrulesall

New member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
316
Reaction score
0
Location
Federal Way, WA
See it as a chance for our D to evolve. Maybe reserect the Bandit.

I mean, why not? Our D could use a fresh approch for 4. Other teams wont be able to gameplan as well

#1/2full
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
No update. Rumor mill is the appeals are heard this week. They won't miss any games until a ruling. Timeline really depends on their defense.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
If it's going to happen, I hope it happens now.

We have 3 of 4 at home, and are not facing any offense I would consider an "elite" passing offense. We can hold up ok, I think.

I'd rather have them back for the playoffs.
 

SeatownJay

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
10,745
Reaction score
6
Location
Hagerstown, MD
Adam Schefter said on ESPN's pregame show that their appeal meetings haven't even been scheduled yet.
 

HawkFan72

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
16,570
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA
I hope we just get this overwith soon. If it's going to happen, I'd rather it happen now.
 

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
4,845
Reaction score
906
Clayton just said there is a good chance they play next week, but miss the last 3 games and wild card game.
 

sturg78

New member
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
0
Can we suspend them ourselves and have it retroactively count? 1st and foremost I hope they are acquitted, but aside from that we really could use them in the playoffs if they happen
 

Hawken-Dazs

New member
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Messages
600
Reaction score
0
sturg78":395yuf9p said:
Can we suspend them ourselves and have it retroactively count? 1st and foremost I hope they are acquitted, but aside from that we really could use them in the playoffs if they happen


If they admit they took adderall, they can start serving their suspensions now.
 

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
4,476
Reaction score
1,280
CPHawk":3nhkg0gs said:
Clayton just said there is a good chance they play next week, but miss the last 3 games and wild card game.

This would be terrible. Rather see them out starting next week although it looked like Browner took this week off anyway.
 

SeaMeat

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Messages
1,324
Reaction score
51
Location
Goodyear, AZ
CPHawk":1z72xsir said:
Clayton just said there is a good chance they play next week, but miss the last 3 games and wild card game.
This is what I am expecting.

I feel that the league hates the Seahawks and DO NOT want to see them in the playoffs. With our remaining schedule more than easy 3 out of the four games there is a good chance that the Hawks make the post season. What better way to screw the team by ensuring a wildcard loss on the road without the best CB duo in the league?

Suspend them now, and there is still a great shot at the Hawks going to the playoffs since the only team that will be a challenge is SF. Browner and Sherman will be available to play in the wildcard game.

Politics. Dirty, nasty, underhanded politics.
 

BillHawks

New member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
I don't care if they actually did this stuff or not. They're not going to win their appeals. For whatever reason, it just doesn't happen. There's no transparency in the process so we'll never really know the truth.

You're better off suspending them now. Unless you are 100% certain at least one of them won't be suspended, it just makes sense. The defense could handle one of them missing the wild card game, but not both.
 
Top